Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2024, 03:22:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 [963] 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 ... 1525 »
19241  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 25, 2018, 03:13:39 AM
My hopes are already in tatters. This is hardly news.


Let's look on the bright side of things:   




Rosewater panic





Fun crippling doubt for the whole family

Welcome back!!!

If you are eyeballing the cupboards again, then there is not a lot that any of us insensitive interweb dweebs can do / say to save you from ur own selfie . 
19242  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 25, 2018, 02:02:30 AM
My hopes are already in tatters. This is hardly news.


Let's look on the bright side of things:   You are chatting, and you are social.

You are no longer hiding underneath the cupboards.


That b called:


Progress.



Don't give me Malcom X, here.   Cool
19243  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 11:23:32 AM
USD is the ultimate shitcoin

enormous premine, high inflation rate, unlimited supply

this thread is no place to discuss such a currency

Get real.. it is the subject matter and the trading pair of this thread.

We are not getting rid of the USD any time soon... and even though we know that it is inevitably going to decrease in value, it is what a lot of folks (including why this thread is world famous) are interested in the USD/BTC trading pair
19244  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 04:19:38 AM
Altcoins can be a very good way to get more BTC though. There is no reason to hold on to BTC just because you believe it will win in the end.

I'm not just talking about Pump and dump coins - many alts can compete with and beat BTC for long periods of time. The end goal is to accumulate more BTC as well as the few altcoins you believe in.


Altcoins are great for another reason - experienced traders have pretty much cornered the BTC market. If you try to trade there, you will end up losing your money, unless you make obvious trades like buying at $7000 the past week.

Pick a small altcoin (I choose Oyster (PRL)), and you can win in virtually all trades with just a mediocre amount of skill, since you're not competing against veteran Bitcoiners, but rather FOMO'ers who happened to pick something that didn't lose all of its value during the dump.

By trading during the alt-dump to acquire more alt, then selling the alts for BTC after a large pump (alts recover more), I have earned over 2 BTC in the last 2 weeks. It may not be impressive to some here, but 2 BTC is very decent money for me.

(I'm someone who frequented this thread recently - my password was changed though, and my account locked ?)

Get the fuck out of here with your alt coin pumping and your baloney about the supposed benefits of alts versus the supposed "professional" trading on BTC.

Yeah, you may be able to increase your BTC through alts; however, you might also decrease your BTC through alts- so you are suggesting some whimsical and non-specified advice for gambling with alts... and you have not even described how the technique is supposed to work exactly to both 1) identify the alt that you want to trade, 2) time the trading, 3) make sure that you do not get scammed because there are a lot of alt coin scams out there, 4) make sure that you do not get locked into the alt.. sometimes it can be easier to get into alts, but getting out might be more challenging and 5) any other alt coin trick that may be helpful in figuring out what to do and when to do it.

You have given me practical advice in the past (which was an psuedo-algorithm on selling on rises and buying on dips), so I will consider your advice.

Of course, it's not my intention to pump any alt or tell anyone that they must do this to make a lot of profit, and I fully believe that I would get beaten up pretty badly in trading BTC-USD pairings, which trading BTC-sub100 alts has been pretty good.

I actually do all of what you have listed - I go check out an alt and do quite a bit of research, especially on their community, and the hype of the coin. It's quite a bit of work, but after that, I get to trade vs. the FOMO'ers who are impatient and brand new to crypto.

This is particularly good for coins that have been around in only the past few months.

I have not had issues with getting locked into alts, since I am a small-time trader - I can offload my altcoins rather quickly.

This is an area in which I will have to burned first before I quit.

Well, all the more power to you, if you are able to trade alts and to gain BTC through such trades; however, such a trading alts to increase your BTC is far from a given, even if it has worked in the past.  It remains difficult to recognize a pattern, and is likely a more risky and complicated a practice that is not even very relevant to this thread unless there were some obvious BTC/Alt/USD connection, which there is not.
19245  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 03:38:56 AM
Altcoins can be a very good way to get more BTC though. There is no reason to hold on to BTC just because you believe it will win in the end.

I'm not just talking about Pump and dump coins - many alts can compete with and beat BTC for long periods of time. The end goal is to accumulate more BTC as well as the few altcoins you believe in.


Altcoins are great for another reason - experienced traders have pretty much cornered the BTC market. If you try to trade there, you will end up losing your money, unless you make obvious trades like buying at $7000 the past week.

