Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 11:21:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
141  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 30, 2019, 07:29:14 AM
At the moment this problem of the OC and temperatures is causing me great problems. there are already two RIGs, the rig of the RTX there is a card, which is more in the background that even reaches 87 and turn off the miner in security.

But I start observing the FAns in GPU, and I see that suddenly I'm at 84 and fans are lowered to 65% because it has picked up the temperature of another card, according to my rules at 84 degrees it would go to 90% fan, and repende is lowered to 65%, because that card reaches the maximum temperature of 87 and turns off the miner.

I hope you have a solution or I will have to drive MSI aftherburner again. But I really like this native solution. You should only take the value of the hottest card in the RIG and do not go changing card reading

At the same time I'm going to have to leave the fixed fans something I do not want, but of course it's a big mistake that I take the temperature data from different cards, so it can not be efficient.

Please, if you are not going to fix it, tell me already and I will change to the old system with Aftherburner or a fixed fan.

One of the two is wrong. Right now, like this one, you do not look at just one card, you look at all of them. Then a card, the hottest one that should be sent, is activated at 90% fan at 80 degrees, but now it turns out that another card of the same rig reaches 75 degrees and I lower the fans to 70% .. Is it more important to reduce 75 degrees or reduce 80 degrees?

Therefore the concept of temperature for a rig, should take into account only 1 card, the hottest. Because the change of speed is applied to ALL THE RIG. If the speed of the fans was independent by card, his vision would be accurate, but as it is not so, it is wrong.

I suppose I could use Atherburner only for the fans, its solution to put rules that jump at different temperatures is not valid. It can not be that I have a card at 84 degrees that would correspond to 100% of FAN, and suddenly because another card of the rig reaches 75 degrees, I lower all the rig to 75% of Fan. Obviously the card that is in 84 degrees will rise and to 86 I turn the miner to avoid problems of breakage by temperature.

Here there are only 3 solutions:

1- that the rules affect each card independently, it would be very good.

2 - Always take the value of the hottest card, this would be the optimal point, that always in the rules send the FAN the card with the highest temperature. This would be the best solution and faster in programming.

3.- re-use Aftherbuner at the same time as the native, only to control the fans.

You understand that as it is now, even with rules, if I have not activated the heat protection rule, I could have damaged cards. I like your native OC a lot, but the temperature should send the card with more heat, whatever it is inside the rig, and just follow that. If suddenly another card in the same rig exceeds the previous one in temperature, then that new card is the one that would take control of the entire RIG. TAl as it is now, yesterday I skipped the rigs every few minutes and they stopped. I could not give credit to my eyes, to see cards at 84 degrees to 100% and suddenly went down to 65% because another card had reached the goal of a rule and applied to the whole rig, that does not matter as you explain it But it's not good.

You give a greater control of fan as aftherburner or you guide by the card of more temperature of the rig, because if not, cards of those people who do not have rules of stopping the miner can be broken if it reaches 86 degrees as I have.

This kind of situations did not happen with the complete solution of aftherburner, although the connection with the main program is very bad, so I will use the native and I will see that I think so, use a fan speed curve in aftherburner, but this is already ahead of time It will be a problem for many as soon as the heat arrives.
142  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 29, 2019, 12:48:03 PM
At the moment this problem of the OC and temperatures is causing me great problems. there are already two RIGs, the rig of the RTX there is a card, which is more in the background that even reaches 87 and turn off the miner in security.

But I start observing the FAns in GPU, and I see that suddenly I'm at 84 and fans are lowered to 65% because it has picked up the temperature of another card, according to my rules at 84 degrees it would go to 90% fan, and repende is lowered to 65%, because that card reaches the maximum temperature of 87 and turns off the miner.

I hope you have a solution or I will have to drive MSI aftherburner again. But I really like this native solution. You should only take the value of the hottest card in the RIG and do not go changing card reading

At the same time I'm going to have to leave the fixed fans something I do not want, but of course it's a big mistake that I take the temperature data from different cards, so it can not be efficient.

