guys, why are you so desperate for this coin, other coins doesnt have problems.

no pool, no setgenerate command...

Current block 8005

you guys are all at least semi retarted.

This project is by a guy from who from my account has at least 8 businesses (happy to list them if required) which have either become projects that didnt get off the ground or just outright failures.

You guys have pumped the price based on a excellent whitepaper. But a terrible website and the alpha release that super simple a proofessional could wip up in a weekend.

These guy raised less then 15mil but you guys believe the business is worth nearly 2billion. This business has no customers and are burning thought cash to develop a platform that has no current customers and only a promise from a company that claims to turn over a billion but from all reports that seems like a strech.

I heard people talking about cliff high and how he had seen the source code for populous and believes it legit. I just watched a video by the same guy where he mentioned populous could buy credit risk scores of paypie. (populous are doing their own credit risk analysis) and how paypie isn't a competitor to populous. Despite paypie stating in their whitepaper that they where planing to get into invoice factoring. So im my opinion this guy really has no idea what hes talking about.

So d-day for populous is jan 31 and its intresting to note how quiet nicko williams has been. Good luck guys you have 11 days to get out. Oh and if you think this is fud, with all mentioned above if you think i'd invest in this junk you got rocks in your head.

Wow you like to talk about stuff you have no idea about.
There's an endless combination of domain names Reggie could register for Veritaseum. Where should he stop? There are numerous Google and Coke and Walmart domains I can register right now. Are those companies run by stupid fucktards too?

The reality is, ThesisFun is guilty of violating the cybersquatting act. Educate yourself at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticybersquatting_Consumer_Protection_Act

Reggie can get those domains any time he wants by filing a dispute with ICANN.

Wallet on Windoze seems fine to me.  No transactions yet but I synced the chain and connected to 8 nodes.  If I earn anything on testnet mining I assume I"ll see at least one transaction, but can't confirm that yet.  Regarding the website countdown, I also see that it added 12 hours which makes me wonder if it's even real or just a placeholder.  I assumed they were counting down to a midnight ET launch.  Would be nice to know when to expect it.

EDIT: I found several blocks on the testnet but never saw any coins attributed to my account or transferred to my wallet on the testnet.  Not sure if there should have been but if we're testing real world functionality I would assume it should work just like the mainnet will.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x2229cb238cc79c5f6a974e6607f20b4ce6c39782

That's interesting ... I don't even know how to count that high !!!
Say bye bye to your money folks !!!

You are not forced to assume.
The stranger could be wrong.
But he could also be right.
I, as a business owner, could be right or wrong.
I never said I am absolutely right.
Most, if not all, people think himself as the smartest or most right, and thus does not listen to feedback.
When I give opinion/suggestion, I have the sincere intention to help make things better.
Reggie said he is not the smartest person in the world, but if he also happen to think there is no one smarter than he is by the way, then he is indirectly implying he is the #1 smartest (i.e. ego, pride, and arrogance).
I am not saying I am smarter than Reggie.
I am saying that we should be humble and open to suggestions and opinions that seek to improve.
And suggestions and opinions should be made reasonably and logically.
If you do not understand me, that is not because I have no reason nor logic; that is because you are somewhat not mature enough yet intellectually.

Update:
Ask yourself why do you agree with everything Reggie says.
Is it because you are as intelligent as Reggie (bravo!)?
Or is it because you are stupid, and so look up to Reggie as a flawless benchmark?
And so end up agreeing to everything he says?
Now I am not saying Reggie is wrong all the way.
So far I understand he is doing everything right and professionally.
But that doesn't mean I have no suggestion to improve things.
And seeing that human nature is such that ego and pride usually stops progress, I tend to habitually force my suggestion thru to a very stuffy ear.

Update #2:
Regardless, I am a flexible man.
If I found out that stuffy ear will remain stuffy forever, I will stop giving anymore suggestion.
And frankly speaking, Reggie has extremely stuffy ear.

Update #3:
It is not hard for me, or you, or a business owner to tell a stranger that he is wrong.
Because ultimately our ego and pride prevail over reason and logic.
The fact that you are "telling me to give you my veri" means you don't really understand, but pretend that you do, which is false.
My suggestion for Reggie to burn unsold token is not the same as giving anyone his token.
His economic return comes from selling the token.
And the token can be sold either in bulk or thru recycling used token.
Bulk purchase may introduce more supply into the circulating, and assuming the supply is fixed, will depress potential price and price gain, which hurts you and me, but does not hurt Reggie.
Recycling used tokens in which Reggie can resell them means the economic profit goes to him, and not to you and me, despite being OWNERS.
Bulk purchase in combo with recycling used token may end up hurting you and me, without any impact on Reggie while he continue to earn his economic profits.
Am I wrong in my analysis?
If so, please educate me, Reggie, the way you would educate your own sons and daughter.
But then he makes sense when he said that the business would not be sustainable if nobody wants redemption.
Thus it may be harmful to burn all unsold token.
And risk may be introduced with the burning of any amount of token.
That's why I also suggested if there is any assurance that tokens obtained through bulk purchase will be used almost immediately for exposure.
Bulk purchase to be used almost immediately means the buyer is the direct end user buying the token for actual use, not for trading nor speculation.
That is to prevent them from being introduced into the circulating supply.
If there is no such assurance in place, then it is still possible that all the 100 mil supply will eventually be sold out and nobody wants redemption.
Which means the business would still not be sustainable.

Investard: I'm not stupid! If you take the bread outta the bag, then where will the air for breathing come from since we all know that bread is made up of mostly air akin to humans being made up of mostly water since naturally buoyant? Back on topic, I bought thousands of pounds worth of BCC at ~U$3.00 knowing full well that I'll be able to purchase another thousands of pounds more at ~U$2.00, and even a slew more once it reaches ~U$1.00, thus having a handsome portfolio that'll someday moon, whereupon once leaving the workforce, I'll be able to enjoy my retardedment to its fullest.

Reggie said as a token holder of VERI, I am an OWNER. So.....

Nothing makes sense to those that have no sense.
Whether there will be buyer to those domain names is none of my business.

You need to learn to accept contradiction.
And then figure out through reason and logic whether that contradiction is justified and fair.
If you cannot decide if something is fair or otherwise, you should ask questions first, instead of coming into a conclusion right away.
You don't know everything in this world.
Those things that you don't know of, usually makes no sense to you at first.

Update:
Your prayer was answered. But sorry it ain't 6000 words.

Update #2:
If I run a business, and a complete stranger come to me and suggest an idea that will help me make lots more money, I don't care if this stranger is dorky, stupid or idiot, I will accept his suggestion and implement it.

That's like saying selling firearms to terrorists is legit as long as the seller is not the one doing the firing/killing.

The gullible buyer/buyers stand a chance to get prosecuted.