Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:49:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »
121  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 04:22:35 PM
I've seen the trust message changed multiple times.

Quite the imagination you have.  I changed it one time, several days ago, to more accurately indicate how dishonest you are.

You're nothing but a pathological liar.  The only person that has deleted things is you.  The feedback will remain.

Have a better day.

I have proven you are a liar. You just call me one with no proof and sad attempts to find stuff to accuse me of.  Just previous to this you called me a liar saying you had not changed anything. I prove that you did, beyond any doubt and you admit to lying about it. You sir are a liar and a coward. Proven.

Good luck getting anyone to respect or trust you on this forum now. I'll also be following you around reminding everyone what a douche you are since you don't want to do the right thing.

Have a great day, liar Wink

PS.. Several days have not even passed. Guess you just can't help yourself with the lies. Sounds like you seriously need meds or something.
122  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 02:14:30 PM
Seems like it's time to call on these people to do what Vod himself said is the right thing for them to do:

Nice guess, but if I rated a single person with negative trust that didn't deserve it, the people who have trusted me would remove it.  The system is self correcting.  I only have the trust I do because I always do the right thing.
Found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;topic=704391.20;num_replies=24


Well people, by Vod's own words, are you going to 'self correct' Vod's improperly given Green Trust by removing it??
123  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 07:47:53 AM
I'm going to go get some shut eye now. I'll let you cook that one over Vod. I can't wait to see what your response is going to be now.

Looks to me you just got caught red handed and careless trying to lie to the community.
124  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 07:40:42 AM
Are you really going to change your whole basis for the distrust to that now? That would mark what, the 4th or 5th time now you've changed it?

First time: Moved to moderated topic, could be a scam

Second time: I was going to remove it but since you left me a negative too, now I'm not.

Third time: Trying to get investor money to pay himself a big salary and steal it (oh wait, that was an assumption you made so you deleted that)

Forth time: Back to saying I am deleting difficult to answer questions in a moderated topic

Fifth time: Saying I'm deleting questions, have multiple accounts, spam the forums, telling lies about people (all untrue with no proof or even references)

Nice lie, but viewing your negative feedback will show it is unchanged since 7/21 - and you continue to post lies.  Sorry scammer.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=112569



Wow, are you for real buddy? I'm staring to be convinced that you're simply just a malicious lair. Just because the 21st was the last time you changed it doesn't mean you haven't changed it. Let's go take a look at some solid proof here that you've been changing your story, shall we? We can reference here for some direct evidence. I'll pull the quotes and screenshot it now just in case you go try to go delete this stuff after you see it and hide it, because now you're going to look pretty bad. Seems like at this point you're perfectly willing to play dirty since you're now blatantly lying about stuff: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=702233.msg7937222#msg7937222

I've seen the trust message changed multiple times.

Your first reasoning, here's your exact quote which is still live in the original thread (and never got deleted btw)

So the OP wants everything paid for, including a salary for himself, but also wants to keep 60% of the company.   Roll Eyes

Since you will delete this post, the only way I can warn others is by using the trust feature of the forum.

Your feedback stated this crap about a salary and there was never even any talk about it at all. Just you being a baboon with your assumptions. It's quite clear I'm not lying, look at your post there. (you've just been caught in one lie now)

Well, I was going to remove it if you didn't delete my post.

However, I see you have labelled me a scammer for some reason, so I guess we are even.

There again, you and your smug attitude, saying you were going to remove it but since I gave you a rating back... you're not. Yes, clearly you believe I'm this hardcore scammer and yet were going to 'remove' it but since I naturally posted feedback in response to yours, you were not. Basically this alone blows up your entire fucking story about how I'm a lying scammer. It shows that what you're doing is simply out of anger, nothing else. You state here you were going to remove it if I didn't delete the post, which I never did. Ya, you really believed I was a scammer, didn't you. This really proves that you've only done this because I fought back (Liar, again)

You need to re-read my words and understand their context.  No where did I say you deleted my words.  I said you will.  No lie at all.  Smiley   I'm not going to waste time beating your arguments when you can delete all my work with just a click.  Sorry.

Now you can have your temper tantrum and call me every name in the book.  I'm done with you.  

