|
1. mprep
2. Mitchell
3. Lauda
|
|
|
|
-snip-
Ok just having fun with BTC and learning something, i hope you don't mind
Nope. You will probably not hit the hall of fame with that though. -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90982.0If you actually want to sell vanity addresses you should make a thread in the services section and create a simpler step by step. |
|
|
|
und wie is das Leben in Angst vor absurd unwahrscheinlichen Ereignissen? ich habe keinen aber die Tatsache ist: meine eine CPU = 319051 keys/s klar macht, lasse aber mit 6 CPU's rattern = 2.756.600.640 keys/24h ... und ich bin mir sicher, dass NSA & andere Miner mit so richtig Dampf dahinter täglich auf Billionen Key's kommen. Also warten wir einfach mal ab... 319051 * 60 * 6 * 24 = 2.756.600.640/24 MinutenIch lös dann mal auf. Um die Hälfte[1] aller privaten Schlüssel zu erzeugen mit den oben angenommenen hypothetischen Werten benötigt man 2 159 / (10 8*10 8) = 2 159 / 10 16 ~7,3075 * 10 31 Sekunden bzw. 7,3075 * 10 31/(60*60*24*365) = 8,3419 * 10 27 Jahre. Aber vermutlich wirst du - oder jemand anderes - mir jetzt vorwerfen unrealistisch kleine Zahlen genommen zu haben. 100 Millionen GPUs sind ja n Klacks für die NSA und Co. Wir nehmen also eine GTX 1080[2] statt meiner GTX 970[3]. Die hat (aufgerundet) 1,6 mal mehr CUDA Kerne und einen (aufgerunde) 1,5 mal höheren Maximaltakt. Wir nehmen also mal stumpf eine optimale Steigerung an und somit eine Leistung von 39*1,6*1,5 = 93,6 MK/s an. Wir Runden das mal zu den 100 Millionen von oben auf. Die 1080 hat einen Stromverbrauch von 180 Watt bzw. 180 Wh für eine Stunde also 100*360 MK/s = 36 GK/h. Wenn eine GTX 1080 ein Jahr lang ohne Pause läuft benötigt sie also 180*24*365/1000 2 = 1.5768 MWh und kann in der Zeit 36 * 24 *365 = 315.360 GK/a erzeugen. Bis jetzt noch alles langweilig, aber wir nehmen jetzt weiter an das 75% des weltweiten Energiebedarfs[4] für derartige Berechnungen aufgewendet werden. 0,75* 140*10 15Wh/a = 1,05 * 10 17 * 365*24/1000 2 = 9,198*10 14 MW/h. Das reicht dann um 9,198*10 14 / 1,5768 ~ 5,9*10 14 GPUs eine Stunde laufen zu lassen. In der Zeit schaffen die 5,9*10 14*36*1000 3 = 2,124*10 25 K/h. Na also endlich eine Kollision in Reichweite, oder? 2 159/(2,124*10 25*24*365) = 3,9275*1018 Jahre.Das ist ca. 281 Millionen mal länger als das Universum existiert[5]. Wie sagt man so schön: dont hold your breath. [1] Es ist aufgrund des Geburtstagsparadoxon übliche nach 50% von einer Kollision auszugehen. [2] http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1080[3] http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-970/specifications[4] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weltenergiebedarf (davon sind eigentlich nur 17% Strom, aber das ignorieren wir hier mal) [5] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universum |
|
|
|
-snip-
Sorry but I have to say LOL, honestly, go to your nearest mental care institution for help, you uncovered by yourself your long list of scams, what a piece of shit.
