Na so ein Zufall aber auch.  Wenn Sie die wahre Bedeutung von "mendace" verstehen und warum ich diesen Namen gewählt habe, werde ich Ihnen 5 Verdienste verleihen. Nein, ich kann leider keine Gedanken lesen... Auf die 5 Verdienste kann ich ebenfalls verzichten aber vielleicht errät es ja jemand anderes. Bis dahin bitte ich Sie, unnötige Kommentare zu vermeiden.
Wenn man so dreist (und faul) ist, statt echte Kommentare zu schreiben, lieber eine KI-Anwendung benutzt und deren Erzeugnisse anschließend ins Forum klatscht, sowie teilweise direkt aus anderen Quellen kopiert, sollte man lieber mal ganz vorsichtig sein und die Klappe halten.  Nur so als Tipp.  |
|
|
|
1miau, what would you consider a 10 out of 10 Block Explorer? Good question. I don't really have an answer for your question but as we all know nothing is perfect, I believe there are always few improvements to implement. Maybe Blockchair could also be rated 9/10 but for whatever reason, it's currently 8/10. Loooooool but you added Blockchair to the list Yet you talk like someone else rated it only with 8/10 I don't know why I only rated it with 8/10 (but Blockchair is my favorite Explorer). Maybe I wanted to see some more improvements? I also believe it deserves a better mark.
You are right, maybe we can make a public survey. And, changing it is very simple, as it's only up tp you for 2 reasons: (1) you are topic's author, thus you can change marks anyway (smile) and (2) this explorer was suggested by you, thus you are not changing the mark against someone else's will, if you believe it should have a better mark.
But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings? In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate. From my perspective I'd go even more far than 9/10 and I'd give it 10/10 for the following reason: it's the best one we have! As a consequence, all other ones will be compared with best one, right? Therefore, if it is best one we have, it actually deserves 10/10, no matter that it can be improved here and there.
Sheeesh. We need to have space for improvements, dear GazetaBitcoin. If another explorer will come up, having all Blockchair features and also some more nice additions then it will be marked with 10/10 and change Blockchair's mark to 9/10. Does this make sense?
My favorite would be to arrange a public survey and by doing so, we could review the public opinion. Do you agree here?
You are right, I need to spell PrivacyG's name properly, my dear GazetaBitcoin. I'll do it correctly from now on and in Romanian it's Intimitate(a)G's (because PrivacyG might be female ). Unfortunately, the gender of our nyms don't also reveal our real genders Yet I have my reasons for also believing that PrivacyG is a chick  I have to disagree here because we are on the internet. And as far as we know today, Bitcointalk is only an online place, where we can exist, dear Gentlemen / Gentlewomen / Gentlecats. If these platforms cease to exists, so will we.  And I don't beleive, that PrivacyG is a chicken. If so, it would be called ChickenG. And it would be neutral (it). Now it came into my mind to vote PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023.
Nominating PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023 would be a legitimate consideration, dear GazetaBitcoin. It's probably me, dear GazetaBitcoin. 
We could do it like that, if it's ok for everyone [...] Any opinions, if the layout above is decent, are welcome. You trimmed it well, padawan! And it's almost there! 99%! I will explain and also propose a solution for having it perfectly fitting the screen! Done, I've implemented a part of your suggestions to trim it 1% more.  As shown in the above picture, I think we can shorten "Usefulness" column with 3 characters, by deleting that emoji. Having "Usefulness" column shortened then, maybe "Comments" column can be expanded with 3 characters. Deleting the emoji??!!  Are you dense? We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin! I hope this helps.
Yes, it helps, should be properly formatted now? Plz confirm, Sirs!
