Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 06:28:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
161  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 01:19:46 AM
It seems that I have some problem with nethash, whether I buy it from for example BSOD, or even selecting CTM or CC, to obtain Nethash. There are moments that correctly shows the nethash and gives a realistic profir, in this case right now about 500 ghs for veil, but at times it goes to 240 Th / s of nethash and the currency sinks.

At times shows the nethash well, at times shows the burrada of 240 THs.

If I use the CC APi in custom and look for the value, I exceed 500 requests per day, because each currency is a request. In addition, the CC data is well below the real hash according to other sources.

https://www.coincalculators.io/api.aspx?name=veil&hashrate=1
json currentNethash

VEIL has a pretty weird explorer
https://explorer.veil-project.com/
where we can not extract the nethash. IF I use the providers, because you give to choose the 3 that there are, it also gives me failure.

If I use the BSOD data, I get the data well for a while and more or less well, but then it goes to 240 Ths, then it's fine again then again it gives it badly
http://api.bsod.pw/api/currencies
json VEIL.network_hashrate

I do not put data out of laziness.

For that I ask who can pass me the general API of Yiimp, where all the pools based on Yiimp take the data, to request them there, or could even be defined as a nethash provider.

Anyway the formula of obtaining BSOD serves me, the problem is that at times I show the correct nethash, about 500 right now and suddenly it goes to more than 200 ths, then it goes well, then badly and so all the time .
162  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 16, 2019, 12:40:07 AM
@patrike or @moppidoo can you provide me with the general Yiimp API url, where all the yimmp pools take the data?
163  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 15, 2019, 02:42:17 PM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6i4nu2mjviw3y67/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-13%20a%20las%206.35.30.png?dl=0


You will see the Xfox currency and its estimate of more than 7000 coins in a day (rigti 1080ti). But it's wrong, I think the formula of your profit is not very accurate and I can say it because we measure and test all the currencies / pool and elprofit is between 0.70 to 0.95 90% of the time, but it's not what same mine to 0.80 that to 1.

In this case, this Xfox coin has a blocking time of 2 minutes and has a reward of 2.79 (removing fee from the pool), the maximum coins per day is from 2008, it does not matter how many machines and the hash is the same because the difficulty it adjusts itself, the maximum is 2008 coins per day.

With which his estimate is completely wrong in this currency and slightly deviated in many others, but it is no longer a question of data, it is a question of formula.
The formula itself is correct and gives the exact same results are WhatToMine and CoinCalculators in general. There can however be specific coins that do something differently where you manually need to adjust the profit factor as it's not possible to compute the number of coins per day the standard way.

You must take into account block time, reward and nethash, to have a more accurate profit. It is a more complex formula, more data to take into account and we must take into account the maximum coins per day for the estimates offered by AM

It is only a constructive criticism, we customize all fields, difficulty, recommensa, price of exchanges directly (that's why it would be good to cache results between requests)

It's just an example where the formula is not right. Neither can it be to mine ZEL when its real profit is 0.65 and so many currencies. You imagine mining ZEL to profit 1, but then only receive 65% of the mined. That's why I recommend everyone to do pool and coin tests, if you change the pool you have to repeat the test.
Yes, the plan is to add support for the "NetHash" way of doing the calculations as well, where Block Time is one of the factors. The idea is also have this configurable per coin so if you run into a coin where the standard way of doing the calculations doesn't give the expected results, you should be able to switch to this other mode.


Last detail, the benchmark. When I do a 2 or 5 hour test, what value does it give?

The last value he had at the end of the test
The highest peak of hash
The average of the hash of those 5 hours (This would be the correct one)
@patrike should average the benchmar hash, if not, the benchmark is totally useless for AL-GOS that change subalways, it just is not worth it.

@PAtrike is there no way to average the hash value of 2, 5 or 10 hours, during a benchmark?
It should be the average but excluding a few samples in the beginning as those first samples are typically too low. However, I did notice an issue here with long running benchmarks so I will make a correction for that case. Thanks for finding it.

Update - coin properties:
I've just finished the implementation for Network Hashrate and Block Time in the Coin Properties, together with a setting where you can select one of the following calculation methods:
- Difficulty, Block Reward and Exponential factor
- Network Hashrate, Block Reward and Block Time

As always, thank you for your compression of the problems and be the first to want to solve them. That says a lot about you as a good programmer.

As a last suggestion doubt. A rule that changes the fan speed of the rigs graphics without having to restart the mining.

Thanks in advance for the types of profit. It is clear that the other type of profit requires much more work, we in our group assume it, and when closer to reality better.
164  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 14, 2019, 01:27:13 PM
Last detail, the benchmark. When I do a 2 or 5 hour test, what value does it give?

The last value he had at the end of the test
The highest peak of hash
The average of the hash of those 5 hours (This would be the correct one)

I do not know exactly what data is the one that shows and saves the benchmark.

I will answer my previous question. It does not matter 2 hours, 5 hours or 10 hours, it will always give you the last value of the last share. It does not average

So it does not work to put x16r, x16rt, x16s, X17 and the other X, because it will not make an average hash, it will only take the last hash sent after 5 hours.

So far I do it manually, I set to mine x16R I leave it at least 2 hours, I take captures every 10 minutes and then average the hash value of all the captures. That is a very heavy work, and more when each rig is different.

