So now people are not content with spreading FUD, they're resorting to straight up lies in order to bring the price down. The funny thing is that people are actually believing the bullshit when the arguments are obviously nonsense.
Oh look, pictures of boards and chips? That's definite 100% proof that LC are not hashing and could not not have been, otherwise they would be assembled. It's certainly not possible that some boards and chips have been assembled. Nope that wouldn't make sense now would it. It only makes sense for Labcoin to mine once they have finished assembling all the hardware, not just part of it
A lot of people in here are brain-dead gullible idiots, the rest of us are now a lot wealthier thanks to your stupidity.
Only as long as you can find some other fool buying your shares later. BTW you are ignoring some facts but your stupidity cant be cured. By "facts", I take it you mean "lies" from people spreading crap here? |
|
|
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either  What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake. But I'm not mad and my eyes are open. A bunch of liars are claiming labcoin lied about mining. Labcoin made no such claim and if yoiu think they have, then quote Labcoin saying so. What Labcoin actually said is that they're tweaking hardware to get better results. On what planet does "tweaking hardware" mean "we're not mining and never were"? Just do your own research. If you think it worth the risk, wait&see. The market is telling you that a lot of shareholders just don't believe anymore in Labcoin and there are some good reasons for that. After all, this is your BTC's. I do my own research which is why is why I'm unaffected by your lies and FUD. I also don't do stuff just because other people do. /shrug |
|
|
|
What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".
Again, my words: saying "We are hashing at 2 TH/s right now and you will see it growing up to 4 until Monday", then switching to "we are not / no longer (never said quite clearly) hashing at all and you should hold until October 30 to see if it was worth it*", that is quite a setback IMO. * to be honest, they added that it would probably be a 10-bagger by then. Believe it or not... Link to Labcoin saying that because they never said that at all. |
|
|
|
|
So now people are not content with spreading FUD, they're resorting to straight up lies in order to bring the price down. The funny thing is that people are actually believing the bullshit when the arguments are obviously nonsense.
Oh look, pictures of boards and chips? That's definite 100% proof that LC are not hashing and could not not have been, otherwise they would be assembled. It's certainly not possible that some boards and chips have been assembled. Nope that wouldn't make sense now would it. It only makes sense for Labcoin to mine once they have finished assembling all the hardware, not just part of it
A lot of people in here are brain-dead gullible idiots, the rest of us are now a lot wealthier thanks to your stupidity.
|
|
|
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake. But I'm not mad and my eyes are open. A bunch of liars are claiming labcoin lied about mining. Labcoin made no such claim and if yoiu think they have, then quote Labcoin saying so. What Labcoin actually said is that they're tweaking hardware to get better results. On what planet does "tweaking hardware" mean "we're not mining and never were"? |
|
|
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Labcoin never said they are not hashing, they said they are teaking the hardware to get better results. |
|
|
|
where's Mabsark?
I'm still here, watching, waiting and laughing my arse off at you gullible fools who keep selling based on FUD, while the actual FUD spreaders are snapping up cheap shares. |
|
|
|
"THE BITCOIN MINING EXPERTS" |
|
|
|
The 3rd-person references crack me up, what a nice touch. What flavorful personalities this Bitcoin world is graced with.
Looky, that I'm the girl in the avatar pic and that MP is a different person are well documented and long standing established rock solid facts. There's pictures of both of us in the same room, people met us in person at that conference you never knew about (you know, the one where MtGox' demise was decided), on it goes. In spite of this having been amply documented, all over irc, all over this forum even, clueless noobs still jump both feet into their ridiculous assumptions on the matter, which is by now in itself a meme and a perpetual source of amusement at those clueless noobs' expense. The only question remaining would be "why'd you put yourself in that laughable position". Do try and answer, I'm curious. From the link you provided: In the middle with the beard is MPOE-PR. So, when did you get a shave? |
|
|
|
Uuhh, you're talking about me. I feel special  Well, you did sell all your LC shares just before the price rise.  |
|
|
|
I have 6789 shares. I plan on selling them for around 0.05 BTC and expect the ActM shares I buy to increase by 3x. I'd ask you to do the math but I know you're not capable. lol you are going to turn 23btc into 1000btc in the next 15weeks? I think your actual 100btc to 1000btc is pretty ambitious on these exchanges. So who are you going to take the 1000btc off - Gordon Gekko? lol, sorry, but major fiction - have you thought what you are valuing LC at there? That's the plan and it doesn't involve taking 1000 BTC off a single person. I'm flexible though and so is my plan. That's because I'm not a retarded fanboy who worships companies like some religious zealot worships their god. I'll go where the profit is. |
|
|
|
I dare you to come up with a more cringe-worthy catchphrase than that. Good christ, it's like something out of an advert from 1992.
 Challenge Accepted!Just kidding. It's supposed to be ironic, nostalgic, and cheesy. God, do you even hipster? More like:   |
|
|
|
I never claimed to have 100 BTC invested in Labcoin. Post the link to the claim or admit that you lied.
