Message from the mods (one of five today) A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
But yet the pedophilia obsessed, troll king is allowed to post and troll with total impunity. Absolutely hilarious.  In other threads, they'll delete your post for simply agreeing or adding a +1 to a comment, let alone laughing at someone else's post. Unless you actually add entirely new content, even if you post the same spam repeatedly, you're open to deletion. They do seem to leave Adam's thread alone though, unless snitches complain. I do not mind the fact they deleted my post, who cares right? not me really... but it is the fact that the millions of lambys troll posts remain that makes me laugh. |
|
|
|
Message from the mods (one of five today) A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. i see a likely path towards extended life beginning with genetic manipulation prior to birth , basically turning off aging related genes , which is something that has been demonstrated already in lab settings - this might double individual human life expectancy , pushing us into the 150 yr land ... this would be possible within the relatively near future , say , 50-100 years or so , depending on general public sentiment / laws regarding human genome modification ... but wouldn't help anyone live longer who aren't embryos ... meanwhile advances in more traditional medicine the simple ability to treat ailments and diseases , the possibility to print or grow replacement organs might up that 150 to 200 ... beyond that , there really wouldn't be another option that wouldn't be "invasive" so we'd be looking first at internal cybernetics , since we kindof already have some advances in that department , pacemakers , artificial hips , etc - essentially you'd be looking at supplemental artificial organs to further extend life ... nano-tech to support cell function and immune system would probably be next , mostly because you could still look like a non-modified human being ... next up would be external cybernetics , depending on people's willingness to become more and more machine than man out of desire for extra years of life ... this could push life expectancy anywhere from 300-1000 years ... who knows how long it'd take to develop tech like that ... but at some point you'd resemble a head on a robot/cyborg body , more or less... the step of mapping every neuron and the movement of all the electrical impulses of a human brain in real time AND having the ability to transfer a copy of that exact pattern into a sufficiently advanced artificial brain is probably the furthest down the timeline , by a lot ... probably none of us will ever see the day that any of these possibilities becomes a reality , with the possible exception of having great grandchildren that'll live to be 150 ...
I totally disagree.I tend to disagree with the majority of arguments that are posted there. This is either posted by a man that hasn't been reading the (scientific) news since 1960, or refuses to accept them. Seriously man, WTF! There is a button on the keyboard called "ENTER". Look (I will press it now 2 times): You see? This is called a paragraph! (I will now press it another time) Yet another paragraph! Please use it the next time, it's getting really hard to follow up with your comments FGS!  But yet the pedophilia obsessed, troll king is allowed to post and troll with total impunity. Absolutely hilarious. |
|
|
|
drivel
Do not let the door hit you on the way out. Off you pop. |
|
|
|
So guys, do we have any pics of this broad?
 |
|
|
|
If you guys can resist quoting the trolls, maybe (just maybe) they'll go away. Jimbo I'm looking at you.
It is a good point, but no, I do not think this particular loon will just go away.. and it was a bit boring, and as I am tied to the desk tonight, I thought I would pass the time by prodding the resident troll with a stick. Pointless I know. I must admit I have reached maximum boredom level with it all now though. |
|
|
|
NLC is a female?  If you could call it that... |
|
|
|
@empowering: Please do not leave me, everyone leaves me.
Registered for what? you are not going back to your fave topic are you? seriously you are disturbing bro.. you cannot leave the peado shit alone for more than an hour... you are one fucked up brony. Anyway I am sure that you are not just a slut, but a dumb old slut, a gratuitous dumb old slut, with bingo wings and a mouth that has seen more dicks than a urinal. But I do love you. Kissy kissy. |
|
|
|
Slutty slut talk
Oh shush now you slut. (ps Love you lots) |
|
|
|
sorry guys. You go for it Tarmi... |
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_righting_reflex#Terminal_velocity"Terminal velocity" is the maximum velocity of a body as it falls through air. Mathematically, the velocity at ground increases with the starting height, but beyond a certain height the increase is negligible. The article says that (1) the terminal velocity for a cat is 100 km/h and (2) that velocity is pretty much attained when falling from 5-6 stories. One of these must be wrong, since a cat falling from 18 meters (6 generous stories) in vacuum would hit the ground at ~70 km/h only. I would go with 8-10 stories. A veterinarians's paper cited in that WP article says: Kapatkin and Matthiesen (1991) suggest that the type of injury depends upon the height of the fall and the landing surface. The severity of injuries rises linearly up to the seventh storey. After that height, the severity of injuries does not rise and and the incidence of fractures decreases. Of 22 cats that fell more than seven stories only one died, and among 13 cats that fell more than nine stories only one fracture was diagnosed. One cat that fell 32 stories suffered only mild pneumothorax and a chipped tooth (Whitney and Mehlhaff, 1987).
