"This poses a significant obstacle to potential attacks as the attacker would need to acquire the coins in some way, either by spending a lot of hashing power or by buying them."
I am a little confused by this formulation. Why does it seem to me that the project is not very good protection?
Why do not you like this wording? This is the standard phrase for most similar projects The fact that this algorithm will create an obstacle on the way to hackers, which in theory can be bypassed. To buy a coin to crack a wallet? very difficult.. Developers can insert any description, but everyone knows these protection algorithms - PoS and PoW. Each crypto currency exchanger somehow works with these systems Okay, this project is made for minor transactions, we will assume that there is no need for space protection in order for the application to work There is enough protection even if even if your wallet is hacked, you can not get money from it, as this will lead to their loss If the project has haters from among competitors, for example, they can easily crack several wallets and reset them to take away part of the target audience... Yes, it will be excellent to get an empty wallet) I understand you, man! But the protection of the project is not really bad, despite the fact that this mobile application |
|
|
|
Good afternoon! Does the platform provide any way to earn money? I see just this is a service for transferring small amounts of money
Hello, yes, the site says at least two ways to earn money on the basis of this platform! Look closer the specification section PoS minting In order to mine PoS blocks, you should keep your coins in a wallet client or coin daemon. Coins begin to mint if they are held in a wallet that is not encrypted, namely connected to the network once it reaches its maturity date (only 24h!). it was the only thing I found, but it was already over 0,024% of transaction fee goes back to thousands of people, who believe and shared our vision at the early stages and helpd us to developed and introduce Global cryptocurrency worldwide. This is a very small percentage, while it was necessary to work on the project even before it began its work .. It does not suit me, unfortunately You can quite well earn extra money on other projects. Look for similar threads on the forum. you can do lending in various projects |
|
|
|
Good afternoon! Does the platform provide any way to earn money? I see just this is a service for transferring small amounts of money
Hello, yes, the site says at least two ways to earn money on the basis of this platform! Look closer the specification section PoS minting In order to mine PoS blocks, you should keep your coins in a wallet client or coin daemon. Coins begin to mint if they are held in a wallet that is not encrypted, namely connected to the network once it reaches its maturity date (only 24h!). it was the only thing I found, but it was already over 0,024% of transaction fee goes back to thousands of people, who believe and shared our vision at the early stages and helpd us to developed and introduce Global cryptocurrency worldwide. |
|
|
|
Good afternoon! Does the platform provide any way to earn money? I see just this is a service for transferring small amounts of money
Hello, yes, the site says at least two ways to earn money on the basis of this platform! Look closer the specification section |
|
|
|
Judging by the lively reaction, blogs began to appear on their page? Some time back there was empty. Did the project team start informing its participants
They always posted information in various information resources, so tell me that you did not read it, right? Now it can be seen that a few days ago the developers took up this project and began to write a new article every day. Most likely it will. Look at how often the articles were published I agree, there used to be 2-3 articles a month, with a fairly large interval .. But they wrote, and it was good But this raises a natural question: if they started to do information work, they finished building a beta version of their platform and are ready to release it? Do you think that they just relax now and distribute the forces incorrectly? I think that their work is built on a clear plan, according to which they move day by day this is not accurate, since we have been waiting for the beta version for a long time to assess the platform's compliance with what is written on the site and presented on the forum And what if the developers have already done a beta version for a long time and do not release it just to make a noise around themselves, including here, on the forum? No, it certainly is not. so they only lower the loyalty of their members who are very much looking forward to the release, and many of whom have invested their investments in the project Loyalty of participants will fall in the event that the developers do not fulfill their promises. So far, they are coping with their road map, since there is a whole month |
|
|
|
Judging by the lively reaction, blogs began to appear on their page? Some time back there was empty. Did the project team start informing its participants
They always posted information in various information resources, so tell me that you did not read it, right? Now it can be seen that a few days ago the developers took up this project and began to write a new article every day. Most likely it will. Look at how often the articles were published I agree, there used to be 2-3 articles a month, with a fairly large interval .. But they wrote, and it was good But this raises a natural question: if they started to do information work, they finished building a beta version of their platform and are ready to release it? Do you think that they just relax now and distribute the forces incorrectly? I think that their work is built on a clear plan, according to which they move day by day this is not accurate, since we have been waiting for the beta version for a long time to assess the platform's compliance with what is written on the site and presented on the forum |
