I'm down 40% from PPS.. 

tl;dr

So why not blossom some of these extra coin blockchains into alternative domains like NMC. build an exchange for them and begin working on something with a little more of a reasonable way of keeping someone's pet project alive?

Thing is PPC isn't going to knock off litecoin and hey I can surely say it isn't going to even knock off NMC. It could however be a running mate with it. Why can't DEVcoin include functions for "Website.dev? Then those domains be used to fule the image of the software and coders the coin is suppose to support?[/qoute]

NMC was developed as distributed DNS so goverments/others cant take down ur hostname or so u cant get screwed by ur hoster.
"DVC is a ethical currency" where developers/maintainers get most of it of it and there are also projects based on that (QCool for example, if this name is right), DVC is something like a invention/developer Coin, hence the name Devcoin.

The 1x portion of my PCI-E card on my 5970 broke off. I was wondering if I could use a PCI-E extender, and solder it onto alternate points in the card. Does anybody know if this has been done and where they are?

Heres an example picture showing what part broke off, this isn't a picture of my card:

After viewing the following, you'll lean toward alien invasion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fujYoh0SXBs

The Turks have already fallen. 

This will offer synchronous remote invocation for a few functions and have an asynchronous message bus for notification and broadcast between known extensions or authenticated clients. The API (BCSAPI) is supposed to isolate components that need highest level of compatibility with bitcoind from the rest, where innovation should take place. The BCSAPI seeks to serve low level data, such as validated transactions and blocks chain events or outputs by address eliminating the need to hack into core components or interpret binary storage.

I do not plan to imitate bitcoind's RPC out-of-the-box but, make it possible to implement extensions/proxies connecting to above API that create a compatibility layer if you need.

This is a project in development, so interfaces or database schema will likely change. Keep watching this space for a ready to go before using it for real or committing serious development on top of the API.

Suggestions, wishes are welcome.

How will you know if people tend to pick the same types of events, and, therefore, create big non-random clusters of choices that might be easily brute-forced?

Taking an idea from https://gist.github.com/3840286...

.... you could store a small number of bitcoin at private key = SHA256(memory_key), store the bulk of bitcoin at scrypt(Name+PIN+memory_key), and tell users to choose a new memory key if the SHA256(memory_key) coins are either ever spent or if that key ever gets funds from somebody else.

Because that means somebody else chose the same memory key.

So how do you get your bitcoins?

Usually I trade Linden dollars for bitcoins with a VirWox account, but the fees are high...

I need to buy bitcoins using moneygram.
But if I go to bitinstant, when I have to select the country it only shows a few of them, what happened??
I live in Switzerland, and I remember that last month there were a lot more countries available...

If you combine multiple addresses as inputs to a new transaction, then blockchain analysis can see that the original addresses are all controlled by a single entity.  I'm trying to figure out if one can use the blockchain.info mixer in a way that doesn't do this.  It doesn't look like it.

Let's say I have 15 individual addresses with random amounts that I want to merge up to make a larger, single output.  It would be useful if I could spend each of these addresses *in separate transactions* to the mixer incoming address, so they don't become linked.  Then the mixer would do its thing to transfer the total amount from the mixing wallet, as one or more inputs, to my requested destination address.  From what I can see, this can't be done.

Anyway, I've sort of hijacked the OP's thread, so I should just start a new topic in the relevant forum.

https://github.com/luke-jr/bfgminer/blob/bfgminer/miner.c#L7889 is where the device detection is called from... not really sure what you're looking for.

Sure, that's on their site.  But I still don't know if it's possible to combine multiple outputs in a way that doesn't link them.  If you are holding balances in several addresses in their wallet, then send an anonymous (their word), larger transaction to another address, does it create a transaction to their mix wallet for each address you hold, or does it combine them into a single transaction and thus again link them together?  I guess I could try it with some small amount to find out.

Time out: Can anyone point me to the section of code I am looking for on ANY of the miners so I dont have to reverse engineer the whole thing?