Later edit: PrivacyG has one more suggestion but I guess shyness prevailed ( )). He (?) said that he believes that Atomic explorer is not actually redirecting to Trezor explorer website. Instead, he believes that Atomic copies Trezor's website and that there is only a very small difference between the two websites. Ok, many thanks for the input. So, what's our conclusion? In our current explanation, it says Atomic explorer is mirroring Trezor explorer, which should be accurate? |
|
|
|
Why the hell have I not received an invitation to an orgy yet? icopress be like: @The Pharmacist be like  Well, I guess it's me? |
|
|
|
Count me in as well! I've detected your prediction round last year around October / November and it seemed to be fun, so I'll looking forward to join. Maybe we'll get a generous deal from Sportsbet.io once again because I can imagine we'll get quite a long list of interested participants. Personally, I'm not very experienced on Superbru but it shouldn't be an issue most likely (if Superbru is used again) since it seemed to be a good choice for your last round. The upcoming season will be interesting as well, hopefully we'll have Red Bull, Ferrari and Mercedes compete for World Championship. If Ferrari doesn't drop off after summer break again... |
|
|
|
Die Regel gegen AI Betrüger von Royse777 gilt nun in allen seinen Kampagnen. LoyceV ist die erste Person, die einen Betrüger in der Sinbad.io Signatur Kampagne entdeckt und gemeldet hat. Das ging ja schnell, da werden bestimmt noch mehr Kampagnenteilnehmer gefunden werden. Kaum vorstellbar, wenn es noch so viele Altcoin-Signaturen wie früher gäbe, was da los wäre. Royse77 hat diesen Fall geprüft und bestätigt, dass das Forumsmitglied mendace betrogen hat. Na so ein Zufall aber auch.  Was spricht denn gegen AI Texte wenn der Inhalt passt und der Poster es ggf. noch verbessert.
Wird ja nicht in einer Prüfung angewendet, sondern für postings im forum.
Das würde dann eh nicht erkennt werden, wenn der Text noch einmal überarbeitet / umformuliert wird. Mit der Initiative von Royse777 geht es eher um die ganz dreisten Fälle, wo wirklich ganze Textblöcke 1:1 aus ChatGPT kopiert und einfach anschließend ins Forum geklatscht werden. |
|
|
|
Da ich auch glaube, dass unsere ausgewählten Stable Coins ihren Wert von 1 $ behalten werden, sind die Chancen, dass ihre sehr kleinen Schwankungen den Gewinner ändern, fast null. Infolgedessen stimme ich zu, diese Münzen für den Rest des Jahres mit einem Wert von 1 $ zu betrachten und am Ende, wenn wir Gewinner sind, können wir den Preis teilen Danke für die Antwort und ich denke ebenfalls, dass dieses Vorgehen eine faire Lösung darstellt. Im Falle, dass eure beiden Münzen gewinnen sollten, würde ich den Gewinn also entsprechend teilen.
Mittlerweile ist die Auswertung der Startpreise (01.02.2023, 00:01) auch fertig:  Gerne könnt ihr einmal prüfen, ob alles passt und dann warten wir gespannt, welche Münze den ersten Monat (Februar) gewinnen wird. |
|
|
|
Ohhh come on, not this clown again! Yet he is back in action! Unfortunately, this clown is at it again...
I believe that our mr.relax barely knows anything about Trust and feedbacks, as he noticed my feedback only in November last year when, of course, he came to me, very angry, asking me to remove the negative feedback I wrote. I explained to him that it wasn't a negative feedback, but a neutral one and, in case he wants to see how a negative looks like this can be arranged.
You are absolutely right here... When it comes to trust, mr.relax is completely clueless and he doesn't listen to advice / explanations. He claimed multiple times last year, that we would have left him negative / "bad" Trust. Which is not true because it's just neutral Trust. ...Nur zu. Oder verteile negativen Trust.
Die Hater dürfen mir deshalb trotzdem weiterhin negativen Trust geben, weil ich angeblich Opfer in "get rich fast schemes" locke. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5438474.0I could give some more examples, but spending time to search about "bad trust" statements is a waste of time...
If I remember well, he replied, apologized for using wrong terms, but then he sent me a retaliatory feedback though:  A "bad" trust, dear GazetaBitcoin. It's probably the opposite of "positive" Trust. Or is it "good" Trust? And "neutral" doesn't exist? We don't know... |
|
|
|
Sobald sich der Kurs über 25k hält, spricht viel dafür, dass wir rasch die 30k USD sehen und damit würde ich den Bullenmarkt ebenfalls als beendet ansehen. Schon?  Hehe, ich meinte natürlich den Bärenmarkt. Ist entsprechend korrigiert. Das Halving ist noch ein Jahr entfernt, daher würde es mir persönlich nichts ausmachen, wenn es noch etwas zwischen 20 und 25k schwankt, denn wenn es zu schnell ansteigt, könnte das wieder dazu führen, dass das Momentuum schon wieder verpufft ist, bevor das Halving eintritt.