Pick a small altcoin (I choose Oyster (PRL)), and you can win in virtually all trades with just a mediocre amount of skill, since you're not competing against veteran Bitcoiners, but rather FOMO'ers who happened to pick something that didn't lose all of its value during the dump.

By trading during the alt-dump to acquire more alt, then selling the alts for BTC after a large pump (alts recover more), I have earned over 2 BTC in the last 2 weeks. It may not be impressive to some here, but 2 BTC is very decent money for me.

(I'm someone who frequented this thread recently - my password was changed though, and my account locked ?)

Get the fuck out of here with your alt coin pumping and your baloney about the supposed benefits of alts versus the supposed "professional" trading on BTC.

Yeah, you may be able to increase your BTC through alts; however, you might also decrease your BTC through alts- so you are suggesting some whimsical and non-specified advice for gambling with alts... and you have not even described how the technique is supposed to work exactly to both 1) identify the alt that you want to trade, 2) time the trading, 3) make sure that you do not get scammed because there are a lot of alt coin scams out there, 4) make sure that you do not get locked into the alt.. sometimes it can be easier to get into alts, but getting out might be more challenging and 5) any other alt coin trick that may be helpful in figuring out what to do and when to do it.
19246  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 03:27:26 AM
I personally believe that it is not worth it to play around with alts with an intent of increasing bitcoin holdings.  But, if some folks are able to find decent systems to play with alts and increase their bitcoins, then the more power to them.. just careful not to be risking too much bitcoin in those kinds of endeavors.

Gotta agree with you there a hundred times. Every time I double my bitcoin with altcoins, I just half it again with more altcoins. That just keeps on happening, and I've been witnessing it for years now. Roll Eyes


Now, you are trying to act as if you are smart, or something. 

You should be smart enough to realize that past performance does not indicate future results; however, if you have a system that is working for you, and it seems to work under a variety of market conditions, then you have something that you might want to share with others.

I do personally, try to share my strategies, to the extent that others are interested in discussing - however, sometimes, it takes a bit of time to describes what seems to work and what does not work.

Do you have anything in particular that you want to share that you believe might be good or repeatable, or you just want to keep your supposedly superb strategies private?

I've had enough of experience now, have lot to share from it, and I'll publish something interesting (like a guide) for new-comers soon on Steem or here. But everyone here might find my journey with crypto a bit interesting:

"You think you've been the most unfortunate guy in crypto? Well, read my story and think again!"

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@rajaz/7uhjjv-you-think-you-ve-been-the-most-unfortunate-guy-in-crypto-well-read-my-story-and-think-again

O.k.  Maybe I misunderstood your first response in this string?  I thought that you were suggesting that you had a better strategy of increasing your bitcoin, but instead you seem to have been rolling your eyes at yourself, and agreeing that you may have been better off if you had just kept your money in bitcoin.

I did look at your steemit article, too, and I don't necessarily agree with your thesis that you might be the "unluckiest" guys in bitcoin because there are a lot of peeps who make similar mistakes as you - to sell their bitcoins too early and to attempt to trade in alt coins and to cause a situation that is worse than if they had just kept their value in bitcoin.
19247  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 02:08:33 AM
New fangled trading strategy update: Buys and sells $500 apart, a dash of mindfulness, and some whiskey.
Let's do this thing. Cool


I think that you are saying the right thing... hopefully it will help you from panicking too much, especially if you are reluctant to meditate.... I would mostly suggest that you attempt to keep the sizes of your orders relatively small.. so the whole practice accomplishes relieving you of some stress, even if it does not make a lot of money.

In the last two weeks, I cut my order increments down from $1,000 to about $700 because the $1,000 increments were not filling enough to my liking, and I changed a couple other details in my system that I don't want to disclose here because it would likely overly complicate matters and cause too much confusion if I were to try to describe too many of my personal specifics.

My only qualm is my unwillingness to keep a more than trivial amount of monies on an exchange. Which makes the whole thing sort of moot. I guess.

I don't know what you mean by "trivial amount."  I used to keep a bit more than 50% of my BTC portfolio value on exchanges, and I really was not putting that value on the exchanges to use.  A lot of the value was just sitting there on the exchanges, just-in-case.   

