THoughtful thought.. there are a few thing about anoncoin I like such as the I2P built in and a group of developers devoted to security and PRIVACY in financial transactions which will serve an certain desire... But other coins with potential include NAMECOIN for it ability to create aliases for uses of the other networks  and once there is an interest bearing Cyrptocurrency then savings and loans may finally be faced with a real competitor....  check out a POW/POS coin with an interest bearing wallet - Philosopherstone.

I personally support cyrptocurrency networks that seem to be legitimately launched, secure and offer something for the online community: Right Now I support: BitCoin, NameCoin, BitBar, AnonCoin and Philosopherstone.  I also have been looking into the original POS - Novacoin as well as CyrptoGenicBullion but have none yet.

I bought 55 shares and I would have bought more if I had more BTC.

I'm hoping that in the future you will be able to release another block of shares, but for sale using Solidcoins/Microcash.  This is probably the only viable investment I'd be willing to trade for my SC.

Also, as a comparison, Vircurex went public on Cryptostocks back in early February.  Shares were offered for .1 BTC and, at one point, I think they managed to skyrocket to about 1BTC each.  Now, the value is a reasonable .25-30 BTC.

MCXNow is a smaller exchange but it is also much newer.  Furthermore, when MCXNow was turned on, I was hooked from day-one and I've found the experience much more reliable the Vircurex.

If history is any indication of investment worth, a .1BTC/Share buy-in will almost certainly be a good investment, even if you want to sell all on on August 11.

Are the new owners actively building this site? It feels like progress has kind of stalled lately.. it's still the best btc ad site out there, but there is lots of stuff that could be improved upon

Dumping oil would be stupid. Just order a truckload  full of sand and tell him to dump it at his house.

What about 4 GPUs?
Can Ubuntu support that many?  Also are the drivers available?

Thanks for the guide!

Yep, nothing but the best 

This might be the wrong place to ask, but I'm wondering if anybody else has done this.

I don't want my port 9332 open to the world (p2pool Web stats and RPC interface).

I have a Web server on my machine, so tried to redirect it, so that this would work:

URL typed into browser of https://mysite.example.com/whatever/p2pool/ --> proxy to http://127.0.0.1:9332/ on the inside

Although I wanted to keep port 9332 closed from the outside world, I still want to be able to peek at it remotely, and so have added https and HTTP basic authentication to it (old style username/password) on my Web server's configuration.

This works, but unfortunately it's fooled by the JavaScript and HTML in the page, having lots of links to places like "/static" and "/local_stats" and such.

I know my Apache proxy is working, because I get p2pool's redirections, such as when you go to port 9332 without a location and it redirects you to the "/static" webpage: https://mysite.example.com/static

This doesn't work on my setup, because I need to have p2pool be under a path, not at the toplevel.

So, I tried the "mod_proxy_html" Apache module.  This seems to be failing to parse the HTML generated by p2pool, and rewriting it correctly, because then, after doing that, I no longer get toplevel redirects, but I get p2pool to tell me "No such resource/No such child resource".  This text is an error from p2pool, not my Web server, so I know that at least the proxy is getting through to p2pool and making the internal connection to port 9332 correctly.  However, something's getting garbled in my attempt to rewrite the HTML, so it's not getting forwarded to the correct URL, I think.  Unfortunately my debugging trail goes cold there, I have no visibility into the internal workings of mod_proxy_html unfortunately.

Has anybody else confronted this problem?

I wonder if it would be possible to rewrite the links in p2pool's Web interface to be relative, not absolute, paths?  Would there be a technical problem with this, or would it be a good improvement to have?

Thanks!
Josh

I just had a random scary thought.

Is there anyway that editing the makefile like I've done in order to get it to compile could possibly jeopardize the coins in my wallets? Like, for example, being able to send bitcoins to my armory wallets but not being being able to spend them, because the wallets are invalid because of some tweaking made to the makefile?

e.g. if you set the mining username to be username/+64 then cgminer will mine at 64 difficulty to p2pool
Of course it makes no difference to the number of share-chain shares you find, but it does mean you are sending ~1/64th of the number of shares to the p2pool (that's what I used for the ~week of p2pool mining I did)
I've no idea what happens if you use e.g. username/+100000 ...

I turned on a 3.5 coin bounty on http://anc.usr.io until we hit this diff jump, maybe someone will come help?

PPLNS now uses the last 5 not 10 shares.

Mining at p2pool.org is a bad idea (at least right now) because they are not on the latest version of p2pool software and as such are on a tiny fork of the p2pool network that only has a few GH/s.  You may as well be mining solo.

Run your own node or find a different public node to mine at.

It's unfortunate that such a high visibility public node is out of date.

now it is. as i were writing the post, it wasnt.

why are u not on coinchoose?

So simply running my own server is the best thing to do? And i have set a new p2pool which is located in my country and i receive a lot less rejects now. But they do not have many users, so i guess finding and finishing a block isn't top notch i guess

Just wanted to post gtx760 info

-l 30x4, gets 155khash/s


Thanks again Cudaminer!

The 100k at each satoshi up and down is me, I have them all the way from 1 to over 300 or 350 or something and replace them when they get eaten.

Except for a little gap around the active zone to account for fees and a modicum of profit of course.

-MarkM-