|
|
|
Judging by the lively reaction, blogs began to appear on their page? Some time back there was empty. Did the project team start informing its participants
They always posted information in various information resources, so tell me that you did not read it, right? Now it can be seen that a few days ago the developers took up this project and began to write a new article every day. Most likely it will. Look at how often the articles were published I agree, there used to be 2-3 articles a month, with a fairly large interval .. But they wrote, and it was good But this raises a natural question: if they started to do information work, they finished building a beta version of their platform and are ready to release it? |
|
|
|
Judging by the lively reaction, blogs began to appear on their page? Some time back there was empty. Did the project team start informing its participants
They always posted information in various information resources, so tell me that you did not read it, right? |
|
|
|
hey guys, did you read the developers blogs that they put on the medium? This is a very interesting and informative feature
Yes, I saw these blogs. This is the only place where I take the actual information about the project, because on this resource the team really lays out their thoughts |
|
|
|
I'm not sure that I understood the meaning of this question. Did you mean that participation in this section of the bounty program is difficult to understand the rules?
Yes something like that. How many times have I not tried to take part in this type of bounty program - each time was disqualified for the wrong job Maybe you on Facebook have too many fake friends in the opinion of checking the correctness of the rules? It is not necessary to have many fake friends to be disqualified. Maybe the comments were negative, or too frequent? I do not think so, most likely it's in my friends, since many of them just recently connected to facebook, maybe they are mistaken for fakes? Yes it is possible. Be sure to write to the support team, as this is an unfair disqualification, and here you can sort it out. |
|
|
|
I'm not sure that I understood the meaning of this question. Did you mean that participation in this section of the bounty program is difficult to understand the rules?
Yes something like that. How many times have I not tried to take part in this type of bounty program - each time was disqualified for the wrong job it is a rules for that type of bounty 1. Follow and like the LocalCoinSwap Facebook page 2. Minimum of 4 posts+likes per week, maximum of 2 per day 3. Participants must share 4 LocalCoinSwap posts. 4. Accounts with fake friends and followers are disqualified. 5. Participants who post negative or spamming comments are disqualified. 6. Submit your report on Every Sunday. We will add stakes on every Monday. |
|
|
|
Sorry, I would like to ask if there is any sense in participating in this part of the program bounty?
And why do you think that it makes no sense to participate in this section of the program's bounty? it seems to me that there is no difference between sections, because participants receive an award |
|
|
|
Sometimes when I read the white paper of the project it seems to me that the developers approached the distributed computer network issue philosophically
I saw projects where the attitude towards potential clients was much more sensitive. Including the forum was organized by a blog of developers, in which they talked about their latest achievements From such projects I saw only Discipline. In this project, the developers were really busy with the fact that they laid out every event on the forum Yes, indeed, discipline is a huge and steep project, where developers pay a lot of attention to communication with people, especially in a telegram, but I'm not talking about it In any case, communication of project managers with participants or potential consumers is a very pleasant phenomenon I believe that this is indeed so. Now the forum is only communication of individuals to solve problems associated with misunderstandings I think that initially the forum was created for discussion and communication of the project participants, but not for the developers to respond to the messages of the participants, as there are too many of them What format in this case do you suggest? If every time you answer the questions of participants through the mail, then you will have to hire an individual person in the main structure Let's say you're right. But nothing prevents the project team from taking into account the main issues and releasing its block of answers to questions. at the moment they have no such It seems to me that I saw such a block on the project site, you need to look more closely! More details can be answered only in the telegram, and then the developers have a rather rotten channel. There is not enough information and media content updates! |
|
|
|
Sometimes when I read the white paper of the project it seems to me that the developers approached the distributed computer network issue philosophically
