Ok thank you. I guess I missed that post.

Looking forward to an update about this mysterious thing that is more important than the website. =)

Not really unjustifiable though.

For one, Friedcat never said anything about a forum announcement. He told Board members that he had an announcement on May 27th.. Maybe for the board members? Also note that we received this information from someone who is not Friedcat.

Also note that just because some hardware has shipped to some companies does not mean that all companies received all of their chips. I believe it was stated that dividends won't be going out until all shipments have been made so that they don't have to save money for refunds.

Lastly, the post from Jut that contained all this information said "Subject to change."

Maybe the dates have changed?

No reason to get pitchforks after a missed deadline, that wasn't even concrete.

I think FC at least deserves this much, and definitely deserves to not be compared to Neo & Bee.

Remember that it wasn't FC who came on here directly and stated May 27th. It was delivered to us through the Board and it was subject to change.

Why are you guys immediately jumping to FC trying to deceive? Have you guys held shares all these months with this belief?

Kleeck your words are wasted. It seems that many here have never experienced failure. Many here have cried and complained and begged to just have their shares so they can sell off and put this behind them, and then when given their shares, they still decided to continue on in this endeavor.

If one wishes to be a part of the Lawsuit. Then please join the lawsuit. (If you are a part of the lawsuit, you have little reason to come on here and scream at Ken, feel free to post here and talk facts, express concerns, etc.. though).

If one wishes to just sell their shares and put this company behind them, then please sell your shares and put this company behind you.

But it seems many wish to have their cake and eat it too.

"No I won't pay taxes on my Bitcoin." "You can't regulate Bitcoin!"

"Where are the cops for scumbags like Ken? Who scam(?) and steal our Bitcoins!"

This is all I see. It is very hypocritical.

We invested in a unregulated company, in an unregulated domain, with unregulated shares that have yet to (and probably won't) see any kind of profit and is run by someone who is very very very inexperienced in communication.

Everyone was happy that it was unregulated back when they expected profit in January, but now.. not so much.

I am truly sorry so many of you guys put so much of your money into this. But don't be a hypocrite about it. You know what this was when you bought in, and if you say otherwise then you were negligent and really only have yourself to blame.

Say what you want about the trolls but at least they don't flip flop on every up and down.

It's exhausting to see the kind of delusion some of you guys are working with. One person even accused Ken of actually stealing his coins. How do you do these mental cartwheels to arrive at this point in the first place?

EDIT: On the otherhand, if you have purchased hardware. Then you rightfully deserve a refund as soon as possible.

I'm not exactly sure what I want to hear. Just want to know if there will be an update.

• High Div and/or Good Plan laid out for Q3/Q4 = Higher $/share. That might not be good for me.
• Low Div and/or Bad/No Plan laid out for Q3/Q4 = Lower $/share. That might not be good for me.

Just remember FC saying that we should expect a report on May 27th, I think it is May 28th where he is now.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.0

6000+ Pages

Anyways.. So should we expect FC's update today, tomorrow, or has it been postponed? Anyone in the loop?

Things I would choose over Divs tomorrow.

• A financial statement.
• A legitimate reason why the website is on the back burner.
• A serious plan for the foreseeable future.
• A list of people who are working for the company along with some type of verification for what they actually do.
• Legitimate information on a chip. If we are keeping People's Asic on board then I assume this is the endgame.
• # of boards we have sold. How much money we are in debt and what is our plan out of it.

I understand Divs are important. But I think everything I listed above is more important (at least to me).

That's a cool ass image.

It seems this is done manually. Ken might do it later tonight, tomorrow morning or even wait till the end of the deadline to do the rest of them.

Unfortunately I can't help you with that. I believe about 80~85% of the shares were tendered so I have yet to meet someone who has gained access to their shares who did not also tender them. I advise you PM Ken and then PM ActM-Thread (As Ken actually listens to this account) to ask for a solution or an elaboration on how Ken handles this. I wish you the best.

