What if you have the right diagnosis but lacks facilities for treatment ?
I think this is nothing that eHealth can change. It depends on the infrastructure of the country you are in. What eHealth could do is maybe send the data to a specialist in another country so that they get to know the case. Ehealth doesnt handle the treatment, its just about the data management , analysis, and also a few diagnostics. They apply technology to make things faster, more efficient and help people prevent diseases, but this is not to cure someone. I think that eHealth will be able to significantly improve treatment. Having all health information in one place alone can save people a lot of time and money. Besides, telemedicine services will enable easy access to health professionals. I think eHealth will facilitate faster healing of illnesses by providing accurate data that will lead to the early intervention as provide by medical professionals. This is what makes the project noteworthy.  in some way it will facilitate it but not like going to a doctor. actually you can google a lot of your diseases by symptoms nowadays and then decide to go and see a doctor. this will be done by ehealth then exactly, this is what ehealth is going to be. not a replacement for your doc. It just ties in more data then looking up a database for your symptomes and give you the best matching. this will also tie in additional data and very important: your medical history. This give a whole new base to make this work. The ehealth platform will be very useful for doctors as well. They can search our medical history to analyze our disease so that it will save time and get accurate data. |
|
|
|
all this subtitles idea is lame, I think even the project is highly in speculation mode. Not a fail safe program
I don't think its lame, because not everybody have to know english, or if i like see a spanish series(like la casa de papel, a must watch) what should i do besides subtitles? So we need somebody to translate it fast and cheap. there comes the bounty idea. I too don't think that the subtitles idea is lame, I have understood all the Korean series with their subtitles. I would have not got every a word if it wasn't for subtitles. Subtitle will help us to understand the storyline of a movie. Without it, many people can only guess the flow through body language alone and sometimes could lead to misinterpretation. |
|
|
|
These are encouraging new. The more blockchain technology becomes mainstream the better for Biotron.
It applies to almost all of the good crypto projects. Most of people here are seeing cryptocurrencies as an investment opportunity and i think its not the actual point, its about widely used, but of course when many people come in to use it, there will be a huge amount of money too (exchange fiat to crypto). I believe in cryptocurrency and blockchain future. While I like your idealistic point of view, coins are hardly used as except as an investment right now. Coins like NAV who came out with NAVPay have struggled even though people still buy into it thinking it is undervalued. There are payment bottlenecks that need to be sorted first. Not too many vendors came forward to implement that system when it was readily available except for one pornstar. For her, it fits the model - anonymous and cheap. Not so for many others though. It might be a little irrelevant to Biotron here but I am just saying that any new tokens will be an investment vehicle for now and the foreseeable future. I think you are right. If it was not an investment, nobody would participate in an ICO after all. It would be nice though if platforms with utility tokens were actually used instead of hording the tokens. That would speed up adoption. The ability to use the token for something valuable instead of just holding it will give a better future for biotron. |
|
|
|
There is no clear information regarding the main sale period and I am afraid this could give a bad impact to the project.
Easy, Pre ICO is starting soon and im pretty sure were shortly before an big update The closed round is almost finished, I expect there will be some information regarding the pre-ICO and ICO shortly after. As it seems that they postponed the ending of the closed round it would have been good to inform people here until when and how they want to go on. It's a bit disappointing to let people here in unknown. Where did you get such information that they postponed the end of the closed round? If so, it's really not very good. According to the roadmap on the webiste, the closed round was supposed to end in January already. It's now March and it is still open. The countdown on the website was reset several times without any prior notice or announcement. I wish the team would tell us about what's happening, because it doesn't look good. Also, the closed round sale started quite late, they should update the roadmap. There are some stuffs that make a little confusion in regards with the token sale. It will be better for the team to fix it as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
maybe is better if they will apply different prices based on the country where they operate, based on fact that even 1$ can be a lot in certain countries
This is certain. For different countries there should be different prices. Since a person will prefer a pirated film than pay a large price for it. That's not a good idea in general, and I think this is a business, this isn't a non profit organization who just want to eradicate piracy. Why not a good idea? How would you imagine they go on totally different markets with equal price? The product will fail no matter how good it is if people won't be able to afford it. Even McDonald's adjusts prices in different countries. Apply different price for different country won't hurt the business but how they will distinguish people via their country. What if people use vpn to get the lowest price? |
|
|
|
The voting system will probably be about non critical preferences the user can vote on. Its quite common nowadays.
There is a reason why the board of management,not the shareholders, decide important matters of a company. I fear token holders would always vote for short sighted profit. this is why I'm skeptical. Actually, I think such voting system is good but not really necessary. Suggestions from the community should be taken into consideration instead. So i think it will be better to focus on the other important things rather than thinking about providing a voting system, ehfirst token already has a great value according to what they've promised on the whitepaper. Yes, focus on other stuffs will be better. Health is a very long subject to dig and it needs serious treatment than the other one. |
|
|
|
Yes i think we can expect to soon some annoncement about the date of the pre ico and ico. Team will communicate about that for sure, I think the visibly of the project is at a good point at the moment, it will be time soon.
I thought it was after the closed round sale that the main sale will start? Or is there any update yet on said events? Yes, the main ICO will start after the closed round. But when I saw the site, February-March should be the time for the main ICO. I guess something has been changed! |
|
|
|
As far as I know there's no subscription on Cryptoflix, you'll only pay when you watch something (video on demand model)
No subscription is a good approach I guess. Hence we will decrease the chance to waste our money if for some reason we don't want to watch the movies. |
|
|
|
well honestly i dont think that it would be good for this token to have a community driven developement vote service oO" this is not intended by the devs...
