Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 08:32:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 »
181  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BTCFPGA bASIC updated from 54GH/s to 72HG/s on: November 28, 2012, 06:42:50 AM
I love it when people argue points that were never made. I didn't say it was impossible. I don't see any of the three companies making a decent product anymore. They all seem to be in over their head. They could all go bankrupt trying to get something that works, and can be mass produced easily.

ASIC done before. SHA done before. Sure, it's difficult and time consuming to produce the product in question, but anyone thinking it's impossible has no idea what the fuck they're talking about. If you think the idea of a bitcoin ASIC is a scam, you're goddamn delusional.
182  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Should Giga be tagged as a scammer? on: November 28, 2012, 04:01:50 AM
your worried about sending out a couple hundred coins by error when you have profited how much off your investors? $100,000 $250,000? $500,000, Get real

If I send out 65% of 3,500 coins (2,275) and 10% of the coins go to the wrong address, someone they shouldn't have gone to, etc. I've just made a $2,750 mistake and am still liable.
183  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Bitcoinica LP (In Liquidation) form request on: November 28, 2012, 03:54:36 AM
the real question is how did they get our real names in the first place I thought the database was destroyed in the hack?

Can't say that I am satisfied my name is out there like that either, but I rather have this progress than not knowing anything.
184  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BTCFPGA bASIC updated from 54GH/s to 72HG/s on: November 28, 2012, 03:41:36 AM
just because the different asic companies don't like each other doesn't mean they aren't scammers, nor does it mean they are competent enough to design something that never has been done before.

Seriously, there's no way all these different vendors, some of which dislike each other a great deal, are in on some massive "Let's screw with people's with some vaporware!" plot.  We'll get there, it's just gonna take some time.
185  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: November 25, 2012, 04:35:46 AM
seems to imply to me that he won't be buying bonds back, just another scammer who will continue to mine on the 150ghash we helped him buy

You can see all past and future dividends at http://gigamining.com. There have not been any decisions made about buybacks nor does the current contract enable this since the price to quote is from GLBSE.

or he could always just put the bonds on another exchange wait a few days for the price to collapse to almost nothing and then he will buy them back
186  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Why I used to trust Patrick Harnett on: November 23, 2012, 06:52:37 AM
So someone starts a passthrough, they are responsible just as much as pirate but those who invest in said passthrough are not? what sense does that make? at least be consistent

If someone bought a passthrough from X, X is only responsible in case pirate does not default. Doing anything extra is charity ... fine if you can afford it, but certainly shouldn't be expected.
I don't agree. If I help you hire a hit man to kill your boss, am I only responsible if the hit man fails to kill your boss?

People who operated pirate passthroughs paid Pirate to make their customers the recipients of fraudulent transfers. They are responsible to the victims even if Pirate did exactly what they paid him to do. (This requires that they knew or should have known that Pirate was making fraudulent transfers. I think it was totally obvious all along, but I'm willing to accept that this one time people might have thought it would somehow be different. But if this ever happens again, you can expect zero tolerance from me.)

There is no excuse for those who publicly stated that they knew or suspected that Pirate was operating a fraudulent Ponzi scheme yet nevertheless operated passthroughs --  knowingly and intentionally paying Pirate to commit fraud on their, and their customers', behalf and profiting from it, they are no better than Pirate.

187  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Asus 5850 Directu (a swap from Asus for RMA) on: November 19, 2012, 02:42:34 AM
6.5 shipped 74110
188  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] CoinLab Protected Pool - Now with PPS Bonuses up to 200% on: November 19, 2012, 02:19:32 AM
so when do payouts occur?
189  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why people think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme? on: November 19, 2012, 01:44:43 AM
My reasoning went like this:  If the benefit to participants is solely profits from those further down the chain it will sooner or later collapse - and when it does, by necessity the vast vast majority of participants will lose.

So does every company that is running today, so how do you differentiate a valid business vs a ponzi. What does one use as proof? If particular one like our's with no tangible product or place of business. Every company eventually collapses.

Which brings me back to my original idea, when the select few profit too much, that will increase the chance of collapse. Just take a look at hostess they gave the executives 300% raises and lowered the workers pay.
190  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why people think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme? on: November 19, 2012, 01:38:25 AM
The fact is if mining rewards stopped tomorrow, one of two things would happen. (a) Bitcoin would just about die except for extremists who will mine without a profit, or (b) miners would only accept transactions with high transaction fees. There goes transferring money for almost free across the world. Whether miner income is from transaction fees or inflation the end outcome is no different, just a different way of marketing it (similar to buy 3 get 1 free vs 25% off only reversed) Miners have already decided on what they are willing to work for regardless of technology.