@patrike should average the benchmar hash, if not, the benchmark is totally useless for AL-GOS that change subalways, it just is not worth it.

@PAtrike is there no way to average the hash value of 2, 5 or 10 hours, during a benchmark?
165  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 13, 2019, 04:46:05 AM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6i4nu2mjviw3y67/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-13%20a%20las%206.35.30.png?dl=0


You will see the Xfox currency and its estimate of more than 7000 coins in a day (rigti 1080ti). But it's wrong, I think the formula of your profit is not very accurate and I can say it because we measure and test all the currencies / pool and elprofit is between 0.70 to 0.95 90% of the time, but it's not what same mine to 0.80 that to 1.

In this case, this Xfox coin has a blocking time of 2 minutes and has a reward of 2.79 (removing fee from the pool), the maximum coins per day is from 2008, it does not matter how many machines and the hash is the same because the difficulty it adjusts itself, the maximum is 2008 coins per day.

With which his estimate is completely wrong in this currency and slightly deviated in many others, but it is no longer a question of data, it is a question of formula.

You must take into account block time, reward and nethash, to have a more accurate profit. It is a more complex formula, more data to take into account and we must take into account the maximum coins per day for the estimates offered by AM

It is only a constructive criticism, we customize all fields, difficulty, recommensa, price of exchanges directly (that's why it would be good to cache results between requests)

It's just an example where the formula is not right. Neither can it be to mine ZEL when its real profit is 0.65 and so many currencies. You imagine mining ZEL to profit 1, but then only receive 65% of the mined. That's why I recommend everyone to do pool and coin tests, if you change the pool you have to repeat the test.


Last detail, the benchmark. When I do a 2 or 5 hour test, what value does it give?

The last value he had at the end of the test
The highest peak of hash
The average of the hash of those 5 hours (This would be the correct one)

I do not know exactly what data is the one that shows and saves the benchmark.

I feel so critical, it's a huge job, full of great difficulties, all this is normal.

Your current formula can be used in some way for the autoexchanges, because there you do not know what currency mines or their data, and there their formula makes sense.

To mine direct currencies, it is not adequate, it can and must be improved.

What produces maximum to the day (block and reward). What is the total hashnet, how much do I contribute (my participation), therefore how many coins per day can I get x price of the currency (profit)

And take into account the maximum daily production of coins per day, so as not to give strange numbers very high as in the example I have set.
166  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 11, 2019, 06:27:18 PM
You dont need another 100's of clocking profiles, you just need 1 profile with your fixed 80% speed. Nothing else. Apply it with a rule to your miners, nothing else will be changed.

I think you're wrong in what you say. Although I create another profile, if I leave the other values at 0, in the end it will be 100PL 0 core 0 memory and fan speed.

When you apply an oc profile, the entire complete profile is applied, not just one parameter.

If I'm wrong, leave me here a screenshot of how I should leave the OC profile, but before you try it, it really works.
167  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 11, 2019, 05:25:51 PM
Use rules, fixed fans and 2 or more profiles. If the temperature reach 70°C for example make a rule to change to another profile with faster fixed fans. I think it is the easiest way. And in my opinion, if you mining, never use automatic fan control.

It is not feasible to do so, power can be, but it is not appropriate. I have 6 rigs, and I use about 20 Algos. I have established about 100 OC profiles.

What you are saying is that you make another 100 OC profiles with a fixed fan speed. I'm sorry but that's Chinese work.

There must be simpler options than what is proposed, which for an RIG may be worth and even so, there would be several profiles, at least 2 for each SOMETHING.

When you use the GPU Clocking dialog and select Save As, you can specify which GPU parameters to save to the profile. You can for example save only the fan speed property set to a value like 85%. I can agree that the usability should be improved a bit here.

You can then have a rule to apply this "Fan 85%" clocking profile to a running miner. It will not change the Clocking Profile permanently, but it will change the fan to 85% for a running mining.

It should be possible to use the Clocking Groups to combine different Clocking Profiles as well. Not only about having different Clocking Profiles for different GPU types, but also to apply multiple Clocking Profiles to the same GPU - where one profile could apply Fan speed only and another one the GPU/mem clocking.

@Patrike, in the rules, you can know the temperature of the cards and put a rule. But I do not see that it works. The rule can detect the temperature, 80 degrees in my case, and I indicate that the fan works fixed at 80%, but it does not. It seems to me that this one more thought for asic, surely it would have to restart miner in GPU, but to do it also it lowers the temperature and the rule does not shoot.

There some way to do what I indicate, and to apply a fixed speed to all the cards of the rig, without having to restart miner ?, would be an ideal solution for this situation, and summer is near.
If this is the "Device command" action, it's only operations intended for ASIC miners and SgMiner - not for GPU mining in general. This is where you need to apply clocking profiles instead.




----
When you use the GPU Clocking dialog and select Save As, you can specify which GPU parameters to save to the profile. You can for example save only the fan speed property set to a value like 85%. I can agree that the usability should be improved a bit here.

You can then have a rule to apply this "Fan 85%" clocking profile to a running miner. It will not change the Clocking Profile permanently, but it will change the fan to 85% for a running mining.

-----------

as you say in those two paragraphs. What I propose is to create two equal profiles, one with AUTO and another with a fixed speed fan, and by a rule use it. I do that when the temperature reaches 84 degrees and change to a very smooth OC and if it reaches 85 the miner stops.