At current phase vote isn't important stuff to do. Later when the platform already run, maybe once or twice vote will be needed. |
|
|
|
KYC is mandatory for every ICO, if anyone question this it means that it's not clear for you that SEC and other agencies are going after shady ICOs
for many ico its only mandatory above 2-3 ETH. For under 1000$ its bullshit imo. No state or government demands it. I imagine that for small amounts it is not necessary since it does not make sense for governments to investigate small money transactions. Evenmore, in fact I found there was a project that requires their bounty hunters to include their data in order to claim the rewards. This is very ridiculous for me. |
|
|
|
you can experience it just by looking in this forum, why i said that? user can give trust rating to members that they have made a deal and for the added reputation we have the merit system.
i think we all expect to see something a little bit more stimulating than the trust system on the forum, even if the goal is the same  Plus, this forum doesn’t use any AI/machine learning to filter out questionable ratings/behaviour Plus the merit system is very new, untested and many users are not satisfied with it. I can't say anything bad about that merit system. It's the great way to avoid an acc-selling business... Yes, the merit system now looks great to avoid the bad things on the forum but I am afraid that in the future people will trade their merits. |
|
|
|
CRYPTOFLIX is good concept but would be nice if actual content also stored via decentralize storage. Can improve quality and security.
They could make a partnership for that, there are many decentralized storage projects out there like Sia. Lets wait for their product first, I really want to stream there ASAP and I hope there will be lots of movies there, I mean including the old ones and also they will be able to follow the upcoming box office movies. There are several possible partners when they would be looking for a decentralized storage solution: Storj, Sia, Filecoin, Maidsafe, maybe even Oyster (which could also be used to monetize their platform without ads). But I don't know if the team has plans for such a partnership and I don't know if these storage projects are already so far developed that Cryptoflix could use them. Movie archives require large amounts of storage, and it is more appropriate for partners to store these files. IPFS is good choose If cryptoflix will gain more funds I guess they can make their own storage and it'll be better for the project. |
|
|
|
I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.
Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos) We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base. which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel. But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos. To find an independent party which make honest ICO's reviews will be so hard. Self research is the best way to be used in this business and we can use as more sources as possible before making the final decision. |
|
|
|
We live in an an era of no information security, and we prefer to sell data to really need consumers, not stolen by unscrupulous website
unfortunately, it is true that in our time there is no more privacy, therefore, why let the big companies use our data as they please to profit from them and not to sell them to companies like biotron to make a personal profit? Thats in interesting idea. I really like it. Would give all my data to a big company if i can make profit out of it I don't think it's a good idea to sell all of your private data to companies but sadly, it's true that there is no privacy these days as everything can be accessed and data collection companies sell your data so I would want to see how this will go. Companies can get those in some ways whether we sell them or not, I search sth. to buy in google, after that all my social media(instagram, facebook vs) shows me some ads about the search i made. Yeah, google collect the data from us and use it to get profit. This practice is good for them and give nothing to us. |
|
|
|
They should consider another airdrop when the platform works so that people can actually use the tokens. At the moment all you can do is hold or sell.
an airdrop is in my opinion an excellent means of advertising a way to make known the project to really many people who may become investors, another airdrop would be welcome Yup, airdrop is the good way to get massive attentions. It could attract more investors at one side but it can attract only bounty hunters at the other side. |
|
|
|
I like the idea that tokens holders can invest in the offered film projects with the returns and conditions offered in a term sheet. Maybe we can create a own Serie when the ico collect enough If for example I had enough tokens then I invested some on a film project, that will be a new experience to me. The thing that till today is just a dream for me. Thanks to cryptoflix for offering such good stuff. |
|
|
|
You should have some inclination to medicine in order to fully understand the white paper, but if you can grasp what the project is trying to achieve such as being a collection of medical records that can determine cure to common illness.
Its normal with most of the projects, you need some existing knowledge to completely understand them since they can be quite specific and i think eHealth is still quite easy to understand compared to some other ones. The main idea of the project is easy to understand, but I think they should try to make marketing (wp, videos, ..) easier to reach as many people as possible. Yeah, such marketing tools should be easy to comprehend to make it more effective to its target audiences. Imho. Video is the best media to be used. Health is a hard subject and watching the explanation via videos will make it a bit easier. |
|
|
|
By the way, the developers reported something about the planned exchanges, where will BTRN be traded?
Too early to talk about exchanger I think since the private ITE has just started. Maybe they will announce it after the public ITE. |
|
|
|
The Demo, the beta demo will starts after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing.
that is going to be available at some point after March, it said Q2 Very good that Repu already has something to present in Q2, is the most requested so far, will be a differential and so much for the project, and certainly something that will help eliminate many doubts about the functionality of the Platform and its possibilities of application I would've hoped that they have a beta before the ICO to advertise better, but I'll take what I can get. Agreed, beta before ICO will be better and not after it. Imo, when investors able to see something before investing their money is the most affordable thing in ICO's projects. |
|
|
|
I could easily argue that that not hitting the hard cap is a good thing. As long as they raise more than the softcap. After all it means the team had a good assessment of what they need, yet there is still room for growth.
I can't agree more. I always love projects reach soft cap not hard cap. Market cap is the most important thing for me and i always choose it to be lower at start. But doesn't it mean the development of the project is slowed down if raised amount is lower than hardcap? Probably still depends on how much is raised, but still. From my perspective, most icos are very ambitious with the targeted amounts of funds raised. Even if they don’t get all that they are aiming for, it is likely that they can continue on with the project this is right, most of the time they can finish the project just by reaching the soft cap or maybe even less than that Yes, even with soft cap a project can continue but with the hard cap they can expand the platform in the fast way which is good for the future of the project. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
