“Will remain listed or trading?” DVC easily has the longest record of not 1 coin traded. Lol
Thanks tho for using those deep pockets and connects. Wink
As an American citizen they're more than deep enough. The one's you see on TV and shaking hands? Direct your snot attitude at them. Truth my man. Just making a point. Not good to cause division in legit crypto coins. My apologies. I hope ixc and I0C get the same redirect. I did my best to put some volume on the the last few months but it wasn’t much. I’m an American citizens too, don’t wanna give it up but I’ve I ever make the big load I rather donate it than pay taxes in 2 countries. I just was messing around with your sock lol. But for real we're stuck shortly since the round began: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dvc/block.dws?488531I cannot sync for three days... But I am fully synced to the latest (last) block. I wonder if chains are meant to stop. Thus deflationary because if there was a corresponding time chain like in Duality - if one stops, maybe it's deflationary for the merged chains when their value is synchronized? The Raw Block part usually shows Bitcoin Transactions and some merge mining info. But now it says "unknown" - my software "getblock" RPC shows more info: 20:06:15

getblock 3d4731e538de34195d5cf00276a5b46d07a43ca4daf22fb1c66ec00bf16b2ea4
20:06:15

{
"hash" : "3d4731e538de34195d5cf00276a5b46d07a43ca4daf22fb1c66ec00bf16b2ea4",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 1768,
"height" : 488531,
"version" : 262401,
"merkleroot" : "6dfa3a9eb726f156818d36919cedada25f46716c2fa52b601d94e815166322d5",
"auxpow" : {
"size" : 1584,
"coinbasetx" : {
"txid" : "bf51e7fecf9b14ccd9f4f58c6396f439814c707a2a437601ea8a09f6d45e5c38",
"version" : 1,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "0317c20a2cfabe6d6d3045d9720bd53eb492bef3dd7ec117093c39e38f908893a0ffdcc8de71c2b63520000000000000002c536962657269616e207365727665723a20687474703a2f2f736962657269612e6d696e652e6e753a39333334",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_RETURN aa21a9ed1d569e683db704bd88ad08a947cdce8c9dcf4ee454215c4df3468aedf6ff04ae",
"hex" : "6a24aa21a9ed1d569e683db704bd88ad08a947cdce8c9dcf4ee454215c4df3468aedf6ff04ae",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00002586,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "0 0255dc0fbec331363e2a01acca1a64c32c823c9f",
"hex" : "00140255dc0fbec331363e2a01acca1a64c32c823c9f",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00040304,
"n" : 2,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "0 f08016c274a410751718613c6bfed829279b618c",
"hex" : "0014f08016c274a410751718613c6bfed829279b618c",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00069327,
"n" : 3,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 bad6746fa03fad79f2946f6b8f7450d78e3b6c6b OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914bad6746fa03fad79f2946f6b8f7450d78e3b6c6b88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1J2ubGGF22JeASmEvJuEpjhNwDSo9w3MfF"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00367604,
"n" : 4,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 47448ddaea00af9d51d0adda729dac576aa3acb4 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a91447448ddaea00af9d51d0adda729dac576aa3acb488ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"17Vq6qwfE1epzsgEfSw81pQX3gXo9ZN4ET"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00369265,
"n" : 5,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 d1411e6ed46a64687af24ab40f394dda85b2484c OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914d1411e6ed46a64687af24ab40f394dda85b2484c88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1L5SEddaxi114ULkjBAwJsa5zjwuD5628h"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00998088,
"n" : 6,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "0 6483526a33ad1a7f2bdbb40bc9c4cef92bdfe8a3",
"hex" : "00146483526a33ad1a7f2bdbb40bc9c4cef92bdfe8a3",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 0.01024079,
"n" : 7,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 55f94a28584ab5369b0b73ae9187ef3f8a0933a4 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a91455f94a28584ab5369b0b73ae9187ef3f8a0933a488ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"18qb5FrSqHJ7wNQhKUfh7SfEj6Dx758YPn"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.01898610,
"n" : 8,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 ded922ea3e344b81143b4170344d356cb8cc3487 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914ded922ea3e344b81143b4170344d356cb8cc348788ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1MKK8VFFtxiGYqmKyMDpSuTXFmVFtGn6es"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.03671765,
"n" : 9,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 7682032faf81dd32642156a4bfae72cdc925a661 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9147682032faf81dd32642156a4bfae72cdc925a66188ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1BocV4Ruzy3vpVSEWPELR333s4WK9HbsTK"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.03687514,
"n" : 10,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 96eb062efc2724d90073005ac96c70ec10ecc0a7 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a91496eb062efc2724d90073005ac96c70ec10ecc0a788ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1EkyuYGWWrsXCdnPrTmrqdUtqWR5p1gqHn"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.18100114,
"n" : 11,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 d26d73d0aaacc9d4266dad4dc0c517ad28b8f464 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914d26d73d0aaacc9d4266dad4dc0c517ad28b8f46488ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1LBe2Au5d1TwewihmGY83bEaUHBa4a8uvV"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.19618668,
"n" : 12,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 e1b342f79d357d29cb46d1e66af4ecb96c8db918 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914e1b342f79d357d29cb46d1e66af4ecb96c8db91888ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1MaPnUagQ3RnjQ5Z2xsdEyf6NqDyFxFqQg"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.38497260,
"n" : 13,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_HASH160 1304f77cb88a08279d9dacfee2d946acdd84e2d0 OP_EQUAL",
"hex" : "a9141304f77cb88a08279d9dacfee2d946acdd84e2d087",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "scripthash",
"addresses" : [
"33RaiHS99Fp797V7Kw8y9G14CGrJXQQQ84"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.56479445,
"n" : 14,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 00d2148a86989b379ef8a208d337f61b19893560 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a91400d2148a86989b379ef8a208d337f61b1989356088ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"115LfdbHwEmxZ8RvWu19iGAaJiiab36Kx6"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.83841577,
