Not a problem.  It's important to me that I maintain integrity on this forum.

When it burns up in the atmosphere it will no longer exist to fall anywhere.  Only a "few small parts" would be likely to remain.

It's not a solid piece of rock like a meteor.  The hull will be breached and fire will consume the ship from the inside and out simultaneously, unlike a meteor which only burns from the outside surface area and therefore can survive a lot longer.

Whoops.  It appeared I made a mistake!!  I'll modify the negative trust right away.

I would stop my car.  I wouldn't swerve into oncoming traffic causing an accident.

I'm aware of my surroundings at all times, including what's coming up.... I'm not distracted while driving like most women.

That's complete bullshit.  Don't try to drive into people/animals in the first place.

I liked one of the comments I read on that link though.

"Saying men are better drivers is completely sexist!  Women are better drivers!"

How is gay trust different than normal trust?

If I trust a person and someone else trusts the same person, is that gay trust?

vs. the guy (BADecker) that is claiming a 600 year old man took 17,000,000 animals onto a giant ship for 400 days with no food or water?  Yep - the bible says so, so it must be true...

You think the OP is the nut job?  

Two reasons:

1) Anonymous accounts (attract people with no ethics or morals)
2) Irreversible currency

"Trust" a throwaway account.  Good one.   

To verify these keys work, won't the escrow/lender have to use them?
Once they are used, how can they be returned to you?

Not complaining about the civil TOS but the obvious criminal theft.  The scammer wants you to believe they own these MSDN/BizSpark/whatever subscriptions legally, yet they sell more keys than they have on that subscription.  So they are asking you to believe they are legally purchasing multiple copies of these thousand dollar subscriptions and selling the contents for hundreds.  They are just that charitable.  lol
 

I'm glad you understand what you did was wrong.  Such an idea would never work in this community due to the lack of law enforcement and the ease of fraud (Person A could lend to Person B who would default and they would collect insurance together).

I've removed your negative trust.

I would prefer this thread not be used for discussion of any one particular issue - if you'd like the community to vet your ideas, please start a new topic outside this thread.  Thanks!

You were banned for insubstantial posts and running a signature ad - don't waste the moderator's time when the reason is clear.

To be frank - your opinion doesn't matter.  

Fracking awesome news!   For 44 years (as long as I have been alive) the PC party (based out of Calgary) has pretty well ignored Edmonton's needs.

Now with the NDP party (based out of Edmonton) we should finally get some much needed capital projects started!

After 44 years any party will become smug and corrupt.  Change was needed. 

I think your point was just proven in this thread alone.   

You are not an insurance agent, but you are willing to collect consideration for promised protection while being anonymous.  That sir, is against the law (aka fraud, aka scam).

It's not just an actual idea - you have provided a bitcoin address.  You are looking to scam right now.

Quoting for reference.

I'm considering leaving you negative trust for this, but I want to confirm with probability that it is a scam.  To that end, I'm going to ask you some questions.

1) Are you an insurance agent?
2) Are you prepared to do your fiduciary duty to your clients, based on your advanced knowledge of insurance?
3) Are you prepared to fully identify yourself and your insurance agency, and to provide sufficient collateral?
4) Are you prepared to challenge the owners of this forum to provide better law enforcement methods?
5) Are you prepared to take out fiat insurance to cover the bitcoins you will be holding?

I'll give you a hint about #5 - you won't be able to take out actual insurance because bitcoin and this forum is the wild west with absolutely no law enforcement.  No actual insurance agency will look at you.  In fact, a good portion of people have shown they are OK with fraud as long as it benefits bitcoin commerce (Vod vs. Microsoft scammers)

6) Did you just pull the 0.1btc per month premium/consideration out of thin air or do you have actuary tables that show the rate of fraud here?
7) No varying rate tables?  A simple 0.1 btc/month no matter the amount or risk or factors?
8 ) You are nobody.  You have ZERO trust here.  What is to stop you from taking the coins and disappearing?

Will never work.  Too much fraud.

This is just a way for you to get some coins.

In certain situations, it's appropriate to remove negative trust if the user has shown they understand they made a mistake and they won't do it again.