I think the negative feedback should be removed. It appears that tsp made attempts to resolve the old coinchat issue with tradefortress at the time, but that tradefortress was unwilling to discuss it.
I'm now told that tsp has been banned from posting on this forum for 5 days. That also seems unfair, but I'm sure I don't have the full story.
Is there more to this than the bullying of tsp? What's the motivation for banning him like this?
maybe from QS's perspective, the fact that tsp tried to abuse coinchat in the first place is enough to warrant a lack of trust, but either way, there are multiple threads started by tsp regarding this issue, which might be the cause for his ban. It might have been two years later you were indeed running bots on Coinchat.
Everyone is not calling QS to end your imaginary war.
not everyone frankly cares all too much either, and yeah, there isnt a war, except in tsp's head. |
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We guarantee that the address 14z1jcmsYTdHZUAaLvdbryT2UcSRyFXuNt has been generated by Bitcoin Anonymizer.
The address is valid only between 2015-08-18 18:00:36 UTC and 2015-08-20 18:00:36 UTC.
Incoming amount of coins (minus fee) will be sent without any taint or link to the following addresses
19Xe9b7cmkqwXDRt4GmXjWP9ZapV29CQkh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cjtO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
an amount of 0.06 has been sent from a newly generated address for testing this service.
while waiting for the coins to be mixed, ill post some initial thoughts:
the front page is incredibly simple and directs the user very well in terms of functionality, no clutter or wasted space either. No need to scroll horizontally as well with the default window size of TOR. a few things I would like to see added: a custom time on delayed sends. maybe add various options such as: within 1 hour (just being a bit safe), and varying time frames up to 24 hours (paranoid). also, maybe have the pgp site displayed on the window rather than only give the option to download the file; i know its just a txt file, but people get a tad spooked with TOR stuff and downloading files.
=
the address coins were sent from was: 1EMVmCngQHqGJL1gZuZuWqHLPuXVJ4Yd5F
and the coins were received to the address as specified (19Xe9b7cmkqwXDRt4GmXjWP9ZapV29CQkh).
the total amount received to the wallet was: 0.0587836 btc, which comes down to a 2.02733% fee, which fallls within the 1.9 to 2.1% fee range as advertised. taint analysis showed that there was zero taint between the sending and receiving addresses as well, works as advertised.
|
|
|
|
i preffer using blockchain and i think i dont want to using other wallet because i dont want to upload my identity
what wallet requires you to upload your documents? ive never heard of something like that, and almost sounds like bs. if iam not wrong, coinbase and xapo they need verification identity,i ever try them anyway correct me if iam wrong coinbase isnt a wallet, its an exchange. ive stated my points earlier in the thread as well. the argument: "i can put my coins there so its a wallet" is not valid; if you do not control your private keys, then its not a wallet. going by the logic "i can put my coins there," a ponzi/hyip site might as well be a wallet. coinbase requires your documents as you are dealing with reversible transactions (CC), with irreversible currency (bitcoin), and you much verify your identity to confirm that it is your money you are using to purchase bitcoin through that bank account. in addition, i have a xapo account, and have used it for minor things, but i have never been asked to provide any documentation whatsoever besides a phone verification for security/2fa. |
|
|
|
Thanks for your review! I have sent the 0.1 BTC to your destination address, should arrive now. 19 reviews left. guess it wouldnt hurt to test it out; ill try mixing some coins sometime later in the day and ill post the results here, likely within the next few hours. |
|
|
|
i preffer using blockchain and i think i dont want to using other wallet because i dont want to upload my identity
what wallet requires you to upload your documents? ive never heard of something like that, and almost sounds like bs. |
|
|
|
