I believe to get a good understanding of the topic, you can read their website, it's explained very well and to understand the general meaning, we also don't need to be a coder: https://docs.ordinals.com/introduction.html
The most important parts are probably:
Overview Ordinal theory: https://docs.ordinals.com/overview.html
Digital artefacts: https://docs.ordinals.com/digital-artifacts.html
Inscriptions: https://docs.ordinals.com/inscriptions.html

It's a bit text to read but their summary is very decent.

There's also an FAQ for common questions: https://docs.ordinals.com/faq.html
Probably, the FAQ is already answering most of your questions.  


Bitcointalk has also a technical discussion topic about it: NFTs in the Bitcoin blockchain - Ordinal Theory

Schön zu sehen, dass Betnomi schon wieder etwas im Forum sponsort.
Ich kann Poker zwar generell herzlich wenig abgewinnen, wünsche euch aber viel Spaß dabei und dass ihr schnell so viele Teilnehmer wie möglich für eure Runde zusammen bekommt.
Im internationalen Forumsteil dürfte es da bestimmt einige Interessenten geben und wenn es dann noch gesponsorte Preise zu gewinnen gibt, umso eher. 

Wenn man es liberal handhabt, könnte ich mir so eine ähnliche Lösung vorstellen:
1.) KI generell erlaubt, wenn man die Antworten deutlich umformuliert, wenn man in keiner Signaturkampagne ist.
2.) KI nur erlaubt, wenn man die Antworten in eigenen Worten wiedergibt, wenn man in einer Kampagne ist.
Vielleicht sogar alles mit Variante 1.), egal ob man in einer Kampagne ist oder nicht, wenn es keinen Missbrauch gibt (was ich mir bei bezahlten Signaturkampagnen allerdings nicht so wirklich vorstellen kann).

Eine Unterscheidung zwischen Accounts, die aktuell in Kampagnen sind und solchen, die nicht in einer Kampagne sind, fände ich daher schon sehr sinnvoll.
Kann ja schließlich nicht Sinn der Sache sein, einfach jede Woche nur seine Kommentare in KI vorzufertigen, etwas abzuändern und dann ins Forum zu klatschen.  
Die dadurch entstehenden Diskussionen stelle ich mir als wenig gehaltvoll vor.

---

Bei Fußballspielen dürfte auch für AI wenig zu holen sein. Da es dort meist um aktuelle Ereignisse ind den verschiedenen Ligen geht, egal ob national oder Champions League, Weltmeisterschaften etc., es bezieht sich immer auf aktuelle Ereignisse und dafür ist ChatGPT nicht ausgelegt. Oftmals geht es darin ja um die Ereignisse der letzten Spiele, aufkommende Spiele oder das lokale Tippspiel, von dem ChatGPT die Spielstände auch nicht kennt.
Bei anderen Dingen, wie z.B. generell über die Grundlagen des Bitcoins dürfte KI schon eher hilfreich sein, da es sich dabei nicht um aktuelle Ereignisse handelt.

Well, Gladbach has been playing very poorly in their recent games, let alone their big loss against Hertha BSC Berlin from last week, when Gladbach lost 1-4 in Berlin. Hertha BSC Berlin is currently one of the weakest teams in the league, except Schalke (and maybe Hoffenheim, too).
So, a Gladbach win seemed to be very unlikely.
And it destroyed my free bets as well. 

I'm really curious about Bayern - Union next weekend. Odds are favoring Bayern massively (Bayern win is at 1.32), which is favoring Bayern incredibly. Yes, Bayern is playing at home and Union is not very strong in away games and Union's draw against Schalke has been week as well but the week after, Bayern vs. Stuttgart is odds at 1.44 for a Bayern win - against Stuttgart, a team playing to stay in Bundesliga.
I's just very surprising...

That's a great solution and I could try to find some time next weekend to implement it but in my opinion, many readers won't notice such a hovering feature, even if we add a bold explanation.
I don't know as well if it's an option for the mobile version. I've not checked it but hovering might be not possible for mobile devices?

I can implement it as it's a really clean solution and it would help a lot to gain more space buy maybe it's already enough to remove the comment section entirely as it's pretty meaningless sometimes and I can just link the comments from the members who initially presented each explorer?
Opinions?

If there's support for your suggestion, I would implement it, of course. 

I'm always surprised how these unfounded hot takes are coming from Putler apologists, who aren't from Europe and don't know anything about Germany.  
As someone from Germany, I can tell you that your claims are 100% laughable and wrong, dear bunny.  