After BTC prices went above $1k, and then prices kept going up from there, I began to realize that I likely don't really need to keep that much money on exchanges in order to accomplish my goals, and really the risk of keeping the value seemed to be going up a lot causing the worth of even previously considered "dust" to begin to seem like a lot of money (value).

In recent times, I am keeping around 20% of the total value on exchanges, and it is just the amount of money that I would need for the prices to go DOWN a lot (such as 80% from the top) or UP a lot (3x from our current price point), and likely I could keep lower value on the exchanges, but I think that I am more covered for very extreme prices changes, and I would not have to move the money at the last moment.  I did put enough BTC on exchanges to be prepared up to $35k BTC prices because we were moving UP so fast in December 2017 - but probably now, I could remove some of that BTC, perhaps and only prepare for $25k (but I do feel o.k. preparing for $35k, just in case).

So, you could have 10% to 20% of your BTC portfolio value on exchanges in order to prepare for UP and DOWN without having to put all of your value on exchanges.  Further, currently, I have my exchange value distributed across 4 exchanges.  Currently, I am having some ongoing issues with my coinbase account, so I still have 3 exchanges that I can work with until my coinbase matter is hopefully resolved (been a little over 2 weeks so far with those coinbase fucks).
19248  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 01:39:06 AM
I personally believe that it is not worth it to play around with alts with an intent of increasing bitcoin holdings.  But, if some folks are able to find decent systems to play with alts and increase their bitcoins, then the more power to them.. just careful not to be risking too much bitcoin in those kinds of endeavors.

Gotta agree with you there a hundred times. Every time I double my bitcoin with altcoins, I just half it again with more altcoins. That just keeps on happening, and I've been witnessing it for years now. Roll Eyes


Now, you are trying to act as if you are smart, or something. 

You should be smart enough to realize that past performance does not indicate future results; however, if you have a system that is working for you, and it seems to work under a variety of market conditions, then you have something that you might want to share with others.

I do personally, try to share my strategies, to the extent that others are interested in discussing - however, sometimes, it takes a bit of time to describes what seems to work and what does not work.

Do you have anything in particular that you want to share that you believe might be good or repeatable, or you just want to keep your supposedly superb strategies private?
19249  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 01:25:35 AM
New fangled trading strategy update: Buys and sells $500 apart, a dash of mindfulness, and some whiskey.
Let's do this thing. Cool


I think that you are saying the right thing... hopefully it will help you from panicking too much, especially if you are reluctant to meditate.... I would mostly suggest that you attempt to keep the sizes of your orders relatively small.. so the whole practice accomplishes relieving you of some stress, even if it does not make a lot of money.

In the last two weeks, I cut my order increments down from $1,000 to about $700 because the $1,000 increments were not filling enough to my liking, and I changed a couple other details in my system that I don't want to disclose here because it would likely overly complicate matters and cause too much confusion if I were to try to describe too many of my personal specifics.
19250  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 01:15:03 AM
If I were a woman, I would run away from this thread ... and fast.


That's why you gotta grow some balls (figuratively), and stop being so sensitive to reasonable real world discussions.    Roll Eyes


Me too.    Tongue
Pretty sure any woman worth her salt would either join in on these discussions or at the very least not mind. The ones that get offended are brats.

Brats that are living in a fantasy world.... hahahahhaaha    Cheesy Cheesy
19251  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 24, 2018, 01:07:38 AM
[edited out]
The way I see it is that with lower Bitcorn unit prices it will be easier to accumulate Bitcorns, since the same quantities will push smaller volumes.

My current goal is maximizing my Bitcorn holdings with no regard for USD valuations.

Ok.  The goal of accumulating bitcoin still likely subliminally accounts for dollar value, and assumes that dollar value will be increasing with time.

Sure, there may be some point in time that either we measure bitcoin's in bitcoin's... so I don't necessarily disagree with your mental framework to attempt to accumulate as many bitcoin as you can..,. even though subliminally, you are still recognizing bitcoins to be valuable because they continue to go up in value, whether measuring in terms of dollars, some other fiat, some other asset or measuring in terms of most things (partly because we expect that we are on an exponential s-curve that will make it difficult for any other asset to keep up with bitcoin in the longer term, unless it is also on some kind of exponential s-curve, as well - and almost all other assets are not on such exponential s-curve, even if they can fake it for the short term.


I fully expect altcoins to last not just 5 years, but for decades at bare minimum.

