This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: not bitcoin related
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: deletion requested
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: malware
|
|
|
I suspect there's a misunderstanding here. He's claiming to sell a script for a clone of your website, not the actual website itself.
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: referral link
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: does not accept bitcoin
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: duplicate topic
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: fraud
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: duplicate topic
|
|
|
What happens if you return the 970 after selling the key? I feel like in that case the key will be revoked.
|
|
|
lol he ninja deleted that post.
|
|
|
I can't believe you guys, obsessing over some 16 year old's shitty attempt at 'rebellion'. Just ignore him, and let him feel the embarrassment ten years from now looking back. Or we can support him, maybe that'll get him to fly over to Turkistan and see just how great his welcoming party will be He is 31 and lives in Brussels, pretty much the profile of the Paris attackers. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fqqrly2P.png&t=663&c=c1xVBv7_-9AjVQ) Yeah, lets just ignore it. Just like, you know, people getting blown up on a night out by these cunts can be ignored. So do a lot of other people. What are you suggesting? ... You would still need to create a new topic as local rules cant be applied retroactively. ..
Any particular reason why? Technical or level of disclosure on topic creation issue? Forum policy. If the topic post of a topic gives very specific rules for the topic, I will use those rules in addition to the global board policies for that topic. The starter of the topic may not change rules after posting their topic (not even by editing the topic post).
|
|
|
The moderators are seriously concerned about protecting pedophiles and murders? They should be strung up with the rest of the ISIS loving garbage.
It should be basic common sense that an image objectively promoting hate and cruelty should be banned from a forum dedicated to anything other than hate and cruelty.
Really deplorable inaction here mods. Through this inaction you are aligning yourself with this criminality and undoing the work countless individuals have undertaken to eliminate the negative stereotypes of cryptocurrency.
![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) not doing anything about ISIS =/= promoting ISIS
|
|
|
Dont know if it was suggested before: close your topic start a new one self moderated and delete all his posts in there. Redirect all people to the new one.
or just make a local rule on the current thread. some altcoin thread starters have done this before. A local rule? local thread rule. 26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed. Those were mostly replaced by self-moderated topics, but local rules can be enforced at the moderator's discretion.
I've seen someone making a thread rule midway here though. but the OP of that thread ended up making a self-moderated thread anyway. this will sound stupid because I brought it up. but go with self-moderated thread if you don't want to rely on the mods. You would still need to create a new topic as local rules cant be applied retroactively. Also, OP stated earlier in the topic that self-moderated topics are not an option for him, so the best choice is probably local rule. As long as the rule isn't vague and is easily decidable, moderators will enforce it.
|
|
|
We'll see how you feel when one shows up in your thread every day and using your coin and scaring your clients and supporters away!
Just wondering, how many clients/supporters do you think he's "scaring' away?
|
|
|
You put up an argument that saudia Arabia is doing something similar to ISIS, so you could tear down an unrelated point. That's your strawman.
America kills people that break certain laws. So your arguement is about how governments execute people. That is nothing to do with a group of terrorist who have no country or government. It is irrelevant to my point.
I would still like a view on why allowing the avatar is OK given it breaks the law to do so in atleast three countries.
Are you saying that if something is banned in a few countries, we should ban that on bitcointalk? inb4 strawman
|
|
|
I've been told that displaying the ISIS flag is illegal in the Netherlands. So this forum is breaking the law unless IPs from there are blocked from accessing the forum. How many other countries are the same?
You should read that again. In Netherlands it's forbidden to use an ISIS flag in public.
I've got a feeling that you can still find the ISIS flag on google images just fine in the Netherlands. edit:you can even find it on a dutch website. http://www.metronieuws.nl/nieuws/buitenland/2016/01/isis-halveert-salarissen-vechtersend editSaudi Arabia is your own strawman.
*facepalm* That was directed at your remark that implied killing people is covered under freedom of speech. My point stands. Anyone dealing with him might end up being accused of terrorist financing if it turns out he is doing just that. Neg trust is valid. Deal with caution.
And how does that have anything to do with whether he's a scammer or not? Do I need to remind you what the definition of a scammer is? People like you are turning the trust system into a upvote/downvote system.
|
|
|
Isis cut off the heads of Innocent people to get media attention.
You know who else beheads people in public? Saudi Arabia. How about we ban their flag as well? But, hey, thats benefit of free speech. And I will defend with my last breath their rights to kill people for free publicity.
![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Just so you know, killing people isn't part of free speech. Nice strawman though.
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: duplicate topics
|
|
|
|