Let's collect some reasons who could have blown up the pipeline (hint: Russia has blown up the pipeline):


Ukraine
Yeah, sure, it has been Ukraine!
Ukraine doesn't has access to the Baltic Sea, because it doesn't share a border (plz do at least some research about geographics), so Ukraine must have sent Klitschko on the back of a dolphin, a bit dynamite on his back and he started his mission in Odessa, where he swam through the Black Sea, past Istanbul, through the Mediterranean Sea, past Gibraltar along the coast of Portugal, Spain and France, through the English channel and his dolphin was re-charged in Amsterdam, that he finally swam past Denmark to dive several 100m to place his dynamite and blow up the pipeline by placing the dynamite all by his bare hands.
Ukraine doesn't has any capabilities to do this and it would be plain stupid to risk their military aid if their try to blow up NS is detected and Russia could be the big propaganda winner, so yes, it must have been Ukraine!  




USA / UK / Poland
For sure, USA / UK / Poland are behind it! It would make totally sense for them to blow up a useless pipeline because Germany didn't purchase any gas from Russia anymore at the time, when the pipeline was blown up.
It would make totally sense for USA / UK / Poland to do this after Putin messed it up himself, when he showed how unrealiable he has been as a partner when he lied to everyone that he wouldn't invade Ukraine.
It would make totally sense for USA / UK / Poland to do this because Germany planned anyways to stop gas purchases from Russia due to Putin's continued war.
It would make totally sense for USA / UK / Poland to blow up 2 pipelines from Nordstream 1 and 1 pipeline from Nordstream 2, while 1 pipeline of Nordstream 2 remains intact, so that russian gas delieveries would still be possible.
The USA / UK / Poland are completely ready to do such a move to gain exactly nothing from blowing up that pipeline, while risking their entire trust in NATO. No gain at all, but enormous risk, therefore, it must have been USA / UK / Poland!




Germany
Germany is behind it! Who else could it be? It's Germany because Germany is always at fault (because Nazis).

In a secret meeting, Olaf Scholz, chancellor of Germany, discussed together with Robert Habeck (economy) and Christian Lindner (a liberal).
Very concerned, Olaf Scholz asked for solutions why Germany has gotten so dependant on russian Gas. He asked: "Dear Gentlemen, we have a big issue right now. There are 10 Russia apologists demonstrating in Saxonia to open Nordstream 2. It's a very big issue. They aren't relevant at all and nobody listens to them anyways but we need to act. How can we stop it?"
Christian Lindner, the liberal, suggested: "we can nuke the Russia apologists in Saxonia." But Robert Habeck quickly objected: "that would be bad for our economy." He suggested instead: "Let's blow up Nordstream 1 and 2, we wouldn't solve any problems because we won't purchase any gas from Russia anyways and we are safe already that we have enough Gas for the upcoming winter, but we should blow up Nordstream 1 and 2."
Olaf Scholz objected: "that's a good idea but you need to consider that we are Germany and my party likes Putin somehow, it was Gerhard Schröder who got us dependant on russian gas and Schröder is on Rosneft supervisory board. We can't let him down. We should blow up 2 pipelines from Nordstream 1 and 1 pipeline from Nordstream 2, that Putin can still blackmail us to open it again and that Putin gets his prestige project, which he really cares about."
The other two: "that's not a good idea because it would not solve any of our issues. It wouldn't shut down the Putin apologist protests in Saxonia and questions about opening Nordstream 2!"
Olaf Scholz replied: "Do you have better ideas?"
The other two: "unfortunately not, but we won't gain anything from your strategy"
Olaf Scholz: "What did you say, I didn't hear you? Well, let's turn my suggestion into reality, dear Gentleman!"...
And they proceeded to blow up 2 pipelines from Nordstream 1 and 1 pipeline from Nordstream 2...

Sure, Germany must be behind it!




Russia
Impossible, Russia never does bad things! And Russia never lies!
Russia might have made a big mistake to start the war special military operation (because it wasn't succesful, which really angered Russia's trolls), and which Russia didn't want to start and it was only a coincidende, why Russia was amassing troops on the Ukrainian border for more than 2 months. So, it was completely unavoidable that these troops should also be used in the region (as cannon fodder).
However, since Russia invaded Ukraine performed a special military operation, which failed was regrouped because Ukrainians didn't want to get shot and enslaved liberated, the master strategist Putin has messed up completely and exposed Russia as what it is: a corrupt regional power.
The nation of Germany, previously highly dependend on russian Gas, got completely rid of russian gas due to Putin's war and Putin's prestige project Nordstream 2 was set to be a big fail once again.
What should Putin do with a useless pipeline? He was planning to proceed in his useless war, so he already know that Germany wouldn't purchase any russian gas as long as he and his cronies will stay in power.
Outin run out of options and by blowing up NS1 while leaving one pipeline of NS2 intact, he could try to blackmail Germany in case of a cold winter to finally open Nordstream 2 (from which one pipeline was left intact, surprisingly) and potentially send gas to Germany, which would be a huge propaganda victory for him in Russia.

