Very often coin jumps in the last few hours, it's like every time I refresh it's on other coin, my miners are having a hard time keeping up... any chance this can affect profitability of MP in a negative way? Got me thinking, maybe MP should require a coin to become at least 0.05% or even 0.1% more profitable than the one currently mined before making the switch to it.. does that make any sense? (I'm no expert, just throwing crazy ideas around.  ) Each switch costs us about 0.5% efficiency over 10 minutes. That's why all coins are configured with a minimum mining time of 10 minutes other than MNC, LKY and ARG. |
|
|
|
|
BTC-E is the only exchange with significant TRC buy interest, as far as I can tell. (~200 BTC)
|
|
|
|
Is TRC really 7x or did a decimal point slip?
Of last 15 blocks 13 are orphans. Did we get forked?
Looks like they're all orphans, actually. The site just hasn't updated yet. I just restarted terracoind.. It was connected to 8 nodes, so the network may be split or under attack. |
|
|
|
those MEC are adding up fast when multiport switches to it, me likey Yeah, profitability has been insane for the past few days. |
|
|
|
I still cant manually withdraw my 3 nvc confirmed about 10 hours ago.
I also set "Auto Threshold=1" about 2 hours ago but has not yet received coin.
NVC hot wallet is empty and pool reserves are exhausted due to advance paying out of blocks at 80 confirms. There is about 40 NVC coming in from confirmed blocks within the next hour. After that, the next set of blocks is due to confirm later today. maybe raise the confirms back up. isn't it just weird saying we don't have enough to pay out? in any case keep up the good work I'm liking the pool, switched a week ago. It's not really weird when you consider the reason is just that we've paid out some blocks early. What I'm really saying is we don't have enough to hand out more loans against unconfirmed blocks. If I raise the confirms back up now, we still won't have enough to pay out since all of the blocks with more than 80 confirms are already in user balances. It would just result in a delay of already confirmed blocks being applied to balances. The question is what's better, to make everyone wait until 520 (3 days) to withdraw each confirmed block, or to pay whatever portion we can of the blocks early? I'd personally rather pay blocks early even if it results in emptying the wallet. I do see how this can negatively impact people who want to do on-demand withdrawals, however. I will raise the confirms back up to 260 for now so that no more blocks will get auto paid until we have more in the hot wallet. I'm totally not trying to give you a hard time about it, just trying to keep the pool stable as I'd hate to see anything happen to it since I like it  It's cool, I understand where you're coming from. The pool isn't going anywhere, unless someone happens to break into my house, steal my HD and guess my >20 character passphrase for the encrypted VM containing the cold wallets before I'm able to restore it from backup and move the coins out. If that happens we're bankrupt. |
|
|
|
I still cant manually withdraw my 3 nvc confirmed about 10 hours ago.
I also set "Auto Threshold=1" about 2 hours ago but has not yet received coin.
NVC hot wallet is empty and pool reserves are exhausted due to advance paying out of blocks at 80 confirms. There is about 40 NVC coming in from confirmed blocks within the next hour. After that, the next set of blocks is due to confirm later today. maybe raise the confirms back up. isn't it just weird saying we don't have enough to pay out? in any case keep up the good work I'm liking the pool, switched a week ago. It's not really weird when you consider the reason is just that we've paid out some blocks early. What I'm really saying is we don't have enough to hand out more loans against unconfirmed blocks. If I raise the confirms back up now, we still won't have enough to pay out since all of the blocks with more than 80 confirms are already in user balances. It would just result in a delay of already confirmed blocks being applied to balances. The question is what's better, to make everyone wait until 520 (3 days) to withdraw each confirmed block, or to pay whatever portion we can of the blocks early? I'd personally rather pay blocks early even if it results in emptying the wallet. I do see how this can negatively impact people who want to do on-demand withdrawals, however. I will raise the confirms back up to 260 for now so that no more blocks will get auto paid until we have more in the hot wallet. |
|
|
|
I still cant manually withdraw my 3 nvc confirmed about 10 hours ago.
