Sorry, but you are kind of cross posting and promoting someone else's stuff. That's against the forum rule. Also I agree that the price is high but its upto the seller to decide at what price does he want to sell the accounts. That is not against the rules. He is discussing the price and giving examples of what may be a better deal.
|
|
|
The forum was created by satoshi. The domain is owned by Sirius, and managed by theymos.
I am not sure how theymos became administrator of the forum, however he is one of the very early users of bitcointalk.
I'm not sure of the particulars but I heard there was a sizable donation of coins to this forum for its operation to some extent. Sounds like a very interesting timeline tho. I'd like to hear Theymos' opinions of the Bitcoin market up to this point, not sure I've ever been graced with this person's presence. Would be like a mystery unfolding.. Back in 2011 theymos was solicating donations for people to donate 10 BTC to get a special 'donator' status, and 50 BTC to get a special 'VIP' status. Several people donated, enough so that the forum received over 5,000 BTC that was to be used to host the forum (which is now free curtsy of Private Internet Access) and to upgrade the forum software Wow! kool I see this still applies but seeing the price now , that's freaking huge Anyways what do you mean by (which is now free curtsy of Private Internet Access)Are they providing free VPN to bitcointalk PIA is providing hosting/internet to the forum for free. I believe the forum/theymos owns the actual servers that contain the data of the forum's DB and it's backups Oh! that's interesting Are they interested in bitcoin or they have certain terms with Theymos ? Why free?? I have no idea what the specifics of the agreement are, however I assume that it has something to do with the fact that theymos gives PIA one free forum advertisement slot as well as a link at the bottom of every page
|
|
|
The forum was created by satoshi. The domain is owned by Sirius, and managed by theymos.
I am not sure how theymos became administrator of the forum, however he is one of the very early users of bitcointalk.
I'm not sure of the particulars but I heard there was a sizable donation of coins to this forum for its operation to some extent. Sounds like a very interesting timeline tho. I'd like to hear Theymos' opinions of the Bitcoin market up to this point, not sure I've ever been graced with this person's presence. Would be like a mystery unfolding.. Back in 2011 theymos was solicating donations for people to donate 10 BTC to get a special 'donator' status, and 50 BTC to get a special 'VIP' status. Several people donated, enough so that the forum received over 5,000 BTC that was to be used to host the forum (which is now free curtsy of Private Internet Access) and to upgrade the forum software Wow! kool I see this still applies but seeing the price now , that's freaking huge Anyways what do you mean by (which is now free curtsy of Private Internet Access)Are they providing free VPN to bitcointalk PIA is providing hosting/internet to the forum for free. I believe the forum/theymos owns the actual servers that contain the data of the forum's DB and it's backups
|
|
|
The forum was created by satoshi. The domain is owned by Sirius, and managed by theymos.
I am not sure how theymos became administrator of the forum, however he is one of the very early users of bitcointalk.
I'm not sure of the particulars but I heard there was a sizable donation of coins to this forum for its operation to some extent. Sounds like a very interesting timeline tho. I'd like to hear Theymos' opinions of the Bitcoin market up to this point, not sure I've ever been graced with this person's presence. Would be like a mystery unfolding.. Back in 2011 theymos was solicating donations for people to donate 10 BTC to get a special 'donator' status, and 50 BTC to get a special 'VIP' status. Several people donated, enough so that the forum received over 5,000 BTC that was to be used to host the forum (which is now free curtsy of Private Internet Access) and to upgrade the forum software
|
|
|
The forum was created by satoshi. The domain is owned by Sirius, and managed by theymos.
I am not sure how theymos became administrator of the forum, however he is one of the very early users of bitcointalk.
Okay i got profile to Sirius too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=4Seems he hasn't been online since oct 2014 . Two most Important people for bitcointalk Satoshi and Sirius i.e. Do anyone knows about Sirius ? Is he off to somewhere? He is not extensively involved in the forum, although my understanding is that he is involved in bitcoin in other ways.
|
|
|
The forum was created by satoshi. The domain is owned by Sirius, and managed by theymos.
