Wulfcastle
|
|
August 29, 2014, 03:55:14 PM |
|
LOL crazy people selling at 1500 satoshis
There seems to be so little buy support at the moment, not sure why
|
|
|
|
LetMeKnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:12:54 PM |
|
LOL crazy people selling at 1500 satoshis
There are cleary bots manipulating the price and people then get scared and sell cheap! Im pretty sure because when the price was little over 1500 i start buying and then sell wall immediately dissapeared so i only bought a little! It was 1700 price in a second again so i guess someone didnt actually want to sell that cheap so he cancelled sell wall. I dont know but similar situation happened to me twice today.
|
|
|
|
Litoshi
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:40:30 PM |
|
LOL crazy people selling at 1500 satoshis
There seems to be so little buy support at the moment, not sure why Looking at the prices on Cryptsy, the SELL ORDERS (ASK) price is 1950, and the BUY ORDERS (BID) price is 1650. A difference of about 20%. Far too high a difference to attract a buyer. The trade history shows a series of SELL orders executed bringing the price from 1900 to 1650. This is either a dumping attempt to force others to sell and lower the price further, or what the stock exchanges call "Profit taking". "Profit Taking" is a euphemism for "take the money and run".
|
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:45:06 PM |
|
LOL crazy people selling at 1500 satoshis
There seems to be so little buy support at the moment, not sure why Looking at the prices on Cryptsy, the SELL ORDERS (ASK) price is 1950, and the BUY ORDERS (BID) price is 1650. A difference of about 20%. Far too high a difference to attract a buyer. The trade history shows a series of SELL orders executed bringing the price from 1900 to 1650. This is either a dumping attempt to force others to sell and lower the price further, or what the stock exchanges call "Profit taking". "Profit Taking" is a euphemism for "take the money and run". Nothing interesting did not happen with Crypti at this week - everyone is dumping.
|
|
|
|
jari76
Member
Offline
Activity: 165
Merit: 10
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:45:50 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
|
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:49:09 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
He hacked Time
|
|
|
|
crypti (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:51:36 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
Anyway it's can be possible, but you can be in (locall) fork and this block will be removed after fork processing.
|
|
|
|
profitofthegods
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:58:39 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
He hacked Time Omg that's me
|
|
|
|
rabbiter
|
|
August 29, 2014, 05:38:05 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
Anyway it's can be possible, but you can be in (locall) fork and this block will be removed after fork processing. Hi Crypti you promised you were contacting a third party to check the code?
|
|
|
|
atleticofa
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:28:25 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
Anyway it's can be possible, but you can be in (locall) fork and this block will be removed after fork processing. Hi Crypti you promised you were contacting a third party to check the code? They are. Be patient
|
|
|
|
Wulfcastle
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:40:36 PM |
|
@Devs
I've setup a NodeBB forum and it seems to be working perfectly. Could you tell us what stability issues you guys were having? Did NodeBB experience instability under stress tests?
|
|
|
|
informer
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:13:54 PM |
|
I would like to see 2FA for wallet and forge. I know we already have 2nd passphrase. But I like the convenience it affords me with other sites. And I think it's a feature that new investors would find they are accustomed to and presents the coin as well rounded and protected investment. informer
|
|
|
|
Litoshi
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:48:59 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
Anyway it's can be possible, but you can be in (locall) fork and this block will be removed after fork processing. Hi Crypti you promised you were contacting a third party to check the code? They are. Be patient Rabbiter just wants to launch his "Krypti Coin" as soon as possible. Our refusal to release the source is causing him to delay his clone.
|
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:51:53 PM |
|
how is this possible with the proof of time foriging weight resetting after forged block? 9306737411124266105C just forged 2 blocks one minute apart, i didnt think getting two consecutive blocks was possible.
Anyway it's can be possible, but you can be in (locall) fork and this block will be removed after fork processing. Hi Crypti you promised you were contacting a third party to check the code? They are. Be patient Rabbiter just wants to launch his "Krypti Coin" as soon as possible. Our refusal to release the source is causing him to delay his clone. Rypti Coin
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:03:02 PM |
|
@Devs
I've setup a NodeBB forum and it seems to be working perfectly. Could you tell us what stability issues you guys were having? Did NodeBB experience instability under stress tests?
Without hiring another developer to help customize and setup the forum the way we wanted it, we were having issues getting it to function the way we wanted it to. If you use the default template and simply install the base install, it functions ok. That being said, we couldn't afford to take Boris off of finishing Crypti and we didn't have the finds to hire a secondary developer to help us setup the forum the way we wanted it to function, therefore, as I said when I announced the decision to go with SMF, we weren't ruling it out all together, but at the time it just wasn't working for what we wanted to do. We tested it internally for a couple weeks and the default just wasn't appealing to members of our team and to do the adjustments we wanted was going to take development work and customizations we couldn't do at the time. I still haven't written off the idea of using it, you know I am a fan, but we will have to re-visit it at a later time. If you want to develop a NodeBB forum, customize it to not use the masonry style homepage, and get it to a stable point with all of the features necessary for our community (for instance if you can get the homepage modules to work, that was one thing that was bricking for me with the theme we were trying to use), then we would be more than willing to talk about having it be the official forums for the devs to use to answer questions, etc. As long as I can get admin privaleges to assign moderators and control the private forums for members, then I would be happy to discuss it.