"n" : 15,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 0f6d447db363dc935cfa0da8896e80e3dbbd2b48 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9140f6d447db363dc935cfa0da8896e80e3dbbd2b4888ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"12Qa2vL1bvoHDC5yE6kaMDgjVYsJNQagEY"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.26835475,
"n" : 16,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_HASH160 fd394c20ae893d30495e0fda5392dfc01ed3f309 OP_EQUAL",
"hex" : "a914fd394c20ae893d30495e0fda5392dfc01ed3f30987",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "scripthash",
"addresses" : [
"3QmwXAhy1teew5KqBrTL8gYDUsp8J2Ghnz"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.33904148,
"n" : 17,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 d2c95dc4e0045357035699a96d801c3dee287aab OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914d2c95dc4e0045357035699a96d801c3dee287aab88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1LDY8TdfQvqVaZ6jUwZJSAWLfAkY8Ayv7E"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.53029476,
"n" : 18,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b1b6c84293dad7d4d946a372df290588ac5a22e0 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914b1b6c84293dad7d4d946a372df290588ac5a22e088ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"1HCfZtXnrds7drCe7PysTEHC67xtunfKjd"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00000009,
"n" : 19,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "04ffd03de44a6e11b9917f3a29f9443283d9871c9d743ef30d5eddcd37094b64d1b3d8090496b53256786bf5c82932ec23c3b74d9f05a6f95a8b5529352656664b OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "4104ffd03de44a6e11b9917f3a29f9443283d9871c9d743ef30d5eddcd37094b64d1b3d8090496b53256786bf5c82932ec23c3b74d9f05a6f95a8b5529352656664bac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkey",
"addresses" : [
"1Kz5QaUPDtKrj5SqW5tFkn7WZh8LmQaQi4"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 20,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_RETURN 8e3a80e4af016292aab6c743a90ed779a37a843d0b8c77ea8c67af556cf3fff40300000036ea0000",
"hex" : "6a288e3a80e4af016292aab6c743a90ed779a37a843d0b8c77ea8c67af556cf3fff40300000036ea0000",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
}
]
},
"coinbaseMerkleBranch" : [
"b6c1cff5a1b6d40e419339be5d147c98a4264640ff130bcfdf7c2460b23b3549",
"054444b97705071db1c03bba18433c3fbd83a49dd4f0358af9f2a98e863969f1",
"a33d71c82ecef9832bf6427ef72da4e4ea979d9b9a95320bb414c836d9ce9063",
"3411d334437fc637bf896c3e789bc9197d8ffb0a6979a7275525ab1aa57895ef",
"b79b278825b6fdfb5f9e9a0d2d50c7fe9b88910edc2b03dc228814a17e3c51c6",
"bd81be7e7147fd590a075eed1625789cb7f3c442dff07fea8c0a5acce95afa0c",
"e0299a43f5bf9e94b4c8bc70d2854519963c715a9b1755f2396c46403bf29e1b",
"6de3bf5cebd853085821bca317c14d53d9b514f133ecb141a5fcaad13de0aebe",
"29d0fb18bf1adb51256ebf57b6392eb855c1409a7bdac84e52f15e94066a21cc",
"7e19e02de1cfa2ada071e655ad4148c4fcf7f6efb12a1e6307c22916ecd634b8",
"b3888c65c3a1e09fab13d691424a57b0abdd19b2e42470518788547a9a10cc23",
"fdcfe153833c4401f72547c60a43513b2b77fbc0c073838100cdac8a6f0f8a36"
],
"coinbaseIndex" : 0,
"chainMerkleBranch" : [
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"f98c4e9736d8eb8bb46299798906695c755369a3df99a93ffdded1713f1cf6e2",
"48e55233b9707330def98c80a2105eaa5fac8f687d872ffb4b4741fa2bdb247d",
"3d7c24a9c5a40e7cfd2460e876d51566b54b310f417945c02891ae51204491b3",
"03a6b136b242e2ebea0403b97342f66dc3cd491fb74cd7d500192a405297eaca"
],
"chainIndex" : 18,
"parent_block" : {
"hash" : "000000000000003a91b2ae2939a85992e39231eda3f098ef007dbcf80c6c27ab",
"version" : 549453828,
"previousblockhash" : "0000000000000000000c7ff4b74faf30a8cf9c7436316f1550f118abbe01647a",
"merkleroot" : "66a378e93b6679a4686316122eb37fdaf620ce8c59ffd16ffbf6b49bd4a58cdf",
"time" : 1634262649,
"bits" : "170e2632",
"nonce" : 3502354404
}
},
"tx" : [
"6dfa3a9eb726f156818d36919cedada25f46716c2fa52b601d94e815166322d5"
],
"time" : 1634248377,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "196dcc11",
"difficulty" : 39116701.75631578,
"previousblockhash" : "33a11f1eff8287ab19b263f83453a462c8fe1daba06a74796ff90f28240615bc"
}
What's going on here? I've never seen some of the things here until the blocks had stalled before this past summer and for the first time I noticed "chainindex": 18 (its usually just "50")... {
"value" : 0.38497260,
"n" : 13,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_HASH160 1304f77cb88a08279d9dacfee2d946acdd84e2d0 OP_EQUAL",
"hex" : "a9141304f77cb88a08279d9dacfee2d946acdd84e2d087",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "scripthash",
"addresses" : [
"33RaiHS99Fp797V7Kw8y9G14CGrJXQQQ84"
]This is the first time I've seen a P2SH or segwit address on a Devcoin block. I wish for once someone would explain the code like I'm 5 and admit why we're getting Bitcoin transactions on Devcoin "blocks" instead of the actual DVC txn and further more I'd like to know why for the first time our chain stopping seems to always be when our raw blocks have the "chainindex": 18 and "coinbaseindex": 0 ... It is odd that suddenly we're getting P2SH (native segwit) addresses on our blocks from Bitcoin too. We usually just get the coinbase tx (block reward) and an OP_RETURN output and the merge mine data. Here's the missing Raw Transaction Data since Chainz says "unknown" for that as well got it form my RPC console20:21:22

getrawtransaction 6dfa3a9eb726f156818d36919cedada25f46716c2fa52b601d94e815166322d5
20:21:22

01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff080411cc6d19010152ffffffff01004429353a000000232102de77c62c01b329c77072c40509c3665d7f0658cf9db8b5bcce7ffc423f2af3f2ac00000000
20:22:38

decoderawtransaction 01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000ffffffff080411cc6d19010152ffffffff01004429353a000000232102de77c62c01b329c77072c40509c3665d7f0658cf9db8b5bcce7ffc423f2af3f2ac00000000
20:22:38

{
"txid" : "6dfa3a9eb726f156818d36919cedada25f46716c2fa52b601d94e815166322d5",
"version" : 1,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "0411cc6d19010152",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 2500.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "02de77c62c01b329c77072c40509c3665d7f0658cf9db8b5bcce7ffc423f2af3f2 OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "2102de77c62c01b329c77072c40509c3665d7f0658cf9db8b5bcce7ffc423f2af3f2ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkey",
"addresses" : [
"1LUNfzp9sSExfrGGtexCANEbGbfwPUZfZK"
]
}
}
]
}
Maybe the distribution of the receiver files was a few days late, so nodes could not find the latest ones?
