|
I think Bitcoin casino is the most popular gambling platform. It is better to gamble on Bitcoin. On the other hand, the gas fee for ether is comparatively very high so many people are not willing to play with this coin. In addition, the Etherium platform may not be available everywhere. Gamblers are not willing to gamble on any alt coin rather than bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Looking for more crypto casino options,used to play on stake but had kyc asked over,is there any that has absolutely 0% chance of that being asked ?
ps: if you are a winning player (i know its rare or impossible) or won a big jackpot on any crypto casino, i would like some tips if you can,i can pay for your time,my telegram is @ ellieljonzz
I'm afraid I can't name any casinos that don't require KYC, but I can assure you that I respect your desire for privacy and that KYC is only used by licensed casinos. So, even if you win more money, I doubt you'll be compensated on the unregulated ones. I wish you luck in your search for reputable companies that do not require KYC. If you are going to be a professional player and playing a large amount of money then you must do KYC. This is a rule because the government can ask for your information at any time. If you get a jackpot, you may have to pay percentage of your wining money to the government. This is no need for a ordinary player. There are also some other reasons why investors may take KYC. Your information may not be secure unless you must join a good platform before playing casino. Now a days people always try to be free that is why they are not willing to provide their personal information in any casino platform. |
|
|
|
I was also feeling this may be gone either way but after having end of fourth day and poor bowling from Kiwis now it's all ended in 3 - 0 for England's new captain and coach they can enjoy their first win and this could be big booster for them before last test match against India where now we have bad new Rohit Sharma is having Covid-19 and could be doubtful for test match with this it's big below for visitors and having good advantage for home team which is already enjoying good start after the worst end of Root's era.
Kiwis having no full time spinner is big problem for them because this could be good game changes, but they fail and now having more below in this whitewash series.
It will be very easy for the English batter to chase only 113 runs. I wasn't expecting such an appalling performance by NZ bowlers. After the dismissal of Mitchell I was hoping Blundell would take on the English bowlers but he too was having difficulty. The English side is completely different now after Ben stokes took over as a captain. This is a completely different team and after this test match win they will be unstoppable. English have a great chance of taking the series to 3-0 thanks to an unbeaten 132-run partnership between Pope and Root. The Kiwi bowlers looked helpless in all the fourth innings of the series, which ensure England another easy test victory. There is no doubt that this English team has become everyone's favorite. Having Brendon McCullum as the head coach and Ben Stokes as the test captain have paid off in the long run. There is nothing more courageous and entertaining than this English team. Currently, there is a rain delay going on. But England still has a lot of time to score the remaining runs. And I think the rain delay is the only thing that might cause a draw in this match. Otherwise, this match is also going to be a win for England. Unless the pitch is really favoring the bowlers after the rain delay. New Zealand bowlers start taking wickets really fast. That is the only way New Zealand might win this test match but it is still going to be a series loss for New Zealand. New Zealand is again proving that they are not the best test team when it comes to playing in away conditions. In cricket we often see rain interrupted matches. Last day India Ireland T20 match has been reduced due to rain. Anyway, we're already on the last day of the Headingley The equation is very simple. England need 113 more runs on the other New Zealand need 8 wickets. It will be very easy for England to win the match if the game continues. |
|
|
|
For a short-term effect, cooperation with managers who have a good reputation and a long history of work is certainly positive. But if the project hires an unknown manager (or some team member works instead of him) and at the same time all obligations are met on time, then for subsequent participants there is no difference who the manager is, since the work is established and carried out according to plan.
Those who work on bounty managing program on Bitcoin Talk can do well, if the casino owner think they will do better for his or her casino site that is wll. We know that it is a popular forum which is renowned all over the world. But first you have to see that your casino site is legit or not or in developing progress. After a deep observation bounty manager decide they should work or not. Over all i think it would be a great plane. I think this is a strategy. In a competitive business you must work with creative ideas otherwise it will be difficult to get success. |
|
|
|
India : Ireland
The first match of the two-match T20 series against Ireland is going to be held today. India won the toss and elected to bowl. But the match is being delayed due to rain. India should have batted first against Ireland and delivered huge targets. Ireland is not a very strong team. India should win the series by dominating. Maybe this match will be one-sided.
Ireland have done really well in terms of batting in the first match. They have scored a good amount of runs in just 12 overs. But we all know that India loves to Chase and Ireland is actually not a match for them. India is above multiple levels compared to Ireland. India eventually won the match really easily. Hopefully the next match will be competitive. Ireland is doing a great job. The last match Ireland relatively make good score. Tomorrow will meet them again. We have guessed what the result might be. India will win the two-match series. As Indian cricket is a great figure all over the world so they will try to control the mach very easily. |
|
|
|
~
With this format ODI could be died, and we will be able to have only these two formats which are good enough for staying in good shape Test matches and T-10 hopefully someone will give his own comments about this as well.
