Well, shared it was, so now what?

aTriz has taken the "publish and be damned" decision, presumably (dangerous word) on the basis he is pretty much personally doxxed anyway with what's already out there, thus nullifying that aspect of the alia leverage.
Which presumably (!) makes this
hyperbole?

There is a saying "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing".
You may be about to find out why.


Why stop there? After three years you'll be up $2,613,292,844,427....

Are you speaking from experience?

Close this thread. There are many similar in Meta.

I reckon you should urgently think about deleting this post, before you have a junior account with red trust.
Along with anyone who is a stupid as you and posts their address or merits you.

Excuse the quote edit, but culpability is irrelevant, as is speculation about aTrix's story of naive brainfade in getting himself into this situation.
The best strategy to recover?
In the movies? A big mea culpa scene with loved ones and strings and tears is an option.
In organized crime? Run for the hills, before your erstwhile buddies rub you out because you're a compromised weakness that threatens them.
In crypto? Dump the account and start again.

The "script" is incidental now.

Yeah, this ^^^^
Now that you've shown that your actions are under the influence of an unstable entity because blackmail, it would be difficult to see how to trust that any of your future actions will also not be vulnerable to his/her/its demands, especially in the marginal world of shit tokens where you do business.

The oldest and longest of these threads is here.
It hasn't been updated regularly recently, but it is useful for newbies to have a look thru, especially as it suggests criteria which should be applied and met before any investment is contemplated.
Not all scams are straightforward to spot and are not all outright thefts by bad actors.
Some have some mining going on which satisfies superficial inspection, but they actually sell far more capacity than that which they have, so-called fractional mining.
These are usually accompanied by an MLM sales structure, where the priority is to get the investors money in (to satisfy the upline commission threshholds) irrespective of the ability of the token mining to provide promised returns, and then use various excuses to reduce payments to fit what money is left over.
Due diligence about any investment is something essential, people should not become dependent on lists compiled by others, they should develop their own critical abilities.
The first question that one should ask oneself is "Why?" when presented with a scheme, mining or other, which promises fantastic ROI.
"Why do they need my money if they can earn 200% (or whatever)? Why not keep it all for themselves?"

Fuck off and take your scam with you.

With a touch of bunny boiling.

It's good to see how little interest is being shown in scams like this one these days, only 24 views in three days.
Hopefully, the scammers will give up and do something useful for a living, but I doubt it....

Negative trust for you, Spaceman.

A couple off the top of my head:

Format
Walls of text are offputting, pertinent points get lost. Space is free.

Punctuate
Learn the basics; capitalization at the beginning of sentences.

Edit
Read back your draft to yourself thru a reader's eyes or to someone else, before posting.

Don't call people "Sir". We have a big, egalitarian society here /s

/s means that the preceding was sarcastic.

Addiction=experience?

Another thing which doesn't add up, in "recovery" from any addiction, it's usual to run a mile should temptation show itself.

"Other people are spamming" has never been a particularly successful defense for spamming.

Thanks.

*Ignoring an extortionist accusing someone else of extortion*

aTriz, is there any linkage between alia possessing your personal data and the unprecedented 'signature' deal you did?
I mean, in light of what has transpired, it's not unreasonable to see both the "script" vouch and the large upfront payment being hush money/favor made under threat of doxxing/whatever.
That or not, you appear to have got yourself in a right fucking mess, to be honest.
How on earth does a loose cannon newbie end up with your "personal information"??
Was it freely given?

Confusion is always likely when referring to sites with generic bit/miner combinations in their names. Bitminer.io and other variations have been very basic scams, that's for sure.
From the smallest amount of checking, it does appear that bit-miner.com has been running for about four years with basically the same MO ("MaaS"), setup and website.
According to their blog they are currently selling 'shares' in hashrate from 100 X S9's purchased in November.
@ $25 per 100 Gh, with 15% total deductions, their ROI looks to be around 320 days at current difficulty. However, this means that their total charged costs equate to ~ $0.01 per kWh for S9's, (including electricity).

For them to be so low profile after such a long time in terms of feedback, either good or bad, is surprising, they have certainly flown under my radar.
They would certainly fail any basic due dilligence test made by a potential investor, no proof of mining, total anonymity etc. etc.
Any screen shots of their back end would be informative.

Haha, you win, it's flat.

That's no vouch for you or the non existent "script".
The dust you paid him would have been wiped out and much more as soon as he was tempted to bet real money.
And written off with "Oh well, I told you it wasn't 100%...."


You are now implying that the closed thread proved that the "script" worked?
Please.

-------------

Just read your nth farewell.


An excellent, if slightly expensive, trolling exercise.

So you don't consider that the thread you just closed proves that the script doesn't work in any time period? It was just having an off day?
Define the period over which you think it does work.
Define "long run".


So, you were "lucky" when no-one was looking, unlucky when they did?

I'd say from a look thru his posting history that it's pretty similar now, grammar and punctuation wise, to how it's been in the past.