But when applying a rule I can only choose an OC to change. Whatever my OC, the rule will only change to an OC that I choose. It is not the solution I am looking for, since I use multiple OCs according to the AL-GO and the miner in question, I would have to make hundreds of rules, one for miners and for each personalized OC.

If you already know that you can change the OC in real time and really use it to protect the cards. I do not understand why there can not be a rule that only changes the FAN regardless of the OC configuration that you are using, which are many. It is only the FAN is not complicated, the rule can take the current data of the OC that is in progress and only change the value of the FAN of AUTO to a fixed Speed, as easy as that.

I hope you have explained me well.
The solution available today to set fan speed to 85% for a miner via the rules:
- Use rule action "Apply clocking profile", where you have a Clocking Profile set to 85% fan speed for example. That's the only property of the clocking profile so all this action will do is to change the fan speed and nothing else. No matter if you have few or many Clocking Profiles in general, you need one extra profile for setting only the fan speed to 85% in this case.

This could be simplified into the following in the future:
- Use a new action concept to "Apply clocking setting" where you could select that you want the "Fan" property to be set to 85% for example. This would remove the need of the Clocking Profile containing the 85% fan speed property.

There are no difference in behavior between these two ways, it's just that the second one doesn't require you to create a Clocking Profile for each fan speed level you want to set. In both cases, it's only the fan speed that is changed an no other overclocking settings.

through modification of profile clocking, I must choose another complete profile that has the quality of 80% of fixed FAN. But that's what I say. If I have 100 OC profiles, I have to make another 100 equal ones that only change from automatic to one with fixed speed. It is not an option for me. I work with more than 20 people, I work with 1060, 1070, 1080ti and RTX, you know how many OC profiles I have. To think that I have to duplicate all of them and have another with fixed speed does not work for me.

I hope that ne future add a rule option in which only change the speed (internally load the chosen profile or change the car to a fixed number determined by me), I do not see it complicated. And with only one rule I have everything solved.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/e2icft05d0cll2b/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-11%20a%20las%2019.19.51.png?dl=0

That option of the image, as you said is for ASIC, but it would be perfect as is for GPU, that respects the OC of Pl, Core and MEM, and that only changes the FAN. As I already have other rules that if it reaches 82 degrees it changes to another profile, it works very well and if it reaches 84 it turns it off. I do this in case fans are broken, the miner shuts down.

I hope you add it someday, something as simple as capture and work in GPU. Internally the rule would throw the same OC just by changing the fan.
168  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 11, 2019, 10:43:05 AM
Use rules, fixed fans and 2 or more profiles. If the temperature reach 70°C for example make a rule to change to another profile with faster fixed fans. I think it is the easiest way. And in my opinion, if you mining, never use automatic fan control.

It is not feasible to do so, power can be, but it is not appropriate. I have 6 rigs, and I use about 20 Algos. I have established about 100 OC profiles.

What you are saying is that you make another 100 OC profiles with a fixed fan speed. I'm sorry but that's Chinese work.

There must be simpler options than what is proposed, which for an RIG may be worth and even so, there would be several profiles, at least 2 for each SOMETHING.

When you use the GPU Clocking dialog and select Save As, you can specify which GPU parameters to save to the profile. You can for example save only the fan speed property set to a value like 85%. I can agree that the usability should be improved a bit here.

You can then have a rule to apply this "Fan 85%" clocking profile to a running miner. It will not change the Clocking Profile permanently, but it will change the fan to 85% for a running mining.

It should be possible to use the Clocking Groups to combine different Clocking Profiles as well. Not only about having different Clocking Profiles for different GPU types, but also to apply multiple Clocking Profiles to the same GPU - where one profile could apply Fan speed only and another one the GPU/mem clocking.

@Patrike, in the rules, you can know the temperature of the cards and put a rule. But I do not see that it works. The rule can detect the temperature, 80 degrees in my case, and I indicate that the fan works fixed at 80%, but it does not. It seems to me that this one more thought for asic, surely it would have to restart miner in GPU, but to do it also it lowers the temperature and the rule does not shoot.

There some way to do what I indicate, and to apply a fixed speed to all the cards of the rig, without having to restart miner ?, would be an ideal solution for this situation, and summer is near.
If this is the "Device command" action, it's only operations intended for ASIC miners and SgMiner - not for GPU mining in general. This is where you need to apply clocking profiles instead.




----
When you use the GPU Clocking dialog and select Save As, you can specify which GPU parameters to save to the profile. You can for example save only the fan speed property set to a value like 85%. I can agree that the usability should be improved a bit here.

You can then have a rule to apply this "Fan 85%" clocking profile to a running miner. It will not change the Clocking Profile permanently, but it will change the fan to 85% for a running mining.

-----------

as you say in those two paragraphs. What I propose is to create two equal profiles, one with AUTO and another with a fixed speed fan, and by a rule use it. I do that when the temperature reaches 84 degrees and change to a very smooth OC and if it reaches 85 the miner stops.

But when applying a rule I can only choose an OC to change. Whatever my OC, the rule will only change to an OC that I choose. It is not the solution I am looking for, since I use multiple OCs according to the AL-GO and the miner in question, I would have to make hundreds of rules, one for miners and for each personalized OC.