I am really happy to see T 10 as an entertainer as all the bowlers are taken for granted and the batsman keeps swinging the bat but i do not think that all the major teams will be taking on that. T20 is the best format for everyone who do not have time to enjoy the match, i do not want to see matches getting shorter and International teams playing that as it will be really hard to predict any matches.
India won the first match against Ireland pretty easily even though the match was reduced to 12 overs a side and this is the trend i am expecting in this series, unless Ireland proves otherwise  . I was really not thinking that Ireland would be so easy to defeat especially in the t20 format where games can be very unpredictable. Maybe the match getting reduced to 12 over a side would have had an impact on the performance, as it's easier for a team like India to adapt in these situations. But anyway it's just two matches I am treating it more like 2- tour matches before the beginning of the actual fighting series against England which really would be a real test for the Indian team both in t20 as well as ODI series. We didn’t see the 20 ovess in the first match. The game was reduced due to rain. Ireland lost 4 wickets for 122 runs in 12 overs and India reached the winning port in 9.2 overs for 3 wickets. There is no doubt that India will win the 2nd match but it cannot be given 100% guarantee. There is one more T20 match. Maybe the next match will be full 20 overs and would be more enjoyable. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: GigaBit
Current post count (Including this one): 492
bech32 BTC Address: bc1qvg460swwj806hyluscg7gxkaw6ndts6cckhrw8
Merit in the last 120 days: 20
Sir still 1x available, replying to reapply your lucrative campaign. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: GigaBit
Current post count (Including this one): 501
bech32 BTC Address: bc1qvg460swwj806hyluscg7gxkaw6ndts6cckhrw8
Merit in the last 120 days: 20
|
|
|
|
~
Bangladesh team has been able to improve a lot in ODIs. Maybe if they can go this way or they can win the ODI World Cup
The odds for Bangladesh winning the World Cup will be over 100  . LOL.. seriously. According to my calculations, the odds of Afghanistan winning the world cup is much better than that from Bangladesh. The Bongs have constantly underperformed since they got the test status in 1999. The only quality player they have produced over all these years is Shakib al Hasan, and he is in and out of the team due to issues with the cricket board. Litton Das has shown some promise, but he is not quite there. And the board has not shown any interest in revamping the domestic system, which is the root cause of all these issues. I don't know why I can't find any rhythm among the players of Bangladesh. Especially after Mashrafe Murtuza's move away from cricket, there is no interest in Bangladesh cricket. Meanwhile, the psychological interaction of the players with BCB does not seem to be very good. Bangladesh cricket also has many records. They have the power to defeat any countries of the world and there have some legendary figures as well but all in all, their current situation is not satisfactory. |
|
|
|
I think it's really hard to trust a gambler with your money, i had access before to some money that belong to my brother and I used it to gamble and get a profit multiple times and of course I lost half of it once and I had to find ways to give the money back, from this experience I find it hard for me to even trust myself with other people's money, so in my opinion, you can't trust a drug addict with drugs and you can't trust a gambler with your money.
It depends on the gamblers themselves because if they can stop gambling or at least be responsible for themselves and not use other people's money, we can try to believe it. But it's hard to give trust to people who have wronged us and it takes time. Maybe the person who has wronged us should try to correct himself first before accepting the trust of others. Everyone has the right to get a second chance but it depends on how much intention that person has to change for the better. All gamblers are not equal, we cannot judge all gamblers are bad and do not deserve to be given the opportunity to manage money. I think it's just an addicted gambler, which we absolutely shouldn't give any chance to manage money. I agree with you, a person who can be responsible for himself, can always control himself when gambling. To be honest, I have a friend who always gambles whenever he has free time, but his finances remained stable and did not lack money to meet daily needs. This means that my friend is a responsible gambler, he can limit the money to gamble. Usually based on the results of my research, most responsible gamblers always know when it is time to stop gambling and are not obsessed with winning. So responsible gamblers deserve to be given the opportunity to control other people's money. Gambling should never be taken as a income source. Most of the times gambler never control his mind as a result he lost his assets. It should be considered as entertainment otherwise nothing. If a gambler is not desperate then no problem but if he is addicted in any way he would be irresponsible one, there will have no perfection. Addicted gamblers can never keep their commitment, especially financial issue. |
|
|
|
The case with Emirates such as Sharjah, Abu Dhabi and Dubai is different from what we have in countries such as Canada and the United States. In the UAE, the ruling class splurge a lot of money in cricket and the huge expat population also supports the activity. But in countries such as the United States, the government agencies are not very enthusiastic about cricket, and the main reason is that cricket is not an Olympic sport. In UAE, they don't care much about revenues and profits, but those in North America don't have that luxury.