I saw projects where the attitude towards potential clients was much more sensitive. Including the forum was organized by a blog of developers, in which they talked about their latest achievements From such projects I saw only Discipline. In this project, the developers were really busy with the fact that they laid out every event on the forum Yes, indeed, discipline is a huge and steep project, where developers pay a lot of attention to communication with people, especially in a telegram, but I'm not talking about it In any case, communication of project managers with participants or potential consumers is a very pleasant phenomenon I believe that this is indeed so. Now the forum is only communication of individuals to solve problems associated with misunderstandings I think that initially the forum was created for discussion and communication of the project participants, but not for the developers to respond to the messages of the participants, as there are too many of them What format in this case do you suggest? If every time you answer the questions of participants through the mail, then you will have to hire an individual person in the main structure Let's say you're right. But nothing prevents the project team from taking into account the main issues and releasing its block of answers to questions. at the moment they have no such |
|
|
|
Sometimes when I read the white paper of the project it seems to me that the developers approached the distributed computer network issue philosophically
I saw projects where the attitude towards potential clients was much more sensitive. Including the forum was organized by a blog of developers, in which they talked about their latest achievements From such projects I saw only Discipline. In this project, the developers were really busy with the fact that they laid out every event on the forum Yes, indeed, discipline is a huge and steep project, where developers pay a lot of attention to communication with people, especially in a telegram, but I'm not talking about it In any case, communication of project managers with participants or potential consumers is a very pleasant phenomenon I believe that this is indeed so. Now the forum is only communication of individuals to solve problems associated with misunderstandings I think that initially the forum was created for discussion and communication of the project participants, but not for the developers to respond to the messages of the participants, as there are too many of them |
|
|
|
Sometimes when I read the white paper of the project it seems to me that the developers approached the distributed computer network issue philosophically
I saw projects where the attitude towards potential clients was much more sensitive. Including the forum was organized by a blog of developers, in which they talked about their latest achievements From such projects I saw only Discipline. In this project, the developers were really busy with the fact that they laid out every event on the forum Yes, indeed, discipline is a huge and steep project, where developers pay a lot of attention to communication with people, especially in a telegram, but I'm not talking about it In any case, communication of project managers with participants or potential consumers is a very pleasant phenomenon |
|
|
|
Sometimes when I read the white paper of the project it seems to me that the developers approached the distributed computer network issue philosophically
I saw projects where the attitude towards potential clients was much more sensitive. Including the forum was organized by a blog of developers, in which they talked about their latest achievements From such projects I saw only Discipline. In this project, the developers were really busy with the fact that they laid out every event on the forum |
|
|
|
But at the same time there are also projects that were closed after serious attacks, as users lost confidence in them
I agree. Take for example binarix. He could have been hacked some time ago, and I do not think that they had a weak defense! |
|
|
|
I think the development team has been very relaxed lately. In serious projects, you can not be relaxed for a second!
Very sharp statement. What will you justify? Not so long ago the service was openly lagging, and at the same time it seemed to me that the site was about to collapse the domain. This is most likely the consequences of an attack on the server, and they can be caused by a negligent attitude This is not an indicator. What will you do with a direct ddos attack if it is prepared and paid very well? just the project has haters This is by the way not so bad, any fame remains a glory. That is, they say about the project, they discuss it and even some people hate it. Strong! I agree, this is really a weighty argument! I like this approach, that whenever a project is mentioned - it becomes more popular! And yet sometimes popularity hinders stability in work. If this guy is right, now glitches can get more frequent, but they may disappear altogether, as protection will increase I think that even if there were failures in the work, they were short-lived and caused by changes in the project site. The platform is very powerful protection |
|
|
|
I think the development team has been very relaxed lately. In serious projects, you can not be relaxed for a second!
Very sharp statement. What will you justify? Not so long ago the service was openly lagging, and at the same time it seemed to me that the site was about to collapse the domain. This is most likely the consequences of an attack on the server, and they can be caused by a negligent attitude To be honest, how much I follow the status of the project - I have never seen even a slight sag in the system, everything works perfectly |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
