Reading through the pages of the project, I can see that the project has been launched for about a year now. Don't really know if the token sale which was expected to hold in December last year was successful. It would be a very good idea for the team to be more involved in the thread to explain how the project has been faring for a while now. I do hope to learn more about the project.
I can see that token sale is currently going on. In December that might be pre-ICO token sale. But only team can confirm what's current status now. I guess the tokens sale has been ongoing since last year, because it was published that the first phase of the tokensales commenced in December and there hasn't been much information about the tokensales in terms of the amount raised so far. According to ICOBench - I don't know if their information is correct - their tokensale started at the beginning of this year (2019/01/01) and will run until the end of 2020 (2020/12/31). So yeah, the sale is still ongoing and will be for quite some time. And about the amount they raised so far: Their website says 180 984 tokens were sold so far. That's quite a long duration but having a specific date is much preferable than a continuous extension thing, i also understand the fact that the industry is not as quite vibrant as it used to be because of the flaws that emanated from unscrupulous developers which made the market flop and a lot of individuals loosing interest but its good to see the market gradually recovering |
|
|
|
Well, I for one thinks that Contentos is getting this much attention because of the assistance from Binance Lab. It is a very good project on its own no doubt but we can't deny the effect Binance has on it.
You’re right. Just because we having a good week with COS isn’t all from Binance effects. I think the content sharing ecosystem idea of Contentos is plausible. COS tokens could be easily integrated into social media apps like Instagram, imgur and pichunter. It could be integrated, no doubt, but that won't be an easy feat as it will definitely cost much and apps like Instagram (Facebook) don't have a great history with cryptocurrency privacy. I can only root for this after Facebook's Libra coin is launched. Integration of COS into Facebook and Instagram would be a very difficult milestone to achieve, but would be of immense benefit to the cryptocurrency industry. I must commend the Contentos team for their efforts and achievements in recent times and hopefully we would see more greater accomplishments. You're right, these are known global brands that have their own rules and regulations, they are yet to accept the fact that cryptocurrency is a legal tender, even though Facebook has been in the news for accepting cryptocurrency but a lot is still yet to be done and having a global brand associate themselves to the blockchain industry is just not yet a welcome development |
|
|
|
Right now they are using the Binance blockchain, so their tokens are BEP2 atm. Will this change when they release their mainnet next month?
I hope it doesn't change much. They have already started with binance blockchain. So I guess the binance part of the project won't be affected. COS being a binance blockchain based token means they can are listed on binance DEX which gives COS tokens more token liquidity. I don’t think the mainnet is about the tokens. The cryptonomics could be left on binance chain, while the ecosystem would be moved to the mainnet after test. Well, I checked their Telegram group and one of their Admins confirmed that the Binance chain is only a testnet and that they will convert COS to their native blockchain, where they will have their own wallet. Having them go back and forth from different nets, not sure why they are doing that but won't it cause like some financial strain on them?, that's of course if the process is expensive but it seems they choose that option because of the benefits involved, especially in this initial process that they are in at the moment but i also hope it doesn't affect them when they go back to their native blockchain They are not going back or forth with different net. Like most recent projects eg FTM. Most project run their own Chain while running Binance chain by the side. This gives them the opportunity to be able to get listed in Binance Dex Alright, though i think is more efficient to just stick to one net, won't the changing to various platforms affect the tokens or will it just be like static thing with no effect on the token?, but on the other hand, just like i stated above, if they are cool with such and it will drive the project forward then by all means they should do the needful, after all, we all want progress |
|
|
|
There’s a lot left to be achieved on blockchain. When you take a look at how much developers and projects on other open sourced programs, you’ll find out blockchain is just a low fraction. I think rewarding creativity is what needs to be done on Contentos. And investors seem to be happy about that.