i have sent him a pm.. waiting for answer  this is such a pain in a ass to search for escrow regards. -Katerniko1 Actually its not, there are tons of trusted escrows out there you just need to search for them. here is a list https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=108716.0BTW if you would like I can act as an escrow too, but you are free to choose. P.S: I can do it for free. always look for the middleman, never trust the 'middleman' that comes to you. especially when they have absolutely no previous trade history. the point of an escrow is to have someone trusted hold whatever is being traded/secured, not to have anyone hold it (refer to dznuts85). |
|
|
|
Loan amount:0.05 BTC
Repayment Date:7 days from now
Repayment amount:0.055 BTC
Address:1EQ9KgSKx11kev4CtZYVdPR4hJGFcM7xxX
Hwfmz3es/W3V+/MZZ6gfcT+MVj4kf7oa6EXc2OXWkN+VBD0porlY31KrQ2oHiluJcOLCQjyaDhYF6k1bNwMaLiA= why are you taking out loans so frequently? you've just repaid one not even 24 hours ago; trust farming I'm guessing? I don't need boost trust :-/ need to buy something with bitcoin if you're legitimately buying goods and really want them at the soonest possible convenience, that's fine, but it really does look suspicious when all you do is take out loans, especially this frequently. This guy took many loans from me frequently, smoothly and I left him trust feedback almost 3 weeks ago! If he was doing trust farming, he wouldn't ask me loan again! I trust him! But I have to say keeping borrowing is not good habit! it's also possible that he knows you trust him and will continue to give him loans, which might mean he is targeting, but I may be reading to far into it. either way, doesn't hurt to be cautious. |
|
|
|
OP please return the 0.07 BTC to the people who send the coins to you (but you have the right to deduct 0.0001 tx fee from that amount). Also please lock the thread or people will still think this is an open deal.
I'd trust johnnie enough to return the coins once he notices it, he doesn't exactly reply to pm's that quickly though, but sending him a pm would definitely expedite the return. |
|
|
|
Loan amount:0.05 BTC
Repayment Date:7 days from now
Repayment amount:0.055 BTC
Address:1EQ9KgSKx11kev4CtZYVdPR4hJGFcM7xxX
Hwfmz3es/W3V+/MZZ6gfcT+MVj4kf7oa6EXc2OXWkN+VBD0porlY31KrQ2oHiluJcOLCQjyaDhYF6k1bNwMaLiA= why are you taking out loans so frequently? you've just repaid one not even 24 hours ago; trust farming I'm guessing? I don't need boost trust :-/ need to buy something with bitcoin if you're legitimately buying goods and really want them at the soonest possible convenience, that's fine, but it really does look suspicious when all you do is take out loans, especially this frequently. |
|
|
|
Loan amount:0.05 BTC
Repayment Date:7 days from now
Repayment amount:0.055 BTC
Address:1EQ9KgSKx11kev4CtZYVdPR4hJGFcM7xxX
Hwfmz3es/W3V+/MZZ6gfcT+MVj4kf7oa6EXc2OXWkN+VBD0porlY31KrQ2oHiluJcOLCQjyaDhYF6k1bNwMaLiA= why are you taking out loans so frequently? you've just repaid one just barely 24 hours ago; trust farming I'm guessing? |
|
|
|
i think a little bit of transparency will help a site to gain more trust.
not showing pictures and addresses is like they want me send my bitcoins but if sh** happens I don't have a single clue on where to go to get it back. just like what happened with cloudminr.io all we have in domain name is Tom Hassel as owner.
and there's exactly why you shouldn't trust them at all, ever. if the site and its services were legitimate, the owners would have nothing to hide, which in this case they clearly do. |
|
|
|
Just do it via virwox, they will exchange paypal for bitcoin.
They're also safe to use, safer than trading here on the forum.
safer for the one selling the btc, as op here can just charge back; all risk in this trade would be to the seller. Still looking for this!
seeing as how op ignored that post though, I'm inclined to believe he has no legitimate need of some btc, and is just out to scam. |
|
|
|
I sent .33 BTC. The products never arrived and customer service could provide no proof of shipping, even though I also paid for tracking. They took my BTC in exchange for nothing, not even an explanation or apology.
can you provide proof such as screenshots of conversation with customer support, txid, etc? right now all you have is a claim. also, move this to scam accusations. |
|
|
|
there isnt too much of a guarantee that you would try to recover the account once the money is in your hands via a password reset, and you should specify if the contract you have with them is a 1-year contract or a lifetime one; in the case of the former, state how much time is remaining on the contract.
