If you provide me with information? So why don't you already? because you have none, it's all fabricated, and it's obvious.
I pity you. You threaten people, bully them, call them names and try with all your might to belittle them. Don't worry all signs of insecurity. But when it comes to the crunch you won't check out the website that was provided to in order to back up the documents about Nilesh Nair's bankruptcy. See I did my research the proper way, not by trying to say that the pixels aren't accurate! So please, look at www.veda.com.auIf everything that has been posted by Truthful is false, why have they been deleted from this forum?? If I'm false then prove it rather than just delete the posts or indeed anyone else who posts something that you might disagree with. Well I just emailed the Hong Kong office and got the standard we accept URO email. NO email bounce back. Maybe you should consider dropping this obvious attempt at obfuscation before you're hit with real legal ramifications. It's in your best interest and in the best interest of your funders. |
|
|
|
|
If you provide me with information? So why don't you already? because you have none, it's all fabricated, and it's obvious.
|
|
|
|
Nothing you say is Truthful. You can lie and obfuscate all you want, but I know the truth. I can read into your BS. All of your fake documents and lack of evidence does not convince me. The mere fact you're so passionate about trying to destroy URO coin speaks volumes about your true intentions. There is nothing more powerful than greed, and money talks. How much are you getting paid to FUD URO coin? It's not enough no matter how much it is. Admit it, admit you're lying and come clean. But you can't, because liars never tell the truth and they're so deluded they believe their own lies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lieIf you had a valid reason and you aren't lying you'd merely post all of you evidence in one easy to read post rather than scattering "evidence" everywhere and telling people to look it up themselves which people are capable of doing but you fail to provide a clear point of reference. I see through your soul. |
|
|
|
It's okay chang. I know a fake document when I see it. I also know a fake scambusters when I see it. You can't fool me.
You know the old trick, repeat a lie until everyone believes it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie |
|
|
|
|
It's okay chang. I know a fake document when I see it. I also know a fake scambusters when I see it. You can't fool me.
You know the old trick, repeat a lie until everyone believes it.
|
|
|
|
|
It will be of note the official notice is in .pdf format to preserve authenticity. No "scambuster" is going to pay for an Adobe acrobat license in order to create a better "official looking document" unless they are better funded. I guess Jebus better open his pocket book and pay for better "scambusters" cuz I ain't buying it. 'MURICA!
|
|
|
|
"You have no idea about this guy he is the lowest form of scum. Preys on the unsuspecting innocent, his last scam made him bankrupt and his about to lose everything. This his is last dash for cash. So you can only imagine the lengths he will go to in order to save himself. His days are numbered.
I don't know about Australia, but are you aware that accusing a non-anonymous person of scamming in some countries is called slander and that you can actually be accused of slander and brought to trial? Actually is Libel. It's in print. |
|
|
|
If you had a braincell in your head Chang you'd be able to parse sentences, here I'll repost it for you:  Left side is real, right side is "Nair's" fake computer generated fake fabricated fake document done with a word processor and then uploaded as a jpg. |
|
|
|
|
Which is not used for legal papers as it's printed with a laser printer then filed. Which is proper legal procedure.
Fabricated document.
|
|
|
|
And if you learn how to read you'll notice I only claimed the left document was not anti-aliased.  |
|
|
|
Laser printers don't print anti-aliasing.
Fabricated document.
yes, throw in graphic cards terminology. It's because internet copies are the original copy and are all the same quality. Just zoomed in on Mr. Robinson's document and it's pixelated too must be fabricated too When you scan a copy of a real laser printer document you see no anti-aliasing. Laser printers don't use it. Your document is fabricated. |
|
|
|
|
Laser printers don't print anti-aliasing.
Fabricated document.
|
|
|
|
So I did a basic document analysis of the two bankruptcy notices. The one on the left is the real notice belonging to Mr. Robertson. The one on the right is the suspect noticed presumably belonging to Mr. Nair. Notice on the right side, "Nair's" document, the font size does not line up and the letters are pix-elated and anti-aliased. This was produced with a word processor it's not an official document. On the left side, Mr. Robertson's notice, the font size is different and the letters are not anti-aliased. Which means they were printed with a laser printer and THEN filed as all legal documents MUST be in order to preserve legality. Nice try scambullshitter. You ALMOST had me fooled. almost, try bullshitting some other coin now because YOU FAILED MISERABLY HERE. |
|
|
|
i think what we should get from this, is anyone ever declared bankrupt is more likely than not a serial scammer.
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Those blue rings are holes for filing. Your document doesn't contain those rings which makes it even more suspect. Also I did a search for the ASIC filing manually and nothing turns up, nothing at all, which makes scamhunters even MORE suspect.
|
|
|
|
Here's a list of over 200 companies that have filed for bankruptcy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Companies_that_have_filed_for_Chapter_11_bankruptcySome of those companies have reorganized and some are still operating out of bankruptcy. In Nair's case I'm sure this is a move to cut costs which is associated with reorganizing and operating out of bankruptcy. Chang something you have to understand, learn or get through your think skull is, bankruptcy is not the end, it's a legal tool to reorganize and repair a company or an individual. Please stop spouting bullshit and learn a thing or two. |
|
|
|
Thanks davisgreen for cleaning up all that Chang.
Haha, did the forum step in some Chang? |
|
|
|
I just bought some Ether.  When they come out with their platform, I want to play around with it to see if it's something we can use for decentralized contracts for generator grants. It's all greek to me right now (the coding that is) but I know that it costs Ether to create/execute a contract on what ever blockchain you want. At least that's my understanding anyway, so it would fit really well with generator grant applications, it could even keep the identity secure depending on how the contract is structured. I'm a little excited for all of that to come over the next year or two  . It may not be an ethereum solution but from everything I've looked at, it seems to be a very synergistic choice. I'm not sold on etherium. I honestly think the solarcoin wallet itself can handle all of the requests in a decentralized manner by inserting code that sends live telemetry straight from your meter. How would that work exactly? I'm curious. I'm not an engineer, but it is conceivable. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
