I haven't pulled the trigger yet.
I better get to it
Though if it doesnt make 200 BTC I Dont see a problem extending it for 48 hours for one last blitz, we all want to see it fully funded. long as most people agree
What are you waiting for? Ditto. Why the wait? waiting for a few sells to hit in other markets, hopefully the go  Dump and buy jewels dude. Time is running out. He still has 15hours to invest and save dumping. Only dump if you really need to being a couple of hours away. #Be smooth Never dump but also never put yourself in a position to be forced to liquidate a position to get into another. |
|
|
|
Who are the professional promoters and what have you promoted in the past and how can you prove to us that it was you who promoted said coins.
Still waiting!  |
|
|
|
|
I'm going to buy some tonight. I think this is due for a pump.
|
|
|
|
|
Who are the professional promoters and what have you promoted in the past and how can you prove to us that it was you who promoted said coins.
|
|
|
|
How to send the btc?
Make an account and then click on wallet. Send btc to that address and your good to go. |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTICE
We have a transaction that's unaccounted as someone accidentally sent BTC directly to our address rather then their personal address on the Apex wallet, please see - https://blockchain.info/tx/f9b3a1ede9b96d34462b3bca3ab13c51c23c283e880890bbc4e67c9bb865748f
If this transaction is yours we are going to require proof that you own this address. Please PM or email us a signed message from this address to prove your ownership and let us know what your Apex username is so we can properly credit it to your account. You should have made it bigger but its ok. I just did. What a fool though. The person who invested like that and failed to read the instructions is the type of guy who invests in every ico without reading anything. Or shows up at the thread asking something that was just covered just a few posts ago or even worse in the OP.  |
|
|
|
|
I actually think this one has a chance. I'll keep watching.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately it looks like a scam as there is no real information…
Thank you for bringing this thread to my attention…
Is Sebastian part of the scam? |
|
|
|
I have to admit this is the first time I've ever been excited about a project and had full faith in the dev team to deliver. Its rare in crypto but hopefully it will become more routine as the years go on and the scammers die off.
You're not the only one, I'm excited too. In the end you're right the scammers will die off because there will be no room for them. Projects like this should set the standards for future crowdsales. Have you been in long? Seems like forever since I have been counting down the clock lol Its been some weeks but at least its all coming to an end tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
I have to admit this is the first time I've ever been excited about a project and had full faith in the dev team to deliver. Its rare in crypto but hopefully it will become more routine as the years go on and the scammers die off.
|
|
|
|
Can someone please help me to understand the difference between GameCredits and Jewels. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545327.60Is the only difference that one is an inhouse coin and the other is supposed to be picked up by many games going forward. Thank for for the time and sorry about the noob question. Basically yes, we are aiming to become a universal in-game token regardless of platform and we're many steps ahead of them in terms of infrastructure development.  Ive been reading the Jewels thread and read almost all of this thread and I fail to see how you guys are many steps ahead of Jewels in terms of infrastructure development. Care to elaborate? Their roadmap: July 2016 Jewels Crowdfunding Starts Apex Integration of Jewels (as a currency) Apex’s design is finalized August 2016 Jewels Crowdfunding Ends Paypal Processor Standalone (Web) Jewels Gambling Development Apex Integration of Jewels Gambling Games Dice, Slots, etc. Heroes Release of new server “Heroes” Content expansion from “Apex” (Jewels integrated on Release) - New classes, quests, etc. Fall 2016 (Q4) Project Rebirth Prototype Development Initial Concept Paper Released PR / Discussion / vLogs on Rebirth Begin reviewing resume submissions Winter 2017 (Q1) Project Rebirth Official project development starts Apart from crowdfunding and few other things, we've been through all of that and beyond. Their developing is just starting. As windjc proposed, read through all our newsletter issues: https://onlinegames.credit/newsletterI just saw this post today when searching for jewels on the forum. I want to voice an opinion. Chris Cook the lead developer behind jewels and apexconquer is a proven successful developer and already has a userbase of over 20k players. His apex game has been live for a year and his second game is about to be launched called heroes. He has already made money in gaming and he intends to continue doing so with heroes and the upcoming game rebirth. So yeah they still have a roadmap but most of everything is about to be completed and work on heroes and rebirth will start. Its a great coin and ico and I personally think its ahead of gamecredits. Check out their twitter and listen to the two interviews the dev did, one with blockchain dynamics and the other with beyond bitcoin and you can watch his introduction video too. |
|
|
|
Can we get back to topic already guys?