What I'm looking for is a way to reach out to people who think bitcoin is a scam. Not try to convince myself it is not. A large amount of the tech community thinks bitcoin is still a scam/ponzi and I think they are possible the best place to reach out and start increasing our user base.
191  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why people think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme? on: November 18, 2012, 06:57:46 AM
I also believe bitcoin mining should be used as a marketing tool to get people interested, it should be easy to use, like bitminters client with easily available hardware, not asic devices which will probably be backordered until they are no longer profitable. Then when people have them we need great services to spend them with, but people are unlikely to buy bitcoins when they can use cash or credit card instead. At least until vendors provide discount for bitcoin or only sell via bitcoin. Amazon could start accepting bitcoin tomorrow, and little increase of demand for bitcoin would occur, other than purely speculation based.

What I'm trying to do with this thread is warn people that this thought "ASIC is going to make me filthy rich in just months" does not make our endeavors look more legitimate to the general public, in fact it does just the opposite. Its obvious to me that bitcoin is attracted many more fraudsters and thieves based on this idea of getting rich, than would exist in other circles.

Last month Bitcoin miners received a little over 200K BTC, or about 2% of all bitcoins that have been issued.   Next month Bitcoin miners will receive just 100K BTC, or less than 1% of all bitcoins that have been issued.  

This alone will cause many miners to power down their GPU hardware and quit mining.    This should not be a surprise to anyone.

yes but those people who power down are more likely to be small time miners, who once they stop won't look back at bitcoin any time soon.


But Bitcoin doesn't exist for the benefit of miners.  Bitcoin exists because there was the need for a type of money that will not be devalued by political influences and a type of money that has no prejudice as far as how it is used.

It doesn't matter a hill of beans to Bitcoin gaining traction if those who are mining are making any money from it.   It only matters that there be sufficient mining capacity to ensure the blockchain is protected, and it is currently (and will continue to be) protected at a level that is way more than currently necessary.

I understand what your saying here, that mining doesn't matter. But realistically I think it is a very idealistic answer. Its like saying the fed only exists to keep the economy more stable and prevent bubbles/recessions. People do not have a good reason right now to use bitcoin. Most people don't have a problem with paypal/credit cards. Most people do not notice inflation of their fiat currencies. Most do not need to send money half way around the world, and if they do will probably do it at walmart.

the average person is less interested in the exchange rate and don't think any of my post referred to that.

When you stated "we are heading for another several bad months like the end of last year", I assumed you were referring to the exchange rate.  If you weren't referring to the exchange rate then I'm confused as that has a huge role in determining a miner's profit.

I should have clarified I was speaking about price/difficulty not the price directly
192  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 5830 has become unstable on: November 18, 2012, 04:06:10 AM
my $129 sapphire models from newegg (7/2011 I believe) were dead at the beginning of summer. But since I redid thermal paste to fix heat issues, no warranty.

5830 has always been a strong card for mining, the 2 in my farm still function from 18 months of almost nonstop 960/300 clocks. for a long time it was the king of mhash/cost of GPU. $109 Sapphire models from newegg, for 300mh/s 2 years ago was a steal

but back to the op try lower clocks if you still can't get a stable clock try 0.95v and 600 mhz I was able to run one of mine a few more months at those speeds
193  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why people think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme? on: November 18, 2012, 03:56:32 AM
I think the average person is less interested in the exchange rate and don't think any of my post referred to that. More people are interested in the "free money" idea. Right now the general public is mostly blind to the inflation going on in this and many countries. When we see more hyperinflation, which won't surprise me, more people will care about the exchange rate.

But this has very little negative impact on the bitcoin exchange rate (which is generally what is inferred when using the term "ponzi scheme"), and I got the sense from your post that you felt it might.
194  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Why people think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme? on: November 18, 2012, 03:50:17 AM
I don't think you understood me at all. I think it will be almost impossible for anyone to mine at a reasonable profit. The hardware is too much of a jump that after the people who "know someone" profit (didn't mean to single out Inaba was using him as an example) the difficulty will be too high for me and you to make our investment back in a reasonable time. Most people are not attracted to bitcoin because of making anonymous low fee transactions. When bitcoin falls again to almost break even mining rates, like November of last year, its bad news. Bad mining returns equals less people learning about bitcoin which is in the end bad for bitcoin. People then think the free money is over, therefore bitcoin is over. Just like they were saying when profitability rates were low last year


Bad for the Bitcoin exchange rate or just a bad time to be trying to use FPGAs and GPUs to mine at a profit?