-MarkM-
Don't delete. Just realized you're right because there's only one, not two output for every coinbase transaction since round 122. Hmm.
I think it is when the distribution files cannot be found or not enough of them agree that shares don't get given out and miners only get 2500 instead of 5000.
I do not know what happened to make the distribution files not be found or disagree though.
How far back was it happening? Or did it maybe just start when the distribution files started trying to give out 1/10ths of a share?
-MarkM-
Remember caston had receiver files and he put them on a perthexchange website to host them. He said he lost his password for this forum but he came back and talked to you this past year in the Tenebrix thread. Here's what I'm talking about: Unthinking bit: I have a nearly free speech account. I have uploaded it to that for now. http://www.perth-exchange.org/receiver_3.csvAlso I can probably upload to a site khal (dot-bit forum site admin) has given me but I haven't used yet. Does that look ok? Src: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24813.msg426458#msg426458
Anywhere else? My coin tracking program tells me DVC is worth like 0.6 cents so I'm wondering where in the world that valuation comes from. No one on Frei exchange has bought DVC at 1 satoshi since June. It's only "worth" 1 sat on Frei exchange because that exchange won't let you go lower than 1 sat. But if I were to put some DVC for sale at that price it would probably take several years for it to actually sell. So I'm a little confused right now... I have another question. I notice DVC is no longer listed on coinmarketcap.com I'm wondering if there is another ranking service that lists it. I'd also like to know where DVC is actively traded.
Thanks!
https://freiexchange.com/market/DVC/BTCCoinmarket removed coins with $4.99 volume or less. You can trade it on freiexchange- they’re adding most old coins. Genius move in my opinion. That exchange just might end up being in the top 5 with the treasures it’s holding which few see. Wish they'd add TBX FBX, some real ancients  Mark has them in his own treasuries.
Taxes on crypto are getting too complicated and dangerous: https://www.reddit.com/r/tax/comments/9tcnu8/did_i_ruin_my_life_by_trading_crypto/The problems are the following: 1. The tax code for crypto is ambiguous, there is no widely agreed upon way to calculate taxes. 2. When exchanges fail, the trading information is lost, so it can be impossible to calculate trading gains and losses. 3. Accounting fees can be very high for crypto trading, sometimes more than the actual money made. 4. It is possible to owe more in taxes than was actually cashed out. 5. The rules change, and some of those changes are retroactive, so even if taxes are filed correctly today, in future tax collectors can claim that the taxes were not filed correctly and impose arbitrary penalties. Devcoin is worth very little, but the accounting fees and risks are still high. It's a lot of hassle for little gain. Because of this, unfortunately, I am going to resign from devcoin, until taxes are simplified or there's a big tax free cryptocoin jurisdiction, which I don't expect to happen for a long time if ever. I don't want anyone to get in trouble because of something I'm doing or developing. I'll do the accounting for round 94, after that devcoin developers can handle the receiver files however they want. I'm sorry for leaving. I wish there was another way, but I don't see one. didn't you know devcoin is based out of portugal? = tax free zone :-D lel n00b!! Dude been getting ALOT of "pt" ccTLD or URL with pt lately. I mean todays Brazilians back to the Illustrious generation - those we're some ballsy explorers. I wonder if Charlie Lee being from the Ivory Coast has anything to do with us being bound to that location geo-historically. Or uh. Ya know, to a block AWARD we still cannot spend - at least on BTC chain. Maybe we can redeem our own one day and reveal history from a counter-Columbian perspective. Those Portuguese and their weird language/secrets. I know much of their Royal intermarrying and hell - they have the LONGEST fuckin alliance with "England" that I have ever seen continually in action over the years. Bilaterally bound. I thought Columbus chose Castile to get around the Papacy dividing half of the hemisphere for Spain and half for Portugal. Would you let him repair his ships in the Azores if you owned them and he just screwed your treaty? The Azores are the only islands I know on 3 different continental plates, let alone the exile for the last Habsburg Emperor << The last Holy Roman Emperor. And that's your Portuguese chain of history for the day. Sorry my blocks sync slow so I reply to old ass shit sometimes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Portuguese_Alliance#Modern_timesdevelCuy I have a suspicion you and I are on the same page. FOUNDER intentions and activities/objectives are often carried out behind the scenes only to be revealed later. So I think that the solution is time and more input from the creators. Otherwise the hell are we doing but creating things that do not physically exist yet proving its worth our time and its possible to continue with even just 1 peer. I think we're doing great. banter aside @develCuy or markm please go to the discord channel there is a dev from Qortal asking how to configure the rest of his Devcoin for electrumx... [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