Cricket seems to be a game of 3rd world countries Most of the countries of the world don't accept cricket. But still it is appreciable because people have a strong interest in cricket. We know that this game has already started in several countries as new. Hopefully in the near future more countries will start this game and we will have good cricket. |
|
|
|
I guess these technicalities will come mainly from Broadcaster but it's correct that BCCI won't able to move anything on this for next 4-5 years.
Punters are going to love this "Mystery free hit"
I am not a big fan of T10. It horrifies me. But if the youngsters want it, then T10 may become the face of cricket in less than a decade. Although the T10 cricket format is a very short form of cricket , I did not find much attraction here. I think T20 format is better for short form of cricket and this format doesn't attract young people at the moment. Over all T20 is the best. |
|
|
|
|
England tries to keep New Zealand under pressure from the start. Broad, in particular, took two wickets easily which limited the opponent's run. A total of 5 wickets have fallen so far but New Zealand have got an attempt to turn around. Daryl Mitchell, Tom Blundell are doing great. A competitive match is expected.
|
|
|
|
So I was reading this article where a recent study showed that 71% of online gambling merchants have reported an increase in promotion abuse over the past year. After surveying 1,700 fraud and payment professionals based at online gambling platforms, the study found that 62% of all types of online merchants had suffered an increase in fraud over the past 12 months. These operators detailed significant impacts on revenue as a result of online fraud.
Promotional offers are a common tactic employed by online gambling platforms to attract customers; such offers include loyalty rewards, sign-up bonuses and free bets.
Savvy players make use of multiple accounts and different IP addresses to exploit these promotions, finding loopholes that result in heavy financial losses for the companies targeted.
Another form of fraud that has seen an increase is online payment fraud, with 67% of merchants reporting a rise in payment details being taken from customer accounts. The high traffic of the websites involved can make it difficult for companies to clamp down on fraudulent activity. I was sitting and wondering, there will always be bad actors in online gambling but who is to blame, the customers/fraudsters or the gambling merchants? Are the customers/fraudsters getting tech-savvy or are the gambling merchants getting complacent in checking and testing their website for loopholes? Don't these online gambling operators anticipate these frauds while building their websites? Why don't they invest in a robust fraud detection system before the fraud happens and not after? I ask again who is to blame for the increase in bonus abuse, the customers/fraudsters or the online gambling operators? Gambling sites always offer different types of bonuses. There are various reasons why they can give you bonuses like they can give you bonuses on deposits. Can give referrals so that their users will be increased etc. If you can do it with some difficult conditions then you will not get the bonus. However, there are very few people I have met who can qualify that bonus. But I would say that it is always abused most of the time. |
|
|
|
I like it if one concern is to prohibit kids go into the premises of these gambling places.
For those who directly legitimize gambling, this is an upgraded system where they can get more tracks or other benefits from the government of that particular country. One more thing that can be done here is to prevent underage people from running away. Only licensees can avail this facility. However, privacy issues can be a bit confusing. |
|
|
|
I agree that sometimes it's better to lose because it discourages us from playing. In the case of a win, our hunger for winning increases and it is certain that in the log run we will lose much more than we have won.
I fully support your statement. I myself was once addicted to this gambling. I thought I might not be able to give it up anymore. Most of the time i lost my money. As I was losing continuously, I had a question raised in my mind that is why i am abusing my money? It has no return. I was annoyed because I deposit and then lost my assets. when I was able to bring myself under control, my addiction disappeared. It is true that if you have greediness then you must be lost your all assets in gambling. |
|
|
|
England V Netherlands
An ODI match between England and the Netherlands is being held now at Amstelveen. After winning the toss, the Netherlands decided to bowl. And England lost the wicket of Jason Roy by just 1 run. But now England is in a good position. England scored 59 runs in 9 overs. And my guess is that England will have set a target of over 330 today if they don't lose wickets very quickly.
England have scored 498 runs in which is the highest score in the history of ODI cricket. The previous record was also belongs to England. However, the previous highest score against with Australia and today Netherlands. Although the Netherlands is a relatively small team according to the England team position on the cricket field. However, it will be very difficult for any other team to break this record. |
|
|
|
|
Username: GigaBit
Post count: 483
BTC address (SegWit): bc1qvg460swwj806hyluscg7gxkaw6ndts6cckhrw8
Merit in the last 120 days: 20
|
|
|
|
|
The position of investors towards Luna is at the bottom. Luna 2.0 has been launched at around $17 and after the price has gone up again it is $4 and $5. I think it's just an attempt to avoid liability. The Luna authority has created such a big scam and is now creating another currency in name only to show people. Investors also do not want to move towards Luna trap once again.
|
|
|
|
|
The only purpose of investing in new coins is to make large number of profit in a short period of time. But investing in new coins is more risky. Sometimes I see new coins being in big pumping events then only when the bubble bursts we have to lose resources. Here luna can be one example of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
