|
94 has won 3 times - awesome!
33, 79, 83, 90, 91 and 97 have won 2 times!
|
|
|
|
ultimate challenge here - get one of each prize and keep it together as the Mantis Cryptos HODLMas collection
so far #94 is a winner of prizes 1 and 2 - can they get the rest???  |
|
|
|
|
awesome! looking forward to seeing the progress @doblebit
|
|
|
|
|
ultimate challenge here - get one of each prize and keep it together as the Mantis Cryptos HODLMas collection
|
|
|
|
|
lot 2: .0005 BTC
lot 4: .0005 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
Btcpins has made pins with some of his work - pretty good artwork from what I have seen - I dont care for this one though
|
|
|
|
minerjones telegram is "minerjones" the problem with telegram is that there can be many accounts where the display name is "minerjones" you have to look at the profile to see if it is actually the "@minerjones" username. The Telegram usernames are unique and scammers can't copy and use the same usernames as someone else. That's why they will attempt to use a similar username that the victim won't notice and use the person's real username in the BIO field. Those who aren't familiar with Telegram won't know the difference and will misinterpret the BIO for a username.
Can the admins recover and find the content of deleted PMs? I know they get the PM's content if a PM is reported, but I wonder if theymos can see something more... If something like that was possible, it would be easy to prove if a PM was sent, from, and to which account. The displayed name can be the same - that is why one must check the username - I agree - but they have to go into telegram users profile to do this. As for dm’s they can be recovered even if deleted by one party, if the other party still has it in their inbox/outbox. |
|
|
|
|
Nice! As a 3d printer myself I always love to see others printing for collectibles!
|
|
|
|
|
the funny thing about this address is how some block explorers do not show the initial 50 BTC
for example, mempool.space and blockstream shows its balance as 18.55982773 BTC while btc.com, blockchair and blockchain.com shows it as 68.56982773 BTC
|
|
|
|
Really thought I liked the blue one best… then red.. but then the black looks amazing.. as well as the white and clear…
Honestly they all look great! Nice work!
Favorite might be the green actually the green looks great - I admit but makes me think of bcash |
|
|
|
|
they look great! love the variety of colors!
|
|
|
|
Updated the OP to reflect all current digital versions.
Volume 1 has been sold out, the stock of the other volumes are shown on their respective pages. Hodlonaut recently announced that Volume 21 will be the final volume, no new Citadel21 magazines will be released after that.
is that for digital as well? or just printed? hmm I think my sub is paid thru 22 or 23 guess they will refund those. |
|
|
|
Rolling with 70079........
000000000000000000011ad9ae4bc6e6b4a77bf8ad96552a4ea62bf56160d670
The_Crypto_Kid
PM me your shipping info. Use privnote.com if you want more privacy.
-Dave
Awesome! He is outside playing with his cousins - I will have him send you a dm after dinner. |
|
|
|
rest of the spots are covered for whoever wants one Happy new years!!  thank you! I will take C Happy new years to all! |
|
|
|
|
When they get the link via dm and click it - they literally give the “hacker” their pw - so no meed for the “hacker” to change it - the people never realize their is even an issue until after they get screwed - at which time still there is no need for “hacker” to change the pw then.
|
|
|
|
rasengan - When you contacted me to make this 40 BTC escrow deal and I told you that you would be scammed if you tried to do it over telegram, why did you ignore my advice? I told you that I was willing to help you to avoid this scenario and you decided to do the exact opposite of what I told you.
My $0.02 on this is that your account was likely compromised if you received the screenshot. Even if minerjones was a scammer I don't think he would be so sloppy as to provide a screenshot as evidence of his involvement. I'm guessing the screenshot is from your sent folder, or was a fabrication created by getting the message from your sent folder. That or this is some sort of attempt at getting sympathy so people will make donations. Anyway, you literally did what I told you not to do and you allegedly lost your funds as a result. You can't be too surprised by this.
if the message was in his sent folder but then deleted after being sent - as long as it is still in his "received" folder, it should be possible to recover the actual sent dm - we were able to recover dm's in similar situations in the past - provided either the sender or re cepient still ahve the message it was possible to recover. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone willing to buy one or two with fiat from 419mining and sell to me for BTC? Or willing to trade 2 of these for 4 r606’s?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh man i need to look into the new ones!
Shoot - 419 has em but only accepts fiat - so no way for me to buy one atm - need to pay with btc
|
|
|
|
The major issue I have here is that I received a screenshot of the BitcoinTalk message I had sent to minerjones which is how I had confirmed that it was the same user from here.
Currently it appears the position being taken is that the telegram account was a scam. This leads me to believe that either his account on BitcoinTalk or BitcoinTalk itself is compromised.
I would like to see this BitcoinTalk message that you received. (Meaning a screen shot, not simply a copy and paste). The only message posted by "minerjones" is that you're dealing with a scammer. I am most interested in the actual name used on that message since there are many fake "minerjones" variations. i.e. with a basic search.... minerjones` minerjones. `minerjones minerjones ` minerjones . minerjones - minerjonesalt According to bpip - none of those accounts have been active recently. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