That is fair enough.. and they might also be like wak-a-mole and keep popping up in a different form after being wacked down.

Beyond that is difficult to estimate due to singularity type events being increasingly likely.

I still think that status quo institutions are going to keep battling the various trends, including the bitcoin trend.. though you are correct that some BIG thing(s) could happen too, without exactly knowing what that is (those are) going to be.

But either way, if Bitcorn went to $100k or even 1000k it would be much more difficult to increase your Bitcorn holdings by more than a few dozen Bitcorns without having to identify dozens of high quality altcorns. Meanwhile, in current markets it's very easy to gain a hundred or so extra Bitcorns within a span of a year by just throwing them around almost randomly.

I personally believe that it is not worth it to play around with alts with an intent of increasing bitcoin holdings.  But, if some folks are able to find decent systems to play with alts and increase their bitcoins, then the more power to them.. just careful not to be risking too much bitcoin in those kinds of endeavors.

I agree with you that the higher the BTC price, the more difficult in absolute terms to acquire larger quantities of bitcoin, so yeah, it was much easier to acquire decent quantities of BTC a bit over a year ago (and more solidly two years ago) when BTC prices were in the below $500 price range.  So, we cannot really get around valuing some of these bitcoin matters in terms of dollars, so I think that unless you already have a decent amount of bitcoin, it is much more difficult for "regular" folks to accumulate even 10 bitcoins, as compared with 1-2 years ago... so I am not sure where you are getting ideas that it would be easy to increase you bitcoin holdings even by adding some double digit values unless you already have acquired a decent amount of money, but I agree with your point that it is likely going to continue to be easier to accumulate BTC in absolute terms if you get started earlier, rather than waiting to see what it does and waiting to act later... The time remains now.

Regarding trading, you can really fuck your BTC accumulation strategy up if you are gambling too much with either alts or BTC with some formula that expects large returns.

I continue to think that I am doing really good with my BTC accumulation strategy, even though I am not really accumulating a whole hell of a lot.... Take this most recent dip from $19,666 to $5,920 and the BTC price ongoingly bouncing around at various price points in between.  At $19,666, I had a certain assessment of the BTC value and the dollar value of my total BTC holdings (and funds that are dedicated to my BTC portfolio), and yeah the drop and the bouncing around causes a lot of profits and accumulation of BTC, and I am able approximately project how much more valuable my total BTC portfolio is going to be when (or if) it returns to $19,666, and currently, I am roughly anticipating the value of my total BTC holdings (and related funds) will be between 5% and 10% more valuable than it was the first time around, and I feel really good about that.  I also am nearly certain that the allocation of the value, when (and assuming if) it reaches $19,666 the next time around will be weighted a bit more lopsided towards BTC, and that is what the UPs and DOWNs had caused to happen in my holdings as a kind of purposeful design of my system.

In other words, I don't think that I am making any kind of killing with my strategy, but it feels like a fairly rock-solid way to continue to relatively modestly rebalance my portfolio in the direction that I want and in a way that I consider to be on the lower end of the risk scale.



And while that's "just" a few hundred to few thousand grands right now, that would eventually be tens to hundreds of millions a decade or so from now as Bitcorn appreciates toward its true potential.

Certainly, we agree with this overall assessment regarding what has a decent likelihood of playing out in the longer term.


That's why I very much like seeing Bitcorn not exploding any more than it has right now.

Aren't we going to be prepared for an explosion upwards no matter what?  I mean if we already accumulated a lot, then we are already ready for upwards explosion, but at the same time, like you seem to be asserting, we can take advantage of the downside to accumulate more at "bargain prices"  hahahahahahaha.. .  I don't really mind either way and personally, I feel like I have accumulated enough, even though I don't mind going through some further trading to continue to accumulate BTC from my BTC holdings.  It's just that we don't really have any kind of choice anyhow because the price just might not be ready to go up.. and we just gotta wait it out, so may as well just continue to accumulate more BTC and take advantage of the ongoing information disparity.. because we know information that is not known by the general public about the value of bitcoin.. so in that regard, we are likely going to profit handsomely from our knowledge... and I am not trying to brag or to have high hopes or engage in wishful thinking because the fact of the matter is that there are so many fucking people out there, and even once in a while we see them participating in this thread, that do not have any fucking clue about what brings value to bitcoin and what differentiates bitcoin from other cryptos.-- even though on the surface, they are not dumb people, and they may even be way smarter than a lot of bitcoin HODLers in several ways while still not being able to recognize bitcoin's value.
19252  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 23, 2018, 11:55:12 PM
If I were a woman, I would run away from this thread ... and fast.