I am not sure how theymos became administrator of the forum, however he is one of the very early users of bitcointalk.
|
|
|
Loan Amount : 0.121 B BTC Address : 1HkBWTTv4Ms8SFzY57dRFkiXeANx8Xz2PX Term Length : 10Days
As per PM conversations I given my BTC ID, 680DEM, MobGold Account with $11.80 & My Domain account of BitCoinsguru.Com & D4Coin.Com as collateral. The all collateral hold by QuickSeller.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This is quickseller from bitcointalk. Today is Feb 27 2015. I confirm that I am in control of the bitcointalk account ‘bitcoinsguru’, of 683.748395 DEM, a MobGold account with ~$11 in pending earnings and a domain account with crazy domains that has BitCoinsguru.Com & D4Coin.Com registered. TXID for the loan is a4816a263bb562139903dac5eeaee6953bce64ef6e19c1d1e787db9dbfdd3961 .11 was sent to 1HkBWTTv4Ms8SFzY57dRFkiXeANx8Xz2PX and the rest was sent to me for my escrow fee/tip (this was previously confirmed via PM). The borrower is to send .121 to 3ATUksi7Sui7npDwViYYRcGjqJe9Y1Xnik by March 9 2015 by 2359 forum time or the collateral will be forfeited to the lender. This is an address that I have been advised that the lender is in control of. Upon repayment of the loan, the password to the bitcointalk account will be reset to what it was previously, once the borrower confirms control of his bitcointalk account, the passwords to his accounts will be sent via PM, and the DEM will be sent to an address of the borrower’s choice. Thank you -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.orgiQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU8TxHAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUW1iEH/0inJ6vDfq5brb0FRQYcw/X2 9FCqyo1vMVqSBsZ1KR3JzWh4as17/EsgSUxqMGRbPhxgyCs07OkDu3Z5AMTyC0oZ 5Kn5BixekECC+IhoMaazvB3udNgI97TRCHqHwx8FNm/TwRMi7l5Df5R4gMrmtvbl Hx75Kal+UNJ1TqPnBKaYlWQdNd8UbG/oMQqXKRFXR8fLAqf0mUtJz6XkDypYK7sc yMvTpWXoRhQEtX5NG8BshEdCVnTOT7pa4r25oKfwzZadntXZRR6j4wSO6p4EWZwh ceLg1PIyCZPDhuLoVedZBRJ98h9EpuRtdBB4tcwQmCM0z9mksKMMb+1bCxUPxII= =zt06 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This is quickseller from bitcointalk. Today is feb 27 2015. I have received confirmation from Muhammed Zakir that bitcoinsguru is to send only .11 to 3ATUksi7Sui7npDwViYYRcGjqJe9Y1Xnik which is an address controlled by Muhammed Zakir. Thank you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.orgiQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU8Uf/AAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWSooH/2dzsYHCpUsarmBaEH+sEV2d LDdJG2vH5fZKw3BCQc4v6IVInn15dPZJZFOda9gVYFXokApfQ2yy94PmgMFEsHXx qBXLOHwvHHUoQsj+4AvdmBFRayHuhcGLf2JoQDKqAUqNbKWU+iGItuAxjdsIDrKr FMIk6C1Qd6GkvEeYM2rYbxD9TbHAM4/W2UNzQAI/KStNSIoOYJtAPkUgtF/VxocT Te7YPEcPpOnwsOUq+T6gjrlT+gVlACgovITK5hPbkchlBovB6yQc5ml1kqsUlbU5 FVN63nVYvTCaJNSl5VjSLdpp8gPMV4A48nuydv9Txq5M7WhAB2hYLSxgTB6bYFA= =/xZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
Received PM from funtotry: This was before I had control. Dont give it to him ( I have the account) Ignore it, I took the 0.8 loan and sadly it looks like his account was hacked. That settles it. No loan. I hope he didn't lend full 0.8 He got 0.8 BTC from funtotry and 0.2 BTC from Glucose. Follow the discussion here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=947801.msg10597992#msg10597992So he has 1 BTC total loan? Is the collateral worth even 0.5 BTC? It is probably worth a good 1 BTC however it is generally best to lend only a small fraction of the value of the account if you are taking the account as collateral. The reason for this is because there are risks involved in taking accounts as collateral as well as the fact that accounts can sometimes take a while to sell. I offered to lend him .35 prior to me being aware that he has an outstanding loan, and while also asking for a signed message confirming ownership of his account (which he was unable to provide). I have subsequently confirmed that he is an alt of tacoman71
|
|
|
Are you able to provide a signed message from an old address associated with the account in order to prove ownership?
|
|
|
I have 0.8 btc owed by kalgecin I have ownership of the account now in collateral, whats going on here?