Please, if you are not going to fix it, tell me already and I will change to the old system with Aftherburner or a fixed fan.
143  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 29, 2019, 12:40:58 PM
There is a small problem with the speed of the fans in Nvida.

Create the rules that when it reaches, for example, 75 degrees, activate the fans to 75%, in fact I have a scale made from more to less, as if it were an MSI Aftherburner curve

But I have noticed that the system sometimes takes the temperature of one and other times of another. I have a rig that now reaches 84 degrees and the fans go to 90%, but suddenly the FANS go down to 75% because it takes the temperature of another card from the same rig.

You can fine tune this so that you only always consider the card with the highest temperature of each rig. It is useless to create temperature rules if sometimes the data is from one card and sometimes it is from another. You must always collect the data for the hottest card rule.

I am preparing the summer, improving extraction, improving card heatsinks and now I am facing this problem. A rig at 84 degrees is set to 90% and then drops to 75% and the card follows 90%, then changes to 90%, and quickly again to 75% without lowering the temperature of the hottest card.

Please Patrike that the rules always take the value of the hottest card or I will finish burning cards.
144  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 25, 2019, 01:51:02 PM
Linux agent

Ubuntu sometimes runs Overclocking sometimes doesn't
Have you identified if it's a specific GPU property (like Core Clock, Fan speed, ...) that cause the failures? The Remote Agent log file (can be accessed via the toolbar Tools -> Log File -> Remote Agent) might give further details.

Now when you download the drivers, yesterday update, there are two versions, the standard driver and the "creators" driver that is more stable and is more focused on intensive applications (photoshop, cad, lightroom), this is the driver that I use. Yesterday I installed it on a computer see. 419.xx and I do not have a problem.
145  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 24, 2019, 03:50:48 PM
Awesome Miner version 6.3.3

 Features
  - New trigger for device hashrate
  - Bulk edit of External Miner properties: SSH port and SSH credentials
  - Bulk edit of Managed Miner properties: Autostart miner
 Integration
  - Add additional block explorers for wallet balance
  - Add additional pools for Mining Dutch
 User interface
  - Menu of available rule triggers rearranged into groups to make it easier to find triggers
 Version notes
  - Improved logging for the Dynamic Update feature of coin properties
 Mining softare
  - SrbMiner 1.8.5
  - TeamRedMiner 0.4.4
  - lolMiner 0.8.1
  - WildRig Miner 0.15.5
 Corrections
  - Correction to the Change Pool Group operation to ensure correct pool priority for ASIC miners
  - Correction to the password parameter name for the Phoenix Miner pool configuration file

Good update It could be added in Notifications, when an API fails ?, as we now use dozens of apis to configure the currencies, it is very interesting to be able to monitor those apis that have not been able to collect data, in this way have under control the large amount of apis that we are using, and that otherwise it would be impossible to monitor, and I think the notification tab would be very good.

Currency X api Difficulty problem
Currency X Api Nethash Problem

Something like that. For example, when it happens 2 or 3 times in a row, you do not need to notify the first one that it fails.
Thanks for the suggestion. Maybe it should be indicated on the actual coin in the Coins tab as well, for example using red text to indicate update failures.

It is also a very good idea, better than my suggestion.
146  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 23, 2019, 10:51:21 AM
Awesome Miner version 6.3.3

 Features
  - New trigger for device hashrate
  - Bulk edit of External Miner properties: SSH port and SSH credentials
  - Bulk edit of Managed Miner properties: Autostart miner
 Integration
  - Add additional block explorers for wallet balance
  - Add additional pools for Mining Dutch
 User interface
  - Menu of available rule triggers rearranged into groups to make it easier to find triggers
 Version notes
  - Improved logging for the Dynamic Update feature of coin properties
 Mining softare
  - SrbMiner 1.8.5
  - TeamRedMiner 0.4.4
  - lolMiner 0.8.1
  - WildRig Miner 0.15.5
 Corrections
  - Correction to the Change Pool Group operation to ensure correct pool priority for ASIC miners
  - Correction to the password parameter name for the Phoenix Miner pool configuration file

Good update It could be added in Notifications, when an API fails ?, as we now use dozens of apis to configure the currencies, it is very interesting to be able to monitor those apis that have not been able to collect data, in this way have under control the large amount of apis that we are using, and that otherwise it would be impossible to monitor, and I think the notification tab would be very good.

