Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 02:03:05 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 1016 »
1941  Other / Meta / Re: Lamborghini Member, what title is that? on: June 28, 2018, 10:14:49 AM
Hilarious' "Lamborghini Member" and mprep's "Diamond Member" is poking fun at the Copper Member rank that was introduced a while back.
As you can see, custom titles show at the same place as the "Copper Member" text when people are posting (not on a users profile).
I would assume rickbig's "I'm not a member" is meant in a similar way.

My original custom title was Gold Member. Mprep then one-upped me with Diamond Member, so I had to go one further and become a Lambo member.

I saw hilariousandco  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=164822
, a global moderator . is having this title Lamborghini member on his profile. Is a custom title, can anybody do that? or only few higher members can do that?
Someone ask hilariousandco how to get lamborghini member custom title and hilariousandco replied that in order to have a custom title you have to donate btc and pm theymos about it.

Well, that's how you become a donator which will give you the option of a custom title. I might have joked in the past that if you buy theymos a lambo he will give you that title though.
1942  Other / Meta / Re: Can we get the paytomat spammer nuked expeditiously? Please. on: June 27, 2018, 08:15:04 PM
nuked.
1943  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? on: June 26, 2018, 06:09:00 PM
Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?

Satoshi Nakamoto is from Japan. The name says it all. It should be easy to find Satoshi Nakamoto in Japan.

You've made a really compelling argument there. Congratulations.
1944  Other / Meta / Re: Why were threads about Stunna recently expunge from this forum and by whom? on: June 26, 2018, 05:39:34 AM
But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login.

How do we know it isn't operated by Satohsi and I'm the Queen of England? None of this has anything to do with this thread. Open up another if you want to invent conspiracies up or throw shit at a wall to see what sticks.

Quote
This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks.

My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that?

No, they weren't on topic, not to mention they were all double posts. And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post.

Speaking of not allowing shit, this ...

Quote
It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.

I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc.

When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure.

You can report them and they'll be removed or moved to the investigations board. The doxxing rule is fairly new or at least was probably implemented long after your incident.

PSS: I just remember about the time Josh Zipkin threaten to kill me and that even made the rounds on periodicals, but he wasn't banned.

Meanwhile, the plot thickens ...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956


No, I don't see how the plot thickens. Does you making a post that mentions Zipkin or BFL or whoever mean anything and thereof must be investigated? But please, go ahead. I've always enjoyed reading your posts because they're insanely entertaining at least (emphasis on insane), but again, this is completely off topic. Open up a new thread if you want to go on wild goose chases whilst clutching at invisible straws. Thanks.
1945  Other / Meta / Re: Why were threads about Stunna recently expunge from this forum and by whom? on: June 26, 2018, 05:07:10 AM
Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.
Is it normal to move threads with replies to the trashcan like that? To me, it would make more sense to move those types of threads to the archives or to lock them. Moving threads like this to the trashcan makes it smell like something is being hidden.

Oh look, a wild alt account appears. Any takers that this is QS? Threads are either trashed or archived but I guess it's down to personal choice of the mod, but when a thread is made from a brand new account and he then later edits all his posts to nothing I don't see why it needs to stay. It also seems like it may have been a doxxing or attempting to dox but I can't tell as all the posts have been edited. Relevant post from that thread:

I am a nobody but Millions of people have gambled on his casino and nobody ever wondered who he is?

He is here online everyday promoting Full transparency and I would like to know who he is.

Who is Stunna?

This is Bitcoin, nearly everyone is anonymous here. The only thing that makes you different is that you are an anonymous hypocrite.

The other reason you don't use your real account is you are likely to get banned.

The reason that doxxing has been allowed up until now is that it's occasionally very useful in scam investigations. However, oftentimes doxxing someone is used as a weapon in itself instead of a part of any investigation, and as a result innocent people are sometimes hurt. So to protect the innocent while hopefully not hampering scam investigations too much, here are some new rules on doxxing:

1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.
2. It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon. For example, if there are no remotely-plausible trade complaints, then the person can't be a scammer, and their dox should not be posted.
3. As before, anything that the legacy insecure government/banking system requires to be secret is not allowed anywhere. This includes social security numbers, credit card numbers, and certain account numbers.

This applies retroactively to old posts. If a thread contains a lot of personal information strewn throughout it, then the whole thread will be moved to Investigations. If it's only a few posts, then those will be split off. From now on, it's probably a good idea to create two threads for big scammers: one in Scam Accusations and one in Investigations.