That's why you gotta grow some balls (figuratively), and stop being so sensitive to reasonable real world discussions.    Roll Eyes


Me too.    Tongue
19253  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 23, 2018, 11:40:20 PM
So, pee pare ur selfie for either direction, including DOOM..... but not necessarily gonna happen.

Give us something to work with BMB.... What be happening with uie?

My BTC to cash ratio is about the same as yours, give or take. But I'm obviously not as serene about it as you are.


Maybe some zen meditation is in order?

I mean really dude (or dudette).  We already had our selfies a 70% price correction, and where is the bad news, exactly?

It could be the case that the implosion of various alts are kind of dragging down BTC, but we actually have clear paths ahead for segwit and lightning, and look at those transaction fees and times, low as fuck (just showing that the long-ass spamming attack had been clogging up blockchain matters for quite a long time)...

Anyhow, BTC fundamentals seem to be doing quite good, so I don't see why any HODLer should be freaking the fuck out regarding the "normal" ups and down of bitcoin.

Recall that an aspect of bitcoin that it the most easily counted upon would be its volatility.  In other words, we do not have any guarantees of either UP or DOWN, but we have as close as we could get guarantee to volatility.  

So hang onto your panties (and all the pants you commandeered), and we should be able to make it through these trying (but seemingly expected) BTC volatility times.   Kiss
I would argue that BTC fundamentals are better than ever. The fact that we didn't go back to last year's initial price yet despite China type bans and all the FUD means that the biggest hodlers understand that governments and CBs have already lost the battle. It's just a matter of acting out the play for the masses now.

And from a technological perspective we're obviously much better off than we have been just a year ago as well, so any and every reason that people would've had for selling off (other than panic sales) has already been shown to be irrelevant for the future of Bitcorns.

I agree.  You said it much more forcefully than me (and still accurately) regarding BTC fundamentals being strong, including the fact that there had been decently sized attacks throughout 2017 - while the price kept rising, and even the beginning of the August 2017 forking attacks and the possible confusion from that including the decently funded campaigns to mislead newbies concerning the real bitcoin... and even if there remain newbies to mislead, there is a sufficient amount of smart money and even newbies who are not getting tricked by the misleading information - causing ongoing upwards price pressure strength in BTC - even if the short term does not prove to be BTC price bullish.
I'm really enjoying the current Bitcorn prices. It's fairly easy to increase holdings while Bitcorns are cheap and altcorns are inefficient and stupid (and hence predictable) as hell. While I suck at trading technicals, it's very easy to make predictions based on fundamentals and longer term trends (of several months) in the altcorn market. It takes quite some time and discipline, but it's anything but difficult if you know how scammers, morons and idealistic but highly naive people think and have at least some basic understanding of economics.

I'm not sure whether we are on a similar page here, but I personally think that altcoins and ICOs could be pumped and dumped for several more years - maybe even 5 years or more, so bitcoin may or may not prevail in those kinds of short to medium term pricing battles - even though in the longer term, bitcoin's fundamentals remain the strongest and are likely going to continue to be the strongest because the building upon the  BTC fundamentals are not deviating, and in that regard, bitcoin remains the best investment when considering both upside and downside risk - especially as compared to any alts and any of the various ongoing attempts at snake-oil salesmanship - even though I would not be surprised if some other coins may outperform Bitcoin in a variety of pricing ways in the short or medium term - even while relatively lacking in various BTC POW and decentralized immutability fundamentals.
19254  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 23, 2018, 10:26:42 PM

Dude I can't wait until we have functional humanoid robots to help around the house. Screw sex dolls, it's utility that really counts.

That's their purpose, isn't it ?

 Some people use sex dolls to allow them use the car-pool lanes.




I don't see how that is a doll.  Sure, she might have pale skin, and sure she might have a really great figure (maybe a bit much on the tits), but doesn't look like no doll to me.
19255  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 23, 2018, 10:13:55 PM
So, pee pare ur selfie for either direction, including DOOM..... but not necessarily gonna happen.

Give us something to work with BMB.... What be happening with uie?