Wow, that statement alone contradicts your whole argument, doesn't it? Your basis then was that I 'WOULD' delete your words. Still, to this very moment, I have not. Even the stuff that's irrelevant and has nothing to do with the topic itself. I'm glad I didn't, it shows what a liar and a creep you really are. I never deleted any questions, I never avoided answering anything.

I encourage you all to go read that thread and then come back and read what Vod has said here. Tell me who the liar is.

Original feedback left on July 20th, last feedback on July 21st. Ya, he didn't change it yet ANOTHER time today (at least so far) but you CAN clearly see that he has been. You can also clearly see his reasoning / story is changing a lot and has been changing because his old one is falling apart badly. Vod, I've just proven to everyone you're a liar with direct evidence based on what you said there, what you've been doing and what you've just stated in this thread here. Are you sure you want to continue this charade?
125  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 06:53:27 AM
I deleted personal information from my profile at the same time I did that, I didn't realize it was public and I don't want it to be (like my personal skype, ect), especially while I have a public battle going on with you.

Ah, so you do have something to hide.  Stop lying and saying you don't.

It's very easy to scam when you are anonymous.

In my thread I specifically said I would hold meetings with potential investors, tell them about myself and my history and what I bring to the table as well as the concept I'm proposing. I offered to even hold these meetings in person, go read my post. Are you claiming that I was asking people to blindly send me bitcoin investment because that's the only way what you're saying would be relevant. Are you really going to change your whole basis for the distrust to that now? That would mark what, the 4th or 5th time now you've changed it?

First time: Moved to moderated topic, could be a scam

Second time: I was going to remove it but since you left me a negative too, now I'm not.

Third time: Trying to get investor money to pay himself a big salary and steal it (oh wait, that was an assumption you made so you deleted that)

Forth time: Back to saying I am deleting difficult to answer questions in a moderated topic

Fifth time: Saying I'm deleting questions, have multiple accounts, spam the forums, telling lies about people (all untrue with no proof or even references)

Now it's that I am hiding my personal skype contact and former website project on my profile, so I must be running a scam based on that.

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound here? How many times you've changed up your story and reasoning for what you're doing?

Just stop already... I'm no scammer and the reason I'm exposing what you've done so vigilantly is because I'm very insulted and offended that you would do this to me. I to fight scammers and expose people. You looked me up on Google didn't you, can you probably easily see I have a long history (many years) of doing it under the same user name on other forums. The difference between you and I is that I don't jump the gun, I do it responsibly and with undeniable evidence against the accused. I'm well respected for that at the places I frequent.

At this point I think you're just too proud to admit that you've mislabeled me and jumped to a conclusion about who I am which is not correct.

Just remove your negative rating and I'll remove mine and do my best to delete everything I've said in protest to what you've done to me.

I never set out to ruin you but you've got to admit when you're wrong and in this case, you are. I'll happily retract what I can if you do the right thing here.
126  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 06:19:39 AM
I have NOTHING to hide and I'm not avoiding anything other than trolls trying to derail my topic.

Is that why you deleted your name and website from your profile?  Because you have nothing to hide?  

I don't remember what questions you deleted.  Why don't you post the questions you deleted and the reasons you deleted them?

I just did say what I deleted in the above post, that's the only thing that took place. I wasn't hiding anything.

As for why I deleted my website from my sig, I already stated that too, it was a dead site that I made a while back that no longer exists. It was just a vbulletin forum, go look it up on archive.org - ccxe.org is the domain. Nothing shady there.

I deleted personal information from my profile at the same time I did that, I didn't realize it was public and I don't want it to be (like my personal skype, ect), especially while I have a public battle going on with you. What's that got to do with it? You're really getting off topic and now ridiculing me for what information I keep on my profile in the forum? Not even false information, just not displaying it. Sounds like you're getting desperate now for something to use against me.

 I've told people who I am in great detail "trustworthy people that I don't mind having it". Why don't you ask Tomatocage? Just because I don't want every single troll on the planet to have my personal contact information doesn't make me a scammer.

Do you give out all of your personal information in your profile? No, you don't. Please stop with your hypocritical nonsense. You even changed your user name 'mlawrence', to try to hide your identity when you started harassing people.