By the time ASICs ship the block reward subsidy will already have dropped to just 3,600 BTC mined per-day.  It doesn't matter if there is 24 Thash/s mining or 60 Thash/s mining away, or 600 Thash/s ... the same number of BTC are mined each day -- 3,600 BTC.

[/quote}
195  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Mount 4 GPUs on extenders on: November 17, 2012, 07:14:03 PM
that is the exact one I have, wonder why its not on their website. just in case you are wondering I haven't seen any plastic chip off of mine, I'm sure it could happen eventually but nothing to be concerned about unless you move your system all the time
196  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GLBSE asset issuers feeling comfy? on: November 17, 2012, 03:41:00 AM
There is no good reason for the asset lists to not have materialized yet. asset holders will pay back their "friends" who they trust and that will be the end of that, just like bitcoinica

even if nefario actually did provide all the asset information, there WILL be asset holders who say they didn't receive it. and then who will you believe
197  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Mtgox deposit confirmations? on: November 17, 2012, 03:35:39 AM
yep, and when I asked why their system would be delayed behind the bitcoin network, I received the same email again, lol
198  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Mtgox deposit confirmations? on: November 17, 2012, 01:29:25 AM
Hello,

Thank you for contacting us. Before we may action your request we require the following information:

Mt.Gox Username:
Sending Address:
Receiving Address:
Amount:
Date/Time of Transfer:

Please be aware that:

When withdrawing or depositing bitcoins into your Mt.Gox account there may occasionally be a delay (1~24 hours) depending on network congestion, your internet connection speed and the time required to get 6 confirmations on the network. If you're sending to your computer's wallet, it's good practice to keep your bitcoin client running so it can download the block chain. For those that may not know the block chain is the complete history of all transactions made on the bitcoin network, and as such it can take some time to update and download the most current block and see the bitcoins in your wallet.

If you aren't seeing the funds after either withdrawing/sending to Mt. Gox from your bitcoin program, please wait 24 hours before contacting us. If your transfer has still not occurred within 48 hours, please lodge a support request so we may begin the process of tracking your bitcoins and reinitiating the transfer.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. If you have any further enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact Mt.Gox Support either by responding to this email (should the enquiry relate to this ticket) or by using the following support request form:

https://mtgox.zendesk.com/entries/20256702-contact-us

Thanks,

MtGox.com Team
199  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Why people think Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme? on: November 16, 2012, 11:07:34 PM
If your like me, you probably first heard about bitcoin because you could earn money with your computer.  Although I don't think bitcoin is a ponzi scheme, I think it does make some sense to see it that way. Just take the last few weeks for instant. In anticipation of the block reward halving prices have mostly stagnated but difficulty has skyrocketed. As if after block halving there will be no more money to be made, like the end of a ponzi. People seem to be mining every coin they can in anticipation of the end and although some are hoarding it seems many are selling to recoup quickly while they still can. Now I understand alot of that is because of anticipation of new hardware.

But if as many asic devices have sold as vendors and some others would like us to believe, I can only see that after a few months people will be dumping coins to make up for the huge increase in difficulty and struggling to make their investment back. Creating a very similar cycle to where we are now, a panic. Which I believe will continue until the cost of asic devices becomes much cheaper and people see it as a good investment again and not something that will only benefit early investors. Unless a discounted used market or major competition between vendors causes a huge price decrease shortly after release it seems to me that we are heading for another several bad months like the end of last year. I think increasing the power of bitcoin mining devices so quickly will cause a bubble in what a miner can earn as profit, I don't think the bitcoin market will be able to handle, short term, terrahashes getting into the hands of someone like Inaba. (does anyone seriously think he will not be the first one to have a bfl asic?)
200  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Mtgox deposit confirmations? on: November 16, 2012, 10:26:06 PM
well just so you know its pointless emailing gox about it, they will send you some automated email about btc deposits taking up to 48 hours. But I've seen deposits take up to about 12 confirms as well.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!