Contentos is not far from the goal of rewarding creativity, I believe the campaign which was held on photogrid was channelled towards rewarding creativity. We all heard the news about the highest winner who was rewarded with over 600$ within a period of less than two weeks. I agree with you, I also read about the fashion blogger who was the most fortunate participant in the campaign and went away with the highest sum. Its a certainty that she published a creative piece which I guess was related to fashion and bought the admiration of several persons who were instrumental to her victory. Saw the news on one of their articles and actually it wasn't just a fashion blogger but a leading one in Brazil, so i think that sought of drove a lot of traffic to their platform, which in turn led to a massive turn out, resulting in a win-win situation but the good thing about the whole thing is the coming in of individuals that know little or nothing about cryptocurrency |
|
|
|
The collaboration with Binance Labs is one of Contentos' smart moves. With support for liquidity and some other help from Binance, Mainet will soon succeed in September and moon soon.
Sorry, to take you backwards, I've been reading about the impact of binance labs on the project and don't seem to understand. Please I would like to know what exactly is binance labs and what's the implications of partnership with binance labs on several projects. Binance own their own chain the Bep2. Going through Binance lab means you going to migrate to binance chain to have a chance to get listed in Binance DEX. The impact of Binance is in its outreach. In the amount of people using the exchange on a daily basis Thank you for the explanation, we all know binance is very influencial when it comes to cryptocurrency exchange as it holds a large customer base for traders. It was indeed a very good idea for contentos to go through the binance labs, that must have contributed to the pumping of the token value. It's a good strategy for contentos to migrate to the binance chain, but I still believe that it's a limiting factor because not many other exchanges supports the BEP2 tokens as against the ERC20 tokens which is ethereum inclined. It would be better if contentos could have the two tokens protocol to enable them interact easily across several exchanges. You're right, that has been my concern, i understand that they may be trying to get a large community because of the fact that they have associated themselves with binance but there's need to understand that a large chunk of the crypto community still see ethereum as a stronghold, known, so far, it has been a fair fight for them with a good launch pad |
|
|
|
Right now they are using the Binance blockchain, so their tokens are BEP2 atm. Will this change when they release their mainnet next month?
I hope it doesn't change much. They have already started with binance blockchain. So I guess the binance part of the project won't be affected. COS being a binance blockchain based token means they can are listed on binance DEX which gives COS tokens more token liquidity. I don’t think the mainnet is about the tokens. The cryptonomics could be left on binance chain, while the ecosystem would be moved to the mainnet after test. Well, I checked their Telegram group and one of their Admins confirmed that the Binance chain is only a testnet and that they will convert COS to their native blockchain, where they will have their own wallet. Having them go back and forth from different nets, not sure why they are doing that but won't it cause like some financial strain on them?, that's of course if the process is expensive but it seems they choose that option because of the benefits involved, especially in this initial process that they are in at the moment but i also hope it doesn't affect them when they go back to their native blockchain |
|
|
|
Right now they are using the Binance blockchain, so their tokens are BEP2 atm. Will this change when they release their mainnet next month?
I hope it doesn't change much. They have already started with binance blockchain. So I guess the binance part of the project won't be affected. Why they will change the tokens? Binance have invested money in this project and I don't see a reason to change token type. At first, they started with an Ethereum based ERC20 token, then swapped completely to Binance chain (BEP2). And once they will release their mainnet, I assume they will have their own blockchain, which means there should be another token swap? Wow, that's incredible, the team has been working so hard, I was thinking the project is new, but as it stands they've been working for a while now. I have a firm conviction that they'll achieve the aspirations of getting their own blockchain. With the way the project is going, I can confidently say that the future is bright. Never knew that they are not an ethereum base project and i'm new to the news of the binance chain, guess that was why they had such a huge upward movement recently and its nice to see the binance brand expanding, they have accomplished a great lot of deeds, i hope to see other brands in other niches of the blockchain industry become more formidable in the long run |
|
|
|
Wow, huge number of tokens was there to earn. One participant got more than 15k tokens which was worth 600+ USD. It was fun, we like to see such events for other places as well.
