These exchanges each have there uniqueness, but Forkdelta is the odd one here because it is a decentralized exchange in its own class and while binance and bancor can be seen to be classic and traditional exchanges they also have their puculiarities. Bancor basically provide easy liquidity to tokens by offering interchanges between all supported token pairs but at a fixed rate, binance provides a more regular exchange service of great trading volume and support large number of coins but with limited exchange pairs. So, for ease of use I go for binance.

Only cryptocurrency will break geo-economic barriers and bring about balanced prosperity around the world.  Many more economically backward nations will some get this fact and join the crypto train.

I agree with you. Knowledge everything to both the beginner and the seasoned. As a beginner I made so many costly mistakes that I can only look back and wish I knew better.

This question is more like why do I breath out after breathing in? Buying and selling coins is at the core of the crypto market and I do both to keep alive and remain relevant.

As the world's 2 biggest economies tackle each other in a trade war that could lead to what may become the biggest shakeup and re-alignments in global trade order, are we likely to see new funds flow into the cryptocurrency market from the commerce and trade sectors?

If we all stay away from ICOs how would startups raise funds, and how would coins ever make it to the exchange? Airdrops are not so safe either.

Besides new wallets and scam ICOs, bounty hunters and airdrop chasers should check very carefully before participating in such campaigns. Scammers are now more than ever using airdrops as baits for hacking and phishing. Please avoid any airdrop that gives direct link to your MEW or other wallet account. You may end up on a scam wallet site.

There are many exchanges springing up these days giving token traders the freedom of choice, and at the same time making it hard to find the right exchanges for specific coins. The ideal solution would be a wallet that gives the ability to inter-swap all the tokens it supports. I know of a certain project promishng that possibility, but I can't recall which one it is.

I don't understand why nations reject bitcoins when it should be embraced as the perfect financial instrument to democratize any economy, which is what I think India needs. Bitcoins is really huge, rejecting it means missing out on something big and accepting it means taking in something really big. So, let the Indian authorities act wisely.

I just imagine how urgly I would look in my angry state and change my mind.

I just discovered this wonderfull project. I just registered for the signature campaign and would like to check the spreadsheet. Please, where can I find it?

The concept of project is ok and promising. I look forward to a succesful ICO and listing on the exchange.

Sir, please help re-audit my twitter account.
Twitter handle: @kingsalight
Twitter url: https://www.twitteraudit.com/kingsalight

Thank you.

Hi mods, instead of sending postcards which takes days or even weeks to verify why not use utility bills or other document to verify addresses?

I was paid all honestly!
[/quote]

Honestly?

What the OPEN team just did is clearly against the principle of natural justice. Taking from each man according to his ability and giving to each man according to his labour is fair recompense but, the OPEN team has taken from us even beyond our individual abilities and have given to the investors according to their needs.

I have read the announcement carefully and I see no iota of fairness in the  decisions taken by the OPEN tean with regards to bounty rewards. They are rather most unfair and unjust. It is like robbing Peter to pay Paul, and all for their own interest.

It is kind of commn these days for bounty administrators to delay token distribution way beyond stated timelines on some execuses, the most common being "we've got so much work to do". Unfortunately, they "reserve the right" to do anything including changing bounty rules or outright suspenrion of Token payments. Any responsible project should be able to abide by stated obligations no matter what, or promptly provide information to clarify bounty participants of any genuine, unavoidable delays. Afterall, timelines are integral objects of contracts.

Shouldn't we rather accept the merit system and move on? Merit has come to stay for the best interest of this community as proposed by Admins. Thankfully, Merit is instilling sanity in the forum. But just like any other rules the full purpose of the Merit system can only be realized through effective, fair and balanced implementation. Despite the good intentions behind the Merit system it has a  major challenge which is the lack of objectivity in the award of merits. In other words whether or not a post or comment deserves a Merit point is at the discretion of the giver. OK, a really, really good post deserves some Merit points, but most times you come across some Merit winning posts and you can't help but ask: What really passes for a really, really good post? So long as the award of Merit points is subject to the personal judgement of the giver Merits can't be said to be a true measure of the responsibleness of a member or the quality of his/her posts, and is open to abuse for the same reason.