Even if you updated to a fake version, your coins wouldn't be stolen. You have to review every transaction on the in-built screen. You would notice right away if something was wrong. Electrum offers far many more features than Ledger Live and the phising method you mentioned doesn't work anymore if you have the latest version.

As long as nothing happens to your hardware wallets (or both mnemonic phrases to be more precise), you will be able to recreate the wallet in Electrum. Transaction history and UXTO will be fetched from the node. Why don't you give it a try? Create a new wallet file under a different name to see how it works.


Yes, but you might need to recreate the wallet if you use, for example, Ledger instead of ColdCard.

Część użytkowników ma zablokowane prywatne wiadomości od nowych użytkowników (możliwe, że tak jest domyślnie). Aby ominąć to ograniczenie, musisz zdobyć rangę Jr. Member. Jeden merit Ci nie wystarczy. Oprócz niego musisz mieć 30 activity, które jest liczone w następujący sposób.

Isn't it exactly the opposite? I looked up this command on a few websites and they said that setting it to -20 makes the process the most favorable. Thanks for your suggestion. I have already contacted Zand_ and we might give it a shot along with neutrino.

Yes, you are. Anyway, in Ledger's case, you don't have to worry about it when using a wallet normally. The only thing that theoretically could be obtained by an attacker is your PIN code. People who want to generate a new seed or restore the old one, should connect their wallets to a wall charger or use the built-in battery (Nano X). It's very unlikely that you will be targeted now. I would not worry about it.

Using a Raspberry Pi is kinda a bumpy ride. It works well for most of the time, but sometimes, it slows down for no reason. It will be usable if you don't mind waiting another 30 seconds from time to time.


Most tutorials out there are made for LND which is the only implementation supporting neutrino. Neutrino seems to be working fine since Lightning Lab decided to use it in their mobile mainnet Lightning Network wallet. There's also another light client called Breez available on iOS which also uses neutrino.

Myślę, że 400 zł (najlepiej w BTC ) + przesyłka to uczciwa cena. Nie mieszkam w Warszawie, więc pozostaje jedynie wysyłka.

This short guide seems to be accurate. If you need any help or encounter any problems, feel free to post here. Check Electrum changelog from time to time in case a major vulnerability is fixed in an update.

Yes, your funds will be safe as long as you don't fall for the phising you mentioned. If you decide to update it then download it from the official website and verify the signature just to be sure. However, there is no need to do so if you don't use your wallet on a daily basis.

If you fund a channel then coins are on your side of the channel. You won't be able to receive money over the Lightning Network unless you spend some coins. You have to free some space in the channel (some coins have to be on the other side). More detailed and easy to understand explanation can be found here. There are also services which open a channel to you for a small fee. In such a case, you would be able to receive payments.

Have you seen my LN FAQ and the basics of the Lightning Network? I might not reply you for the next few hours.

You have to wait until the transaction gets confirmed by miners. It might take some time because the current recommended fee is 11 sat/byte. Don't worry, your transaction should be confirmed within few hours.

It looks like you have misread my post. Bitcoin Lightning Wallet is the one that charges users for backups. More information can be found here.


No, it doesn't. If you choose LND then you can use built-in neutrino which is a light client. The Lightning Network node itself doesn't use many resources. We could set it up even on your VPS.

I made a small assumption here. It's still 144 blocks by default, but it is extended to 2016 blocks when the user enables receiving payments over the LN. You are more likely to lose money when the other party had coins on their side in the beginning.

Eclair Mobile sets the timelock for the remote uncooperative close to 2 weeks which is plenty of time, especially if you take into account that most people keep their phones constantly connected to 3G or 4G networks (unless you live in the US where data plans are expensive ). It's also possible to have an LND node on a VPS and a Zap app on a phone which makes sending and receiving payments much easier without a risk of theft. Spark is an alternative if someone uses c-lightning.

Once you fund the node's on-chain address and decide to open a channel, your coins will be automatically moved to a new multisig address controlled by you and the other party who accepted your proposal. After a few confirmations, the channel will become active and you should be able to send coins over the Lightning Network. You won't be able to receive payments unless you spend some coins or ask someone to open a channel to you.

Both Eclair Mobile and Bitcoin Lightning Wallet allow user to backup their Lightning Network channels. The former allows creating local backups as well as encrypting and uploading them directly to user's Google Drive account automatically. As far as I remember, the latter asks user to pay for its backup service. It might have changed, though.

It would still work, but you would be able to access those coins only through Electrum or any other wallet that supported Trezor devices and native SegWit. We don't know when Trezor is going to support bech32 in their own wallet.


No, you can stick to nested SegWit (p2wpkh-p2sh). RBF is not available in Trezor wallet; you have to use Electrum at the moment. What version of Electrum do you have? If you update to the latest one then it should have RBF turned on by default. If not, go to Electrum settings and enable Replace-By-Fee.

No, you would have seen a different wallet. Trezor does not support native SegWit in their web wallet, so I doubt that you have ever used it. You can switch to native SegWit if you want. Your addresses will start from bc1 and you will save a little bit more on fees. However, some services don't suport sending to bech32 addresses (native SegWit) and you won't be able to use Trezor's wallet to see the balance since they don't suport this feature yet.

Actually, it's a little bit more complex You would be right if Bluewallet's and Loyce's nodes were connected to each other directly; meaning that they would have a channel in which both of them had some coins on their sides. In such a case, there would be no fees. However, you paid a really small fee. This means that your transaction has been routed by some node which is connected to both Loyce and BlueWallet or a much longer path was found.

Have you seen my LN FAQ and the basics of the Lightning Network? Feel free to post your further questions there.

Try playing with sliders on this website. You will probably use regular (legacy) addresses. Outputs are the addresses you generate. Also, don't forget to look at the fee rate. It increases from time to time, so you will have to divide the estimated fee by it.


Electrum allows users to include multiple outputs by entering multiple addresses and amounts in the Pay to field like this:


All the addresses have to be in separate lines. Otherwise, it won't work.