Bottom line is this:

I don't remember what questions you deleted

Ok, then please remove your negative feedback until you remember something that actually took place.
127  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 05:25:22 AM
His basis for the negative feedback was that I was removing questions / not answering questions in a moderated thread I had, which is simply NOT true at all. I had never removed any questions or avoided answering any. So, he lied and when he was questioned about it, it further infuriated him and he has since made the feedback sound worse and worse, trying to ensure that no one will do business with me or deal with me.

And I found Vod's response in one of the your linked threads:

You can click on the "Reference" link in the negative trust I left for him.  He is asking for 700btc and deleting questions he doesn't like.

He deleted several questions that were asked of him.  Unfortunately, bitcointa.lk wasn't copying the thread.  Sad

Google cache only has his original post:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=702233.0

This entire thing has come down to the scammer denying he deleted any posts.


It seems there is no way to prove either side's claim, unless theymos spend some time to check the deleted posts in that thread...


I deleted a thread that was not moderated to move to one that was. I reposted the questions in the new thread (including Vod's) pertaining to business and not the troll posts that had nothing to do with it. People making one word posts like "+" or coming in just saying "SCAMMER" or some stupid BS like that. Anyone that posted a legitimate question I was happy to answer and respond to, just didn't want my topic getting derailed by trolls (i'm sure anyone that's posting something serious can sympathize because there's a ton of trolls on the forum).

If he claims I deleted a real question and not just troll posts, he should be able to easily just say what question that was. In the original thread, I was unable to delete anything other than my own posts, so obviously that did not take place there. In the second moderated version, it got derailed so quickly by Vod's negative rating (within a few minutes of creating it), there was not even a chance for that to get off the ground, so I wasn't on any deleting spree there either. I in fact did not even delete the battle back and forth between Vod and I about it (which should be deleted from it).

It's very simple really, all he has to do is say what question I'm allegedly avoiding because I have NOTHING to hide and I'm not avoiding anything other than trolls trying to derail my topic. If he's willing to leave me a negative stating I was trying to scam by deleting important questions, just simply restate the important questions... anywhere... in any unmoderated thread that I cannot delete... why won't he do that, it's not hard..?
128  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 23, 2014, 04:56:12 AM
Do you see why I refuse to chat with people who are dishonest and delete posts in moderated threads?

Only person that is dishonest is you. What post did I delete or what was I dishonest about? Please tell....
129  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 23, 2014, 04:07:15 AM
My name is Martin Lawrence and I live in St. Albert but that is not my phone number or my address.  I also don't work for Servus - I work for my own company.   Smiley   I don't really care if you verify or not.

But I have a question for the Shawn Niderost from Grants Pass, Oregon (aka known as the scammer evershawn from ccex.org)

If suddenly SEO links were put up saying he was a paedophile and incestuous child rapist (easily done), would he kill himself due to shame, or would he admit that maybe ANYBODY can post ANYTHING they want?  His personal info is splattered all over the internet.

I guess that is a personal decision everyone has to make.  Do you believe what you are told, or do you keep an open mind?

Vod, unlike you, I've got nothing to hide. That is me, I fully admit it. I've used the same user name for 10 years.  This further attests to the fact that I'm not out to run scams or even try to. I wouldn't try to hide my identity, a simple Google search shows who I am and plenty about me with a long history behind it and nothing suggesting I've done anything shady.

Secondly, I didn't open up this bounty on you, someone else did but I can see why he did it.

Third, it's CCXE.org not CCEX and what's that got to do with scamming anyone? Anyone can see it was just a vbulletin forum project I had thrown up at one time to let users trade alt coins for free based on a reputation management system. I have since abandoned the project, didn't have time to really finish it. Not sure how it's relevant but again, nothing to hide here from me.

The only truth here is that you've lied about me for some petty stupid reason that's of a personal nature. I have not scammed, or even tried scamming or deceiving anyone, ever. I've asked you to provide some sort of proof or example of your claim, and you won't (further enforcing the fact that you're telling lies). You are a libelous asshole. I haven't told any lies about you, I didn't make this thread on you, nor was I the one who claimed to find proof of you being a pedophile (yes, that's how it's correctly spelled by the way).

It is interesting how you direct all of that energy at me as if I did though, just because I sympathize with the person who did create it.