#11 Probably the biggest red flag, this all is just a concept, there is no indication that anything besides a fancy homepage was actually created. I had sent you (and dabs) the whole backend script that was made by me, In the original PM of me notifying you. The only scams that I have been part of are ones where I have been hired to develop something and not realised the code was going to be used to scam, Both of these cases (Equilibria, BitcoinGo) I received no money for anyway and I was scammed also. Does a company who manufacture knives deserve to be blamed because some idiot used their product for criminal reasons? I currently see no reason to leave you a negative rating and I dont see why this should change any time soon. I dont trust most users here, dont take it personally. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Before when days were missing they compensated this days with an extra entry. So far this is not done for the missing days and you didn't get credited the payment for e/a. Maybe they still can add this days with an new entry specially when you miss 11 days.
The last post by namworld made it sound like they are working on a solution, but it will take some time. 2016/11/15 - 1:00 AM shorena -1 posts
2016/11/14 - 1:00 AM shorena -1 posts
2016/11/13 - 1:00 AM shorena 9689 posts
2016/11/12 - 1:00 AM shorena 9673 posts
2016/11/11 - 1:00 AM shorena -1 posts
2016/11/10 - 1:00 AM shorena -1 posts
2016/11/09 - 1:00 AM shorena -1 posts
From the randomness I suspect its a timing issue. IIRC the forum will block requests that happen more than once a second. Maybe achow101 can help out, he wrote bctalkaccountpricer[1] which does a high number of requests without issue. [1] https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.infoSame thing is happening to me, missed 14 days so far. Any updates from the OP? Nope, just that the dev is busy. |
|
|
|
Hallo Jetzt habe ich etwas mit https://bitnodes.21.co rumgespielt und plötzlich habe ich 16 Verbindungen. Ob es da einen Zusammenhang gibt? An meiner Konfiguration habe ich nichts geändert. https://bitnodes.21.co behauptet allerdings, dass mein Node erst seit 10 Minuten online wäre, was aber nicht stimmt, es sind in Wirklichkeit knapp 8 Stunden und die vollständige Synchronisation war vor über 7 Stunden abgeschlossen. Kann helfen, weil dein node dadurch anderen bekannt wird.
100 ist niedriger als Default (125).
Oh sorry, dachte 8 wäre default. Dann habe ich nichts gesagt. Für ausgehende ja. Das kann man aber leider über die config nicht einstellen.
-snip-
Es bleibt bei 8 ausgehenden Verbindungen.
Habe genug Bandbreite und alten Telekomvertrag um 1MBit/s @ 24/7 freizugeben.
Immer oder nur nach nem IP wechsel? Wenn du bei 21.co[1] IP und Port eingibst ist der Node dann erreichbar? Port im Router an den lokalen Rechner weitergeleitet? [1] https://bitnodes.21.co/1. Immer 2. Ist nicht erreichbar. dynDNS Adressen akzeptiert die Seite auch nicht. 3. Jop, aber nur via TCP... Aber UDP hatte ich testweise auch aktiv, läuft auch nicht. 2. dynDNS hilft auch nicht da core nicht den dns speichert sondern die IP. Magst du mir die IP/den Namen schicken? Dann probier ich das von hier. 3. TCP ist was du brauchst. |
|
|
|
und wie is das Leben in Angst vor absurd unwahrscheinlichen Ereignissen? ich habe keinen aber die Tatsache ist: meine eine CPU = 319051 keys/s klar macht, lasse aber mit 6 CPU's rattern ... und ich bin mir sicher, dass NSA, andere Miner mit richtig Dampf dahinter täglich auf Miliarden Key's kommen. Also warten wir einfach mal ab... Meine GPU macht ~39 Million die Sekunde. Sorgen mach ich mir nicht. Kannst ja mal durchrechnen wie lange du brauchst für die hälfe aller privaten Schlüssel (2 159) bei 100 millionen GPUs mit 100 Millionen keys pro Sekunde. |
|
|
|
Paper Wallet mit einem dummen Drucker ausgedruck Gut gemacht – bis jetzt ist das die Sicherste Variante um Coins aufzubewahren. Sie bittet jedoch auch keine 98% Sicherheit, denn sollte jemand zufällig deine Adresse/Key Paar finden - dann sind die Coins weg   und wie is das Leben in Angst vor absurd unwahrscheinlichen Ereignissen? |
|
|
|
-snip-
Sorry but I have to say LOL, honestly, go to your nearest mental care institution for help, you uncovered by yourself your long list of scams, what a piece of shit.