Mir wäre es lieber, wenn sich der Bitcoin-Preis endlich endgültig von den Halvings emanzipiert (wie mehrmals geschrieben, ist deren Einfluss auf die reale Angebot/Nachfragesituation bei jedem Halving geringer). Meines Erachtens sind die der Grund, warum es alle ca. 4 Jahre so tief runter geht: weil viele sich schon an vorherigen Zyklen orientieren und etwa zur "Halbzeit" zwischen den Halvings verkaufen. Und die selbsterfüllte Prophezeihung geht in eine neue Runde ... Definitiv, die mit dem Halving verbundenen Auswirkungen werden sich mit der Zeit abschwächen aber zumindest dieses (und nächstes) Halving ist das bestimmt noch etwas Besonderes für viele (neue) HODLer. Irgendwann wird dann auch der psychologische Effekt abnehmen, wenn eine gewisse Halving-Müdigkeit eintritt. Vielleicht ist das an den Punkt erreicht, wenn bei dem neu ausgegebenen Bitcoin pro Block die Menge unter 0,xx BTC fällt und sich beim nächsten Halving die Zahl vor dem Komma nicht mehr ändert? |
|
|
|
It's getting really interesting: after Bayern lost yesterday, Union Berlin only achieved a draw against Schalke 04. Borussia Dortmund won 4-1 against Hertha BSC and now, Bayern, Union and BVB have the same number of points:  Freiburg, Leipzig and Frankfurt are still close as well and if the Bundesliga top teams should waste some more easy points, even different teams could end up winning the league. Bayern is only still leading because of their impressive number of goals. Next week, Bayern will face Union in Allianz Arena. Odds are favoring Bayern massively but even if they only share points, Dortmund could end up leading the table next week. It's a bit surprising to see Union slip against Schalke... |
|
|
|
Sorry, I was in a hurry earlier and expressed myself wrongly. I mean, of course, I distrusted him and of course I didn't leave a negative trust entry. That would have been wrong and I didn't do it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. No problem, I've also checked your left trust feedbacks and didn't saw a negative one sent recently, so everything is fine. Many thanks for getting active on DT and acting against abuse, +1 We are always happy to get more Bitcointalk members actively using the DT system, making it a bit more decentralized. |
|
|
|
Yeah, I've added the right link for download accordingly. Otherwise, every step works correctly, tried and generated wallet successfully. Danke sehr Nice to hear, I hope you found some nice vanity addresses. I successfully generated address via CPU but I want to generate it via GPU. Followed the steps but then I got this error.
I've tried it as well, I don't get such an error but doesn't work for me as well because it depends on your device. Maybe that's a good question for the original topic and someon can help you for your question. The original topic is in Development and Technical Discussion, so someone probably has a valid answer. Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] |
|
|
|
... He should read this: The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas. Yeah, that would be a good idea, although I beleive I have at least explained him the difference between the use of positiv, neutral and negative trust or even linked our German translation of your Trust guide topic. But he still doesn't know the difference between neutral and negative trust... If there's an opportunity, I'll provide a link to your topic of course. Even though I'm only DT2, I've given him negative trust now. Unfortunately, I can't say much on the subject, since I have absolutely no idea about trading and haven't followed the subject either. But I rely on the statements of 1miau and this thread. According to our DT standards, we should be hesistant to give out a negative trust for the abuse mr.relax did. Distrusting him would be more appropriate because it would remove him from DT and his left feedbacks would only be visible under "untrusted feedback". Such feedbacks would not show up as default. Distrusting works by adding ~mr.relax to your trust list, which you'll find here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trustOf course, it would be the best solution if mr.relax realizes his abuse. But I doubt it after his recent abuses. Here's also a good beginners guide about DT: LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system |
|
|
|
Ich würde dir da auch einfach jegliche Freiheiten überlassen. Unterm Jahr kannst du ganz einfach 1$ als Kurs annehmen.