If you already know that you can change the OC in real time and really use it to protect the cards. I do not understand why there can not be a rule that only changes the FAN regardless of the OC configuration that you are using, which are many. It is only the FAN is not complicated, the rule can take the current data of the OC that is in progress and only change the value of the FAN of AUTO to a fixed Speed, as easy as that.

I hope you have explained me well.
169  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 11, 2019, 10:32:57 AM
Use rules, fixed fans and 2 or more profiles. If the temperature reach 70°C for example make a rule to change to another profile with faster fixed fans. I think it is the easiest way. And in my opinion, if you mining, never use automatic fan control.

It is not feasible to do so, power can be, but it is not appropriate. I have 6 rigs, and I use about 20 Algos. I have established about 100 OC profiles.

What you are saying is that you make another 100 OC profiles with a fixed fan speed. I'm sorry but that's Chinese work.

There must be simpler options than what is proposed, which for an RIG may be worth and even so, there would be several profiles, at least 2 for each SOMETHING.

When you use the GPU Clocking dialog and select Save As, you can specify which GPU parameters to save to the profile. You can for example save only the fan speed property set to a value like 85%. I can agree that the usability should be improved a bit here.

You can then have a rule to apply this "Fan 85%" clocking profile to a running miner. It will not change the Clocking Profile permanently, but it will change the fan to 85% for a running mining.

It should be possible to use the Clocking Groups to combine different Clocking Profiles as well. Not only about having different Clocking Profiles for different GPU types, but also to apply multiple Clocking Profiles to the same GPU - where one profile could apply Fan speed only and another one the GPU/mem clocking.

@Patrike, in the rules, you can know the temperature of the cards and put a rule. But I do not see that it works. The rule can detect the temperature, 80 degrees in my case, and I indicate that the fan works fixed at 80%, but it does not. It seems to me that this one more thought for asic, surely it would have to restart miner in GPU, but to do it also it lowers the temperature and the rule does not shoot.

There some way to do what I indicate, and to apply a fixed speed to all the cards of the rig, without having to restart miner ?, would be an ideal solution for this situation, and summer is near.
If this is the "Device command" action, it's only operations intended for ASIC miners and SgMiner - not for GPU mining in general. This is where you need to apply clocking profiles instead.
The problem I see with the overclock groups is that I should do many, but many. I already have about 100 individual profiles, type

85 90 +400
85 85 +400
85 85 -400

PL - Core - MEM

and they are called like that, and then from each miner in each protocol or AL-GO to be able to choose an OC that just by reading the name on the OC that I am going to apply. But do 100 groups and customize card to card is not an idea, because then a group would only serve for a rig in question, for their cards and their independent oce. At the end there would be many more groups, a lot of extra work

I have no choice but to work with fixed speed, but it seems like a savage to have 80% a whole year a fan, that's why I like the automatic one more. What I propose are two easier solutions for everyone.

At the time of defining an OC, I know that I can choose either fixed or auto, but inside the car there could be a box marked something like "aggressive" where the AUTO is higher than normal. Or a rule that really works in real time with the rig GPU without resigning.

With aftherburner if you changed from auto to manual the fan, it did it without stopping to mine, because you can not do that AM through a rule ?. They have already passed the Nvidia documentation on the commands they use, sure there is a way to do it.

That will allow an automatic use of the fan, and only if a card exceeds the limit, raise the speed to the whole rig, without having to restart mining. Creating Groups is not feasible for me having more than 100 profiles already made of OC, and OC groups are taking into account card by card, which would be many more. There must be something simpler, Just for that reason I'm rethinking Aftherburner although I know it has problems, but I can define an aggressive line of Automatico and leave the problem aside, but then every X time does not work and I have to change the folder The remote server is very messy.

If all my rigs were equal, their option would be valid, but since each rig is different in card and power brands, I can not stop making OC groups that should be customized to that rig, and then other dozens of OC groups to another rig etc ...
170  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 11, 2019, 12:17:32 AM
@Patrike, in the rules, you can know the temperature of the cards and put a rule. But I do not see that it works. The rule can detect the temperature, 80 degrees in my case, and I indicate that the fan works fixed at 80%, but it does not. It seems to me that this one more thought for asic, surely it would have to restart miner in GPU, but to do it also it lowers the temperature and the rule does not shoot.

There some way to do what I indicate, and to apply a fixed speed to all the cards of the rig, without having to restart miner ?, would be an ideal solution for this situation, and summer is near.
171  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 10, 2019, 11:51:49 PM
Use rules, fixed fans and 2 or more profiles. If the temperature reach 70°C for example make a rule to change to another profile with faster fixed fans. I think it is the easiest way. And in my opinion, if you mining, never use automatic fan control.

It is not feasible to do so, power can be, but it is not appropriate. I have 6 rigs, and I use about 20 Algos. I have established about 100 OC profiles.

What you are saying is that you make another 100 OC profiles with a fixed fan speed. I'm sorry but that's Chinese work.

There must be simpler options than what is proposed, which for an RIG may be worth and even so, there would be several profiles, at least 2 for each SOMETHING.
172  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 10, 2019, 11:59:05 AM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/udd9r53npzgcbu7/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-09%20a%20las%2021.27.52.png?dl=0


I have a problem that I do not know how to fix. Please see the image

The rig 4 you can see in the capture, down in GPU says that I have 1050, 1050, 1060 And that was before, some time ago.