Maybe you are correct and maybe you both deserve a negative rating. The problem I have right now is that I dont trust you. I dont trust icanscript either and their proof is weak, but you raised a ridiculous amount of red flags. Anyway, here is my view on this and why I left a negative rating. Bullet points version: #1 Contacting me with a signed message that proves nothing. Address in the profile of the account used to contact me, tells me the account that contacts me contacts me, nothing else. On top of that, the message didnt verify. I would expect someone that contacts an escrow to ask the escrow for verification.#2 Contacting me. I have no active escrow thread, I dont activly promote this service and I was gone for 2 months. If you end up with me and I dont know you, you have either gone through a lot of other escrows and they all denied or you have a specific reason to contact me. Maybe you want to exploit my little experience in the field. #3 Self moderated thread. Seriously, I dont care who you are. It makes you look bad instantly. I know the spam is bad, but the obvious troll posts had not been removed and 'local rules' are usually a better alternative. #4 Rushed time frame, as SebastianJu already pointed out, the show was about to start. (#5) The post that told people not to send to the multi sig address covered by escrows. Im still not sure who payments would have been received. Might be just miscommunication though and you actually wanted to say "not yet". #6 The payment rate, 3% (!) of (potential) 3200 BTC. Why would you pay 3% if you can get the most trusted escrow this forum has to offer for 1%? Not only that, 3% each. That does not strike me as a sane financial plan. #7 The payout wording for the stages. "Stage 1, A maximum of 530 BTCs or 25% (whichever is more)". This could have potentially drained all funds. #8 The stages and the amount of coins needed(?) for them. #8.1 Stage 1 "Main net launch" and "Coin distribution". What exactly costs 530 BTC here? Is this the amount needed after stage 1 to reach stage 2? #8.2 Android PlayStore launch is 1 month after Beta Release. #8.3 "Stable Profit"? The idea is not new. I know people that worked on a similar project (without the special currency) in asia. It failed. #9 No reference to past projects. This is not a small project, unless you are a well oiled machine and have experience. If you have experience, show it off to build confidence in investors. #10 No proper signature campaign. I would expect you to be busy with the project at hand and thus hire a manager, escrow the funds for the campaign. The usual. #11 Probably the biggest red flag, this all is just a concept, there is no indication that anything besides a fancy homepage was actually created. #12 Uhhh, I forgot one. Dabs and me wanted a 3rd escrow, you never contacted them and told me some bullshit about need to see an ID. Seriously, why would you require an ID from the 3rd escrow, but not from the 1st and 2nd? |
|
|
|
-snip-
I was thinking of an algorithm where the instance of the software could verify the transaction, but it was not possible to make further analysis in it. Like Monero has analysing resistant blockchain with a reason.
Its blockchain is still public. The way the signatures are created make it infeasible to follow coins.
I dont need to hide anything im doing online, soo they can search about those. If there were a way to conect each transaction to black market as well to the owners they would already made those. Bitcoin should be an example, for countries manage their adress, how they say they have nothing to hide and do wanna to show all transactions, with some improvement regulamentation.
 |
|
|
|
Thank you for your ansver.
I have another question. My wallet is on c disk, and sync data are huge, can i simply transfer wallt to D disk, where i have much more GB?