Allesklar, dann nehme ich 1$ vereinfacht für die Zwischenauswertungen. Für mich wäre es sogar in Ordnung, den Gewinn am Ende des Jahres einfach mit GazetaBitcoin zu teilen, falls die Stable Coins auf Platz 1 und 2 im Portfolio sind.
Klar, sofern GazetaBitcoin dem zustimmt, können wir es gerne so machen, dass der Gewinn zwischen euch beiden aufgeteilt wird, falls eure beiden Stablecoins dann führen und keiner kollabiert ist. @GazetaBitcoin würdest du lieber einen genauen Gewinner ermitteln oder dir im Bärenmarkt mit mir den ersten Platz teilen?
Da GazetaBitcoin hier nicht mitlesen dürfte, habe ich die Frage mal per Direktnachricht weiter geleitet und um Antwort gebeten. |
|
|
|
Sicher, Zentralbanken sind "KomMuNiStiSch".... Was ein hirnverbrannter und eindimensionaler Propagandaspot. Aber immerhin haben sie schöne Stockvideos verwendet.
Schöner Kursverlauf heute (bzw. gestern), neues 6-Monats-Hoch, 25000 in Schlagweite. Ich hätte den letzten Dip hartnäckiger eingeschätzt, er war aber tatsächlich noch im Rahmen von dem, was auch beim Bullrun Anfang 2019 an Rücksetzern zu beobachten war. Für mich wäre der (womöglich) endgültige Umschwung zum Bullen da, wenn das Zwischenhoch aus dem letzten August (nachhaltig) überschritten würde. Das waren bei Bitstamp genau 25205 US$. Sind bis dahin nur noch 300 US$ (ab dem Tageshoch von 24895) oder auch rund 1,2 % Gut 2 Tage später steht der Kurs noch immer auf diesem hohen Niveau, was ein gutes Zeichen ist, dass die Bären aktuell wenig Chancen haben. Sobald sich der Kurs über 25k hält, spricht viel dafür, dass wir rasch die 30k USD sehen und damit würde ich den Bärenmarkt ebenfalls als beendet ansehen. Das Halving ist noch ein Jahr entfernt, daher würde es mir persönlich nichts ausmachen, wenn es noch etwas zwischen 20 und 25k schwankt, denn wenn es zu schnell ansteigt, könnte das wieder dazu führen, dass das Momentuum schon wieder verpufft ist, bevor das Halving eintritt. Denn als Großereignis sollte man die marktpsychologischen, positiven Auswirkungen nicht unterschätzen. Vielleicht stehen wir zur Zeit des Halvings schon bei 100k USD. Mal prüfen in einem Jahr, ob das so eingetreten ist. |
|
|
|
I t was great game with 5 goals and that extremely early Upamecano red card helped for Borussia a lot.
A very unlucky red card for Bayern very eraly in the game opened the door for Gladbach. Upamecano barely touched the Gladbach player, so very harsh decision extremely early in the game. Bayern still managed to score 2 goals but overally, one player less on the flied and some defensive mistakes were too much against a well-paying Gladbach team today. Great chance for Union to return to the top. They're playing with worst team in league Schalke tomorrow.
A win for Union would be great to overtake Bayern in the table. And Dortmund could also come close to Bayern by winning against Hertha BSC Berlin tomorrow. Should be likely for Union to win against Schalke but as everyone expected, Bayern also lost to Gladbach today, which many participants of our prediction pool didn't expect... |
|
|
|
So, on this relatively new decentralized DT system, mr.relax can be kicked out of DT2 without having Buchi-88 to remove him from his trust list, you just need more DT members exclude him [~mr.relax].
Exactly. If Buchi-88, as a DT1 member, keeps trusting mr.relax, it needs 2 DT1 exclusions for mr.relax to be kicked out from his DT2 position. Accounts are DT2 as long as one DT1 inclusion is active and are kicked out if they have 1 more DT1 exclusion than DT1 inclusion. As far as I know, maybe someone can confirm.
Not anymore because if I'm correct, 1 DT1 inclusion makes him DT2 - and he needs 2 DT1 exclusions to be kicked out again. But before I created the topic, he only had 1 exclusion.