In the MAP GPU box if you see correctly 5x1070 1x1080ti, that is correct. But even if I map the cards, I still see 1050, 1050, 1060 etc ... And above all I have problems with the automatic speed, as it assumes other GPUs because it uses a different speed, usually a low speed, with which the GPU heats me. I had to force 80% GPUs in that profile.

How can I make AM recognize my real cards in GPU with their real names and real characteristics? As much as I remove the Mapping mark and then map again, the old cards keep appearing.

It would also be interesting that if an api gives a failure (it can not read the api) it appears in notifications, thus I will not be hours undermining the same difficulty without knowing that something fails.
Can you please send me the API Report for this specific miner? You can send via PM. Thanks!

where I get the Api report, I have looked and I do not see anything to have it. Please tell me how I do it

Sorry, I found it, I sent it to MP. Let's see if we can see what happens. Because to me the problem that it gives me is that it does not do a good control of the automatic fan and it is 80 degrees and 60% fan. I have to put profiles with the FAN fixed at 70 or 80% but I like more the performance of the car, but this confusion of cards must be.
Thanks for the report. I can see that you have set your own names of these GPU's, and that's why the names from Awesome Miner doesn't show up in the list.

Please select each of the GPU's in the GPU tab and click the "Set name" button. If you remove your custom names here you will see that Awesome Miner will display the default names instead.




Well, what a silly problem, I have corrected it, but this poses another problem.

Because using an OC profile with automatic FAN, some cards reach 80 degrees and do not exceed 60% of FAN? it is assumed that at that temperature in automatic, the fan should go much faster than 60%.

We know that in Aftherburner you can create a speed line based on temperature and it would go automatically. Here it does not exist, but there could be a slider button or a number from 1 to 10, where the FANS were more aggressive, that means they go faster than revolutions at a lower temperature, or higher. Being 10 very aggressive and 1 very soft. Or something similar. Because although native OC works very well, its big problem is the automatic control of the fans.

As I say I see more than one card at 80 degrees and the fan at 60%. This happens to me in several cards of different rigs, it is as if some mark of Nvidia is not controlled well. In the capture you can see one at 80 degrees and 60%, but you will see others that have more speed and less temperature. I really do not know how to correct that, unless I use fixed fan speeds
173  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 09, 2019, 10:07:20 PM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/udd9r53npzgcbu7/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-09%20a%20las%2021.27.52.png?dl=0


I have a problem that I do not know how to fix. Please see the image

The rig 4 you can see in the capture, down in GPU says that I have 1050, 1050, 1060 And that was before, some time ago.

In the MAP GPU box if you see correctly 5x1070 1x1080ti, that is correct. But even if I map the cards, I still see 1050, 1050, 1060 etc ... And above all I have problems with the automatic speed, as it assumes other GPUs because it uses a different speed, usually a low speed, with which the GPU heats me. I had to force 80% GPUs in that profile.

How can I make AM recognize my real cards in GPU with their real names and real characteristics? As much as I remove the Mapping mark and then map again, the old cards keep appearing.

It would also be interesting that if an api gives a failure (it can not read the api) it appears in notifications, thus I will not be hours undermining the same difficulty without knowing that something fails.
Can you please send me the API Report for this specific miner? You can send via PM. Thanks!

where I get the Api report, I have looked and I do not see anything to have it. Please tell me how I do it

Sorry, I found it, I sent it to MP. Let's see if we can see what happens. Because to me the problem that it gives me is that it does not do a good control of the automatic fan and it is 80 degrees and 60% fan. I have to put profiles with the FAN fixed at 70 or 80% but I like more the performance of the car, but this confusion of cards must be.
174  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 09, 2019, 07:35:36 PM
https://www.dropbox.com/s/udd9r53npzgcbu7/Captura%20de%20pantalla%202019-04-09%20a%20las%2021.27.52.png?dl=0


I have a problem that I do not know how to fix. Please see the image

The rig 4 you can see in the capture, down in GPU says that I have 1050, 1050, 1060 And that was before, some time ago.

In the MAP GPU box if you see correctly 5x1070 1x1080ti, that is correct. But even if I map the cards, I still see 1050, 1050, 1060 etc ... And above all I have problems with the automatic speed, as it assumes other GPUs because it uses a different speed, usually a low speed, with which the GPU heats me. I had to force 80% GPUs in that profile.

How can I make AM recognize my real cards in GPU with their real names and real characteristics? As much as I remove the Mapping mark and then map again, the old cards keep appearing.

It would also be interesting that if an api gives a failure (it can not read the api) it appears in notifications, thus I will not be hours undermining the same difficulty without knowing that something fails.
175  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 09, 2019, 07:02:45 PM

Hi Patrike,

Small requests as related to the above discussion if possible.

1) Include (non-dynamic) properties to set block time for coins (CTM happens to return 0 for a good number of them, and I'm being maths incompetent, would prefer method 2 above for calculation in Excel regarding possibility of solo mining)

1-1) (Not Important), most wallet JSON can report time elapsed since last block was solved (I think in seconds, or relative linux UTC timestamp), again, might be useful if this metric can be included for solo-mining (also display via AM HTTP API response (GET http://mypc:17790/api/coins/stats method) and coins tab)

2) Include (dynamic) properties to fetch network hash rate via custom sources (again, CTM is either displaying 0 or mostly incorrect data as sometimes Yiimp pool APIs it uses report hashrate incorrectly), again, this is probably going to be useful metric for solo-mining.