By implication you said exactly that. You have mentioned this fact several times and there are 41 pages of your posts so forgive me if I don't spend an hour of my life reading through them all. Here is what you are saying just a week or so ago on the ACtM thread - and it took me 10mins to find this amongst your endless posts: Yes, my strategy is to reap the profit from Labcoin,
I have no intention of buying back into ActM until I've made a nice profit from LC. My calculations say I'll be making that switch around November. If things go to plan, I'll have around 1000 BTC by the end of the year.
1000btc? And you expect us to believe you have a few btc invested in LC? You have outlined the profit you expect form each investment a few times too, about 300% on each if I remember. So it doesn't take a mathematician to work out you have atleast 100btc in LC. I really don't know why I bothered with that, what a waste on my time it is to prove you wrong. Last time I waste 10mins on you. So, where did I say I had invested 100 BTC into LC? Thanks for proving yourself to be liar, I knew you wouldn't be able to help yourself. I have 6789 shares. I plan on selling them for around 0.05 BTC and expect the ActM shares I buy to increase by 3x. I'd ask you to do the math but I know you're not capable. |
|
|
|
You claimed I said something which I didn't say. I said you are full of shite because you are full of shite.
Calm down Mabsark. This is going in circles - just tell me what you think I made up. Thanks. Pretty much everything you said in that post was your imagination but the bullshit all started with you claiming that I said I had 100 BTC invested in LC. |
|
|
|
Anyone is free to look through it and then point out you are full of shite. You're are a shitty liar,
lol Why can't you LC people just make reasonable comments on the meat of the argument rather than make immature personalized attacks?  Surely this extreme comment is the sign of a very worried individual? Are you worried that you might lose a lot of your money here Mabsark? Well that is a valid concern. Your outburst proves you are having a bad day. But really you shouldn't make this personal. I'm not here to berate you, just to stop you from ripping off the noobs. This isn't personal, it's business, so you should be a bit more professional in the way you conduct yourself. PS - if you specify which points I 'made up', I will find the precise comments you made which will prove I am not inventing things, just reporting facts. You claimed I said something which I didn't say. I said you are full of shite because you are full of shite. I asked you to provide the proof for your claims, yet you refuse, because you know as well as I do that you are just talking crap. I never claimed to have 100 BTC invested in Labcoin. Post the link to the claim or admit that you lied. |
|
|
|
I'm officially completely out of this.
Made about 75 btc profit on this stock, so I guess I can't be too mad.
But I'm pretty positive on the fact now that this is a scam. So fuck you, LC.
You know what the worst part is? MP was right. Another fuck you for that.
Don't take it so hard now. Best move of the night. He'll have the last laugh. If you do not own any LC shares, and you are here only to 'help', why dont you just go to sleep or anything? Is this that entertaining? I'm getting my revenge on Mab because of the way he carried on in the ActM threads. No more, no less. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. It's that simple. And yes, it is quite entertaining. Are you insane or just incredibly stupid? If you want revenge on me, come back in November. I had a real effect on share price tonight by pointing out some home truths about this company. I had zero financial motivation to do so. I was disgusted with the way you conducted yourself on the ActM thread for a prolonged period and am now happy that I feel I have paid you back the favour. I don't care if you make money or lose money or if this company succeeds. I simply wanted you to be on the receiving end of some good old fashioned fud. I am not insane, nor am I stupid. I am intelligent and very well balanced. Good night.  And I couldn't care less about the share price at the moment, so what do you think you've achieved? If your intent was to piss me off, then you failed miserably. /shrug |
|
|
|
where I made those claims you just made up. You can't, because I made no such claims.
All in your post history, open for anyone to see. Look for posts on ACtM thread approx 2weeks ago. Anyone is free to look through it and then point out you are full of shite. You are a shitty liar but they say practice makes perfect. Next time, make it so that your lies can't be proven to be bullshit, that way you won't look like a jealous lunatic, frothing at the mouth because a poor person made you look like an imbecile. |
|
|
|
wow... come back from a great week on vacay to find this whole thing has turned into a piece of shit.
oh well. picked the wrong horse again.
You sure did, Speculating is for the Labcoin thread I thought a press release from eASIC was a good thing? looks to me like it killed it. Can anyone give me a short & sweet TL;DR of what the fuck happened? ActM announced they would have nothing till mid-November. The result was obvious. |
|
|
|
I'm officially completely out of this.
Made about 75 btc profit on this stock, so I guess I can't be too mad.
But I'm pretty positive on the fact now that this is a scam. So fuck you, LC.
You know what the worst part is? MP was right. Another fuck you for that.
Don't take it so hard now. Best move of the night. He'll have the last laugh. If you do not own any LC shares, and you are here only to 'help', why dont you just go to sleep or anything? Is this that entertaining? I'm getting my revenge on Mab because of the way he carried on in the ActM threads. No more, no less. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. It's that simple. And yes, it is quite entertaining. Are you insane or just incredibly stupid? If you want revenge on me, come back in November. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