My BTC to cash ratio is about the same as yours, give or take. But I'm obviously not as serene about it as you are.


Maybe some zen meditation is in order?

I mean really dude (or dudette).  We already had our selfies a 70% price correction, and where is the bad news, exactly?

It could be the case that the implosion of various alts are kind of dragging down BTC, but we actually have clear paths ahead for segwit and lightning, and look at those transaction fees and times, low as fuck (just showing that the long-ass spamming attack had been clogging up blockchain matters for quite a long time)...

Anyhow, BTC fundamentals seem to be doing quite good, so I don't see why any HODLer should be freaking the fuck out regarding the "normal" ups and down of bitcoin.

Recall that an aspect of bitcoin that it the most easily counted upon would be its volatility.  In other words, we do not have any guarantees of either UP or DOWN, but we have as close as we could get guarantee to volatility.  

So hang onto your panties (and all the pants you commandeered), and we should be able to make it through these trying (but seemingly expected) BTC volatility times.   Kiss
I would argue that BTC fundamentals are better than ever. The fact that we didn't go back to last year's initial price yet despite China type bans and all the FUD means that the biggest hodlers understand that governments and CBs have already lost the battle. It's just a matter of acting out the play for the masses now.

And from a technological perspective we're obviously much better off than we have been just a year ago as well, so any and every reason that people would've had for selling off (other than panic sales) has already been shown to be irrelevant for the future of Bitcorns.

I agree.  You said it much more forcefully than me (and still accurately) regarding BTC fundamentals being strong, including the fact that there had been decently sized attacks throughout 2017 - while the price kept rising, and even the beginning of the August 2017 forking attacks and the possible confusion from that including the decently funded campaigns to mislead newbies concerning the real bitcoin... and even if there remain newbies to mislead, there is a sufficient amount of smart money and even newbies who are not getting tricked by the misleading information - causing ongoing upwards price pressure strength in BTC - even if the short term does not prove to be BTC price bullish.
19256  Other / Meta / Re: Lauda has 3 DT1 3; 100 people excluded lauda; 6 socks added lauda to their list on: February 23, 2018, 08:50:32 AM
It should not be difficult to find evidence yourself though. Just pick one person who has added lauda to their trust list; there is a ~1 in 9 chance of it being a clearly purchased account, and from there it should not be difficult to find the rest.
The burden of proof is on the accuser. You make a pretty shitty case if you can't provide such, and instead tell people to find it themselves.
There is no burden of proof in the court of public opinion. This is just a smear campaign although I do suspect there may be some small truths to some of it.

Of course there are burdens of proof if you are going to allege something then you need to provide a clear description of what you are alleging, and you have to provide at least some facts and logic to support what it is that you are alleging to be some kind of problem, whether that is breach of rules or morality or law.
19257  Other / Meta / Re: Lauda has 3 DT1 3; 100 people excluded lauda; 6 socks added lauda to their list on: February 23, 2018, 08:44:35 AM
Instead of all the bullshit and all the empty threats of "I have proof.. I swear". Why don't you just share the proof QS?

I feel sad for anyone that actually listens to you or think that your words hold any weight at all.
Your latest change (I believe today) to the title of the thread was to add the language "6 socks added Lauda to their list."  Are you going to list out those "6 socks" and then state reasons why you believe them to be socks of Lauda?  Lots of moving goal posts and revolving drama here, no?   Can you explain why you believe such an approach is justified?


It should not be difficult to find evidence yourself though. Just pick one person who has added lauda to their trust list; there is a ~1 in 9 chance of it being a clearly purchased account, and from there it should not be difficult to find the rest.

You want people to believe you, but then we are supposed to do the work?  In any kind of case that you are alleging wrong doing, you should at least, for starters, make sure that the allegation is clear, thereafter you would at least outline the facts and the logic that supports the allegation(s), no?  Those burdens are on you.  It should not be our obligation to go research the seeming vagueness that you are asserting, right?

It should not be difficult to find evidence yourself though. Just pick one person who has added lauda to their trust list; there is a ~1 in 9 chance of it being a clearly purchased account, and from there it should not be difficult to find the rest.
The burden of proof is on the accuser. You make a pretty shitty case if you can't provide such, and instead tell people to find it themselves.