Currency X api Difficulty problem
Currency X Api Nethash Problem

Something like that. For example, when it happens 2 or 3 times in a row, you do not need to notify the first one that it fails.
147  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 22, 2019, 10:16:19 AM
Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.


try     https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty       Json    proof-of-work

Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.
When I open https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty in a web browser I do see the Cloud Flare protection page the first time I launch it. It basically indicates that they only allows web browser that can solve a Javascript challenge are allowed to move on to the actual page. Cloud Flare protected sites cannot be accessed as an API from applications like Awesome Miner that only load data without being a complete web browser.

There might be some solution to this, but not an easy one that I get in place right away.
Delay 5 seconds and follow the redirection of cloudflare, which will be a 301,302 or 303
148  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 22, 2019, 10:11:59 AM
@PArike I send you a small problem or discrepancy, it's very strange.

Currency PHL using your exponential formula gives a more or less close value, but it is dominated by auto exchanges and it does not work for me, but good. But when I choose the complete formula, I mean nethash, blocktime, reward ...... The result changes an awful lot to worse. I have checked the data several times, can not give a result that is 1/3 of the result with the exponential formula. To see if something is wrong, I think the blocking time may be wrong in the formula, or it is simply something else. I leave you the full currency data so you can configure it.

PHL  X16r  block reward 2.5    Blocktime  150 seconds

Difficulty
http://explore.placeh.io:8080/ext/summary     token json  data.[0].difficulty

Price

https://api.crex24.com/v2/public/tickers?instrument=PHL-BTC      token json  [?(@.instrument=='PHL-BTC')].bid

Nethash 

http://explore.placeh.io:8080/api/getnetworkhashps


With the exponential formula in the same machine 0.0014 6x 1080ti, with the complete formula 0.0058 the difference is huge, I do not understand it, it should not be like that, something fails.

I have done the measurement with exponential and the correct profit would be 1.25 but only when the auto exchanges (zpool, zergpool etc ...) do not give war.

It's not a coin I'm going to use, but this huge difference has caught my attention that something is not right. The formula with all the data can not be so far away. Somehow I do not trust the blocktime that is 150 seconds 2.5 minutes, but it is not a non-metric value.

I await your conclusions.
First a general answer. The formula for calculating coins per day using Difficulty-Reward-ExpFactor works for almost all coins and the formula using NetHash works for many coins as well. There will however always be coins with some unique properties where either one or none of these formulas can predict the number of coins per day. That's not an indication that the formulas are wrong, just that they may not be usable in a few cases.

Coins based on CuckaRoo29 / CuckaToo31 / CuckooCycle coins are examples where you never will get any correct values out of the formulas.

I just wanted to highlight this in general as I assume you will play around with quite a number of coins to do these calculations, and eventually you will find coins where they do something unique and the numbers will look strange.

In this case I entered the sources of information as you did, and from what I can see the Difficulty and NetHash forumula gives almost the same result. It was only 1 - 2 percent difference between them. However, in my case I used Block Time 60 seconds (1 minute) as this is what both CoinCalculators.io and CoinToMine reports. If you entered Block Time 150 seconds, it probably explain the difference you got.

Well, if you are right Patrike, it is 60 seconds, the person in charge of adding data in the online excel, did not do well, I and another measured the coins, yesterday the average exponential, today I will do with the complete formula . I do not know why they gave me 150 seconds.

