|
perhaps so - but it is incorrect to differentiate them as "maker funded" and "buyer funded" all the coins are "buyer funded" and directly buyer funded at that. The buyer funds the coins directly - no funds are sent to smoothie and he then in turn funds the coins.
I dont know about the laser marking in the past but all my current Lealanas are "buyer funded" and all have the laser addresses etched in them though a magnifying glass and bright light is needed to see it.
the correct terminology is "funded" or "not funded" in reference to these coins.
|
|
|
|
and to clarify - all Lealana are Buyer Funded - zero are funded by Smoothie - there are 2 versions of "buyer funded" one where the buyer funds the coins directly prior to the coins being shipped by Smoothie - this way Smoothie can verify they are funded prior to shipment. the second where the buyer funds the coins directly upon receipt.
while there is a difference in that the first are guaranteed to be funded, at no point does smoothie fund the coins himself.
I think we just say buyer funded as that is how he sells them. 100% agree with your statement yes - the difference is one is guaranteed to have been loaded when sold while the other not. just clarifying the "maker funded" statement. |
|
|
|
|
at one point, I had #14 - this was specific to the pokemon styled cards though - and since I never received the 20 card set that I paid for, that might as well be moot.
|
|
|
|
|
and to clarify - all Lealana are Buyer Funded - zero are funded by Smoothie - there are 2 versions of "buyer funded" one where the buyer funds the coins directly prior to the coins being shipped by Smoothie - this way Smoothie can verify they are funded prior to shipment. the second where the buyer funds the coins directly upon receipt.
while there is a difference in that the first are guaranteed to be funded, at no point does smoothie fund the coins himself.
|
|
|
|
Will take #9, #11, #12 - 1 of each.
Thanks
will send you a dm  |
|
|
|
man, cannot believe I missed this, but was traveling  from the 7th until the 14th - I initially wanted to buy #17 but was told it would be auctioned. I see it was sold but I see no bids, what did it sell for? the opening bid amount? if so that was a steal! I really wish I had seen this before leaving. |
|
|
|
|
updated quantities and added a few extra small items.
|
|
|
|
|
76 - MoparMiningLLC thanks krogoth!
|
|
|
|
interested in:
(2) 1 BTC goldine
(3) 0.5 BTC goldine
what are you asking for them?
There's only 4 coins. I updated the first post for clarity: (COIN 1) 1 BTC 1 oz silver (COIN 2) 1 BTC goldine (COIN 3) 0.5 BTC goldine (COIN 4) 0.1 BTC 1 oz silver Currently pending sale but if it falls through I will repost. yes and i was asking about coin 2 and 3 - lmk if sale does not go thru. |
|
|
|
|
Well then - would be super hard to find then lol - it says only a few prototypes were made.
As for Doorsa, sounds like that died as well.
|
|
|
|
|
interested in:
(2) 1 BTC goldine
(3) 0.5 BTC goldine
what are you asking for them?
|
|
|
|
you have been looking for one of these for a while - I recall reading your older thread last year. I also added it to my WTB list |
|
|
|
|
can you share photos? I dont know the coins by name but I may be interested if any are ones I do not have.
|
|
|
|
|
Lot 6 - .015 BTC
Lot 8 - .01 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
76 - MoparMiningLLC - thanks @krogoth!
|
|
|
|
The premium had higher quality paper and print quality from what I remember, however I can't find a source right now.
Here's a source: Yes that's correct, it was called "premium" because I used the highest available print quality. If I recall the difference was quite small, but printing cost about double. Interestingly I still have a handful of "scraps" of the signatures and holograms leftover from the Autographs Edition, I don't know how many but I'd say about 20 substantial sets, which could be used in some special way down the road. any chance of selling a set to go inside my book? dont know if that would be crazy priced or not |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
