I think dev wants 0.7 version on launch.
why not 0.7.7.7? I prefer 6.6.6! We should make a poll about it. Chinese want 8.8.8 |
|
|
|
Hello everybody, good and bad news below.
yes it's right, we will launch with 0.7. that number indicates a major release version. However, 0.7 will be pretty close to 0.62 for sure.
Network is "still" stable, however we unfortunately found a bug, introduced by this version itself. We forgot to remove a test feature which kicked in after a certain block amount threshhold and it modifies the block's hash in an unwanted way.
So we already removed that one line, but we need to re-upload the binaries and restart the network... I'm sorry for this mistake.
To compensate this happening we will delay it some more hours ("what - more? yes, read on...") and will integrate the faster sync feature (needed syncing time should decrease up to factor ~50-80) already in this version. I promise that we will start the open beta test today (today in UTC time).
I hope you can understand that
eXocoin
what - more? |
|
|
|
I think dev wants 0.7 version on launch.
why not 0.7.7.7? Why not ask dev about this? |
|
|
|
well, if we reach #1000 without problems it should be enough of testing  We did not managed to include the mechanism to dramatically increase the initial sync speed in time yet. This and some more features will be implemented in the next 2-5days. If the network stays stable we will update the binaries on client and server side in the live system directly without interruptions then. Network on the live system started successfully. Nodes are up and running. We can sync up with the network and initiate transactions as usual. It took some more hours than expected, also, as usual... I'll go to bed now, while uploading some binary-packages (2xlinux + windows) If network is "still" running tomorrow early, then we will start with the beta (~5-7hours). Changelog of V0.62.0 will be finalized tomorrow. OSX will follow shortly hopefully. best regards eXocoin What version will be on launch? this version if it perfect good. I think dev wants 0.7 version on launch. |
|
|
|
well, if we reach #1000 without problems it should be enough of testing We did not managed to include the mechanism to dramatically increase the initial sync speed in time yet. This and some more features will be implemented in the next 2-5days. If the network stays stable we will update the binaries on client and server side in the live system directly without interruptions then. Network on the live system started successfully. Nodes are up and running. We can sync up with the network and initiate transactions as usual. It took some more hours than expected, also, as usual... I'll go to bed now, while uploading some binary-packages (2xlinux + windows) If network is "still" running tomorrow early, then we will start with the beta (~5-7hours). Changelog of V0.62.0 will be finalized tomorrow. OSX will follow shortly hopefully. best regards eXocoin What version will be on launch? |
|
|
|
United coins under NXT tech. Who benefits in the end ? NXT.  Definitely, crypti should get in supernet to help NXT become the King.  |
|
|
|
If one united thing is better, why there is so many alts, maybe BTC is enough. |
|
|
|
Do you really think NXT is going to join SuperNet?
Now ask yourselves this, do you think Etheruem, MaidSafe, NXT and BitShares (these will be Crypti's competitors) want to become part of SuperNet? No because their own networks are already far superior. Why don't you guys realize that when Crypti supports custom blockchains, Crypti immediately moves onto a whole new level, competing with the likes of the coins I mentioned above?
You are wrong, one more time. NXT will be used by the devs of SuperNet (jl777 and his team) to create the network and distribute the shares etc... It is not NXT "joining" SuperNet, but SuperNet using the vast features of NXT. Maybe supernet is good for short term, but is not good long term. Supernet is lake with small fish. Crypti is bigger than this lake. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Flowcontrol needs some more adjustments. We are working on it. open beta test will be delayed to tomorrow night probably therefore.
Meanwhile tests on xp, vista, 7 and 8 were successfull. We are preparing the builds for linux and osx as well.
have a good night
Have you ever made something without delay from your OWN dates?Have you ever made anything but complaining? Have you ever asked smart question? Was your highlighted question a smart question? Have you ever made anything but answering my questions? have you ever respect dev's hard working ? lol go on this quote pls Have I ever said opposite? |
|
|
|
Crypti + SuperNet = 99% assured nice jump in price.
That is all ladies.
Short term or long term? |
|
|
|
Why does everyone want to be added to SuperNet? I posted earlier about this below : Basically all jl777 wants to do is get features from other coins, which BTCD, doesn't have and use them to BTCD's advantage. I don't see the point in helping out another coin establish it's own network, with the use of our features, when it only benefits them. Why should Crypti really "ask" to be put into a network that doesn't benefit us in any way.
With that being said, I'm wholly for the idea of a Storj & Crypti partnership as GreXX mentioned a few pages back. Why? Becuase Storj will be utilizing our network and providing a service for Crypti users. They could create an App with Crypti's custom blockchain to enable use of MetaDisk and DriveShare on the Crypti network. This is a mutually beneficial partnership. Supernet on the other hand wants all coins to bend over and provide features for the hub of the network which is BTCD.
Crypti with custom blockchains support, can be it's own Supernet, which is why I don't see the point of becoming part of an inferior network. Agree SuperNET is good for "small" coins, but I think Crypti is too big for this project. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Flowcontrol needs some more adjustments. We are working on it. open beta test will be delayed to tomorrow night probably therefore.
Meanwhile tests on xp, vista, 7 and 8 were successfull. We are preparing the builds for linux and osx as well.
have a good night
Have you ever made something without delay from your OWN dates?Have you ever made anything but complaining? Have you ever asked smart question? Was your highlighted question a smart question? Have you ever made anything but answering my questions? |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Flowcontrol needs some more adjustments. We are working on it. open beta test will be delayed to tomorrow night probably therefore.
Meanwhile tests on xp, vista, 7 and 8 were successfull. We are preparing the builds for linux and osx as well.
have a good night
Have you ever made something without delay from your OWN dates? Have you ever made anything but complaining? Have you ever asked smart question? |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Flowcontrol needs some more adjustments. We are working on it. open beta test will be delayed to tomorrow night probably therefore.
Meanwhile tests on xp, vista, 7 and 8 were successfull. We are preparing the builds for linux and osx as well.
have a good night
Have you ever made something without delay from your OWN dates? |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Flowcontrol needs some more adjustments. We are working on it. open beta test will be delayed to tomorrow night probably therefore.
Meanwhile tests on xp, vista, 7 and 8 were successfull. We are preparing the builds for linux and osx as well.
have a good night
Waited this long, I can wait another day or so! I still think eXo will be big, have you contacted jl777 about joining the SuperNET? Exo will create DelayNET. |
|
|
|
all tests with 0.62 were successfull on our windows testnet.
Tomorrow we will test it again on the final linux server that will be used for the launch.
Still want to improve one minor thing tomorrow as well. Beta test should start tomorrow night if everything goes well, otherwise the day thereafter.
best regards
eXocoin team
This is the moment, Tonight is the night. |
|
|
|
it's only daytrader. hodl. september is coming.
What will happen in September?  |
|
|
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
Anyway it's can be possible, but you can be in (locall) fork and this block will be removed after fork processing. Hi Crypti you promised you were contacting a third party to check the code? They are. Be patient Rabbiter just wants to launch his "Krypti Coin" as soon as possible. Our refusal to release the source is causing him to delay his clone. Rypti Coin |
|
|
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
He hacked Time |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