If I am aware that the complete formula is not valid for all, but if more than 90% of the coins or 95%. I know there are some very special coins that the complete formula is not worth, as you say for example Grin, that both CC and CTM gave very different values. KARL de CTM changed numbers to make it fit, even so, I had to change its PRofit in its day to 2.1 to get closer to reality.

It's been our fault so I'm sorry. A bad data in a moment has someone. I still like the complete formula, getting the data from the coolest sites, because in the auto swtich profit mode, you enter the currency much earlier, and those who use CC or CTM will always be late with cached data.
149  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 21, 2019, 11:07:01 AM
Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.


try     https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty       Json    proof-of-work



Thank you friend.

But sites where in the title are three words
I have more.

There is a mistake, and it will be corrected PAtrike as soon as possible. But for this specific problem of RVN I have given you the solution. I also have a problem that I have reported. Just wait, the insurance that reads your post and review the problem. Just give it time.
150  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 21, 2019, 01:06:24 AM
Hello, Patricke.

I noticed that when creating an API request for determining complexity, etc., the response does not recognize the name of the site of three words.

For example, https://explorer.ravencoin.world/api/getdifficulty.


try     https://ravencoin.network/api/status?q=getDifficulty       Json    proof-of-work

151  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 20, 2019, 01:53:49 PM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/397zu7whoj1s93u/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-20%20a%20las%2015.46.06.png?dl=0

This is happening to me in several currencies, both with supplier data and with personalized data, that remain at 0 of profit. I have tried many times already, and it is not just one currency they are several. You will see that all the data is added, it is impossible that with all the data the profit is 0 and I have measured the AL-GO to have reference

We also use the getnetworkhashps command a lot to get nethash but it depends on which currency, it gives us errors, the data is good on the form, but then the coin drops a lot, if I put it with the exponential formula which does not require this data , go back up But something is failing, as Moppidoo commented, he uses getinfo that we are not used to. I hope you have an easy solution because it is a small stone in the road.
152  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 20, 2019, 03:09:23 AM
@PArike I send you a small problem or discrepancy, it's very strange.

Currency PHL using your exponential formula gives a more or less close value, but it is dominated by auto exchanges and it does not work for me, but good. But when I choose the complete formula, I mean nethash, blocktime, reward ...... The result changes an awful lot to worse. I have checked the data several times, can not give a result that is 1/3 of the result with the exponential formula. To see if something is wrong, I think the blocking time may be wrong in the formula, or it is simply something else. I leave you the full currency data so you can configure it.

PHL  X16r  block reward 2.5    Blocktime  150 seconds

Difficulty
http://explore.placeh.io:8080/ext/summary     token json  data.[0].difficulty

Price

https://api.crex24.com/v2/public/tickers?instrument=PHL-BTC      token json  [?(@.instrument=='PHL-BTC')].bid

Nethash 

http://explore.placeh.io:8080/api/getnetworkhashps


With the exponential formula in the same machine 0.0014 6x 1080ti, with the complete formula 0.0058 the difference is huge, I do not understand it, it should not be like that, something fails.

I have done the measurement with exponential and the correct profit would be 1.25 but only when the auto exchanges (zpool, zergpool etc ...) do not give war.

It's not a coin I'm going to use, but this huge difference has caught my attention that something is not right. The formula with all the data can not be so far away. Somehow I do not trust the blocktime that is 150 seconds 2.5 minutes, but it is not a non-metric value.

I await your conclusions.
153  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 17, 2019, 04:05:10 PM
I have a suggestion of the easiest.

In the benchmark module, which is now correct, it already averages well. You can put the date of the last measurement AL-GO to AL-GO. So I can see if X16r in rig 4 3 months ago I have not benchmarked.

For example, I am now reviewing all the AL-GOS and each rig is different, I have the need to see when I scroll in benchmark when an AL-GO has not averaged for some time.