Yeah. Picture lovers will leave with a lot of COS tokens and I expect a lot of competition to happen now that photogrid and COS has a patnership. The competiton will be massive. BTW this event was only for Brazilian people? And was there any specific reason to keep the even only for Brazilian people? I noticed that too. I don't think there was any reason rather than just because of the population in brazil and maybe where photogrid had a large number of active users. photogrid users number is huge somewhat in millions ..so you do mean brazilian peoples are more into in the photogrid ??or you are talking about the number of population in the country. I think this is not just about the population but Contentos used the photogrid niche as an advantage to the development of their brand, i once stated that the social media has a huge number of users and this brand finds it imperative to utilize the numbers available and such has driven them to a new found level of awareness, so its about using what's already available to their advantage Yeah. I mentioned photogrid might have most of it's active users from brazil, which might have led contentos having the first event in that region. I am just assumming though. We don't know the reason yet. I'm not sure Brazil has that number of followers compared to other regions and lets not forget about the number of active users of the internet in a particular region as a yardstick to ascertain that but i do get your point that its based on assumption and not actually a fact, be that as it may, they've issued out a good head start in their launch into the crypto world |
|
|
|
Wow, huge number of tokens was there to earn. One participant got more than 15k tokens which was worth 600+ USD. It was fun, we like to see such events for other places as well.
Yeah. Picture lovers will leave with a lot of COS tokens and I expect a lot of competition to happen now that photogrid and COS has a patnership. The competiton will be massive. BTW this event was only for Brazilian people? And was there any specific reason to keep the even only for Brazilian people? I noticed that too. I don't think there was any reason rather than just because of the population in brazil and maybe where photogrid had a large number of active users. photogrid users number is huge somewhat in millions ..so you do mean brazilian peoples are more into in the photogrid ??or you are talking about the number of population in the country. I think this is not just about the population but Contentos used the photogrid niche as an advantage to the development of their brand, i once stated that the social media has a huge number of users and this brand finds it imperative to utilize the numbers available and such has driven them to a new found level of awareness, so its about using what's already available to their advantage |
|
|
|
Contentos is actually a big blockchain project. They have got a great year. Photogrid is just one way to earn COS tokens. There are other dApp where you could post content and earn COS when people like your content/photo/post. You can check out dApps like like LiveMe and Cheez.
Contentos being here all along and it had to take a big event like this to help me find out about Contentos. It’s got all the good stuffs any investor might be looking out for in a cryptocurrency/blockchain project. I think the team isn’t about trying to hype the tokens, but instead they’re focused on developing the idea of a content sharing ecosystem, and that’s awesome. Never knew that they have been around for a while because i thought it just came out like recently, be that as it may,they have the community talking, so lets see how things go with them, nowadays a lot is required to get the attention of the community unlike what we've been used to and their input will determine if its all hype or not, only time will tell |
|
|
|
According to the second blog, this "Creation Mining" event was also a great success for Photogrid itself. They got a significant increase in both new users and content created. If other platforms recognize this, it can be a great selling point for Contentos when it comes to signing new partnerships.
They seem to have created the needed momentum to set a pace and perhaps attract notable individuals in their area of residence, which is Brazil, indeed they have initiated the process but so much more needs to be done and i will love to see them penetrate the Asian market and leverage the strength of the Asians, its a long journey ahead and i hope to see them succeed |
|
|
|
many interesting partners and investors. Of course, Binance Labs is an outstanding example.
There seems to be some potential, I think I'll buy some tokens before Mainnet starts in September. And then I will see what happens:-)
I have recently been noticing the term binance lab, is it like an extension of binance or what?, saw the process of the photogrid task that was done by Contentos and i think its a brilliant idea, the cryptocurrency industry should rise above what we've seen and create things that are strange and new yet innovative, that's the only way the industry will be able to grow |
|
|
|
What will happen if the project successfully do their goal, will and as you said, Online games, will you have partnership to a large online company, example steam or it will just focus on more on blockchain games ?
Tokens would appreciate when it’s fully launched. I think when Transburn project becomes successful, the tokens would appreciate and there’ll be more demand for the tokens. The tokens is even expected to appreciate as the amount in circulation reduces, but with the launch of the platform which would increase the demand for the tokens, the value would grow geometrically. Let's hope that the team are committed to the project development and speed up the project launch I agree with you, for us to get the best value of the tokens, the team needs to be serious with the token development. Depending on only the deflationary tendency of the tokens for an increasing value is risky. The real use case of the tokens speaks volume and that's what reputable exchange like binance considers before listing projects. Yes, i love the term you used which is "real user case", that's all that matters in the development of every brand and they should ensure that such is truly implemented, its not all about just stating things on paper but getting things done in real time, this alone is enough to beckon on any investor or group of investors to get on-board the brand |
|
|
|
While going through the history of the transburn token, I realized that it got to a wonderful ATH but recently dropped, what is the plan of the team to avoid more dump in the future?