You are causing damage to my user account here, which effects my business ventures and actually goes beyond just a simple negative feedback on a forum. You've done it maliciously and it is untrue and libelous. Everything I am doing back; posting about it, telling people what you're doing, is warranted and a normal reaction. You are the only person in this scenario that is out of line.
130  Other / Meta / Re: Remove Vod from DefaultTrust on: July 23, 2014, 02:30:14 AM
Vod does NOT just give new members negative feedback that haven't scammed anyone, he did this to me too. I am a full member and been around for a while. He gave me feedback completely out of anger / dislike of something I had to say that was of a personal nature. His basis for the negative feedback was that I was removing questions / not answering questions in a moderated thread I had, which is simply NOT true at all. I had never removed any questions or avoided answering any. So, he lied and when he was questioned about it, it further infuriated him and he has since made the feedback sound worse and worse, trying to ensure that no one will do business with me or deal with me.

This is one hot head with a short fuze and a massive ego that has ZERO respect for the trust system or other full members of this site. If you fart in the guys direction he's going to leave you a negative saying you tried scamming someone. To this day he's never said what I removed or what question I've never answered

Please see my thread about him here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704289.msg7971391#msg7971391 and here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=702774.40
131  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 22, 2014, 08:15:19 PM
Oh, so Vod is mlawrence. I figured that might be the case since the avatar is the same and the Dank connection.

How does one change their forum name?

You have to ask theymos to do it. Martin likely asked for it because he was so hated by people, he didn't want something so close to his real name being shown to everyone.
132  Other / Meta / Re: Little help with an abusive member: Vod - Self Proclaimed forum admin on: July 22, 2014, 05:29:18 PM
Posting like that isn't going to get you anymore pull with the more passive long term members here, sorry, but when people accused of scamming get indignant that just irritates me especially when we have people on this forum who have tried to blackmail legitimate sellers as new members.

So by way of this statement, just because someone is a long time member here (which in this case, I am too), they have carte blanche right of prosecution without having to post any evidence or reasoning for it? Seems legit...
133  Other / Meta / Re: Little help with an abusive member: Vod - Self Proclaimed forum admin on: July 22, 2014, 04:36:35 PM
NAME THE "NEUTRAL" PARTIES THAT "ATTEMPTED" TO ASK ME, LIAR?  Roll Eyes

Listen bozo, I'll make this very clear to you.  When a person starts to threaten me in PM and post lies about me on the forum, I end all dealings with that person.  Life is too short to deal with dishonest people.



There have been people backing me up and supporting that you should provide the question I allegedly deleted or avoiding answering in some way which is what your negative trust says, even in this thread. I've asked them to contact you too since you're unwilling to provide answers here about it.

What lies am I telling? If you consider a threat, exposing you for what you're doing to me... what the hell did you expect?

You make all these claims but provide ZERO examples of anything. You're mad because I react to you leaving me a false negative trust rating. That's just plain silly. Maybe you're used to getting away with being a cyber bully with most people but I'm one of the people that punches the bully back.

Anyway, you make a lot of claims but never do you provide any proof or examples of any of it.
134  Other / Meta / Re: Little help with an abusive member: Vod - Self Proclaimed forum admin on: July 22, 2014, 04:25:12 PM
This can be the official thread for scammers to come and attack me!   Grin

I'm proud of the fact scammers hate me so much.  Shows I am making a difference.

Actually, a scammer would normally just walk away when caught and make a new account. It's the innocent people that you try to ruin that make a fuss.

Your smug attitude and arrogant demeanor really do a lot to show who you really are though, so I appreciate it when you drop in and give a display of it for everyone to see.
135  Other / Meta / Re: Little help with an abusive member: Vod - Self Proclaimed forum admin on: July 22, 2014, 04:15:10 PM
I am on Vod's side on this one. All he is doing is protecting the community. If you have neg trust then you can use escrow when you do trades.

You're not getting it. This isn't about doing trades. This is about someone with some inner circle green abusing it because he can. It's wrong and damaging when it's done to people that don't deserve it. He's given me the red based on false information. In this case he's not protecting the community he is reacting to something out of anger and emotion to get to me and display his status.

So protecting the community is in no way ALL he is doing. He's also being abusive and rating people negative and falsely accusing them of scamming when they have not done so or even tried to, simply because he doesn't like them or something they said to him.
136  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 22, 2014, 03:58:17 PM
you may be right that you don't deserve the neg. trust, however
because the thread that got you negative trust was self moderated
it is hard to tell.