Please. Any constructive valid criticism or questions I'm happy to answer. Not interested in bct users that have not done any research on the project. Let's get the discussion back on track then. Can you tell us a little more about private blockchain implementation? Firstly, who will validate the transactions on this private blockchain? Are the transactions visible to everyone/whole network? How are the members of the private blockchain identified? Who is able to change/modify who is part of the private blockchain? Read the White Paper? I did. None of these are adequately answered. Here' the relevant section of the whitepaper from page10: A secure blockchain network will typically consist of hundreds or even thousands of computers running the same protocol. Consequently, there are significant advantages to employing an established network with proven stability and security, rather than starting from scratch. Although it is possible to develop applications on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, the first and still the best-known and most secure cryptocurrency network, there are good reasons why few businesses would want to so. Bitcoin has comparatively slow 10-minute confirmation times, and periodic attacks on the network means that transactions can be delayed for hours; addressing these effectively requires a controversial hard fork and the pace of development is slow. Businesses have no control over upgrades or other changes to the network such as the capacity of each block and the rate that transactions that may be processed. Thus Bitcoin’s security advantages come at a cost of significant rigidity and unpredictability. By contrast, Stratis private chains allow developers complete freedom to customise their implementation for their specific needs, whilst the underpinning ‘parent’ blockchain is established enough to give users a high degree of confidence in its security. For example, if a business requires large block sizes to accommodate a high volume of transactions; rapid block times to enable low-latency trading; controlled transactions so that only approved users can submit a request to the network; a given rate of inflation; or additional space for metadata in each block, any or all of these can be specified at launch. The private chain can be accessed by straightforward APIs, meaning that stand-alone applications can rapidly be developed. Basically technical aspects of Stratis were all introduced in the whitepaper. Dude what you are asking are beyond the dev's plan. So advance that I cannot comprehend what answers do you want from the dev. Sure there are several blockchain platform projects that are emerging now with the features that are not as of now been incorporate with stratis. Eventually I may say , dev will soon adjust as development goes by. Wait a second ... you're telling me that the whitepaper claims to create private blockchains on Stratis, but the devs have no idea how this is going to be done? The literally just released a blockchain I'm pretty sure they can work out how to deploy a private blockchain - it is basically the exact same concept. They released a clone, this would need to be a new blockchian totally. |
|
|
|
...
The dev wont show his face.
...
This is true. Technically fake 'Frank' did show his face. His linkedin profile shows his picture, his full name and his employer. But for some reason he won't make a video because it compromises his identity. Wassermans excuse makes 0 sense. 'Frank' won't even talk to his investors or the community. This scam would be dead in the water if people took the time to read these threads before they invested. I feel sorry for investors that don't speak english. Everything I said was true and technically 'Frank" showed us a picture of someone's face. Look at my signature, this is the way of the future for ico's if you agree adopt my signature or wear one with your own spin. Let's get the community to wake up and realize what''s going on here. Its too much scamming and too much lying. We need to stand up for a change! Yes, now more and more elabprate scams now, we won't invest a penny to them unless they show the id, faces, intervoes and so forth. Btw, some more clever scams hire actors to have videos, we should do more research on their backgrounds. That's correct and a wise post. Scammers can hire actors and for that reason look to invest only in projects where the dev who is know, happens to have a strong history both through video and other means online so we can verify. For example The Jewels dev has his moderator account on epvpers which dates back to 2005. He also posted on that account about the jewels ICO so we know he is that person on the epvpers forum. But still his account could be hacked on the forum right?? So we need to do further investigation. He posted a video introduction of himself and the jewels project so we have this to go off of, but it could be a paid actor like you mentioned and a hacked account. So we need to make sure that's not the case. For a final piece of verification we need to check out Chris's apex conquer videos online dating back a few years to see if they are the same person or voice and if they are a match then we know we dont have a scammer. And in jewels case all the math is clear and the due diligence has been done. Chris, jewels, apex conquer is not a scam and if you like to support real people and real innovation then you should invest in the jewels project. Disclaimer- I have invested in jewels and am a little upset its not getting the attention it deserves. |
|
|
|
|
BTC60.66 so far and tonight im buying some more so I know it'll be over BTC62 at least tonight. But im still pissed at shit ico coins like opair, waves, rise, ect. Just in the three I mentioned have over BTC18000 invested and none of them had anything working just some silly white paper and a dream. And look at them all today, coin value is less then ico they have delivered nothing and are looking like they wont deliver anything.