At minimum particularize the allegation for us with sufficient facts and logic, in order that we could look to verify what is being alleged.
19258  Other / Meta / Re: Lauda has 3 DT1 3; 100 people excluded lauda; 6 socks added lauda to their list on: February 23, 2018, 08:37:25 AM
There is proof the accounts in question are both purchased and owned by the same person. It is undeniable that you have declined to answer questions about if you have lobbied people or otherwise given incentives to people to add you to their trust lists.

There is also this...

OP's vendetta against me, which turned into an sick obsession, started before the alleged accounts[1] apparently added me.
[...]
[1] Still no idea who these accounts are. No proof that they are purchased, nor proof that they are owned by one person.
These statements do not agree with each other Roll Eyes

QS:  Do you believe that you are acting in good faith when you continue to change the title of this thread?   The thread has become a rolling stream of consciousness of allegations, no?  Where does it stop?  

Maybe you want the title of this thread to say, "I hate Lauda for a variety of changing reason"

Your latest change (I believe today) to the title of the thread was to add the language "6 socks added Lauda to their list."  

Are you going to list out those "6 socks" and then state reasons why you believe them to be socks of Lauda.. that would be evidence and logic?  Seems like a lot of moving goal posts and revolving drama here, no?  

Can you explain why you believe such an approach towards the supposed behavior of Lauda is justified?
19259  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: February 23, 2018, 07:48:53 AM
For me that does not make a whole hell of a lot of sense - even though it is possible to work to the extent that the price of BTC and alts are inversely correlated.  but sometimes they all drop together, which is why the dollar/BTC pairing can be helpful.  

Perhaps jbreher plays some of those various pairs, but I think that whatever I am saying is kind of ruled out when you start adding various other cryptos as your pairs, mostly because of the extra questions of the lack of a straight line performance of the other crypto that is going to bring extra volatility and even too many additional uncertainties that vary from cycle to cycle.

I know that each of us have our own systems, so it probably does not matter any fuck what I say, because your mind seems to be already made up to trade certain other crypto pairs because for some reason you see some kind of disutility in holding dollars.  

Personally, I understand that the long term certainty of the dollar is that it depreciates in value; however, in the short term, the dollar is way the fuck more stable than any alt coin, including LTC or ETH, and part of the reason for dollar pairing with BTC is to get in and out of crypto volatility and to play it off of the dollar

To me, you seem to be adding a certain unnecessary level of additional risk and additional unknowns in terms of what the fuck those two crypto projects are doing.  

But ultimately.. whatever floats your boat... but it seems more removed from my system when you add more variables of uncertainty that can kind of negate the more focused BTC/USD approach.
The bulk of my (automated) trading model is based upon this - I've been doing okay so far, but it is a bit risky since any alt can massively drop - with no guarantee of return, I'm now trading with 100% profit and already cashed out way more than I put in, and cash out profits on a fixed basis - so happy with the risk. I tried working against fiat with a similar model and always end up out of the market


I suppose the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and if you can get better results by pairing with alts rather than pairing with the dollar, then no reason to fix what is not broken.

In essence, I am NOT against employing something that works for you, but I certainly am not interested in pairing alts because I barely even invest in alts, so I don't want to be stuck holding any alts, even though historically they may have done fine.. I just have little to no ambition to involve myself in some crypto asset that I do not have long term confidence - and my only one, at this time, is bitcoin.
19260  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: February 23, 2018, 07:39:54 AM

If you use any other language than English (stated as: a language I don't speak!) in some of your posts, you won't get merit. That is just racist.

How are people supposed to rate a post they do not understand?

You’re racist against words you do not understand.


Me too.

I don't get this stupid-ass racist allegation regarding having an expectation that understandable English is typed.

Sure, there are levels of English, and I doubt that anyone expects the English to be perfect or proper grammar in all instances.. and sometimes bad grammar and typos are purposefully used for effect.. but in the end, there is nothing racist about having an expectation that people deserve more merit (or credit) when they communicated more skillfully to get their ideas across, and the language of the forum is English, unless posting in the local sections.

In the end, the accusation would not be racist, but there could be a valid accusation of "elitism" or "prudism" if someone is expecting English skills that are perfect or near perfect when we are posting on the interwebs....... however, I don't think that anyone is expecting that kind of high level.  Surely you are judged more favorably if you can communicate your ideas clearly and concisely.
Pages: « 1 ... 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 [963] 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 ... 1525 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!