This obviously happened because @tvplus006 was specified instead of tvplus006 The "@" doesn't matter. The post was edited, see loyce.club/archive/posts/5406/54062288.html for the unedited version, which is what I used. Unfortunately, I have no easy way to notify for edits. |
|
|
|
Please have the decency of paying my 30$ deposit or my 100$ overall in earnings If it's a scam to get you to deposit, I'm pretty sure you didn't win the $100. My experience with similar scams is that everybody will "win", just so you'll deposit more. Flag supported. |
|
|
|
I gave him a negative feedback because he put my name in the distrust list for no reason and he did the same with my second account Virtualis Games for no reason. You're going at this the wrong way. Please start by reading LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system (translated into 12 different languages, which shows broad community support for what I wrote). First: anyone can include or exclude anyone they want. This isn't moderated, but more importantly: you shouldn't take it personally! Anyone can also leave anyone any feedback they want. This too isn't moderated. However, if you ever want your feedback to mean something (by reaching DefaulTrust), you'll need others to include you, which they may do if they think you leave valid feedback. He put my name in the distrust list because i was trying to explain myself about a situation where TECshare made an error but TECshare was trying to make me close my mouth like a dishonest person. Again: you're taking the wrong approach. You could discuss this in a new Reputation thread, but none of this is a reason to leave negative feedback. He put "ABitNut" in the trust list TECSHARE included ABitNut more than a year ago. The only thing that changed is that TECSHARE reached DT1 recently. but this user abused of the feedback system since he gave me a negative feedback for "multi account" without any reason (muti account and what ? it makes me a scammer ?) I don't know. If you open a new topic for this, I'm willing to look into the evidence. But it still doesn't justify negative feedback. |
|
|
|
Just inquiring, shouldn't a newbie/guest trust flag also be opened against them? I suggested @@Poker_face@@ to create a type 3 Flag: Only the victim is allowed to create a type 3 Flag. If he doens't create it, a type 1 Flag would be the next best thing. |
|
|
|
I don’t typically go looking for scammers, but when they get my attention I don’t mind adding them to my network as such. I reviewed a great deal of that thread and other references as I advised others to do as well. My suggestion would be to create a proper Reference thread in Reputation, where you collect all relevant Reference material for easy quick review. If it's convincing, I'll tag dragonvslinux myself. Being a long thread isn’t an excuse for a thread being invalid Let's see: http://loyce.club/showall/2057229.html ( archived). Dragonvslinux's first appearance in that thread was on page 103, post 2046. I guess we have different standards of presenting evidence. It now looks like this:  ( source: shutterstock.com) I get that I’ve been vocal recently about constantly making threads with statistical analysis on this forum being merit whorish and not a contribution to Bitcoin, but I won’t go as far as saying your involvement in this thread is retaliation for it. Lol  Okay, you've got me! If I'm a Merit whore, I guess I'm just very, very good at it  I don't really get how that has anything to be with posting in this thread though. Sad to see you join in to derail this thread which exists to discuss Vod’s constant lies. I had removed this topic from my Watchlist, until you dragged me in again. That post made this thread about more than just "Vod is a liar.". I honesty expected more from you. I'd appologize, but then I realized as a Thick-Skinned Gang Leader, I don't care. I'm not here to meet expectiations in forum drama. I post what I believe is right. |
|
|
|
Or just neg me in retaliation for my accurate neutral trust left against you (as someone who previously trusted your judgement)  OgNasty used the same Reference as Lauda did 5 months ago. That's disappointing, the topic has 120 pages and 2383 posts by now. If you call someone a "Known scammer", please use a reference link that points directly to the evidence. You can't expect people to review half a book first. Now it looks like retaliation indeed. Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility ( source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement. If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them. |
|
|
|
Please prove my words too, without revealing sensitive data.