It's something simple, always the date of the last test. There is plenty of space.
154  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 17, 2019, 12:48:44 PM
Awesome Miner version 6.3.1

 ASIC mining
  - Support for Antminer Z11
 Features
  - Configuration of Network Hashrate and Block Time per coin
  - Added an additional way to calculate coin revenue, based on Network Hashrate, Block Time and Block Reward. Calculation method configurable per coin.
  - New trigger Detect Miner State to detect specific mining states
 Mining softare
  - SrbMiner 1.8.3
  - NBMiner 22.3
  - Gminer 1.38
  - Nanominer 1.2
  - Bminer 15.5
 Corrections
  - Improved compatibility for change of frequency on Antminers
  - Corrected calculation of average hashrate for benchmarks
  - Handle invalid JSON responses from JCE miner

Hi Patrike,

thank you for the continual implementation of the coin statistics features.

Just wondering if this would be something easy for you to implement, now coins with custom properties will have the "Coin" column shown in blue font, can this be extended to individual overridden properties such that if I specify custom value for Block time/Block reward/Difficulty/Hash rate/Exchange....that they can be highlighted individually depending on if their properties were overridden in the Coin Properties dialog?

Best Regards,

Thanks! You are correct that it would be quite easy so just highlight the overridden properties, so I will go ahead and make that modification.

That's what I've been saying for some time, and now if you see the modified ones in blue. In previous update I said that they looked blue, but I did not see blue, neither I nor anyone in my group, because it was not important I did not want to insist. With today's update, if you modify them. Thank you
155  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 17, 2019, 12:44:50 PM
You dont need another 100's of clocking profiles, you just need 1 profile with your fixed 80% speed. Nothing else. Apply it with a rule to your miners, nothing else will be changed.

I think you're wrong in what you say. Although I create another profile, if I leave the other values at 0, in the end it will be 100PL 0 core 0 memory and fan speed.

When you apply an oc profile, the entire complete profile is applied, not just one parameter.

If I'm wrong, leave me here a screenshot of how I should leave the OC profile, but before you try it, it really works.



Tienes que entrar enGPU Clocking->Cambiar el FAN de cualquiera-> Y cuando grabes el profile, marcar solo el FAN. Así ya tienes el profile 80% FAN

how do you do it? I do the profiles, but I always get the fields of Core, Mem, PL, FAN and auto. I can not remove those fields. I can not create a profile from 0, I duplicate one and there are all those fields.

How do you manage to make a clocking profile with only the data of the fans? You have left me crazy, I do not do that. I have more than 100 profiles and I do not make a profile with only one value, I do not see any way to make a new one nor do I see the way to remove the other fields in one already created.

How do you do it?

And thank you very much for the capture, you have left me very intrigued




1st / Select any miner and you go down where the GPUs that compose it are.
2nd / Select GPU clocking
3º / In this box, select any card and put the value you want in the FAN
4th / Profile-> Save as->
5 /  and select only the FAN

You can do it for any value, the FAN, core, memory, etc ... It is very useful for partial configurations in the clocking profile  Wink

En español para evitar el traductor.

1º/ Selecciona cualquier minero y te vas abajo donde están las GPU's que lo componen.
2º/ Selecciona alli GPU clocking
3º/ En este cuadro, selecciona cualquier tarjeta y pon el valor que quieras en el FAN
4º/ Profile->Save as->
5º/ y selecciona solo el FAN

Puedes hacerlo para cualquier valor, el FAN, core, memory, etc... Es muy util para configuraciones parciales en el clocking profile  Wink
 

Muchas gracias no conocia esa subfuncion, de hecho yo solo toco los profiles desde options. Ya lo tengo hecho y funciona perfecto
156  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 05:49:23 PM
It seems that I have some problem with nethash, whether I buy it from for example BSOD, or even selecting CTM or CC, to obtain Nethash. There are moments that correctly shows the nethash and gives a realistic profir, in this case right now about 500 ghs for veil, but at times it goes to 240 Th / s of nethash and the currency sinks.
One way to see what values Awesome Miner reads for these properties is to look in the Awesome Miner log file for "Dynamic update of coin property". These lines will indicate the coin to be updated, the property to be updated and the new value. Can you for example see the large variations of NetHash here?

the culprit was BSOD, I was seeing his api in the browser and updating and certainly gives some exaggerated values ​​at times. From the Explorer, CC and CTM are far from reality, in the end take the value in this case of WTM, although whenever you can we get it directly from the Explorer.