Yo, Dan, what’s deflating? I thought the cut in the dvc growth rate was cancelled. Over time. As we approach infinity I realize the inflation approaches zero forever. But right now there’s no deflation but the inflation is coming to be acceptable. My question is why 2 trillion coins? That’s insane? First thing to mind comes global distribution. But backed by what and what’s use-case? Would be nice to have a rational answer to the above two questions. After-all, This was the first coin I bought like 9 years ago and secondly, at 5 million coins I’m a whale. I deserve prompt accurate answers from someone smart on the team. Like Traxo but minus the sarcasm. Just this once. Vlad - I’m contemplating buying 1 trillion DVC once my best in class portfolio moons freiexchange into the titan’s moon! Cause that’s how I do. Slower block times. My node not even accepting them. The 50K to 2500K reduction. It wouldn't take much burning on my behalf to give us a deflationary day. Sorry I was being loose with my wording. Im tired. But consider this dear friend. Do you know how many USD exist. What the max supply of dollars? We don't know. So the fuck is inflation anyhow? A measure of how little money we have when the rich stuff their pockets and fund projects that people don't get to take part of or work on? Seriously. I can't put a # on "coins" because if the value is just black and white and we're talking Bretton Woods here, then we might as well buy computers with 256 MB hard drives and set a cap on how much content we generate/print locally and send over the web. We don't want bitflation do we? 
Maybe the distribution of the receiver files was a few days late, so nodes could not find the latest ones?
-MarkM-
EDIT: Mark I've been here awhile now and I say this with the utmost respect. You created this thing. If you think something is broke or needs fixing you'd be the one to know how. You're our Elon Musk. Now get up in that shit! Did you not once write,
"From simple abstractions, great power may bloom. Sometimes, this power comes not
from wholly new ideas, but rather from the emergent insights that arise when bits of
common wisdom from disjoint communities come together"
If I observe that your words re coming true from every angle surrounding us and this project, who calls bs and makes everyone show their hand?
“Will remain listed or trading?” DVC easily has the longest record of not 1 coin traded. Lol
Thanks tho for using those deep pockets and connects. Wink
As an American citizen they're more than deep enough. The one's you see on TV and shaking hands? Direct your snot attitude at them. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
I am releasing FeatherCoin now. I have been working on this for a while and now want to give it go in the big bad world. This coin is a fork of Litecoin diving back to its 0.6.3 build. I am a supporter of Litecoin and will be following Coblee’s releases. The Litecoin team is working on a newer release and this project will move with them. The joys of a Litecoin fork, are that we get to use Scrypt and follow a release designed for specifically for it. There are a lot of Bitcoin forks but with the advent of ASIC miners we are starting to see how much havoc they can cause. To give us GPU miners shelter we need Scrypt based coins, as, in my opinion, Litecoin is currently the only valid one. Litecoin being as mature as it is makes it hard to join in the fun so let’s start with a new coin that follows Litecoin’s tradition. FeatherCoin has a block reward of 200 and will have a total of 336 million coins. This makes it four times that of LiteCoin, this is the same position that LiteCoin was set against BitCoin. There is no private preming of this coin. This coin is in beta like all this cryptocoins. GUI Version for Windows - http://www.feathercoin.com/FeatherCoin.zipWindows Daemon - http://www.feathercoin.com/feathercoind.zipSource Code - http://www.feathercoin.com/feathercoin-0.6.3.zipThere is a website to come and I will get this on to GitHub. I will update this post with some more technical details tomorrow. It has been a long day so I'll leave you to test this over night. markm, if nothing else I hope that you find this coin useful one day. Smoovious, just start mining. Maybe in 2021 you can be honest and acknowledge TENEBRIX $TBX is the first scrypt coin and not once has it died. It mines fine. I mine and produce blocks and send to other peers to test transactons. The first deserves some praise here, who knows what could happen to your chain without my support of the original Scrypt. AND its own clone of Litecoin, Junkcoin JKC which sounds funny but is a big part of another functioning OG 0.6.3 v scrypt Litecoin exact clone, maybe even pseudo private gone public born before it. CoinyeCoin, it has JKC addr in it and so does the Omni tab for sending Omni Layer transactions on the software that made me invest in FTC, OmniFeather. Now I'm sure after FeatherUS EXCUSE me, that's not correct - it's called "Property 31" reveals its circular end game, we will all scale into the future. |
|
|
|
|
We have a winner here folks
|
|
|
|
Maybe the distribution of the receiver files was a few days late, so nodes could not find the latest ones?
-MarkM-
That what I figured. I thought since the receive isn't showing up but the mining rewards are that possibly we were missing out receivers csv... What can we do to fix that so we sync? Also, I like the ides of deflation, but we need to put something like Counterparty and the branch @sidhujag left for us or at least wrap our value to the SysCoin Core #NEVM bridge fromSHA-256 merge mined L1 to EVM tokens that will increase our coins value. I could've sworn our longevity, our average hashrate for the # of blocks we have secured etc, would matter for some intrinsic value. It can't all be about cash i nor spot exchange prices... |
|
|
|
why ixc?
not clear to me why it exists
Out of thin air, it's created because we love it so. But it exists because the miner fund was funded in 2018 when premine was given back to keep a 1 IXC block reward/subsidy duh... and who hates a nice set of big b...locks. You just can't stop looking at IX! https://youtu.be/ogoIxkPjRts |
|
|
|
I think it is when the distribution files cannot be found or not enough of them agree that shares don't get given out and miners only get 2500 instead of 5000.