Fixed it thanks for the suggestion. Also you must contact support to change the email associated witht the account so upon sale you may contact them and change it and I will verify the email they send me and then I am no longer linked to the account. You were desperately looking for a loan from me and providing this ad the collateral. It seems as though you would probably have had no intention to pay back the loan if I had sent you the funds.  usually the pattern goes more like: tries to sell item-> doesnt sell-> sells it via loan maybe he had no intention to pay back, maybe he did, who knows. No I wasn't "desperately" looking for a loan from you, I was looking for a response.... I would have without question paid it back but instead I want to try and build trust and it doesn't seem like anyone will loan a newbie account with no prior transactions so i will do it by taking a loss and selling an account.
so youre admitting to attempting to buy trust? not the way you want to start off things. |
|
|
|
Skill to trick people, maybe; besides that it is pure luck (statistics, if you prefer to put it that way). Of course basic logics are required...
I posted this graph from an high stakes player some time ago in another thread: [im g]http://edge1.pokerlistings.com/assets/photos/2bengrundyPLO2.jpg?t=1269379105[/img] Thats over 300 thousand hands, now you tell me this is pure luck? two things that come to mind: someone that has no idea what theyre talking about and wants to sound like they do, or signature spamming without even putting a modicum of thought into their post, or both. either way, that picture should pretty much solidify the notion that poker is all skill, maybe 1-3% luck at most, given an unnatural order of dealt cards for an extended period of time. however, the people who can play poker at that level to make a consistent income from it are extremely few. Yeah, of course poker is a skill based game, that's why Phil Hellmuth, phil ivey, John Chan got so many champions, but not other LUCKY guys, they have best skills, no wonder they can be the best players, I don't think they are lucky players, I have watched their videos, what I can see is that they are super talented on poker, they can judge opponents' hands very easily and accurately, it is totally skills and experienced. thanks for bringing up that point; experience is almost as important as skill in poker; it might help you notice just the small things, but in the actual game, small things can be the difference between folding on someone's bluff and taking the pot. |
|
|
|
Today very bad day lost some good amount on betting and now thinking to avoid this betting because this addiction is going to kill my good ways of life
Just keep betting and you will win big and change your life casino games are designed to make the house money, not the player. continuing to gamble will more than likely dig him into an even deeper hole; worst advice ive ever seen. my advice would be to quit gambling altogether and focus on other, more lucrative activities. I have to say that gambling is addictive and it is difficulty for ppl to get rid of it until you lost all of the money and regret you haven't stopped gambling! They will learn a hard lesson. well of course its addicting, casinos are designed to make money, and what better way to do that then to get people addicted? that aside, i think its rather dangerous that people are associating gambling with "earning" for whatever reason in this thread. in addition, i doubt that a majority of addicts ever learn, they continually talk themselves into continuing. |
|
|
|
The owner of the website is using a service to hide their identity
that should already be a red flag for the site, regardless of who's running it, cloudminr's people or not. makes sense to hide your identity knowing people are going to be absolutely furious at you once youve taken down whatever site after stealing people's coins. |
|
|
|
will you still buy if the addresses are already used in digging clams?
No. That's the whole purpose. not much incentive for people to sell you their old wallet files then imo, unless the original owners already know that the wallets are devoid of any CLAMs. no reason for someone to sell you their wallet files for cheaper than the value of the CLAMs they could get from it themselves. |
|
|
|
Skill to trick people, maybe; besides that it is pure luck (statistics, if you prefer to put it that way). Of course basic logics are required...
I posted this graph from an high stakes player some time ago in another thread: [im g]http://edge1.pokerlistings.com/assets/photos/2bengrundyPLO2.jpg?t=1269379105[/img] Thats over 300 thousand hands, now you tell me this is pure luck? two things that come to mind: someone that has no idea what theyre talking about and wants to sound like they do, or signature spamming without even putting a modicum of thought into their post, or both. either way, that picture should pretty much solidify the notion that poker is all skill, maybe 1-3% luck at most, given an unnatural order of dealt cards for an extended period of time. however, the people who can play poker at that level to make a consistent income from it are extremely few. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