Yes you can move the data folder to a different disk. Dont move the programm files though. The data folder for windows is %APPDATA%\Bitcoin. You can enter that in run as well, it will open an explorere window at the correct location. Once you moved the entire folder, start core with -datadir=D:\bitcoin (or wherever you moved it to). You have to pass this everytime as it does not get stored. If you use a shortcut you need to modify that, otherwise bitcoin core will think you started it for the first time, create a fresh folder in %APPDATA%, create a new, empty wallet file and start syncing from scratch. |
|
|
|
What are the advantages of BTC's blockchain being public? Would it not be more secure if it was hidden from people?
Because there are methods that could assemble the information in the blockchain with the information from certain other methods and could point with high precision what blockchain activity belongs to who. Secret services are researching methods like these.
How would you verify that my transaction is valid if the blockchain is not public? |
|
|
|
i am out of sync 1 year and 28 weeks :/ it will by long journey
If you have high memory you might be able to improve the speed a bit. Its a bit trick to get a good number. Lets say you have 4 GB, keep 2 GB for your System and 1 as buffer. You can now give core 1 GB as database cache so it has to write less often to disk. You do this by closing bitcoin core and start it again with -dbcache=1000How to do this depends on your System, the below example is for windows. If you are using something else let us know so we can give you a step-by-step. #1 close core #2 open "run" (win + r) #3 enter c:\Program Files\Bitcoin\bitcoin-qt.exe -dbcache=1000#4 confirm with "ok" If you have more memory you can use a larger number. |
|
|
|
Hast du in deiner bitcoin.conf die maxconnections hochgesetzt? unter linux liegt das unter /home/USERNAME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf unter macOS liegt das unter /Users/USERNAME/Library/Application Support/Bitcoin/bitcoin.conf unter Windows liegt das unter C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\bitcoin.conf Da einfach (bzw die Anzahl, die man haben möchte) Es kann aber sehr lange dauern bis diese Anzahl erreicht ist. 100 ist niedriger als Default (125).
-snip-
Es bleibt bei 8 ausgehenden Verbindungen.
Habe genug Bandbreite und alten Telekomvertrag um 1MBit/s @ 24/7 freizugeben.
Immer oder nur nach nem IP wechsel? Wenn du bei 21.co[1] IP und Port eingibst ist der Node dann erreichbar? Port im Router an den lokalen Rechner weitergeleitet? [1] https://bitnodes.21.co/ |
|
|
|
Hello my friend,
i decided to sent my btc from my wallet (bitcoin core) to kraken.com and transform their to EUR and sent to my personal bank account. For the first of all i try to sent 0.03 btc to kraken, than i trade it to EUR and sent to my personal acc, everything works great, money arrived. On the next day i try to send all my BTC (cc 1.3btc) from wallet to kraken.com i used same adress as for 0.03btc, wallet sent money, but btc didnt arrived to kraken. I try to contact kraken, but they dont see this transaction on blockchain.info. What can i do and solve my problem?
Sounds like there is something wrong with the transaction. My wallet is out of sync, can by that reason of my problem?
Yes, if the wallet is not synced it will not send a transaction, because it does not know whether or not its a valid one. Can I use any method that sync come much faster as lasts now?
Please can someone help, i wont lost my bitcoins.
Thank you
The main factors for the sync time are: HDD/SSD speed, CPU speed, internet speed. Usually these cant be improved quickly. How far are you behind? Your coins are not lost, the transaction will be send once you are synced. |
|
|
|
I was reading about the bitcoin process online, and I found out that transactions only get inside the blockchain after they get confirmations, they are then attached to a block and start they life inside the chain.
But where are they stored before confirmations? there's a central point or there's a "second chain" inside the first one, without confirmations? How miners reach such transactions if they aren't distributed yet.
ps.: tried search but no luck :/
Unconfirmed transactions are stored in the memory of full nodes. If the full node is turned off (or rebooted) they are lost. Miners usually have at least one full node running in order to gather unconfirmed transactions and send blocks once founds. This is a graph of the memory usage on my node, as you can see I restarted it a few days ago when I updated to a new version.  |
|
|
|
Yup. I'm getting all sorts of weirdo bitcoin carding related emails too. So be it. It's clearly from the hack back in the day.