Kalgecin account has probably been hacked. He asked a lot of people to loan him today and hasn't been able to produce a signed message or to send me an e-mail from his original e-mail. Looks like you will never see your 0.8 BTC again (probably) and I will never see the 0.2 I loaned to him... Ok but we have the account, which is probably worth about 1 btc, if he does not pay in 7 days then we will liquidate his account and repay you 0.2. That would be great. The negative feedback will probably be removed if we organise that. Have to sleep, will write you tomorrow. Keep me updated if you have any news from him. @funtotry - Didn't you see Glucose's and Quicksellers' feedback before making the loan? The only problem is if the account goes for less than 1 BTC. If the account goes for less than 1btc the amount will be reduced marginally for both of us. For example, if we get to the point where its worth 0.5 btc (half), thats 0.4 for me (half my 0. and 0.1 for him. Sadly we have to wait 7 days (or at least a message from him) before starting to sell the account. IF we get to that point, the members who are leaving the neg feedback will be instructed to remove negative feedback surrounding this loan. I don't think the lender has agreed to take any kind of haircut on his loan. Don't know what that means. https://blockchain.info/address/1Fo6Uy8JWnV9SnDM5LBnYA8nnCQgbfbyDTThis is the address I loaned to. He is an alt of tacoman71 who claimed his account was hacked hours after taking out a loan. He is also an alt of Madern and Twipple. I will remove the negative that I just left for kalgecin upon repayment to to Glucose.
|
|
|
I have 0.8 btc owed by kalgecin I have ownership of the account now in collateral, whats going on here?
Kalgecin account has probably been hacked. He asked a lot of people to loan him today and hasn't been able to produce a signed message or to send me an e-mail from his original e-mail. Looks like you will never see your 0.8 BTC again (probably) and I will never see the 0.2 I loaned to him... Ok but we have the account, which is probably worth about 1 btc, if he does not pay in 7 days then we will liquidate his account and repay you 0.2. That would be great. The negative feedback will probably be removed if we organise that. Have to sleep, will write you tomorrow. Keep me updated if you have any news from him. @funtotry - Didn't you see Glucose's and Quicksellers' feedback before making the loan? The only problem is if the account goes for less than 1 BTC. If the account goes for less than 1btc the amount will be reduced marginally for both of us. For example, if we get to the point where its worth 0.5 btc (half), thats 0.4 for me (half my 0. and 0.1 for him. Sadly we have to wait 7 days (or at least a message from him) before starting to sell the account. IF we get to that point, the members who are leaving the neg feedback will be instructed to remove negative feedback surrounding this loan. I don't think the lender has agreed to take any kind of haircut on his loan.
|
|
|
I am not sure your reputation is worth .5 BTC. I would also say that 5% interest over a month is a little low when offering loans on here, but I guess it is a free market.
I only offer interest in accordance with my ability to pay. That is fair enough, however I don't think the interest is enough to attract potential lenders
|
|
|
Still waiting, I will urge others (and myself) to remove all negative feedback when repaid.
Might set a bad precedent. Take a 3 day loan, repay it after 2 months and no harm done. On the other hand, he probably won't repay it if he thinks the negative feedback will stay in any case. That is the incentive for him to repay. If the negative trust were to remain no matter what then there is no reason he would pay back williamj
|
|
|
I am not sure your reputation is worth .5 BTC. I would also say that 5% interest over a month is a little low when offering loans on here, but I guess it is a free market.
|
|
|
If someone were to buy from you would they be able to sell them for bitcoin right away on virwox?
|
|
|
Anyone considering working for this person is going to have a very high chance that their name is going to get dragged through the mud with what will likely turn out to be a scam
|
|
|
Accepted new loan over a PM request. Hello I'm looking for a loan of 0.80 btc I can pay back 1 btc in 7 days
I can give my account as collateral, let me know
Account of him is now held by me so make sure not to contact it or anything since I am now the sole owner of his account until he pays back 1 btc. Tx sent here: https://blockchain.info/tx/e2e79809de7a6d1826dc470043e3571a2902c23385d6c8e50008c4277e9609c1Added to OP Repayable to 1KJzoypF6Yw8JAnFYjpagxupTWoj9vcJGB in 7 days i hope you checked his trust before you sent him that loan. He not only has another loan outstanding but also is a potential hacked account.
|
|
|
OK np Will you pick ecsrow or me?
Advice you to use escrow because that way you both will be safe. Better safe than sorry. the quote that you quoted is asking who is going to act as escrow. Therefore I think it is safe to assume that they are planning on using escrow.
|
|
|
Scams are not moderated. It is impossible to tell when something is possibly not a scam so by moderating 100% scams the forum is defacto saying that what is not removed to be not a scam
|
|
|
The preimum this person is "offering" for any seller to send btc first is not worth the risk (100% chance) of you getting scammed without escrow
|
|
|
|