That's why I wont understand if this ico cant make it to a measly 200 btc. Obviously people are waiting for the last minute to jump in but why, its not like you get a last day bonus. Just invest now and show your support.
|
|
|
|
...
The dev wont show his face.
...
This is true. Technically fake 'Frank' did show his face. His linkedin profile shows his picture, his full name and his employer. But for some reason he won't make a video because it compromises his identity. Wassermans excuse makes 0 sense. 'Frank' won't even talk to his investors or the community. This scam would be dead in the water if people took the time to read these threads before they invested. I feel sorry for investors that don't speak english. Everything I said was true and technically 'Frank" showed us a picture of someone's face. Look at my signature, this is the way of the future for ico's if you agree adopt my signature or wear one with your own spin. Let's get the community to wake up and realize what''s going on here. Its too much scamming and too much lying. We need to stand up for a change! |
|
|
|
Can we get back to topic already guys?
Please. Any constructive valid criticism or questions I'm happy to answer. Not interested in bct users that have not done any research on the project. Let's get the discussion back on track then. Can you tell us a little more about private blockchain implementation? Firstly, who will validate the transactions on this private blockchain? Are the transactions visible to everyone/whole network? How are the members of the private blockchain identified? Who is able to change/modify who is part of the private blockchain? Read the White Paper? I did. None of these are adequately answered. Here' the relevant section of the whitepaper from page10: A secure blockchain network will typically consist of hundreds or even thousands of computers running the same protocol. Consequently, there are significant advantages to employing an established network with proven stability and security, rather than starting from scratch. Although it is possible to develop applications on top of the Bitcoin blockchain, the first and still the best-known and most secure cryptocurrency network, there are good reasons why few businesses would want to so. Bitcoin has comparatively slow 10-minute confirmation times, and periodic attacks on the network means that transactions can be delayed for hours; addressing these effectively requires a controversial hard fork and the pace of development is slow. Businesses have no control over upgrades or other changes to the network such as the capacity of each block and the rate that transactions that may be processed. Thus Bitcoin’s security advantages come at a cost of significant rigidity and unpredictability. By contrast, Stratis private chains allow developers complete freedom to customise their implementation for their specific needs, whilst the underpinning ‘parent’ blockchain is established enough to give users a high degree of confidence in its security. For example, if a business requires large block sizes to accommodate a high volume of transactions; rapid block times to enable low-latency trading; controlled transactions so that only approved users can submit a request to the network; a given rate of inflation; or additional space for metadata in each block, any or all of these can be specified at launch. The private chain can be accessed by straightforward APIs, meaning that stand-alone applications can rapidly be developed. Basically technical aspects of Stratis were all introduced in the whitepaper. Dude what you are asking are beyond the dev's plan. So advance that I cannot comprehend what answers do you want from the dev. Sure there are several blockchain platform projects that are emerging now with the features that are not as of now been incorporate with stratis. Eventually I may say , dev will soon adjust as development goes by. Wait a second ... you're telling me that the whitepaper claims to create private blockchains on Stratis, but the devs have no idea how this is going to be done? You should join slack. Chris hangs out there quiet often, and Krushang is there all the time. I'm sure they can help you with your questions. Is it true though, does chirs not know how its going to be done. |
|
|
|
If you missed our segment on Beyond Bitcoin, we will be tweeting the link to their SoundCloud once the recording of the entire meeting is uploaded as well as mentioning the time when we speak at. If you weren't able to directly ask us questions on the Beyond Bitcoin hang out, join us over on Slack where we're more than happy to engage in dialog! Is this available yet? I can't seem to find it anywhere and I missed the hangout earlier. No not yet. It was only a hour ago. |
|
|
|
|
Just saw the co is over 55 btc now. One new 9 btc investor showed up on the list and there may have been a few small new investments too. If it keeps up like this 200 btc will be easy to reach. Comon guys. Let's help this amazing project get funded.
|
|
|
|
there is escrow or not?
Why would you use a escrow who may be anonymous and not just trust the dev who is upfront with his identity. Rhetorical question. The answer to you is, no escrow. Either trust the dev or don't. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