I do not know what happened to make the distribution files not be found or disagree though.
How far back was it happening? Or did it maybe just start when the distribution files started trying to give out 1/10ths of a share?
-MarkM-
I think its been happening since block 488000. |
|
|
|
WARNING: I am pretty sure the code only supports 1/5ths of a share, trying to make it do 1/10ths would probably require a rebuilding of the actual node core software as well as maybe some modifying of the scripts we use to build the distribution files.
So file custodians be aware the files I just prepared might not actually work, we might have to re-do the file-preparing using 1/5ths of a share as I am pretty darn sure that is the smallest granularity we coded in from the start.
-MarkM-
Thanks for the heads up Mark! This is how we are fixing the issue: 1. Increase shares from 200 to 400 2. Duplicate assigned shares to all receivers (i.e: 1/10ths to 1/5ths) 3. Redistribute remaining 1/5ths to ensure the new receiver file is paying 1/5ths (tricky part) For #3 (and after several tests) I found additional 3/5ths of a share needed to be distributed somewhere, so I did as follows: - Increase Satoshi0x's Marketing duty shares from 1/5th to 2/5ths (well done Dan!) - Increase develCuy's Earning Factotum shares from 1/5th to 3/5ths (dude you're keeping me very busy!) I'll give up (again) some fractions of shares in the future, whenever we need to onboard new people. Changes are ready to deploy. Go go Devcoin! - develCuy Um. New wallet downloads require manual peer node entries or the wallet will not sync. It is still an old wallet with known vulnerabilities. Block rewards are down to 2,500 which made the miners give up. It is supposed to be 50k DVC reward per block, but now it is only 2.5k. We had some days where transactions didn't go through after waiting for hours. Nobody really cared though because there are so few transactions. See for yourself ... this blockchain is not very secure and the rewards are a fraction of what they are supposed to be https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dvc/#So I am asking: why is anybody taking shares when the coin is fundamentally broken? I remember back when you received shares for getting things done. You should send all of the ongoing shares to a burn address and give out bounties from your own fat wallets to get this project back on track. As it sits now, someone with a little hash power can set up their own local DNS entries for the receiver hostnames and bypass your ongoing shares forever. ~ctya Looks like the code just needs to adjust what the expected share amount given to the beneficiary should be. I just turned on my node and its 30 hours behind because this is what happened with the subsidy going down to 2,500: received block 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb
connection timeout
trying connection 146.52.211.139:52333 lastseen=52278.9hrs
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
received block da21e468d0cdeed0141ea397eb0f919e37a4b1bd49a510998dcdf0b2eb26afd0
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
received block bef0f3e5dcc92e31bcf1ce4a364dad14fa7582470e846b579968c1ffa506085e
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
received block 56341a94f8f09385f6767d2eb898cd8c3d382e970ad06af19cc5604f4325d897
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
received block 8575c0c5103874604a0d56a38a9db403a1aaa533fcc82ef24d7079093507d6b6
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
received block d2567b0720e46283df537ba958cb57df7de6464b35753631c44639b20af73f99
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
received block 900c8410d625c77960e2eb7fa06192fd0e03a20b69fc56074f06f7b93716ba98
ERROR: ConnectBlock() : Share to beneficiary is insufficient
ERROR: SetBestBlock() : ConnectBlock 367d787286695beb08828f6849ef50abb7a8079e45e4538feb65910f266179cb failed
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED And that just keeps spitting out in the debug.log Maybe we're meant to be deflationary and people will notice us again. Let's go 3-Dimensional on this bish, I think 10+ years in public we have enough security locked in here do we not? How would someone rewrite our entire chain... =P  |
|
|
|
Messaging here on the forum would work too but has no real expectation of privacy and in principle could even be spoofed by whoever runs these forums nowadays.
theymos? |
|
|
|
Oh, no Dan! You misunderstood me. I'm Cpol! Qtera is one of my many aliases! I haven't gone, just lurking around and waiting for my call! It's curious, because I've been worried the whole day thinking about devcoin and it was as if develCuy were calling me using telepathy!
my apologies! I just edited my post bc I noticed something I missed that I'm on board to do for "cpol" haha. You can read the EDIT right at the top as it is important to read first imo. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=233997.msg58184244#msg58184244We would be prepared to pay you the lumpsum of!  |
|
|
|
Jeez develCuy, i don't know what to say. Thank you for your confidence! I think it is not a selfless act at all, I hope it would. My way of see things is: if this project moves forward good enough, I would get more than I need to with my actual saved coins. But you are right, we need to move fast and now, because we have missed a lot of time already. We need those satoshis moving.
P.S.: Could I replace one of those seniors devs in your daily work? I'm kidding!
Hey Qtera help as much as you feel. Fernando is always letting me help when I ask. Glad you're back!
WARNING: I am pretty sure the code only supports 1/5ths of a share, trying to make it do 1/10ths would probably require a rebuilding of the actual node core software as well as maybe some modifying of the scripts we use to build the distribution files.
So file custodians be aware the files I just prepared might not actually work, we might have to re-do the file-preparing using 1/5ths of a share as I am pretty darn sure that is the smallest granularity we coded in from the start.