Cryptocurrencies are having a bad trading week. I say the prices have been brave. Libra, trying to defend its self in Congress, has been a poor representative of cryptocurrencies. I think Transburn tokens are naturally designed to have a bullish price. Although tokens are burnt, holders tokens have a better price. Yeah, no doubt the market has been going through a bearish season and has affected a whole lot of tokens and coins, even the chairman of them all Bitcoin was not spared this time. Let's be optimistic that the bull will be upon us soonest than we ever imagined so we can all enjoy the goodies of the land. Transburn will surely do well in terms of price It’s a bullish market. Not as volatile as we saw in 2018. But this time, it’s going far higher. I think the market is trying to shake off weak hands. There are more institutional investors looking at coming into cryptocurrency and regulations is around the corner. I do believe that the future is bright with cryptocurrency, the bearish trend of 2018 has been replaced by a bullish trend this year. The year is yet to end and am expecting a much higher bull run before the end of the year. I would endeavour to hold some tokens till the end of the year and see what would become of this project. The bullish trend seems to only be relative to just bitcoin and not the entire cryptocurrency industry, though it seems like a boost but altcoins have a long way to go for the industry to be termed successful, so how will this happen?, well, its all about creating and implementing projects that will revolutionize the industry and not just to be seen as another avenue for quick bucks I've come to realise that any project that does not have a solid foundation would not stand the test of time. For a project to be successful, they need to create value. That explains why the use case of Transburn cannot be overemphasised when it's longevity is considered. Its basically while most projects in the blockchain industry are collapsing because most of the team members just woke up one morning and decide to do something that they know nothing about, probably to just get the money and go into thin air, a foundation needs to be built, value needs to be inculcated into the brand and the right expertise should be brought into the picture, i hope this will deliver |
|
|
|
Moozicore is actually one of those blockchain backed projects options to make blockchain technology very popular while solving real life problems. I thought Ethereum would the last, but now we’ve got moozicore. Cool. Super cool.
Moozicore would be opening the cryptocurrency space to music streaming possibilities with the help of Blockchain technology. Moozicore appears to be quite unique and we can only imagine the level of greatness that could emanate from the project. I think so too. Plausible but there might be a problem. Moozicore has to face big competitors. I’m talking about Spotify and Apple Music. They crush competition, or better still buy these companies. US government is trying to create a fair competition game when it comes to new tech, but would they make the same arrangements for cryptocurrency projects? There seems to be a misconception here, there's a difference between the two and that's the fact that one is based in the blockchain industry and the other is a conventional music brand, if moozicore will come up successful, then it will be termed as the first of its kind in the blockchain industry and a new kind of technology in the music industry |
|
|
|
While going through the history of the transburn token, I realized that it got to a wonderful ATH but recently dropped, what is the plan of the team to avoid more dump in the future?
Cryptocurrencies are having a bad trading week. I say the prices have been brave. Libra, trying to defend its self in Congress, has been a poor representative of cryptocurrencies. I think Transburn tokens are naturally designed to have a bullish price. Although tokens are burnt, holders tokens have a better price. Yeah, no doubt the market has been going through a bearish season and has affected a whole lot of tokens and coins, even the chairman of them all Bitcoin was not spared this time. Let's be optimistic that the bull will be upon us soonest than we ever imagined so we can all enjoy the goodies of the land. Transburn will surely do well in terms of price It’s a bullish market. Not as volatile as we saw in 2018. But this time, it’s going far higher. I think the market is trying to shake off weak hands. There are more institutional investors looking at coming into cryptocurrency and regulations is around the corner. I do believe that the future is bright with cryptocurrency, the bearish trend of 2018 has been replaced by a bullish trend this year. The year is yet to end and am expecting a much higher bull run before the end of the year. I would endeavour to hold some tokens till the end of the year and see what would become of this project. The bullish trend seems to only be relative to just bitcoin and not the entire cryptocurrency industry, though it seems like a boost but altcoins have a long way to go for the industry to be termed successful, so how will this happen?, well, its all about creating and implementing projects that will revolutionize the industry and not just to be seen as another avenue for quick bucks |
|
|
|
Moozicore is actually one of those blockchain backed projects options to make blockchain technology very popular while solving real life problems. I thought Ethereum would the last, but now we’ve got moozicore. Cool. Super cool.