***Really want to have feature***
3) Ability to set pool profit factor via HTTP-API

Best Regards,
Thanks for the suggestions.

For 1 and 2 I suppose we would also let Awesome Miner use the NetHash formula if for example the coin Difficulty is zero. Have you had a chance to test if this formula gives accurate numbers?
CoinsPerDay = hashRate / (hashRate + nethash) * secondsPerDay / blocktime * reward

3) Today you can only set Profit Factor for a Coin over the API, but not for a pool. If it's needed for pools as well it should be easy to add.

Hi Patrike,

I haven't tested the "accuracy" of the formula cause luck is also a factor + I used autoexchange on ZergPool which made it a little hard to track earnings, but it was what I was using for the past 2 days for experiment. (see pic)

https://imgur.com/HBOVlmx

so from the picture, you can see I'd need to add my own BlockTime where AM's API reported 0 due to coin providers, then some factors I consider important as below.

* The NetHash has to be accurate, cause else it'll affect the entire calculation as per the formula we discussed here
* BlockWorth for solo as some blockchains block reward just won't cover the cost even if you win 100% of blocks even the difficulty was low etc. This this is filtered to suit one's need (for me, 500 satoshis per minute)
* BlockWinChance, Simply used the hashRate / (hashRate + netHash) to work out percent chance I'm likely to hit a block
* BlockWin_IntervalSec, to keep consistent flow of earnings a big win every few days/weeks may not be as good as lots of little wins daily
* SatPerMinute, Just for earning reference in perfect fair conditions (not sure I used the terminologies correct at all, but you get the idea)
* Division <--- now, this is something I'm trying to find a way to prioritize pools with a balancing factor but like I have mentioned, my maths are bad so I don't even know if this is right (currently using SatPerMinute / BlockWin_IntervalSec).

Result for the past 2 weeks follows, AM estimate on earnings are averaging about 40 USD or more, I tried solo mining, conventional shared mining, switching interval of 5~10minutes. regardless, I'm only averaging about 200 satoshis per minute, which is far from the earnings estimate regardless of which formula I used, call it a streaks of bad lucks, but even shared mining didn't end up much better, the Yiimp pools (used Zerg, zPool mainly) tend to seem to have particularly bad lucks that usually sees block efforts 500% regardless solo/shared mining.

This is to report on the effect of the Dynamic Coin Properties Update on earnings I promised 2 weeks ago since it was made available.

Now it's only been 24 hours since I used the Excel custom profit factoring to prioritise pool, so I cannot say this is going to continue but so far I'm seeing vast improvements on earnings (doing solo mode on most chains where feasible for my farm's hashrate on ZergPool with AutoExchange), I'm averaging approx 400 satoshis per minute which is about double of what I get for the past 2 weeks via various methods as described above.

***

So if this works out, you might consider some similar sort of mathematically correct feature to implement some kind of profit factors based on the above metrics (since they are already all available in AM) similar to how you apply factors for Online Services vs Actual/Estimated earnings, I believe this will be then be a lot closer to SMART profit switching, more likely better than what NPLUS Miner's claimed PLUS logic ;p

***
3) Currently I worked around the need to apply pool profit factors by using the API to include the top 3 pools in the Excel List I showed here in my example, so ability to modify pool profit factor via API is not that much sought after anymore, since there are also benefits for a small selection of profitable pools to mine for, as some of my hardwares are low memory (1060 3GB) and they won't work on many of the new algos such as MTP, GRIN...etc.

Best Regards,

I will look into this in more detail after the 6.3 release. Most likely Block Time and NetHash will be two configurable properties for a coin with support for Dynamic Updates.

In addition, the coins-per-day and revenue can then be calculated using the NetHash+BlockTime formula instead of the formula based on Difficulty. Either by a setting per coin or simply use the NetHash formula if the Difficulty is zero.


good decision, those two values ​​through http api as we are using difficulty or price, will make the data much more realistic.

I am not a user as advanced as moppidoo, I will not use an external Exel and handle my own data. But if you read the apis and Json, and the power to add blocktime and nethash, you could give us something of value by choosing between the two possible ways of doing the profit calculation that you explained to me.

We in our group use an online excel and we have pointed the urls of difficulty, price, request of the price, profit of the currency etc ... We have noticed that when a currency its blocktime is higher than 1, the profit is usually lower . If the blocktime is 1, the value is usually quite close to what AM indicates. There are coins that we have to use profit of 0.65 so that the estimate of AM and what is obtained is the same.

To be able to add these two data and be able to use them for self-profit in some way, instead of its classic formula, could be interesting. Have two types of profit to choose, two different formulas. One based more on the nethash and blocktime, and the classic one of you.

One last suggestion Is there any way that all the data in AM can be saved from the last time data has been requested from the APIs? I explain. I use CC and make a request every 7 minutes and read all the data, but then I make requests from loose currencies defined by us that if we do not find the Explorer or we can not read the explorer, we use WTM, CC or the one we see more realistic. But then we exhaust the requests per day, because each currency that I ask for a data, is a request to the api.

If in each complete request of api of WTM, CC, CTM, Coinwarz, the last one is stored in AM, and that data could be read from the cache of the last time within the AM itself, the problem of excess requests to these services.