In addition, maybe he wanted to divide the pro-ukrainian alliance against his war by sowing discord and relying on his conspiracy war criminal supporting trolls such like BAdecker or Branko to spread bullshit claims that Ukraine / USA / UK / Poland / Germany would be behind it. Because Putin knows how reliable his trolls are because his trolls are never blaming Russia (as we know from some idiots on Bitcointalk, right).  
In addition, maybe Putin just wanted to make sure that no Oligarch could decide to remove Putin and his cronies because a new government could stop the war in Ukraine + use Nordstream again for gas? (which would threaten Putin and make a removal of Putin more likely).
These are just coincidences and Russia has, with a huge margin, far the biggest potential to gain from their pipeline being blown up, which got useless anyways due to Russia's war against Ukraine.
So let's be fair, Russia might be lying all day but it's not Russia blowing up their useless pipeline.





Let me know which stories are plausible in your opinion.  

Nein, ich kann leider keine Gedanken lesen...
Auf die 5 Verdienste kann ich ebenfalls verzichten aber vielleicht errät es ja jemand anderes.


Wenn man so dreist (und faul) ist, statt echte Kommentare zu schreiben, lieber eine KI-Anwendung benutzt und deren Erzeugnisse anschließend ins Forum klatscht, sowie teilweise direkt aus anderen Quellen kopiert, sollte man lieber mal ganz vorsichtig sein und die Klappe halten. 
Nur so als Tipp. 

I don't know why I only rated it with 8/10 (but Blockchair is my favorite Explorer).
Maybe I wanted to see some more improvements?  


You are right, maybe we can make a public survey.  


But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings?  
In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate.


Sheeesh.
We need to have space for improvements, dear GazetaBitcoin.  


My favorite would be to arrange a public survey and by doing so, we could review the public opinion. Do you agree here?  

---

I have to disagree here because we are on the internet. And as far as we know today, Bitcointalk is only an online place, where we can exist, dear Gentlemen / Gentlewomen / Gentlecats. If these platforms cease to exists, so will we.  

And I don't beleive, that PrivacyG is a chicken. If so, it would be called ChickenG. And it would be neutral (it).


Nominating PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023 would be a legitimate consideration, dear GazetaBitcoin.


It's probably me, dear GazetaBitcoin.  

---

Done, I've implemented a part of your suggestions to trim it 1% more.  


Deleting the emoji??!!  
Are you dense?
We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin!  


Yes, it helps, should be properly formatted now?
Plz confirm, Sirs!

---

Ok, many thanks for the input. So, what's our conclusion?
In our current explanation, it says Atomic explorer is mirroring Trezor explorer, which should be accurate?

Well, I guess it's me? 

Count me in as well! 
I've detected your prediction round last year around October / November and it seemed to be fun, so I'll looking forward to join.
Maybe we'll get a generous deal from Sportsbet.io once again because I can imagine we'll get quite a long list of interested participants.
Personally, I'm not very experienced on Superbru but it shouldn't be an issue most likely (if Superbru is used again) since it seemed to be a good choice for your last round. 

The upcoming season will be interesting as well, hopefully we'll have Red Bull, Ferrari and Mercedes compete for World Championship. If Ferrari doesn't drop off after summer break again... 

Das ging ja schnell, da werden bestimmt noch mehr Kampagnenteilnehmer gefunden werden.
Kaum vorstellbar, wenn es noch so viele Altcoin-Signaturen wie früher gäbe, was da los wäre.  


Na so ein Zufall aber auch.  




Das würde dann eh nicht erkennt werden, wenn der Text noch einmal überarbeitet / umformuliert wird.
Mit der Initiative von Royse777 geht es eher um die ganz dreisten Fälle, wo wirklich ganze Textblöcke 1:1 aus ChatGPT kopiert und einfach anschließend ins Forum geklatscht werden.

Danke für die Antwort und ich denke ebenfalls, dass dieses Vorgehen eine faire Lösung darstellt.
Im Falle, dass eure beiden Münzen gewinnen sollten, würde ich den Gewinn also entsprechend teilen. 

---

Mittlerweile ist die Auswertung der Startpreise (01.02.2023, 00:01) auch fertig:



Gerne könnt ihr einmal prüfen, ob alles passt und dann warten wir gespannt, welche Münze den ersten Monat (Februar) gewinnen wird.

Unfortunately, this clown is at it again...  

---

You are absolutely right here...
When it comes to trust, mr.relax is completely clueless and he doesn't listen to advice / explanations.
He claimed multiple times last year, that we would have left him negative / "bad" Trust.
Which is not true because it's just neutral Trust.  