Moozicore would be opening the cryptocurrency space to music streaming possibilities with the help of Blockchain technology. Moozicore appears to be quite unique and we can only imagine the level of greatness that could emanate from the project. Every new project in the cryptocurrency space appears to be a seed which would require some effort to make it grow healthily. The developers and team are levied with the responsibility to carry out the project development, which is the nurturing that the seed needs. Not just in the cryptocurrency ecosystem but the entire process of a brand and it all depends on the team, the community will only support a brand when they have given them a good reason to do so, we all know how the Industry works and how impatient some investors can be, not to mention the continuous competition that comes up each day with every new brand |
|
|
|
1% of Transburn tokens gets burnt every time someone makes a transaction. Wow. I guess that going to make the amount of tokens in circulation very low and with increasing demand the price would skyrocket.
It's a popular strategy among deflationary tokens to get a portion of the tokens burnt per transaction. My concern is that the supply is low and with the consistency of transactions, it may take few years before everything eventually gets burnt. It's quite funny, the way you arrived at your conclusion. Everything would eventually get burnt, no doubt. But that's not in few years time. Rather the limited supply would keep increasing the value and make holding the tokens become very lucrative. Well, its all based on the user-case of the brand, how many intend to actively use their token for the purpose of what they offer because the consumer determines the circulation of a particular token or means of exchange, so having a low supply shouldn't be a problem but when the demand is really high, then another means of curtailing such will come in, possibly the amount to be burnt per transaction will be reduced I agree with you that when the demand gets high, the amount to be burnt would either be suspended or reduced. The increase in demand would also lead to an increase in value due to the fact that individuals who are fortunate to have some would be unwilling to let it go for peanuts. At the end of the day the value may even surpass the value of more superior cryptocurrencies. Yes, that's just basic economics and its left for the team to implement it well, otherwise, it will affect the brand negatively, this is where an expert comes in and ensure that everything is well balanced with proper checks and balances, so i hope they get it right and become notable in that aspect, making both themselves and investors happy |
|
|
|
It’s great to know moozicore has got a good legal advisor. It might be illegal to play a song or stream music in some public locations. That’s why businesses would need a streaming app. Moozicore would change the hospitality industry approach to music, cost effective and good knowledge of your customers preferences.
Not only this, I think proper legal permissions/rights for playing any songs also needs to be checked. In light of lot of illegal websites ignoring legal rights of media/entertainment , this step of making legal team will surely help Moozicore to gain trust. Also its good feeling for a user that he is not listening to a pirated version of some song he is listening. :-) I don't think it's big deal to have legal team. It's actually part of the corporate structure. Having internal legal saves you cost a whole deal than outsourcing. It's basically common sense. Well, almost every brand that means business do have a legal team and terms of agreement which should be kept, this shouldn't be any different and also based on the fact that they are located in a nation that's strict when it comes to legal matters, it will be logical enough for them to incorporate such into their business, like you said, is not actually a big deal |
|
|
|
1% of Transburn tokens gets burnt every time someone makes a transaction. Wow. I guess that going to make the amount of tokens in circulation very low and with increasing demand the price would skyrocket.
It's a popular strategy among deflationary tokens to get a portion of the tokens burnt per transaction. My concern is that the supply is low and with the consistency of transactions, it may take few years before everything eventually gets burnt. It's quite funny, the way you arrived at your conclusion. Everything would eventually get burnt, no doubt. But that's not in few years time. Rather the limited supply would keep increasing the value and make holding the tokens become very lucrative. Well, its all based on the user-case of the brand, how many intend to actively use their token for the purpose of what they offer because the consumer determines the circulation of a particular token or means of exchange, so having a low supply shouldn't be a problem but when the demand is really high, then another means of curtailing such will come in, possibly the amount to be burnt per transaction will be reduced |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