Still, it seems on the surface that the negative trust from Vod
is unwarranted.  You stated a business proposition, plain
and simple... There's nothing deceptive about that.

(Whether we think its a good investment or not is irrelevant).

So I think Vod should remove the negative trust.

To add to this, I deleted NO questions. The purpose was just to prevent people from trolling / derailing. The previous unmoderated topic had a couple people starting to come in making one word posts and stupid off topic unrelated posts.

If I had deleted a post, Vod would have quickly replied to one of the many posts I've made on him since (which are not moderated) with what that question was. There's no question I've avoided or is difficult to answer. Vod will not respond to this because he knows his negative trust is complete bullshit.
137  Other / Meta / Re: Little help with an abusive member: Vod - Self Proclaimed forum admin on: July 22, 2014, 03:48:11 PM
Look guys, Vod supposedly was away from the computer (even though he had made posts since). He had an opportunity to respond in the posts he just made, all I have ever asked is which post or question did I delete which was the basis for his negative feedback.

He's still replied with nothing. Because there is nothing.

I react like I do, because I'm an innocent man being slapped with a guilty verdict and being sentenced by one man who is an arrogant smug asshole about the whole thing. He's got no shame, has no problem completely fabricating his reasoning because of his emotions yet I'm the bad one for getting upset that he did that to me. Before he did that, I was  totally professional and forthcoming with him. I did nothing to deserve it.

Think about that guys... really... Just because he does some good, it makes it ok for him to harass some people that don't deserve it? It's like some people are giving him a free pass because he's busted a few real scammers along the way.
138  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 22, 2014, 03:27:59 AM
Seems rather weird to do this to someone?

Not weird, just kind of a dick move, if the person doesn't have it coming.

I think this guy has it coming, OP thought he had it coming and so do about 2 or 3 dozen other people on this forum.

He has it coming. The guy is unreasonable, arrogant, egotistical, malicious and a little crazy. There are also rumors flying around that he's a bit of an incestuous pedophile (not sure how true that is but others have posted evidence of it).

So ya, sounds like he has it coming.

And every rumor is true, right? There's no proof. At all. Just a random site that points accusations. But then again everything on the Internet is correct. Rumor has it, I'm a demon.

Some are, some are not, who knows if it is. I can tell the guy has issues, not sure if they're that severe or if it stops at just social skills. At this point, I'd lean toward +incestuous pedophile.

I'm leaning towards, your disturbed mate. If newbies are asking for loans that are so painfully obvious scams, you're saying Vod has issues? Even when he stops people from getting scammed? You're so intent on saying he's a incestuous pedophile, but you have no proof. I told you I'm a demon. Do you believe that?

How would you like it if you negative rep'd OP and then got DoXed for doing it?

You're just being biased.

It's painfully obvious that you have not read anything other than my last post about this. If you want to add to the topic, at least try reading it first.

Ahh. So you failed to answer my question? Good. I'm adding something to the topic, by asking you how you'd feel. So, how would you feel if you got DoXed just because you negative rep'd someone? How? But then again, you're failing to answer, so I'm guessing your refusing.

I didn't just read your reply, by the way. Don't make the poor assumption that I did. Thanks.

If you read everything, then why are you saying the OP was asking for loans instead of giving them? Why are you saying that I'm saying Vod should be doxxed because of that? Those are both incorrect statements. Vod should be doxxed for what he's done to me, OP and about 3 dozen other people.

Still, you fail to answer. You're avoiding the question.

I'm guessing you know it's unreasonable. The Ditz even stated why he wants the DoX:

Why do you have a grudge against Vod? Is it just because he left you negative trust?
That is correct. Vod, you used to be cool, before you went on a power trip Smiley


Wow. He negative rep'd you guys, disagreed. Big deal. When he was mlawrence we had a disagreement one time. Nearly negative rep'd me. I'm guessing it wasn't three dozen anymore, probably way more.

But your failure to answer the simplest questions spouts the obviousness. It's so unreasonable that it's spouting from the Earth. Usually I'd be apathetic, but Vod has found a good number of scammers. Probably around three dozen, if you say.

Still failing to answer the question.

Sigh.

Answer your question? lol...

