As a gambler he is responsible for the gambling sites and licensed casinos are liable to the laws of that country. These sites will require KYC to avoid their liability however, KYC is not a big issue for non-license based casinos. But KYC is required to avoid money laundering issues. And I don't think there is any other important issue related to KYC other than the fact of money laundering. One of the main reasons for the rapid growth of crypto casinos is that there is a gambler's anonymity.

I think it all depends on personal experiences, "knowledge" of a certain event and what are your ideas of "fun".
Personally I find betting or playing in real life very funny, but by now, the opportunities to do so have practically disappeared, since in my country gambling is heavily controlled/taxed.
vice versa, I always find online gambling a valid alternative to have fun, regardless of the real or less possibility of winning substantial sums of money 

Op, do you think common people are stupid? Governments have never positioned CBDC as any one of the four points you have mentioned. Governments are positioning CBDC as a convenient mode of value transfer and nothing else!

In turn, the government will get many incentives like complete overview of people's finances, effective curb on money laundering and a weapon against black money hoarding. CBDCs will be adopted by the population because it will soon be mandated by the government.

Thanks for some actual statistics.

There is a huge difference between "people who gamble" and "people who have gambled". When the Super Bowl comes around, I have dozens of friends and colleagues who never usually gamble throwing a few bets on. When the football/soccer World Cup comes around, almost everyone I know has a sweepstake or similar being organized in their place of work or in their friend groups, usually with a buy in of somewhere around $5-20. All of this counts as gambling and puts all these people in the category of people who have gambled, although almost none of them are regular gamblers who bet daily or weekly.

It doesn't surprise me that the statistics show that the vast majority of people in the US have gambled at some point, while <1% are considered problem gamblers.

They do create this money but this money is never spent.

Suppose this,

Its like someone having staked ETH which they couldnt withdraw, ETH foundation created new ETH in exchange for those locked staked ETH so that user could withdraw immediately. Then when those locked staked ETH were unlocked, the ETH foundation would take them back. So the supply remains the same.

The above example is all hypothetical.

Physical gambling is more fun because you experienced it first hand. It’s like sex which physically is much better because you can feel the intensity of what you’re doing.

Obviously those user that will choose online over physical gambling doesn’t experience the physical gaming. No offense, Online gambling is good because it’s convenient but physical gambling is the best if it comes to fun.

Yes. it was also heavily impacted but If we pay attention to what is happening now, one of the main impacts is the imposition of economic sanctions on Russia where the international community has imposed economic sanctions on Russia in response to its actions in Ukraine.

It is undeniable that these Sanctions can have an impact on the Russian economy and its trade relations with other countries, which can have a ripple effect on the global economy. A war between Russia and Ukraine could have far-reaching effects on the world economy.

One more thing, the uncertainty of conflict resolution can also affect investor confidence and financial markets due to unresolved geopolitical tensions.

And scammers! Like Calvin, who out of his feel for charity supports a mentally challenged doctor of theology CSW. He probably made Calvin believe God made him invent bitcoin.

From wikipedia:
In 2012, Ayre was indicted by the US Attorney for Maryland on charges of illegal gambling and money laundering.

It's great that  they made their fortunes in gambling industry, I have nothing against that, but what's the point of the thread? If you think you can make it in this business, think again. These people weren't starting with nothing and aren't really role models to follow in all aspects.

I would say that Referral bonuses are waste of time for those who do not have friends who can signup under their referral links. But think about social influencers who have thousand of followers and they can gain a considerable amount of Referral bonuses. So in a nutshell, if we cannot generate referral income, it is the problem at our end as the referral program can earn you good amount if you have the people who can signup under your referral link.

Yes. The problem is not with the centralized exchanges but it was with the stablecoin themselves. What happens with USDC is not a new occurrence anymore so people should have learned already long time ago that they must stay away from them and stick only with cryptos. If they cant deal with volatility, then this place is not for them.

There is no problem with cryptos so they must not convert it with cash. Cash sucks. It is prone to inflations. Keeping your cash in the banks is even worse. Do you know what happened to the banks lately? Although that wasn't new either. Banks are a bad way to invest and make money. Not only that they are risky but the reward is also tiny. I'll better go with De-Fi than on them.

You're not alone, many of us here I guess have that habit that we're not reading the TOS of where we're registering with. I think that's a par thing to do even if we don't read TOS and just sign up immediately but before we sign up, we're doing some research. However, that's still not a reason to avoid reading the TOS just because we've already made research. Actually, it's making me think that research first which is needed to be done, and then reading the TOS if we're decided to sign up and gamble from that casino we're researching. So, it's gotta be a combination of both of it to be not resulting into a mistake.