Robinson (1976)stated that the maximum recorded heights for survival were 18 stories on to a hard surface, 20 stories on to shrubbery, and 28 stories on to awning So there seems to be some reason to think that cats reach terminal velocity at relatively low height (8-10 stories); that the terminal velocity is quite a bit less than 100 km/h, perhaps half of that; and that a cat could indeed survive a fall from the Empire State Building (if it does not die of boredom along the way ) I do not think it would survive from the top of the state. I have had this explained to me in some detail by a vet in the past, after an incident with a cat thrown out of a balcony type situation in Sydney (not my cat) and basically, they are fucked below a certain height, there is a sweet spot where they would survive, and then there is height from which if they fall, there is nothing that can stop the cats head, dipping, and they would most likely die. But this is getting circular and I am not about to go and test this and when it comes down to it, I am not an expert in throwing cats off of a roof... beyond what I have been told by someone else... so I concede it could be wrong.. but that said, I would take a cash bet on this, and my bet would be kitty is fucked up beyond all repair from a flight off the empire state. |
|
|
|
There is a safety net a bit down from the top to prevent people from killing themselves. Your kitty will land there and come back up to cut you up.
Yeah man, dem furballs do not pull punches  A more pertinent question would be how big of a splat would Lamb make? if say one were to drop a cat off the top of the empire state onto Lamb on the ground... did I mention the cat is made of lead? Nah, a golden cat. Bought with bitcoin. Dressed with dollar bills. It would be poetic. I like it. Plan approved. |
|
|
|
There is a safety net a bit down from the top to prevent people from killing themselves. Your kitty will land there and come back up to cut you up.
Yeah man, dem furballs do not pull punches A more pertinent question would be how big of a splat would Lamb make? if say one were to drop a cat off the top of the empire state onto Lamb on the ground... did I mention the cat is made of lead? |
|
|
|
I think you should end your life.
Why is this not reported to the authorities and his IP BANDED?! Cyberbullying is so wrong! What if he takes you up on it, huh? As if supporting terrorists with your terrorcoin wasn't enough  oh shush now, that was not bullying , I was trying to help. Because I care for you. I love you lamb. Is that what you filthy NAMBLA creepos call it?! Keep it to yourself, mister! Kissy kissy... Love you lamb.
Don't be coy with me you slut. |
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_righting_reflex#Terminal_velocityI suggest many of you should be open to learning new things. I might be proven wrong, but for now my provided link clearly states: - cats do not land on their feet after falling from great height. - real data (~130 cats from NY) is available on falling cats and mortality/injury rate. - height > 7 stories does increase survival rate based on data "In a 1987 study, published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, of 132 cats that were brought into the New York Animal Medical Center after having fallen from buildings, it was found that the injuries per cat increased depending on the height fallen up to seven stories, but decreased above seven stories.[8] The study authors speculated that after falling five stories the cats reached terminal velocity and thereafter relaxed and spread their bodies to increase drag." I'll probably be lurking again after this one. The forums have gone pretty rotten the last couple of years. yeah... this is correct... but it is only correct up to a certain height, there is a sweet spot, and anything over that, and the cat gets it. so go up to the 102 floor of the empire state building and throw the cat off, then it dies.. there is nothing that can stop the mass of the cats head from hitting the ground. Fools! You have no perception! The stakes we are gambling are frightenly high! We must crush him completely So like John before him, this Jesus must die For the sake of the nation this Jesus must die I would go with 8-10 stories. I can't believe I feel the need to chime in, but I do. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7l7Uq1s-gtsYeah.... I repeat though chuck a cat out of the top floor of the empire state, and I would bet my bottom dollar, that the cat will be dead as fuck when it is reunited with the ground. |
|
|
|
I think you should end your life.
Why is this not reported to the authorities and his IP BANDED?! Cyberbullying is so wrong! What if he takes you up on it, huh? As if supporting terrorists with your terrorcoin wasn't enough oh shush now, that was not bullying , I was trying to help. Because I care for you. I love you lamb. Is that what you filthy NAMBLA creepos call it?! Keep it to yourself, mister! Kissy kissy... Love you lamb. |
|
|
|
"Terminal velocity" is the maximum velocity of a body as it falls through air. Mathematically, the velocity at ground increases with the starting height, but beyond a certain height the increase is negligible.
That is really not true, due to the fact that the atmosphere gets less dense at higher altitudes. Jumping out of a plane at 12,000 feet, an average-sized man will reach a terminal velocity of between 100 and 120 mph in about 12 seconds. If the same man jumps out a 180,000 feet, his terminal velocity would be supersonic. Yeah, you do not even need to be that extreme, the difference is noticeable when you jump from 12,500 than if you jump from 18,000ft you climb the hill faster and you accelerate to a higher speed and your terminal velocity decreases as you drop - the "climbing the hill" is more violent at 18,000 ft , noticeably so. I am talking from experience here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