But that's basic, we also make requests to Exchanges to extract the price, if every 7 minutes I read 24 coins of the same exchange, make 24 requests, and in a few hours I am unable to ask for more data to that exchange. I do not know if once an API is read, whatever it is, it is saved in a kind of cahe, whether it is an exchange or a provider, and only save the last time it was requested, in my case every 7 minutes. So if I have to read several prices of different currencies of the same exchange, I read it in local because I have the copy of the received in the api.

I hope you understand my idea.

176  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 06, 2019, 03:12:45 AM
Hello Patrice
By mining history

if you select statistics for 7 days or more, incorrect data is obtained!
that is, if one rig worked for a week then everything correctly displays 98-100 percent in the mining half.
And the second ring was added just a couple of days ago - in the statistics of mining time will be the same indicators for the week!
Hi.

The Mining Time is similar to an Uptime concept. If a more is added recently and is running most of the time, it will show up with 98-100%. Even if you added the miner two days ago and look at the the last week, Awesome Miner will still consider the mining time for this miner to be 98-100% because during the time the miner was present, it has been up all the time.
That is, it is essentially a useless tool turns out.
It is impossible to calculate the actual operation of the software. And bring the average hash rate.

Although those machines that have been idle in the middle of the week show and 65 percent of the work.
Is there any way to make this tool work?
To show the time of mining as in the time equivalent and percentage. As also shown, the average real hash rate. With the ability to export this data - when a lot of rigs.

Well, in General it is logical to understand if you put 3 days or 7 days - I want to get the percentage of the real work of machinery in this period...
To get access to hashrate and data export, please use the Mining History Export feature via the toolbar Tools -> Mining History Export. Many users running larger scale mining operations export hashrate, temperature, revenue, profit and mining uptime to CSV files that can be imported to Excel for further data processing.

For the mining time, Awesome Miner is currently indicating that as an uptime concept. It will be close to 100% unless you have actual downtime. If you add a new miner and it's running all the time, it will not be considered 0% uptime before it even was created. Only the time the miner existed in Awesome Miner will be counted here.

The main purpose of "Mining time" is to find miners not performing well and the current concept works fine for that purpose. Any miner with < 90% is indicating that it's not performing well. This is why showing low percentage for recently added miners (that do perform well) may not be preferred by many users. Especially if you have many miners and cannot really keep track of which ones you added recently.

I suppose this is where you rather would like it to show as 50% uptime for the last 7 days if the miner was added in the middle of the week - even if it's been working perfectly fine all the time. Is that a correct interpretation of your request here?





when you add the times you made the change, and know how many times I change each coin to get the% they have. For me it is an important fact to know if a currency with a small percentage has many changes, it is a currency that I do not want to undermine. It would be nice to have that data in that panel of statistics next to the% of time of use of that currency.
177  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 06, 2019, 03:08:42 AM
A technical question Patrike

The other day you told me that you do not take into account the blocking time to calculate the auto profit, it surprised me a lot. Because the reward + blocking time determines the amount of maximum coins produced per day.

A coin with 2 minutes of blocking and 100 of reward, will make a maximum of 72,000 coins a day, but if the time of blocking is 1 minute will make 144,000 coins per day

How can profit be calculated without this data?
  In AM CU I asked for it and I see it logical. There are coins with blocking time of 5 and up to 10 minutes.

How can you compensate for that lack of this data in the system of self-profit, when it is crucial to know how often it will give a block and therefore reward and therefore profit.
There are two ways of calculating coins per day. In both cases you need to multiply the result with your hashrate as well.

You can find out coins per day by using one of these concepts:
1) Block Reward, Difficulty, Exponential Factor
2) Block Reward, Network Hashrate, Block Time

Awesome Miner uses #1, where the Difficulty in combination with Exponential Factor gives similar results as using the Network Hashrate in combination with Block Time. It's basically two different formulas.

The Block Time and Network hashrate impacts the Difficulty property of the coin - and this is why Awesome Miner doesn't have to use Block Time directly as it's already "included" as part of the Difficulty.


If so, then it works. But is not it easier to know the blocking time than the exponential factor? They are just my doubts.
178  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 05, 2019, 12:21:22 PM
A technical question Patrike

The other day you told me that you do not take into account the blocking time to calculate the auto profit, it surprised me a lot. Because the reward + blocking time determines the amount of maximum coins produced per day.

A coin with 2 minutes of blocking and 100 of reward, will make a maximum of 72,000 coins a day, but if the time of blocking is 1 minute will make 144,000 coins per day

How can profit be calculated without this data?
  In AM CU I asked for it and I see it logical. There are coins with blocking time of 5 and up to 10 minutes.

How can you compensate for that lack of this data in the system of self-profit, when it is crucial to know how often it will give a block and therefore reward and therefore profit.
179  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 04, 2019, 01:48:16 PM
Version 6.2.12 (Development preview of 6.3)

 User interface
  - Negative mining profit can be displayed even if the revenue is zero or unknown
 Version notes
  - Correction to Nanominer benchmark device selection and pool list in configuration file
  - More user interface updates to the built-in web interface
 Mining softare
  - Added mining software: Miniz 1.2l
  - CryptoDredge 0.18.0
  - NBMiner 21.4

To get access to development versions, open the Options dialog in Awesome Miner. In the General section, enable Check for development versions. Then go to the Menu and click Check for updates.