-MarkM-
ELI5 what would this do to the output data? (ie what a noob like me would see in his Devcoin-Qt or logs, or chainz block explorer?) |
|
|
|
I kindly ask everybody, specially in A-Team, to follow the example from Cpol, the guy doesn't earns a single ongoing share, yet he is accountable with his role within our DevTeam, he is always there whenever I need to test a new build, he does better reporting than many paid senior devs I know in my day job. Cpol does it all for a different model of incentive, get paid for actual achievements, when things are really done! No money upfront. Please don't take me wrong, I don't plan to change our current ongoing model, I only want to incentivize onboarding more people like Cpol and to awake the power from A-Team, together we could move Devcoin from under 1 sat to 10 sats in no time. Time will tell if I'm wrong and you'll then blame me for failure. EDIT: Wow lots to digest and input on. I only have the one share but I have been around GitHub and I know cpol's talented in ways i will never be and useful to you all in ways I am not. If you don't have money to give, and he likes hodling devcoins that don't pay the bills but he's here for the eventual value by price discovery - then you may forfeit whatever share I have left after your 90% reduction and give the 1 share I receive from Devtome for Social Media and community interaction involving Devcoin to cpol. I have amassed millions of DVC and had bought millions and millions all the way back when they used to be on altilly before they sold to the Swedes that ruined that exchange! Let me know if that helps. Was enough for me and I haven't spent one sat. Dear Devcoin community,
This is an announcement I had in the oven for so long. Part of the reason is that things slowed down so much due to the pandemic, yet not the complete answer. Free Software projects move along their community and leadership, the last one being my call. If you are familiar with driving cars, you know that the break is used more often than the accelerator pedal. Devcoin is ethical by purpose, one that I truly and deeply believe, but nothing is perfect so leadership should make some decisions to move the project forward.
The decision I'm taking this time is to reduce the number of ongoing shares from 223 to 200, it increases the amount of Devcoins minted for every ongoing share every round by about 10%. YET, we still have our markets in comma, so we are basically incentivizing hodling and inactivity for too much time. Rather I prefer to incentivize more active participation from A-Team (Devcoin staff), since we have several areas that need help, other than just hodling for passive income. Isn't that ethical?
For the reasons above, I reduced ongoing shares for staff by 90%, it means that incentive for all roles is now one tenth (1/10) of a share starting on round 122.
The immediate effect is that Devcoin inflation is lower and miners are receiving a higher income, they should since network hashrate reduced by 99% this year (remember that we don't have any blockchain without miners).
I believe that was a game played out by the exodus and/or shutting down of Chinese Bitcoin miners. Last time I checked that's the issue effecting Bitcoin in Asia but not having much effect on price besides positive ones. 80% of Bitcoin miners were once in China and now that there's shutdown localbitcoin shows a far smaller amount carry on, but with all different software - a majority core but still (how would we know if any of the rogues are mining Devcoin and others merge mined altcoins with their Bitcoin?). Another thing about our "blocks" would be they show raw data for exact transactions within BTC blocks as I've previously pointed out, and all Devcoin transactions are only shown in our one operating explorer in a separate "transactions" raw data section. I realize the CSS isn't the problem, but the way merge mining won't be the plan forever. It makes sense to eventually stop distribution millions of DVC to the same people yet not do something to try and tie or write the value of all that POW and all those held coins that were produced with copies of BTC Coinbase transactions for each Devcoin "Block" - as you see such data when you go under the hood of the Block tab in our current explorer and select raw block data. There's your BTC Newly Generated Coins along with some data at the bottom that has a few strings, a chainID for merge mining, etc etc. Without 80% of Bitcoin miners in mainland China, a slowing down in the production and shipment of BITMAIN hardware, and (read this news story) ports so full that the coastal California water is filled with cargo ships waiting weeks to be unloaded. The invisible hand wants this and it has even stalled our blocks. Mark has said having a blockchain that doesn't move doesn't mean its dead. We can still use record of it or mine a block with some special type of jumping point written into it that could helps us bridge tokens or work on transition trials to NEVM and accessing our first route to the wealth of DeFi and EVM chains as well as contributing our 10+ year secure blockchain to another sister project, surely returning value to our coins whether we wrap some tokens and bridge to NEVM, or whether those tokens even bridge to all other EVMs and then back even onto Syscoin Platform which is a UTXO model blockchain but it has software that allows on-chain issuance and movement/transaction of Syscoin Platform Tokens (Assets) and even NFTs. The testnet I've participated in extensively and this stuff works wonderfully. If we put enough work into relaying a price for Devcoin's present, future, and most definitely past - we should see a fair network with very fast processing speeds (Syscoin claims 4 million TPS on NEVM) acknowledge and identify things currently unreadable, non-standard, etc that also correctly account for value from Devcoin's past. Which there is, otherwise none of you would still be here. Logic wins that arguement everytime. We all know this coin needs some bridging, some oracles, some relays, some value lost to be rediscovered or regained, and most of all, run without manual .csv file configurations showing in my wallet as part of the devtome share I earn as "Mined" txn. It's a cyclical man written disbursement of coins for work. A payment maybe. But I know I'm not mining. That kind of thing if its in code could be screwing up the values of every L1 original UTXO chain. We know Devcoin is fixable, and needed. But yes whatever you want us to do - we're doing it. I haven't seen many people discussing things in the Discord or Keybase at the same time - but maybe the blocks are halting and the block subsidy should go down as well as change its distribution because Devcoin needs to evolve. Who knows how or what besides the leadership here. We can do this - that I know. I kindly ask everybody, specially in A-Team, to follow the example from Cpol, the guy doesn't earns a single ongoing share, yet he is accountable with his role within our DevTeam, he is always there whenever I need to test a new build, he does better reporting than many paid senior devs I know in my day job. Cpol does it all for a different model of incentive, get paid for actual achievements, when things are really done! No money upfront. Please don't take me wrong, I don't plan to change our current ongoing model, I only want to incentivize onboarding more people like Cpol and to awake the power from A-Team, together we could move Devcoin from under 1 sat to 10 sats in no time. Time will tell if I'm wrong and you'll then blame me for failure.