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:05:27 PM |
|
I would like to see 2FA for wallet and forge. I know we already have 2nd passphrase. But I like the convenience it affords me with other sites. And I think it's a feature that new investors would find they are accustomed to and presents the coin as well rounded and protected investment. informer We have discussed 2FA internally. Some felt that tying Google or another company into wallet access might be an issue for some who want less involvement for those players, but when we do the fully featured web wallet, it will more than likely contain some form of 2FA. Not making any promises, but it is a desire of mine as well.
|
|
|
|
Wulfcastle
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:22:40 PM |
|
@Devs
I've setup a NodeBB forum and it seems to be working perfectly. Could you tell us what stability issues you guys were having? Did NodeBB experience instability under stress tests?
Without hiring another developer to help customize and setup the forum the way we wanted it, we were having issues getting it to function the way we wanted it to. If you use the default template and simply install the base install, it functions ok. That being said, we couldn't afford to take Boris off of finishing Crypti and we didn't have the finds to hire a secondary developer to help us setup the forum the way we wanted it to function, therefore, as I said when I announced the decision to go with SMF, we weren't ruling it out all together, but at the time it just wasn't working for what we wanted to do. We tested it internally for a couple weeks and the default just wasn't appealing to members of our team and to do the adjustments we wanted was going to take development work and customizations we couldn't do at the time. I still haven't written off the idea of using it, you know I am a fan, but we will have to re-visit it at a later time. If you want to develop a NodeBB forum, customize it to not use the masonry style homepage, and get it to a stable point with all of the features necessary for our community (for instance if you can get the homepage modules to work, that was one thing that was bricking for me with the theme we were trying to use), then we would be more than willing to talk about having it be the official forums for the devs to use to answer questions, etc. As long as I can get admin privaleges to assign moderators and control the private forums for members, then I would be happy to discuss it. Were you using Majestic v3/v4 as the theme? Okay, I can set up, edit and customize the NodeBB forum, as long as you're still open to the idea of using it . I'm using the default theme currently and there aren't any problems here at the moment, I'm going to test it out soon though with a couple of separate themes to see the results.
|
|
|
|
DeadlyEskimo
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:32:43 PM |
|
I would like to see 2FA for wallet and forge. I know we already have 2nd passphrase. But I like the convenience it affords me with other sites. And I think it's a feature that new investors would find they are accustomed to and presents the coin as well rounded and protected investment. informer We have discussed 2FA internally. Some felt that tying Google or another company into wallet access might be an issue for some who want less involvement for those players, but when we do the fully featured web wallet, it will more than likely contain some form of 2FA. Not making any promises, but it is a desire of mine as well. Someone will just have to build a Crypti App that provides 2FA. I prefer text messages with the code contained.
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
August 29, 2014, 08:39:05 PM |
|
@Devs
I've setup a NodeBB forum and it seems to be working perfectly. Could you tell us what stability issues you guys were having? Did NodeBB experience instability under stress tests?
Without hiring another developer to help customize and setup the forum the way we wanted it, we were having issues getting it to function the way we wanted it to. If you use the default template and simply install the base install, it functions ok. That being said, we couldn't afford to take Boris off of finishing Crypti and we didn't have the finds to hire a secondary developer to help us setup the forum the way we wanted it to function, therefore, as I said when I announced the decision to go with SMF, we weren't ruling it out all together, but at the time it just wasn't working for what we wanted to do. We tested it internally for a couple weeks and the default just wasn't appealing to members of our team and to do the adjustments we wanted was going to take development work and customizations we couldn't do at the time. I still haven't written off the idea of using it, you know I am a fan, but we will have to re-visit it at a later time. If you want to develop a NodeBB forum, customize it to not use the masonry style homepage, and get it to a stable point with all of the features necessary for our community (for instance if you can get the homepage modules to work, that was one thing that was bricking for me with the theme we were trying to use), then we would be more than willing to talk about having it be the official forums for the devs to use to answer questions, etc. As long as I can get admin privaleges to assign moderators and control the private forums for members, then I would be happy to discuss it. Were you using Majestic v3/v4 as the theme? Okay, I can set up, edit and customize the NodeBB forum, as long as you're still open to the idea of using it . I'm using the default theme currently and there aren't any problems here at the moment, I'm going to test it out soon though with a couple of separate themes to see the results. No, we were trying to create a non-masonry traditional style homepage with available updates and a little bit of news functionality so that people would only have to check in there and could see straight away kind of what was going on.
|
|
|
|
|
|