Direct download links if needed:
https://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setupdev/AwesomeMiner.msi
https://www.awesomeminer.com/download/setupdev/AwesomeMinerRemoteService.msi


I have a problem with Miniz, I have activated it before using it in the rig. Then I went to Zhash and I changed Gminer for Miniz, but it does not start, it's more, I think it tries to start Bminer.

I have not changed anything in the pool, it is assumed that if the pool is fine for Gminer, it should be fine for Miniz. I leave the log here, and I continue with Gminer.



Initialize diagnostics (20)
Starting Diagnostics. Awesome Miner Remote Agent version: 6.2.12
OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
nVidia driver version: 418.96
nVidia OpenCL Platform ID: 0
Microsoft VC++ 2013 runtime installed: Yes
Microsoft VC++ 2015 runtime installed: Yes
Starting Mining Software
Setting up Miner Engine. Instance: 1
Engine Type: BMiner, Auto Download: True, EnginePath: , Subtype: Disabled, CustomExecutable:
Set clocking start profile: 135, RTX 70 +100 +600 (when stopping, the following will be used: -1, type: Single, Use: False)
Properties: (WindowMode: ConsoleFormat, EngineType: BMiner, IsProfitMiner: True)
====================================================================================================
C:\Users\truco\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\bminer-v15.4.0-9e272fc-amd64_1\bminer-v15.4.0-9e272fc\bminer.exe  --pass minpayout=625 --pers BitcoinZ -uri stratum://t1dcY5Vwz8ABGgnrMCzzfWz1XLHRh1mK4m5.rig6@btcz.2miners.com:2020 -watchdog=false -api=0.0.0.0:4028
====================================================================================================
Mining Engine Process started, PID: 6796
> Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast (v15.4.0-9e272fc)
>
> flag provided but not defined: -pass
>   -api <host>:<port>
>        The endpoint (i.e., <host>:<port>) that bminer serves its REST API. The REST API is disabled if it is unspecified.
>   -devices GPUs
>        List of GPUs that Bminer should run on. By default bminer runs on all GPUs available on the system.
>   -dual-intensity int
>        The intensity of the secondary mining. Valid values are 0 to 300. Default is 0, which is to tune automatically.
>   -dual-subsolver int
>        The sub-solver for dual mining. Valid values are 0, 1, 2, 3. Default is -1, which is to tune automatically. (default -1)
>   -failover sameHost|immediateNext|random
>        Fail-over strategy between multiple pools. Bminer can retry the connection, failover to the next pool or a pool that is randomly chosen in the lists of available pools. (sameHost|immediateNext|random) (default "immediateNext")
>   -fast
>        Enable agressive optimizations. Bminer is more performant under this setting but it might be unstable on some OS/drivers
>   -gpucheck uint
>        The interval in seconds that Bminer polls whether the GPUs have hung. Set to 0 to disable the checks. (default 90)
>   -intensity int
>        The intensity of the CPU for grin/AE mining. Valid values are 0 to 12. Default is 6. Higher intensity may give better performance but more CPU usage. (default -1)
>   -logfile <path>
>        Append the logs to the file <path>.
>   -max-network-failures int
>        Number of consecutive attempts that Bminer tries to recover from network failures. Set to -1 to keep on recovering. (default -1)
>   -max-temperature int
>        Hard limits of the temperature of the GPUs. Bminer slows down itself when the temperautres of the devices exceed the limit. (default 85)
>   -no-runtime-info
>        Disable runtime information collection for Bminer.
>   -no-timestamps
>        Suppress timestamps in the logging messages.
>   -nofee
>        Disable the devfee but it also disables some optimizations.
>   -pers string
>        Personalization string for equihash 144,5 based coins. Default: BgoldPoW. Valid values include BitcoinZ, Safecoin, ZelProof, etc. (default "BgoldPoW")
>   -share-check uint
>        The interval of seconds that Bminer polls to ensure there are accepted shares. Set to 0 to disable the checks. (default 900)
>   -strict-secure
>        Verify the certificates of servers when connecting to a SSL-enabled Stratum server.
>   -uri <scheme>://<username>[:<password>]@<host>:<port>
>        A comma-seperated list of URIs that bminer should mine towards. It has the format of <scheme>://<username>[:<password>]@<host>:<port>. Please refer to https://www.bminer.me for the specification of the URIs.
>   -uri2 <scheme>://<username>[:<password>]@<host>:<port>
>        A comma-seperated list of URIs that bminer should mine towards secondarily. It has the format of <scheme>://<username>[:<password>]@<host>:<port>. Currently Bminer supports blake14r:// or blake2s:// as secondary for ETH mining. Please refer to https://www.bminer.me for the specification of the URIs.
>   -watchdog
>        Automatically restart to recover from hung GPUs. Bminer exits itself in case of errors if watchdog is disabled. (default true)

====================================================================================================
Unexpected exit of mining software. Possible cause: Incorrect configuration or crashing software
Diagnostics completed
180  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners on: April 02, 2019, 11:15:56 PM
I have seen patrike that you have returned add the PRofit value in the properties of the coin, in tabs coin by double clicking on a coin

That was before and it was removed, and let's say that the one that has preference is the profit of the currency pool.

How does this new Profit affect the Specs of the currency? It seems to me redundant. If people have problems in finding the profit in the coin pool, pass it from the AVANCED tab and put it under the Password of the pool or a more visible site

TEner two profit can lead to confusion. Can I continue using the currency pool in avance as it is now, and this will affect the currency, profit and the coins tab?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!