OMG, thanks to this post OP, and to the comments to this post.. Now I know the reason whats behind the huge fall of Bitcoin. Now should I stay as BTC or stay as BTU.
Without a doubt protect your btc and mine a non BU pool. unless of course you want Bitcoin to scale on the main chain with bigger blocks... or you think Segwit is too complicated or risky... or you think the Core team shouldn't be in charge of Bitcoin's scalability roadmap any longer since they've failed so miserably... ...in which case you might want to mine a BU pool. I dont see how you can say they have failed it so miserably considering when you got up this morning your btc that you have was worth over $1200 us dollars a coin.
|
|
|
OMG, thanks to this post OP, and to the comments to this post.. Now I know the reason whats behind the huge fall of Bitcoin. Now should I stay as BTC or stay as BTU.
Without a doubt protect your btc and mine a non BU pool.
|
|
|
Everyone pushing for a hard fork in bitcoin is risking all of our money. Segwit gives them (BU) the increased block size that they want while protecting the network sovereignty.
It's obvious they don't want blocksize increase, they want to control bitcoin Thats the truth. This debate over blocksize is turning into nothing more than a hostile takeover attempt.
|
|
|
Well this issue of blocksize has took too many time to get a suitable solution and now they are considering making the split and for sure it will damage bitcoin, we can see the community is moving some funds into others altcoins, but well i do wish the best to bitcoin, now the question wich part of the fork will remain with the bitcoin value?
Blocksize is addressed in segwit. So Im not sure why BU looks better.
|
|
|
Everyone pushing for a hard fork in bitcoin is risking all of our money. Segwit gives them (BU) the increased block size that they want while protecting the network sovereignty.
|
|
|
I am going to choose to go with segwit right now. This whole SEGWIT/BU battle is bad for the values of the network. Some of the features I agree are overkill however it does bring more information and stability to the network as a whole. It does bring the larger block size which is the biggest argument that most of your BU supporters are campaigning for. Am i Wrong?
|
|
|
Issue at hosting facility so 225 miners are offline. Should be running at 3.3PH again once problem is solved then we can go back to cracking this block Closing in on 100%. Should be a block soon.
|
|
|
Assuming your hash rate and the total hashrate stays the same throughout the round that is correct. If our total hashrate goes up or your hash rate goes down you would make less per round. The upside to having a higher total hashrate is the frequency of finding blocks. Right now at our current hashrate we should average about 1 block a week.
Actually it is down to 6 days.
|
|
|
Yeah at current rate that works out about $1million a month they keep Thats absolutely crazy!
|
|
|
GUiminer
I need to take that down. You can't mine with video cards any more the difficulty is way to high. Probably need to set up an Ethereum pool..
|
|
|
Can some help me i am mining with but i am not seeing my progress or the worker showing up in the worlers pannel of on the website
Click in the dashboard update workers I tried that mutiple times it refreshes the page but i still dont see anything new What are you mining with?
|
|
|
I yesterday was late to the block for 10 minutes, joined after Don't worry! We are going to be finding some more. Hopefully we can keep this pool growing. Got some more stuff working to bring more hash.
|
|
|
I'll fix cron error as soon as I get home. Sorry new setup probs.
|
|
|
No RPC commands were removed in 0.14.0. New ones were added, and some old ones were marked as deprecated, so they will be removed in a future release.
Thanks. Did not want to update the pool and smoke myself.
|
|
|
You wont get higher than 8 connections usually if you do not have the ports open.
|
|
|
So in reading some of the info... Did they completely do away with some of the old RPC commands or just add new ones to it?
|
|
|
I was wondering if pools actually interested to share some of the fees they get with individuals running full nodes relaying and supporting their pool? Or doing that brings any benefit for them at all?
Not sure what that would help. I have my pool capped at 125 connections because it was connecting to more than that and taking up so much bandwidth.
|
|
|
People are drawn to finding multiple blocks a day. Even if they only get .00001 bitcoin. But they solved 7 blocks today..... People have a hard time justifying lower frequency but higher payout.
|
|
|
I had around 25% of the total shares of last round
I hate it for all the people that had rented and invested power. I did everything I could to get the round back. I would have had the pool back up imediatly if I had not tried to save the. Round. I have out things in place to make sure this does not happen again. Start mining now. We have 3+ PHS perminate base hash going online later in the week. We will be finding some blocks.
|
|
|
|