Yes, probably he's not DT2 anymore, I've looked it up on wednesday and it might have changed by now.
It has been changed and he is not a DT member anymore. If you go to this page, you will see this: mr.relax (-1) Since neither you nor GazetaBitcoin are DT1 member now and only Nestade is a DT1 member, another DT1 member has excluded mr.relax. Yes, according to BPIP, NeuroticFish excluded him: https://bpip.org/TrustLog |
|
|
|
It's a very valuable contribution and I would like to add it to my OP but each table column would even get smaller Sadly, this is true. Yesterday, when I saw PrivacyG's update of the table it looked seemed to look fine... However, today I inspected it again after your reply, as I did not understand why columns should be smaller. I observed now that in its new shape, the column for comments is not fully shown on the screen (at least on 1080p resolution). Practically, in order to see everything written there you have to drag all text to the right... Same here, I need to scroll as well. Maybe it is shown fine on higher resolution but most users have 1080p therefore the table should be kept in its actual form.
I'm viewing it from my largest device but I'm sure it won't get better on smaller devices or even mobile devices, so I've cosen the approach to add PrivacyG's contribution below. We can still change the table or add the column on the right side but it might be cut off entirely then. so I've added a sentence below
PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG's contribution here to find out more about it. That also works I added this update to the translated topic as well. +1 By the way, make sure you write PrivacyG's name properly, my dear 1miau. The name should be written between tt - /tt BBCode  You are right, I need to spell PrivacyG's name properly, my dear GazetaBitcoin. I'll do it correctly from now on and in Romanian it's Intimitate(a)G's (because PrivacyG might be female ).
If it gets distorted on your display, maybe it is not a good idea to add my column to OP. Does my table fit better on your screen if we shorten the Usefulness column by a few underlines? I am sure there are a few columns we can tighten up to make more space.
We could do it like that, if it's ok for everyone: Bitcoin block explorers: | Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?* | Usefulness
(subjective rating)
 | Works without
JS | Rated by | Comments | | ________________________ | ____________________________ | _______________ | ___________________ | ______________ | ________________ | ________________________________________________________________________ | | Blockchair.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | 8 / 10 Points | Yes | 1miau | | | Trezor Bitcoin Explorer | Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (11/2019) | 7.5 / 10 Points | Partially** | Saint-loup | The only one with Blockchair to manage zpub keys | | mempool | Yes (10/2020) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (10/2020) | 7.5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | Detailed and great UI | | OKLink | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | Yes (08/2022) | 7.5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | It quickly became one of my favorites! | | bitaps.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | 7 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | | BTC.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2019) | 7 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | | chainflyer.bitflyer.jp | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 7 / 10 Points | No | Alveus | | | BitcoinWho'sWho | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022) | Yes (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | No | GazetaBitcoin | Very efficient, including very interesting features; now it supports Bech32 addresses as well | | BitcoinExplorer | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | Yes (08/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | Partially** | SFR10 | Simple and clean. | | bitquery | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022) | Yes (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | No | Rizzrack | Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual
representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address | | TokenView | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022) | Yes (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | No | ajiz138 | Interesting block explorer, and there's a balance chart underneath. | | BitInfoCharts | Yes (09/2022) / No (11/2022) | No (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Points | Partially (see Comments) | ajiz138 | This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance. If using no-JS, click a random TX, Block or Address and edit the URL in your browser to view the desired information. | | SoChain | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (09/2021) | 6 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | | Blockcypher.com | Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | No (09/2019) | 6 / 10 Points | Partially** | 1miau | | | cryptoID | Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 6 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | | ViaBTC.com | Yes (09/2019) / No (10/2022) | No (09/2019) | 6 / 10 Points | No | 1miau | | | Btcscan | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | Yes (08/2022) | 6 / 10 Points | Yes | SFR10 | | | Blockchain.com | Yes (11/2019) / Yes (10/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 5 / 10 Points | Partially** | 1miau | | | Localbitcoinschain.com | Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022) | Yes (12/2019) | 5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | Great UI but it doesn't support addresses with large # of TX's. Currently unavailable. | | BitcoinBlockExplorer | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | No (08/2022) | 5 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | | Learnmeabitcoin | Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022) | No (10/2022) | 5 / 10 Points | No | ajiz138 | Quite simple and nothing more than that. Currently a few k Blocks behind. | | Atomic | Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022) | No (08/2022) | 4.5 / 10 Points | Partially** | SFR10 | Outdated UI / currently mirroring Trezor Explorer | | CoinCap | Yes (10/2020) / No (10/2022) | No (10/2020) | 4 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | | Yogh | Yes (10/2022) / Yes (10/2022) | No (10/2022) | 4 / 10 Points | No | ajiz138 | Quite simple but less interesting | | Blockexplorer.one | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (10/2022) | No (12/2019) | 3 / 10 Points | No | LTU_btc | | | Blockpath | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | No (12/2019) | 3 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | Outdated UI | | Blockstream | Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | Yes (11/2019) | 2 / 10 Points | ? | pooya87 | good details, blocks visitors from my country | | Insight | Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022) | No (12/2019) | 1 / 10 Points | No | SFR10 | | | Walletexplorer.com | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (05/2022) | No (09/2019) | 0 / 10 Points (avoid) | Yes | 1miau | Risk of getting your IP tracked, not recommended to use | | Spiral | Yes (09/2022) / Yes (10/2022) | No (09/2022) | x / 10 Points | No | cygan | beta phase ... only working for addresses with balance right now |
Any opinions, if the layout above is decent, are welcome. |
|
|
|
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=522205 I don't see mr.relax on dt2 according to bpip. Maybe a couple of you have ~ him already and knocked him off but i'm not really sure because I don't think BPIP updates that quickly. Yes, probably he's not DT2 anymore, I've looked it up on wednesday and it might have changed by now. As far as I know, he's just one exclusion away from getting kicked out of DT2 since he has been distrusted by Nestade, GazetaBitcoin and me before the incident (see LoyceV's trust list viewer).
I had to Google translate that trust feedback and I agree:
Negative tag is not OK to be given for insults.
I've not even really insulted him, but he likes to paint himself as victim... Obviously he doesn't like it when his fraudulent tactics are criticized or his questionable positions in general. It's quite funny because he has been the one pushing lies repeatedly like the unproven claim, that Nestade would be my alt and that my trust from November 2022 would be a negative trust. He has even sent unsolicited and harsh PMs to other forum members. Negative tag is not OK to be given as a result of disagreements.
Exactly, there are so many disagrements. What a shitshow if we would start to give out a negative trust for disagreements for example in Bitcointalk's reputation section. Now.. I see some sort of oddity too.
You are trusting Buchi-88 (DT1), he trusts mr.relax (and makes him DT2) and you distrust mr.relax.
Buchi-88 is a trustworthy member and it's just a coincidence. I may be wrong, but I think that mr.relax remains DT2 as long as Buchi-88 trusts him and no matter how many direct distrust we give him.
Exactly but mr.relax is just 1 DT1 exclusion away from getting kicked out of DT2. And the current DT selection is very favorable for mr.relax because normally, GazetaBitcoin, Nestade and I are usually DT1. (edit: I misread that part, mr.relax loses his DT2 position if there are more DT1 exclusions compared to DT1 inclusions) But if my logic is correct, an idea would be that maybe you also discuss with Buchi-88 review his trust list. After all, I see he's a fellow German and may be more aware of the context too.
It's a suitable approach but I don't want to bother Buchi-88 right now, especially because I expect that DT will exclude mr.relax quickly. I expect at least 4 new DT1 exclusions for mr.relax due to his abuse listed above. So, let's see next week. |
|
|
|
I was looking for customized bitcoin-address generation through this website and just right now discovered this article, it's phenomenal but there is slight correction from me: When I clicked on original address to download from github, https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen/downloads showed me 404 error page. As it seems, correct url at the moment is without the addition of /downloads, i.e. https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen is a right one that directly connects you to page. Yes, you are right. Obviously, GitHub has changed a bit and my current link is not supported anymore... I've added it in my OP and replaced the link. Many thanks for pointing it out. If you need a customized SegWit-Address generator, you might also be interested in VanitySearch from Jean_Luc. He's even active on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112311.0 |
|
|
|
Nice giveaway, I'm in of course and my prediction is 4,11 USD. Helau. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