Final words here: No matter how low our chances are, success is always part of the possibilities!
Go go Devcoin!
- develCuy
P.S: "Si los perros ladran, es señal que avanzamos"
We know the math is fucked all over and noted in many different ways. Some people may see all those 0's and say hey, that's very cheap in unit of BTC. Another may know the value of those zeros as a set of integers expressed in hex, or even binary (0,00000001) or 0x00000001 or flipped endianness because they're beyond inclined in computer language and math (0.00000001 actually being 10000000.0 vv). 1 to 10 sats? some day the truth will shine, so why limit it. 10 sats - that's just not what this coin has put in - the cost of time has to be accounted for in the value but its not yet. The cost of carrying this chain whether mining or node operating has to be counted to every last millisecond and electrical efficiency doing it. We don't have all the values flowing through concretely. I wonder sometimes is that why the true reason this project has leaders is because they are the only ones who truly know. GitLab just went Public Traded in the US this Thursday 10/14. That should excite all who are aware GitLab has owned the Devcoin source code and thus "git" since 2015 when it bought Gitorious. It made those commits and code read-only shortly before stowing it away into its private company - GitLab. I've seen enough of that code to know it is as important to finishing Devcoin's past as sidhujag, belovachap, and others branches authored in our current GitHub repository "core" is to tying the present, past, and future into a fully functioning and time accurate software with an even more robust and strengthened network. Only you guys know how we get there but Markm thinks were the UTXO merge mined ready candidate to do Counterparty txns on Devcoin on the cheap and every now and then write them into the BTC main chain (like rollups and EVM Eth L2 solutions), but as one big transaction of transactions settled in DVC on Devcoin's blocks. If mark does that expect Devcoin to bounce to 5-$10 which is still many more satoshi's but still nearly not truly expressing Devcoin's value. At it's age and having tested so much software with these different blockchains, or same chains but diff params, I know a good bet when I see it. Here's the clay cup time to grab it Indiana Cuy.  Besides my busy work I've been engaging and testing what you said we might do down the road with Syscoin and their community too. As i mention here, I think them being aware of us is good. They may need us. And also I am seeing things that would be amazing for Devcoin once tested for bugs and built for production by Syscoiners first.I know I'm not able to code and compile things on Linux like cpol but I'm around, active, and always talking Devcoin with people open to hearing it (like SysCoin Devs, Execs, and Blockchain Foundry consultsants)... I even find guys you wanna track down to let them know you're interested in talking. But this project only will move as fast as its destiny. And I think you're doing great. One day we won't need to manually invoke periods of slowing down activity on purpose nor encouraging more activity. This has been a long experience for me. And i've been around only into my now 4th year. But I'm trying. Can't wait for my 4,500 DVC. I have more than enough imo - because I value it highly even if the software doesn't display the correct values worldwide. I know it will soon. It'd be awesome also to know if you all use the original gitorious source code or your own fork on GitHub etc. I'd like a link if you can to the LOC where these "Shares" we're going to divy up to 1/10 per 1 share is because then I prob wouldn't be confused as I am. I know I get my staff share paid out of Devtome shares, which I was getting 1 of the 50 shares allocated to pay for Devtome contributions (but for Social Media and Community outreach). Does this proposal mean my pay reduces to 0.1/50 shares coming from Devtome? I'm totally fine with that. I hodl'd and I will be for a long time. But I feel fortunate to be creeping my way up to the top 60 soon. They may be worth nothing but status wise they reflect the project I work hard at most to help however possible because I believe in it the most. |
|
|
|
Ditto. Our time will come. they NEED us like we need Vlad =P |
|
|
|
Have talked to FreiExchange on telegram. They have indicated DVC has "historical significance" and will remain trading for now... assuming that means its safe from first delisting but I'll update here if there is clarification.
A good community member here folks  You want his number? Lol. Ye, he’s one of ours. That means ixc and i0C are safe. I beg keep Btx, it’s gonna rain one way or another with that coin. LOL. Gonna have to change this since giving it to vlad So if IXC DVC gets delisted from freiexchange due to low trading activity where can it be traded comrades? ... assuming that means its safe from first delisting but I'll update here if there is clarification. Also, for those unaware you can hit up markm here from this thread to get 1:1 OTC token exchange for DVC on Stellar ( https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/DVC-GBHAQ252S4Z4AQOM4BWIRC3UHAOJIKCZQBUJGD336YH2O7W2NKRXMHA5-1). And then you can trade the DVC token on Stellar for whatever its listed against or make a new market hoping someone else trades with you... this can be a little quicker than FreiExchange if you're looking to get some liquidity for your DVC but I don't know at the moment what Mark's longterm plans are for that token. FWIW - he has reliably "cashed in" my DVC coins for DVC tokens and "cashed out" my DVC tokens (from Stellar DVC) to DVC coins (sent to my Devcoin wallet) in the past year. That's only my personal experience and not a recommendation to do it. “Will remain listed or trading?” DVC easily has the longest record of not 1 coin traded. Lol Thanks tho for using those deep pockets and connects. Only thing pockets deep in are crypto that don't trade! Easily... |
|
|
|
Cryptopia is still in the process of trying to get people's coins back to them so who knows, maybe we'll get those IXCoins back eventually.
-MarkM-
Wouldn't tokens "lost" on some database along with the passwords etc to release those from an actual Cryptopia wallet have a chance at being backed up somewhere? And if so, wouldn't a database of recording who owns what be regularly backed up to tell who is owed what IXC at what date? This is simple grade school accounting practice (backup your ledger on a separate device, hell a cloud or a jump drive) and wallet file backing up for me even. I would be curious to find out where that actual wallet for Cryptopia was stored and backed up for Cryptopia. There would be a reasonable explanation that GrantThornton"NZ" could give about the recovery process. Ya think? So if IXC gets delisted from freiexchange due to low trading activity where can it be traded comrades? Yobit. Lol. But don't deposit (if its possible) and expect to withdraw on old wallet software (think they run 0.11.9 right Vlad?)... Or my response in [DVC] thread about Stellar DVC IXC tokens.
