Norton is good, but you have to pay for it. If you are willing to fork over some extra cash for an antivirus, Norton is probably one you should look into.
|
|
|
This is an address I have used for some time but never signed it, if you go back through the history of my posts, you will see this is the first address I have ever posted. It has also recently come to my attention that someone believes my account has been transfered hence the reason I am now signing a message.
So, this post today is to show proof that I, MoreBloodWine, am still in very much control of my account and my original BTC address.
Also, as I could not seem to import it to my local client, it was signed via my blockchain.info account.
Address: 1AKjJqVViFZGYat2BqerLPyYWscwVEPZht
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is MoreBloodWine from bitcointalk.org and today is 2015.07.09 or as some of you might write it 07/09/15. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- HCcx7X0euGA/07Ju7KbETf2/8VUtNrLsUN+R799Fqk9bfEWDgXlI8+Q6sbQK+344BD4UZT5b+iFuFlgLsVZ40PE= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Requoted, as MoreBloodWine has now fixed the "Pi Day" thing.
|
|
|
Reserved, I will enter if I have time ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I wasted some time googling this useless boat. I blame Vod.
|
|
|
Hey OP, everytime you have a giveaway for deposits, you should post a thread in the "games and rounds" section. That way, you can get more users to see your giveaway and your site! It's a neat game, but there is no one online. :/
|
|
|
1RichwEoTirvjKgaTxkcjwZgyy7J6w4Vt
Quoted! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I'm interested, please PM me.
|
|
|
Bitcoin, but if I had to choose, I'd choose PayPal.
|
|
|
About a zillion of them were registered in the past few days. No posts. Is this someone's idea of a joke I'm not getting or do they actually expect to sell them?
I guess at least some part of their intention is spamming their web URL. Because those accounts are the first alphabetically they appear as soon as ' MEMBERS' is clicked. And guess what, their Website appears right there. Considering there are 510,000+ users now I really think nobody cares about the list of users sorted alphabetically. IMO ' search for members' should appear when MEMBERS is clicked instead. The list of users should be a secondary option. That would save a click most of the times and would discourage people from creating spam accounts just to be first on the list. They're idiots of they think it will work. That would put most people right off their website straight away. I mean who would actually say "oh look a spammer let's check out their website." I believe that it also helps with SEO, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think putting their website in an account's signature or profile counts as a backlink.
|
|
|
Are blockchain.info web wallets running Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 and later? Just want to know if I should wait for 30 confirmations. Is this going to be a major problem ? are blockchain.info wallets safe in the moment? thanks a lot
I think... this is just for Bitcoin core, as written on the News above ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) No, this issue concerns web wallets too.
|
|
|
That is actually quite sad, the use of censorship. Post with "Vict0ria" instead of "Victoria" if someone really wants to post about Victoria. (You risk getting banned, post about Victoria at your own risk.)
|
|
|
Sent to all!
Thanks, I received my free bits. The sites design looks very nice! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Nice! Maybe you could add another lower tier room for 100 bits? That way, people can have fun playing with lower amounts.
|
|
|
Thanks Victor, I received my payment. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I like the campaign how it is, I would just suggest maybe an avatar campaign, and a google spreadsheet for participants to check their stats.
|
|
|
Some of the subreddits have now gone back to public, such as /r/science and /r/gaming.
|
|
|
|