We have already measured about 5 coins and the precision is better, the profit does not go down much, 0.95 0-90, the logical thing removing the Fees and the hash that does not reach the Pool, for now I have not seen any at 0.70 or lower as before.

The exponential formula is the easiest but the most inaccurate. A profit measure in a currency that has 400 ghs of nethash, changes if that same currency and hash rise to 800 Ghs, because any deviation will be greater by the exponential factor.

The formula with all the data, it is more laborious to obtain, but for now it is giving us more reliable results than before, that more the benchmark corrected the profit should increase, but the hahahahaha market fell. Everything is fine, thanks patrike, a great job.

Hey by the way, you will not create an OC profile with just the fan control. How is it done?
157  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 05:41:22 PM
You dont need another 100's of clocking profiles, you just need 1 profile with your fixed 80% speed. Nothing else. Apply it with a rule to your miners, nothing else will be changed.

I think you're wrong in what you say. Although I create another profile, if I leave the other values at 0, in the end it will be 100PL 0 core 0 memory and fan speed.

When you apply an oc profile, the entire complete profile is applied, not just one parameter.

If I'm wrong, leave me here a screenshot of how I should leave the OC profile, but before you try it, it really works.



Tienes que entrar enGPU Clocking->Cambiar el FAN de cualquiera-> Y cuando grabes el profile, marcar solo el FAN. Así ya tienes el profile 80% FAN

how do you do it? I do the profiles, but I always get the fields of Core, Mem, PL, FAN and auto. I can not remove those fields. I can not create a profile from 0, I duplicate one and there are all those fields.

How do you manage to make a clocking profile with only the data of the fans? You have left me crazy, I do not do that. I have more than 100 profiles and I do not make a profile with only one value, I do not see any way to make a new one nor do I see the way to remove the other fields in one already created.

How do you do it?

And thank you very much for the capture, you have left me very intrigued
158  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 02:27:55 AM
@patrike or @moppidoo can you provide me with the general Yiimp API url, where all the yimmp pools take the data?
https://api.zergpool.com/api/currenc
https://zpool.ca/api/status


I will try, but zergpool reads the hash from the general yiimp database, so when I read it from zergpool it is late, I prefer to read it directly from the source closest to the original one. Anyway, thank you very much, I will try, because this update will give us a lot of work
if I understand your question correct, then you can click the "define coin" button on Pool tab while mining on Zerg to override the profitability source for it, afaik.

Sorry I did not understand what you want to tell me. I'm doing tests with BSOD but the same thing gives you the correct value that gives you an exaggeration.

Now I will try other methods. Is that VEIL does not have an explorer type inquidus, if not, it would be easier

But all yiimp pools take the data from a central api and iimp, and I do not know what that url is for that api.
159  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 01:27:09 AM
@patrike or @moppidoo can you provide me with the general Yiimp API url, where all the yimmp pools take the data?
https://api.zergpool.com/api/status
https://zpool.ca/api/status

The values of hashrates they give are averaged to 24 hours, it is far from the current one.
160  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 01:21:13 AM
@patrike or @moppidoo can you provide me with the general Yiimp API url, where all the yimmp pools take the data?
https://api.zergpool.com/api/status
https://zpool.ca/api/status


I will try, but zergpool reads the hash from the general yiimp database, so when I read it from zergpool it is late, I prefer to read it directly from the source closest to the original one. Anyway, thank you very much, I will try, because this update will give us a lot of work
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!