It's a junk email address anyway but it's so offensive that I won't be able to open another of a similar ilk so I'll be rather sad if it has to be retired.
I dont, in fact the only spam I get is from BTC servics that I signed up for and didnt bother to uncheck the "get info by mail" box. Got my first ponzi spam today. |
|
|
|
Hello all
I read that post, but i dont really understand that. I didnt linked my btc address to the user, nor posted it anywhere. What else can i do ?
When was the last time that you had access to this account? In most cases, if you can't sign a message, there is nothing that we can do. Who is "someone from DT" ? Please mark zombie007 as hacked, if you read this message.
There exactly isn't much proof to go by for now, I've left a neutral rating. Hello ! As i said i have some other proofs that i own that account. -Login ip-s i used my account in past 3-4 years -ALL the email history about private messages going up and down - i can make new photos with a paper with actual date of this air handler stuff i posted here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg11720493#msg11720493- i had some deals on the site, for example with JohnDow1968, he can help me prove that i own the account, i can talk to him via skype. ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1407373.msg14288708#msg14288708) -The last post i wrote: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1559587.msg15680077#msg15680077 Now i cant login, and some fucking jerk using my account... -I sent my last PM to eliovp, asking him about nanos for sale, he answered me with the price, on 21th of august. PLEASE help. Send me a pic like this and Ill drop a negative rating on the account. I cant tell whether or not any of the above will be enough (or not too much) for an admin, but it can help the account not getting misused. Quoted just in case: Just finished my air handler, only 2TH, but expanding  The miners blow the hot air right into that metal air handler stuff, and a big mofo exhaust fan pulls out the heat. There are 9 "slots" on the air handler merger unit, 2 in use now. I will user 1 for each miner, probably for S5-s. Handler on the rig side [ img]https://i.imgur.com/NFLasv2.jpg[/img] Handler on the exhaust side [ img]https://i.imgur.com/lXbOHrq.jpg[/img] Miners [ img]https://i.imgur.com/jgjkbKO.jpg[/img] Completed [ img]https://i.imgur.com/k12ElDM.jpg[/img] [ img]https://i.imgur.com/u8tNHOY.jpg[/img] Will upload the gpu farm images too  PS: looks like evil twin bro of Bender [ img]http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/filepicker%2F90URbbaARRysdfTe3zpQ_futurama__bender_by_suzura-d59kq1p.png.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
Was auch zu bedenken ist: der Gebührenvorschlag wird besser wenn der Client schon ein bisschen lief, weil dann mehr Daten über aktuelle Transaktionen verfügbar sind.
|
|
|
|
Remove the feedback system and disband all the default trust members. Create a ticket system where fellow forumers send in their accusations against suspects and let the mods and admins read the reports at the end of the day and deal with the cases objectively and according to the forum rules. There are too many vigilantes stirring the pot already and making the forum experience not fun for everyone else.
So you replace DT with Staff and get the same thing (or at least a similar) at the end, only that you will get less activity from it, since mods are busy anway with moderating the forum/posts (their main purpose). It's not the same thing when you replace mod-wannabes with actual mods and admins. Are you saying that mods can't read 2 or 3 lines of text which a red paint usually consists of and decide for themselves what to do with the account in question? Or do you prefer to have random people giving feedbacks just because they think someone sneezed at the wrong moment? The default trust network is not randomly generated. It was set in place by theymos (admin), its root (DefaultTrust) is controlled by theymos (admin). Its level 1 members are 42% staff: theymos (admin)
HostFat (staff)
dooglus (-)
Maged (-)
dserrano5 (-)
OgNasty (-)
Tomatocage (-)
SaltySpitoon (staff)
DeaDTerra (-)
BadBear (admin)
philipma1957 (-)
Cyrus (admin)
Blazed (-)
OldScammerTag (admin controlled)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