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5438474.0

I could give some more examples, but spending time to search about "bad trust" statements is a waste of time...

---

A "bad" trust, dear GazetaBitcoin.  
It's probably the opposite of "positive" Trust. Or is it "good" Trust? And "neutral" doesn't exist?  
We don't know...  

Hehe, ich meinte natürlich den Bärenmarkt.  
Ist entsprechend korrigiert.  


Definitiv, die mit dem Halving verbundenen Auswirkungen werden sich mit der Zeit abschwächen aber zumindest dieses (und nächstes) Halving ist das bestimmt noch etwas Besonderes für viele (neue) HODLer. Irgendwann wird dann auch der psychologische Effekt abnehmen, wenn eine gewisse Halving-Müdigkeit eintritt.
Vielleicht ist das an den Punkt erreicht, wenn bei dem neu ausgegebenen Bitcoin pro Block die Menge unter 0,xx BTC fällt und sich beim nächsten Halving die Zahl vor dem Komma nicht mehr ändert?

It's getting really interesting: after Bayern lost yesterday, Union Berlin only achieved a draw against Schalke 04.
Borussia Dortmund won 4-1 against Hertha BSC and now, Bayern, Union and BVB have the same number of points:



Freiburg, Leipzig and Frankfurt are still close as well and if the Bundesliga top teams should waste some more easy points, even different teams could end up winning the league.
Bayern is only still leading because of their impressive number of goals. 

Next week, Bayern will face Union in Allianz Arena. Odds are favoring Bayern massively but even if they only share points, Dortmund could end up leading the table next week.
It's a bit surprising to see Union slip against Schalke... 

No problem, I've also checked your left trust feedbacks and didn't saw a negative one sent recently, so everything is fine.
Many thanks for getting active on DT and acting against abuse, +1 

We are always happy to get more Bitcointalk members actively using the DT system, making it a bit more decentralized. 

Yeah, I've added the right link for download accordingly.

Nice to hear, I hope you found some nice vanity addresses. 

I've tried it as well, I don't get such an error but doesn't work for me as well because it depends on your device. Maybe that's a good question for the original topic and someon can help you for your question.
The original topic is in Development and Technical Discussion, so someone probably has a valid answer. 
Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]

Yeah, that would be a good idea, although I beleive I have at least explained him the difference between the use of positiv, neutral and negative trust or even linked our German translation of your Trust guide topic. But he still doesn't know the difference between neutral and negative trust...
If there's an opportunity, I'll provide a link to your topic of course.  


According to our DT standards, we should be hesistant to give out a negative trust for the abuse mr.relax did. Distrusting him would be more appropriate because it would remove him from DT and his left feedbacks would only be visible under "untrusted feedback". Such feedbacks would not show up as default.
Distrusting works by adding ~mr.relax to your trust list, which you'll find here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Of course, it would be the best solution if mr.relax realizes his abuse. But I doubt it after his recent abuses.
Here's also a good beginners guide about DT: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

Allesklar, dann nehme ich 1$ vereinfacht für die Zwischenauswertungen.  

Klar, sofern GazetaBitcoin dem zustimmt, können wir es gerne so machen, dass der Gewinn zwischen euch beiden aufgeteilt wird, falls eure beiden Stablecoins dann führen und keiner kollabiert ist.  

Da GazetaBitcoin hier nicht mitlesen dürfte, habe ich die Frage mal per Direktnachricht weiter geleitet und um Antwort gebeten.  

Sicher, Zentralbanken sind "KomMuNiStiSch"....
Was ein hirnverbrannter und eindimensionaler Propagandaspot.
Aber immerhin haben sie schöne Stockvideos verwendet.  

---

Gut 2 Tage später steht der Kurs noch immer auf diesem hohen Niveau, was ein gutes Zeichen ist, dass die Bären aktuell wenig Chancen haben.
Sobald sich der Kurs über 25k hält, spricht viel dafür, dass wir rasch die 30k USD sehen und damit würde ich den Bärenmarkt ebenfalls als beendet ansehen.
Das Halving ist noch ein Jahr entfernt, daher würde es mir persönlich nichts ausmachen, wenn es noch etwas zwischen 20 und 25k schwankt, denn wenn es zu schnell ansteigt, könnte das wieder dazu führen, dass das Momentuum schon wieder verpufft ist, bevor das Halving eintritt.
Denn als Großereignis sollte man die marktpsychologischen, positiven Auswirkungen nicht unterschätzen. Vielleicht stehen wir zur Zeit des Halvings schon bei 100k USD.
Mal prüfen in einem Jahr, ob das so eingetreten ist.