From time to time there may be cases where it is very desirable to publish some results of an investigation. For example, if a class action lawsuit is filed, then the person's username should probably at least be publicly linked to the legal case so that other people can join in. For now, there is no uniform policy for this, and if you need to make some personal info public, post in Meta and we will deal with it on a case-by-case basis.


And as I said above, I don't believe I was the one who trashed it but I probably would have had it been reported or I came across it.

BTW, thanks for deleting the following post of mine. You're the man!

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Meanwhile, which mods do I have to suck off in getting this entity tagged as a scam? --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4486941.0. Or are they too fuckin busy tagging activity that's basically no count?

This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks.
1946  Other / Meta / Re: Why were threads about Stunna recently expunge from this forum and by whom? on: June 26, 2018, 04:27:34 AM
So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway?

In the trashcan, which any member of staff can see.
1947  Other / Meta / Re: Why were threads about Stunna recently expunge from this forum and by whom? on: June 26, 2018, 04:03:30 AM
Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to:

Remove thread thanks.

And I don't believe I trashed it, but good luck on your witch hunt.
1948  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! on: June 25, 2018, 08:46:30 PM
Thanks, suchmoon. Now it's time to get my dick wet with shit from sticking it up hilariousandco's ass some more ...

Congratulations, you've proved that you can get Gage to take a picture of himself which we've already established that. Funny how these are never instantaneous and come hours into the debate. You have to wait for Gleb to wake up or something?

Was just sent a PM which I'll reply here ...

Your accounts have been banned numerous times before. Care to tell me what the bans were for?

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

A couple of those bans I don't have a clue as to why I was banned. My recent ban pertained to this account for blasting PMs which I found on my own accord was a no-no, thus stopped the practiced but was banned ~2 weeks after the fact for the offense. Akin to stopping the practice of trying to sell my account for fear of what's happening now.

My first ban back in 2011 resulted in me founding the very first crypto-based charity - Bitcoin 100 - where not a single satoshi was misappropriated nor any of its Team members paid a single satoshi of their literally thousands of hours of work in advancing this space.

You really are an fool, aren't you? The real Gleb would have been able to tell me what the bans were for and you still can't. I'm not interested in your recent bans that whatever naive rando has taken over this account got banned for. I'm talking about the bans the real Gleb received, you know, the ones he would know about and you don't. Yet another nail in the coffin for me.

I'll give you a clue what one of them was for: You keep doing it in this thread hence why your post are getting deleted. 

And I'll say it again: read the rules, you know, the ones you we're previously banned multiple times for breaking.

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

Maybe that's why he's asking - to verify if YOU know if you're the real Bruno.

Bingo, but this guy obviously isn't very smart is he? Gleb has always been a buffoon but he wasn't this dumb.

Again, the account was attempted to be sold but nixxed the idea upon learning that such course of action would affect my cred, opting to go another route, i.e. sig campaigns. Then both course of actions were stuck up my ass. I was liking getting fuck up the ass till recently seeing that I was missing out, now fucking those up their ass who fucked me up my ass.

Is this not you essentially stating in your sales thread that selling an account effects credibility?
https://archive.is/Sk4PJ#selection-3023.0-2936.5

You also tell your potential buyers the accounts can be used for signature campaigns, so that "route" seems well known before you decided to sell. I can only imagine what changed your mind?  Regardless, you claim to have successfully sold 2 other accounts before deciding to go this other route...

I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice.

To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do.




I'm surprised I'm seemingly the only one who feels this way. Like Gleb or not, it's been proven he will sell or loan his accounts out for a few hundred bucks. For what it's worth, I don't think the guy who tried to sell the accounts or the person controlling the op account now is actually the real gleb though, but they are obviously in cahoots. Maybe greed just got to him and he wanted some of that tasty ICO money idiots are all to eager to spurge on, but either way I don't trust any account he is associated with due to all of this.
1949  Other / Meta / Re: Account name: , on: June 25, 2018, 08:10:39 PM
It was locked due to inactivity. The original owner is obviously long gone.
1950  Economy / Services / Re: [FULL] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | 0.00075 BTC/post on: June 25, 2018, 08:03:24 PM
No, you need a good/great posting history and seeing that most of your posts seem to be for collecting bounties I think your chances of getting a slot will be slim unless you drastically improve.
1951  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! on: June 25, 2018, 06:56:29 PM
Here's another thing that you can stick up my ass, ASSHOLE. I just now noticed that your a Global Moderator.

I'm on record in stating that I have no qualms with any admins or mods on this forum. Not anymore. I have major qualms with you, ASSHOLE.