Did you tender your shares to AMC-TENDER? Then he has your email address. This should also be the email address you email him with.

lmao, that actually made me laugh. I'm in the library dammit.

I think he's cheating then, I haven't even found the first dot yet lol.

Not in the least. I will still make the assumption, I just won't be as out and in the open about it around you. Out of respect.

It seems you are annoyed that people assume you are someone who previously did exactly what you do, in the same manner that you do it, in the same areas that you do it, right before you appeared and started doing it (because they were banned).

I don't think it matters that much though. You have built a reputation for yourself just like your predecessors have, so we/they have little reason to base you off of those people anyways.

You're right. Just giving them the benefit of the doubt. Before this week they had other concerns, now.. Not so much. So I would love to hear what excuse make it out and in the open this week.

I just can't possibly see what's more important than selling hardware.

From previous post we can conclude that Ken has a web design guy. So what exactly does this guy do?

We should at least figure out how many individual people work for this company so we can get a better understanding of what this company is and is not capable of in under certain timelines. I am starting to sense that this Web Guy is also the PR Guy who is also the Finance Guy who is also busy setting up racks in the DC.

So Ken. (Or ACTM-Thread since I feel like this will be ignored). Are there any specific plans to fix the website and what is this more important proposition that you are currently working on. I am assuming it's finishing tendering shares as I can't see it being anything else.

@Zum can you connect these dots?

Hopefully Ken will unveil this very important project that has kept him very busy this week, tomorrow. I look forward to hearing about it.

Yes and that is just a Ponzi scheme imho. I know what happens with the 30btc, I personally don't see myself following suit with throwing money into it.

I don't need a broker, I know how to lose money and place bets without doing any research myself (a little sarcasm in there but not really lol).

@NotLambChop I have been operating under the assumption that you were Crumbs who might be MPOE-PR which in turn would make you Mireacu P. this entire time. I hope that you don't mind if I continue with this assumption.

I am unfamiliar with Numbers 1, 2, and 3. So I will definitely do research on that (as I've said before I haven't used Bitbet or invested in it, only watched it).

4. I've heard that they steal late bets as in people trying to place bet on topics that are closed for betting. Of course, they should just refund the person their money but I believe it is in ToS (Or w/e they call it on there) that they will claim any late bets as their own and you should make sure you aren't placing on a late bet. Other companies have done worse.

5. If you look at this in another light, this definitely conflicts with the point you made in number (3) Which says that they make large bets to make their own profit.

Are you saying so many people make late bets that that in and of itself is making more money than they are by actively rigging bets? Does this mean that they have very low transaction fees too then?

6. I have never and will never pay that 30BTC, as I've just said, its ridiculous. I have heard MPOE and Pankkake's argument for it and I don't think it holds in any context. But this doesn't negate other things those two have said, Mireacu (or however you write his name) will never be getting that 30 BTC from me. I have never recommended his website to anyone just like I have not recommended ActiveMining to anyone.

I haven't invested but I don't think shitting on a company that turned any sort of profit is ok. They have turned a profit on a website that seems to need little maintenance and require almost no marketing. Seems to be a pretty good business plan IMHO.

I'm only saying from my encounters with BitBet, and BitBet alone (not my encounter/s with the people behind it) it seems like a good business idea. Just like Just-Dice looks like a good gambling Idea, I think BitBet has a good idea too.

I know nothing about MPEx securities but BitBet actually looks pretty cool, especially if this found its way into the mainstream. Where anyone can make their own bet, that has a lot of room of potential. (Television Shows, Sports, E-Sports, Elections, Company performances, Crypto prices. It's pretty endless) I haven't actually used it but I've followed the bets and I think there is a lot of room for growth and profit. Though 30BTC to even get into MPEx investments, seems a little ridiculous. If BitBet appeared on Havelock, I wouldn't be against switching my dust of AcTM into dust of BitBet.