What I often find useful, specially when looking at new casinos is to check their reputation. This is something newbies are encouraged to do before depositing their money onto dodgy casinos.

I was just going through some reviews and I came across the review on this casino.





So, I thought it might be useful for new people to see the pros and cons of this casino, and what it offers, as well as what other people think about it.
For the full review click here.

Can you really say that casinos' bonuses are more generous during these festive times than their normal promos and bonuses? Maybe they're not that different...

A good casino would run promos and bonuses for new and current players throughout the year, but I suppose if a casino wasn't to promote Christmas challenges and content overall, people might not like that as much and might start avoiding those places.

Anyway, I also feel that just because casinos and places generally have Christmas related promos that doesn't necessarily mean they provide better value for money than they would otherwise.

A growth in the market cap is exactly what we need to see, as a higher market cap means that new money is being pumped into the market rather than more BTC being unlocked.

This is the type of stimulus which will help it reach the highs everyone is excited about.

The better question to ask is what moves the price of BTC?

The response is simple: supply and demand. And the players in the filed such as whales, institutions, investors etc are contributing to tipping the market of demand and supply, and what seems to be happening now is that demand is much higher. This could be to these players speculating that BTC will go up in value. This in turn creates a positive loop whereby more and more people now become interested in buying for fear of not losing out, reinforcing the cycle.

Token burning without a fundamental is exactly the issue here. Because this in reality doesn't shorten the supply the expected value driven by a round of token burning would not bring a long-term inflationary token price. If anything this will only be temporarily.

It seems to me that most project nowadays add this feature just to keep up with the trend and reap the short-term benefits this might bring, but not really projecting the real value a true token burn can entail, and this means that some investors lose big time, not to mention the deteriorated trust in the crypto system the project was built on.

In theory I could agree with that but in reality only a handful of people are that lucky to be winning strikes in a row, the fact is that the losses far out weigh the winnings. But this is the nature of gambling. I also find that when you feel lucky you go in big and when that ends in a loss because you feel lucky you keep betting forming this perpetual cycle. Of course, this is more the norm for people with an unrealistic idea of the world, themselves and gambling.

This is why is best to have a prepared exit strategy and be prepared to walk away as soon as you reached your pre-set spending limit. Sure that takes dedication but habit is the power of success.

To me this type of game is more difficult and challenging to win. While it is exhilarating to find out within 1 min if you were right or not from my point of view a better approach for me would be predicting its direction.

One other thing that surprised me was that I didn't find any info about where the BTC/USDT value is taken from? Making this clear will help people to better extrapolate.

I think it is safe to assume that at least for the next 5 years or so BTC will mainly be a market for investment. This is because in my opinion even if BTC continues with the uptrend we are seeing now, people and institutions will see BTC as too risky and volatile to set a business as their mainstream finance pipe, but I do think that in a few years time the picture will look very different. In the sense that I do expect digital currency to be playing a much larger part in everyday purchases. And it may or may not be BTC, but the path for cryptocurrency is visible!

I agree. Although there are a few out there who can't recognise BTC as a digital currency and a few who do, at the end of the day what's important is adoption by the majority.
Even if public facing personas like Biden recognise the power BTC entails, the major role is still about the rest of the world responding in a positive manner.

Given the current state of the BTC it look likely that more people will join the BTC market just like they did in 2017, and that would contribute greatly to increasing BTC's marketcap which is what's needed to see the abundant growth everybody expects/talks about.

Agreed. Trading vs investing can both make you profit if you know how to utilize the strategies to your best interest.

Nonetheless, either of the methods present their own risks and a fair amount of research needs to be done before hand but you'd need to do that anyway irrespective of which way you decide to make a return, crypto or not.

I'd be more interested to hear more about investment options that either you or other people are doing i.e. yield farming, staking, liquidity mining? It would be great to see your thoughts.

If this indeed is what the project provides, then I think this is still a pretext to form the so called 'community' which in turn because they'd have a stake into the mess they'd likely assist with the project.

In other words, this is just another way to utilize token holders to artificially inflate their token price as people would buy them just to get a share of the revenue. It is just another spin of yield farming, and staking.

Not a project with real vision, value or long-term potential - but a short term 'get rich type scam'.  That's so far my opinion about it, but if other would like to challenge it - let's see it!

I think in order to succeed in trading you don't need signal groups or any tutor to 'guide' you through your investments.

What you need is knowledge of the market, different strategies, information on what others are doing how are other investors acting etc - all of this is information. And in line with this you also need a network of people you trust and can share information about opportunities as well as dangers.

Thus, the two most important things that go beyond trading are:

• Information/knowledge
• Trusted network

Quick update one the latest JackPot winnings across the different games - though so far most of these jackpots are related to dice.

Potentially an interesting observation across the platform?

I agree, despite BTC going super strong right now there is one thing to have it go up a few millions and another multiplying to trillion in the space of just 1 year. The problem with this speculation as I see it is no so much around the marketcap value it could reach, I think BTC can reach trillions in marketcap, but the question is about WHEN. It is always the element of time that dictates when the profitability comes, rather than the value on its own.

I come to realize once again that every time there's a sway of the market in a different direction sentiment among newbie investors changes dramatically.

You have people who pour lots of money into shit alts and then worry that their investment isn't doing well because they ignored the signs of a bull BTC market.

The only thing you an do is learn not liquidate, and next time look for better opportunities and get to look at the market for over a few days as for sure you'll start seeing the trend/pattern the market is heading into.

Speculation isn't good if it comes from the back of a 'gut feeling' but from a more elaborate analysis of the market. As any speculation warrants at least some evidence.

I fail to see transparency about this project, and we all know that in the world of crypto where transactions aren't tied to any particular identity having transparency is key. On that point this project from my point of view failed. There are enough platforms like these which promise a sweeter deal but at the end of the day the legitimacy of it is lacking.

Also, what's the point of having a BANK (as what you shared on here is not a regular exchange but more of a bank) which can deal with crypto but without an ounce of decentralization and a complete local authority? It just doesn't go with crypto or modern exchanges!

This is clearly a strategic move, and one that makes a lot of sense.

If you have a crap hand there's no point in raising or bluffing your way through as that will most definitely cause you to lose.

However, when you get a strong hand there's nothing stopping you, you can start applying your well learnt strategies to convince others to raise you as much as comfortable and then make for a clean win!

This is a strategy of cards not other way round, and patience is by far one of the most important factors.

In my opinion, the consensus is that of a HODLing position. If you can hold and hold for as long as you can, unless life throws you down. With so many indicators around we have seen that year on year BTC has provided nothing but an upwards trend.

Take this and apply it to a market visible in the next 5 years and that investment if you managed to HODL would have made you more than any other "passive investment" could ever make you.

It really is that simple.

I don't see PayPal serious enough about the cryptocurrency market to turn into some sort of centralised exchange. The reason for this is that in my opinion Paypal added the ability of its customers to buy/sell crypto only as a "face" and to ensure that if crypto does end up handicapping the finance industry (which I think at some point in the future is inevitable) they will have a stand in it and won't be missing out.

Even if they were to adopt something like that in the future it won't make it any different from a centralised exchange like eToro, and definitely not close enough to DEX.

I agree. Anything run by the central government even if it is digital does not mean decentralization, and I agree that it is no different from a bank.

The fact that there are talks about a digital currency is irrelevant to the world of crypto which is based on anonymous identity and decentralization.