No idea I'm a Global mod? You must be new here. This is almost certainly not Gleb/Gage. The more you talk the more I'm sure of it. Anyway, I have nothing else to add if you're just going to rant and rave like a lunatic.


There goes fucktard talkin' through his ass again. Yes, I may not know how DT thrust thingy works because ... wait for it, shit for brains ... I never participated in it before and had no reason to till now.

I've never used a buttplug either but I know how they work. You never seemed to react like this with all the other collective negative you recieved over your other various accounts.

-----

I would also suggest you read the rules and stop double posting needlessly.
1952  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! on: June 25, 2018, 06:32:53 PM
Luckily for me - unluckily for you - I've received PMs from users who are able, willing and ready to pounce on your once positive cred further.
Unfortunately, this won't have any noticeable effect for most users. I recommend reading up on the trust system and seeing what DefaultTrust of depth 1 and depth 2 means.

(Your feedback will show up as untrusted by 99.99% of forum members)

I think this is further evidence that this account belongs to someone else. I find it hard to believe he doesn't know how DT works. I really don't think the original Gleb/Gage would have behaved like this. Totally out of character.



There's not a motherfuckin thing I've done wrong to warrant this fucked up abuse.

You mean apart from the fact that you'll sell your soul accounts for a few hundred dollars? This alone is good enough reason to not trust any account associated with you.
1953  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! on: June 25, 2018, 05:47:52 PM
I was just about to comment on that:



This behaviour is pretty much exactly what you expect from every other scammer who gets busted before they can take money.

I also find it a little weird that someone who has been here as long Gleb/Gage wouldn't know who I was. I've also had previous interactions with both of them but those have seemingly slipped his mind. I think it's highly probable that whoever controls these accounts now is whoever Gleb/Gage went into business with (or loaned the accounts to) for this ICO.

Will the real Gleb please stand up?
1954  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! on: June 25, 2018, 05:28:44 PM
If anyone has lost their mind here it's you. You used the Gage account as colleteral and never paid the loan back, and then you tried to sell your Gleb account. I think it's highly likely the person controlling or posting from this account now isn't the original Gleb/Gage either. Given the fact that you will happily loan or try sell your accounts means that none of them can be trusted and this should be noted.

I'll refrain from calling you a stupid motherfuckin moron for a sec as I've declare once again that I, Bruno Kucinskas, is in COMPLETE MOTHERFUCKIN CONTROL of this and PG's account. If such is NOT the case, theymos has my permission to ban all my user accounts thanks to your fucked up noble efforts.

Bruno

What does any of this have to do with the fact that you 1) Used your original account as collateral and had no intention of paying it back, and 2) Tried to sell the other one? You saying "IM IN CHARGE OF THIS ACCOUNT" isn't sufficient proof of anything and regardless doesn't change the fact of point A or B, does it?

What fuckedup forum this is!  Shocked


I think Bruno made some enemies at the cabal for busting their altcoin scam pump and dumps in the past.

And it now looks like he's probably trying to do his own.
1955  Economy / Reputation / Re: Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!! on: June 25, 2018, 03:47:19 PM
If anyone has lost their mind here it's you. You used the Gage account as colleteral and never paid the loan back, and then you tried to sell your Gleb account. I think it's highly likely the person controlling or posting from this account now isn't the original Gleb/Gage either. Given the fact that you will happily loan or try sell your accounts means that none of them can be trusted and this should be noted.
1956  Other / Meta / Re: Banned account says 7 days but is banned from January on: June 25, 2018, 03:28:10 PM
I'm not sure what you were banned for but it's permanent. Do you have a screenshot of the ban?
1957  Economy / Reputation / Re: A Famous Bounty Manager Has Multi account on: June 25, 2018, 10:08:59 AM
riyad is permabanned so it's probably ban evasion more than anything.
1958  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Bitcointalk's English Premier League Football Pool |£25 to join Pot @ £425 on: June 25, 2018, 10:04:11 AM
bump
1959  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Bitcointalk's FIFA World Cup Pool Discussion Thread on: June 22, 2018, 04:32:06 PM
Nigeria are one nil up. I was going to go with 0-0 but went with 1-1 in the end so hoping for an equalizer from Iceland. It's been pretty even so far to be fair.

Spoke too early as they've just scored another.
1960  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Bitcointalk's FIFA World Cup Pool Discussion Thread on: June 22, 2018, 03:59:29 PM
I had 3-0 down. They've been very average so far.
Pages: « 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 [98] 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 ... 1016 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!