From ~120BTC received only 32%
68% its ~81 BTC stucked in mixer, or scammed. After verifying the Letter of Guarantee and checking transactions to all involved addresses, I can confirm @@Poker_face@@'s claim. All the above is correct. The Letter of Guarantee was signed by the address archived here and here. [banned mixer]: please respond! For now I'm going to leave a big SCAM WARNING RESOLVED. @@Poker_face@@: please confirm back here if/when this gets resolved, I did not keep your Letter of Guarantee so I'll have no other way to confirm when this gets resolved. And if they do resolve this, it's very important (for other similar cases in the future) to remove scam accusations. If they do the right thing, it should be known! I'm still hoping this is a technical glitch, because it doesn't make sense to exit scam for less than 100%. But I strongly recommend not to use this mixer until it's resolved.
Update: Cryptomixer paid my funds back, I remove all claims. Great! Thanks for reporting back here  In the future, you should probably consider mixing smaller amounts at a time. I'll remove my negative feedback. |
|
|
|
New user claims he sent 120 bitcoins(lol) and user who owns rival btc mixer "confirms" it. Not sketchy at all. I offer to review and if possible confirm the evidence. I've done that before. Just note that sending a Letter of Guarantee by PM might compromise your privacy because the forum uses Cloudflare, which is very probably a NSA honeypot. I find it hard to believe someone will send 120 coins at once. I've seen weird things before  Even the most trustworthy person will be tempted to take the money. It's a life-changing amount for most people, so I sure as hell wouldn't trust an anonymous website with it. But back in the Bitmixer days they made much more profit than 120 Bitcoin. And why he will send 30% and not keep all the money? Super sketchy. Just a guess: maybe the automated system used their entire hot wallet, after which manual action was required (but didn't happen). |
|
|
|
I don't know but have you checked the history of the user? Too many posts has been deleted from what I notice... I have archived 16 of his posts since July 2019. None of those have been deleted. He mentioned that he was starting a physical bitcoin business in the Philippines, and that he was working on getting a fiat loan. He was supposed to pay me back with the money he got for his business loan. In retrospect, paying back a loan by taking another loan should have been a big red flag. |
|
|
|
Is that in progress or did it just kill my browser when I tried to click another link for a different time spot?
Would be interesting if it evolved into where merits were earnt&sent by most of them too... It works okay in (my) Firefox, although 30 days posts is heavy on the browser. I won't add Merit to this, this was only meant as a quick overview of what campaign participants are up to, but I never bothered to make automated updates. Now that I think about it: I used an outdated userlist for this. |
|
|
|
The user seemed very promising and was doing great job for the community especially in their local community. There must be something wrong with him, possibly any physical condition or something? It's hard to believe that they are not responding and ran away with the money but till this point it's seems that's the truth. It won't be the first time a promising user took the opportunity to steal when it presented itself. He was barely active the months before taking the loan, and stopped posting right after he received the loan. That doesn't seem like physical problems to me. Flag supported. Let me know if this gets resolved, I'll gladly withdraw support. |
|
|
|
Since you're curious of about ChipMixer participants, maybe you should analyze where usually participants make their posts (most likely it's either Meta or Beginners & Help) I made a page for that. It doesn't receive automated updates, but I just ran an update. See http://loyce.club/sigcamp/chipmixer/topics7d.html |
|
|
|
Congratulations on the first anniversary of your Merit Cycling Club, and thank you very much for having me as the first Merit Cycler! I'm still amazed by your drawing talent, well done I can't believe I didn't Merit the post that (indirectly) started the (by now) (in)famous Foxpup Merit Cycling Club until now
Note on : The domain IsFoxpupStillANSFWVixen.today is likely to expire on March 11, 2021, so don't trust it afterwards. Although, if the (in)famous Foxpup Merit Cycing Club continues for another year, who knows what else it might bring on the next birthday |
|
|
|
Thanks again, flawless timing as usual! Thank you very much for renting my signature for a full year, and congratulations on the gang Club you've started! I used this opportunity to update the topic title |
|
|
|
Can you make list of users who are included to Og's trust network but he allegedly wants other users to exclude them? And of course, how many users Og excluded. I would have, if not for this: I have not excluded all of the above, and think people should make their own decisions |
|
|
|
it seems to me that it is a trivially easy computation to figure out what rank each user had. It's not: you currently have 5963 and earned 4941 (according to your site) which puts you above 1000 with 22 diff (probably not updated yet) so you were Legendary when you joined. I joined ChipMixer's campaign 2.5 months before I reached Legendary Rank. So I was a Hero Member back then. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