Cryptopia is still in the process of trying to get people's coins back to them so who knows, maybe we'll get those IXCoins back eventually.
-MarkM-
We’ll get them after they moon and crash. Vlad thinks IXC will moon but never said anything about a crash apart from other coins eventually.If IXC is to become anything it should at least hit a few dollars or maybe even $100 some day .This is crypto and anything is possible when you see some crazy prices and liquidity for even meme coins.Nothing makes sense right now. That's because Vlad is likely right... eventually makes sense IXC would be needed for the same reasons Ethereum Mainnet chain needs sharding to scale parallel chains/alt-chains to scale in a horizontal direction/or it needs L2 to scale vertically from L1 and rollups to tie-up many txns into one mainnet tx on L1 for one much smaller-than-usual tx fee divided across all the rolled-up txns of participants on an L2-rollup. Also, if some coins are "lost forever" and were on Cryptopia's balance, even the coins the exchange said they owned... turn out lost forever etc... then you'd think the value once an L1-merge mined "sidechain" of Bitcoin would be all the more valuable? Just some thoughts, in no way factual, of why Vlad may be right/is probably right. Syscoin is making L1-merge mined security matter to the "EVM"/Ethereum L1 chain and thus any EVM bridged chains and Levels above L1 Ethereum chain... The write-up( https://syscoin.org/news/syscoin-the-road-ahead) seems to include all SHA-256 merge-mined chains with Bitcoin as the backing of security for *all* Ethereum smart contracts. More complex details, maybe I'm missing something but that's my understanding that Syscoin is going to utilize Ixcoin's security as a value it'll use $SYS (coins) and EVM/new "NEVM" + bridged/relayed Ethereum-side tokens to exchange correct value with (security through this process goes to Ethereum from Bitcoin merge-mined chains and I would think value goes back to $SYS (coins) and its other merge-mined coins because "kickback" only seems destiny via this process to make sense on both sides of the ledger... Perhaps. |
|
|
|
So if IXC DVC gets delisted from freiexchange due to low trading activity where can it be traded comrades? Have talked to FreiExchange on telegram. They have indicated DVC has "historical significance" and will remain trading for now... assuming that means its safe from first delisting but I'll update here if there is clarification. Also, for those unaware you can hit up markm here from this thread to get 1:1 OTC token exchange for DVC on Stellar ( https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/DVC-GBHAQ252S4Z4AQOM4BWIRC3UHAOJIKCZQBUJGD336YH2O7W2NKRXMHA5-1). And then you can trade the DVC token on Stellar for whatever its listed against or make a new market hoping someone else trades with you... this can be a little quicker than FreiExchange if you're looking to get some liquidity for your DVC but I don't know at the moment what Mark's longterm plans are for that token. FWIW - he has reliably "cashed in" my DVC coins for DVC tokens and "cashed out" my DVC tokens (from Stellar DVC) to DVC coins (sent to my Devcoin wallet) in the past year. That's only my personal experience and not a recommendation to do it. |
|
|
|
I'm having wallet issues now too. I got beyond the point you did, FuzzyBear, but got stuck further down--block 36999 or something. So I tried to manually download receiver 91 (replaced what was in my folder with one I downloaded from the direct download site (only changed to be receiver 91). The next time I ran my wallet, I got the "failed to connect to best block" error message. So I thought, great, I've corrupted the block chain. I deleted all but wallet.dat and tried again. It won't get past block zero now. I tried to shut down wallet and restart. That gave me the failed to connect error message again. Deleted everything, trying again, stuck on block zero (for now). I'm going to walk away and come back (and if it starts syncing I'll post an update). If it stays stuck on block zero, what are the steps I can take to get my wallet working again?
Edit: It's also stuck on only one active connection to network.
Edit: I restored the original peers file to see if that would help. My wallet now has 2 active connections and is still stuck on block zero. I'm running out of ideas. Please help.
Edit: 4 active connections now. still stuck on block 0. Maybe it's just slow?
Not to beat a dead horse or dig up the past issues but since I got here from issue #87 on the devcoin / core repository on Gh this is exactly what happens to me when I try to sync the new Bitcoin 22.0 wallet  |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I'm needing some peers to add to my roaming folder so that I can start downloading the DVC blockchain. I just installed the latest wallet but I'm showing only one connection to the network and no blocks downloading.
Thanks!
the "node list" has peer addresses for syncing: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dvc/#!networkThanks, DevelCuy for your help last night! Hi all,
I'm needing some peers to add to my roaming folder so that I can start downloading the DVC blockchain. I just installed the latest wallet but I'm showing only one connection to the network and no blocks downloading.
Thanks!
Thanks, DevelCuy for your help last night! Hi all,
I'm needing some peers to add to my roaming folder so that I can start downloading the DVC blockchain. I just installed the latest wallet but I'm showing only one connection to the network and no blocks downloading.
Thanks!
Sorry I was two days late wiser just saw today. Thanks develCuy. |
|
|
|
wts 2 billion coinye for 10 BTC. If anyone is interested, please contact lc1395427@126.comand leave your wallet address, I will give away 10,000 Coinye/person, a total of 100 persons. 5TisH55V9otSxGpQQ8J5poJDpsHUaZJ81q |
|
|
|
|
Anyway we got mined by a Bitcoin Cash mining pool =P block 484668 was 16 hours ago lol
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