Sounds more like a rhetorical question, how would I like it? Sorry for not answering your question that seems rhetorical. I don't think anyone would like being doxxed, that's kind of the whole point of it........................ Feel better now?

I wasn't here to discuss if doxxing was a pleasurable experience or not. I was discussing if Vod deserved it. My opinion based on what he's done to me and others is that he does. That's it.

It's not meant to be something that is 'liked'. Mmm'k?

Also your English seems a little off, perhaps there's a language barrier here?

I'm also guessing you don't really understand what getting a neg trust rating from someone with inner circle green does compared to getting some neg trust from some random scrub. It basically makes everyone see your account in the red, so he's not just adding his opinion about something, he's ruining accounts and he knows that. Which is why he solicits feedback from high trust older members and makes threats all the time to destroy accounts with it.

Hopefully you understand a little more about how the site works now too.
139  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 22, 2014, 02:29:12 AM
Seems rather weird to do this to someone?

Not weird, just kind of a dick move, if the person doesn't have it coming.

I think this guy has it coming, OP thought he had it coming and so do about 2 or 3 dozen other people on this forum.

He has it coming. The guy is unreasonable, arrogant, egotistical, malicious and a little crazy. There are also rumors flying around that he's a bit of an incestuous pedophile (not sure how true that is but others have posted evidence of it).

So ya, sounds like he has it coming.

And every rumor is true, right? There's no proof. At all. Just a random site that points accusations. But then again everything on the Internet is correct. Rumor has it, I'm a demon.

Some are, some are not, who knows if it is. I can tell the guy has issues, not sure if they're that severe or if it stops at just social skills. At this point, I'd lean toward +incestuous pedophile.

I'm leaning towards, your disturbed mate. If newbies are asking for loans that are so painfully obvious scams, you're saying Vod has issues? Even when he stops people from getting scammed? You're so intent on saying he's a incestuous pedophile, but you have no proof. I told you I'm a demon. Do you believe that?

How would you like it if you negative rep'd OP and then got DoXed for doing it?

You're just being biased.

It's painfully obvious that you have not read anything other than my last post about this. If you want to add to the topic, at least try reading it first.

Ahh. So you failed to answer my question? Good. I'm adding something to the topic, by asking you how you'd feel. So, how would you feel if you got DoXed just because you negative rep'd someone? How? But then again, you're failing to answer, so I'm guessing your refusing.

I didn't just read your reply, by the way. Don't make the poor assumption that I did. Thanks.

If you read everything, then why are you saying the OP was asking for loans instead of giving them? Why are you saying that I'm saying Vod should be doxxed because of that? Those are both incorrect statements. Vod should be doxxed for what he's done to me, OP and about 3 dozen other people.
140  Economy / Services / Re: 0.25 BTC Bounty - Dox of Vod / mlawrence on: July 22, 2014, 02:23:35 AM
Seems rather weird to do this to someone?

Not weird, just kind of a dick move, if the person doesn't have it coming.

I think this guy has it coming, OP thought he had it coming and so do about 2 or 3 dozen other people on this forum.

He has it coming. The guy is unreasonable, arrogant, egotistical, malicious and a little crazy. There are also rumors flying around that he's a bit of an incestuous pedophile (not sure how true that is but others have posted evidence of it).

So ya, sounds like he has it coming.

And every rumor is true, right? There's no proof. At all. Just a random site that points accusations. But then again everything on the Internet is correct. Rumor has it, I'm a demon.

Some are, some are not, who knows if it is. I can tell the guy has issues, not sure if they're that severe or if it stops at just social skills. At this point, I'd lean toward +incestuous pedophile.

I'm leaning towards, your disturbed mate. If newbies are asking for loans that are so painfully obvious scams, you're saying Vod has issues? Even when he stops people from getting scammed? You're so intent on saying he's a incestuous pedophile, but you have no proof. I told you I'm a demon. Do you believe that?

How would you like it if you negative rep'd OP and then got DoXed for doing it?

You're just being biased.

It's painfully obvious that you have not read anything other than my last post about this. If you want to add to the topic, at least try reading it first.

The OP was not asking for a loan he was giving them to people (Vod did not like it because he felt the people were not deserving of it).

In my case Vod gave me a fake negative / malicious rating because he was upset. Pays to actually read.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!