no
First. I didn't know these were stolen coins
Second. We still don't know if they are really stolen, I'm just speculating here, I'm just wondering who would sell hundreds of thousands of bitcoins sub 300?
Third. if it's really a theft what do you want me to do? send back the 50 btc and don't get the cash back? so that the hacker will be able to sell more bitcoins to other people?
you are trying to accuse me but I can't do anything in this situation anymore
the only thing I can is denounce the username of the guy and the irc channel to authorities, but I'm not sure because :
- do you think authorities will care? bitcoin isn't a currency in my country and I can't tell I was scammed because I did receive the coins
- the hacker was probably hiding with tor or something or using an infected computer

no I am not that is why I will not disclose irc details and username of the guy, I will only give that to authorities or people who are able to do something about it

I'm sure / hope you are right.

Its probably down to my inability to pick stable companies to deal with! I thought with the likes of Andreas at the helm of Blockchain.info it would be bomb proof

Ive been Goxxed, and im nervous maybe

I need to relax!

I had to become a "newbie" here so I could explain my case to all,  and as a last resort to recover my funds.
I did not have any other choice after waiting since last December for answers and a solution from CampBX staff to my issue.

A "smear"? Not in my case.
If anybody is interested, I can document everything about my case.
My BTC deposits to CampBX, my buying of dollars, my successful withdrawals, etc.
You can easily see that there were 3 failed transfers to my Bank account that never went through and were never returned to my CampBX account.

I did contact Mr Keyur via a PM on this forum about 2 monts ago, before going public.
He responded promptly and assured me to see my case immediately:
That was 2 months ago... 
See more about my case here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514176.0

It is not my intention to tarnish anybody's reputation "just for fun", but what do you do after over 3 months of your issue being ignored and not resolved?
By shutting up and taking it, I'm not helping myself or anybody else. Unfortunately I had to speak out.

Yes, I am a newbie here but I'm also a real person that has been affected by CampBX unresponsiveness to customer problems and have lost real money because of it.
I lost hope from recuperating any of my loss from CampBX, so take whatever suits you from my experience and hope it helps anybody.

Regards to all from a real "newbie",

Rodrigo Fernández
Sistemas Edenia Internacional, S.A.
5to piso Edificio Trifami
Ave. 1 , Calle 2 , San José, Costa Rica 006-1000
T: +506-2256-3944 | F: +506-2256-3739
USA Toll free: 1-877-506-0579
www.crservers.com

Should we institute something like the Better Business Bureau for Bitcoin companies?

Companies sign up on the BCBB website and allow users to post any problems they have had with the company along with any resolutions.

The company pays the site for accreditation, users get to check out a company before using them and the decent companies get more users.


(I would say just go with BBB but they are not international, and they may not understand how Bitcoin companies work)

I am trying to list the wise the decisions made by Satoshi. Can you help me list some more?

• He used two rounds of hashing in the nonce finding process so as minimize the risk of SAT solving the nonce at higher difficulties
• He used the elliptic curves which were luckily not the problematic curves suggested NSA
• He made the transaction scripting language non-Turing complete so as to avoid very hard to detect security risks (like escaping the interpreter to root the underlying OS and weird cases of halting problem like having an SPV client embedded in the transaction script)
• He made the Bitcoin divisible into 100 million satoshis so as to avoid the Capitol Hill Babysitting Cooperative problem with deflationary currencies.
• His initial code release was remarkably free of buffer overflows, and other security vulnerabilities