I also set "Auto Threshold=1" about 2 hours ago but has not yet received coin.
NVC hot wallet is empty and pool reserves are exhausted due to advance paying out of blocks at 80 confirms. There is about 40 NVC coming in from confirmed blocks within the next hour. After that, the next set of blocks is due to confirm later today. |
|
|
|
|
New US/EU pool available
stratum+tcp://pool1.us.multipool.in:3449
stratum+tcp://pool1.eu.multipool.in:3449
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I have to say I am really liking MEC. Super low stale rate with hardly any orphans.
|
|
|
|
You can tell pretty easily which coin it is mining ...
Currently it is fastcoin ... Difficulty shown by cgminer: 63.5k
divided by 65532 = 0,96899 = Difficulty of Fastcoin (according to coinchoose)
Way to let the cat out of the bag fallout. |
|
|
|
Does even NVC have a minimum withdrawal of 1 NVC? It's going to take me a long time...
All coins have their minimum set at 1 currently.. I can't really reduce it further without charging a transaction fee. |
|
|
|
Now ok its start
I have it under control robkoz. |
|
|
|
|
>$1 mil in transfers per week and yet not one person who can show evidence of one....
|
|
|
|
DCG doesn't seem to be reporting hash rate nor the users hashing. My miner is reporting shares being accepted, but the web gui doesn't seem to be reporting any activity. As long as it's working behind the scenes, the gui is a lower priority...
It's working.. payouts for the blocks found last night will run soon. |
|
|
|
I am pretty sure we are killing the bottlecaps profitability as soon as the multiport hits it. Bummer.
The stales are driving it down since we're finding blocks so fast. |
|
|
|
NVC doesn't seem to be paying out either automatically or cash out.
There are 4 blocks with close to 500 confirms that should be confirmed within an hour or so. |
|
|
|
It's not down for me.. Oh right, I forgot to give you guys access after I finished adding CAP. My bad |
|
|
|
Adding CAP tonight or tomorrow.
This is the last scrypt coin I will be adding until after PPC and the SHA-256 multiport are set up.
CAP, really? Franko, Anon and Fastcoin have been even more profitable lately (ANC peaked over 1000% on the 22nd). Not complaining, your pool is awesome. Keep up the great work! Fastcoin has been the top of the Coinchoose chart but if you check the profitability with stales it's been lower than NVC. Franko seems like one of those tiny coins that we'll get 10 minutes on. Of course, the same could happen with CAP, but we'll see. At least CAP has over 100MH network hashrate already. Franco has 720 blocks retarget cycle with 4 times a day difficulty changes - this coin will have wild swings like ARG. In reality it took about 1.5 hours (instead of 6 hours) last time to mine those 720 blocks with 430Mhs network speed. This coin is not going to make it unless there are changes to difficulty adjustment rules. CAP on the other hand has dynamic difficulty adjustment, so after MP will jump on it, it will take very short period of time to bring the difficulty up and make it not so profitable - it will be very interesting to see how it will perform with multipool instant on hash rate. Looks like it took about 16 blocks before the profitability went back down under NVC. Interesting. |
|
|
|
Flound I think there is an issue..
My rejects are at 0.0031%
Stability much?
T.
 |
|
|
|
Adding CAP tonight or tomorrow.
This is the last scrypt coin I will be adding until after PPC and the SHA-256 multiport are set up.
CAP, really? Franko, Anon and Fastcoin have been even more profitable lately (ANC peaked over 1000% on the 22nd). Not complaining, your pool is awesome. Keep up the great work! Fastcoin has been the top of the Coinchoose chart but if you check the profitability with stales it's been lower than NVC. Franko seems like one of those tiny coins that we'll get 10 minutes on. Of course, the same could happen with CAP, but we'll see. At least CAP has over 100MH network hashrate already. Also I kinda like CAP for having no premine and also having proof-of-stake. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
