test -- test:

is this the WO- or the NWO-thread now?



BTW: Hash Rate is picking up speed.

 

Alts got hammered, because people are afraid of a bitcoin downturn.

They will recover, if bitcoin continues its upward movement (which it most likely will, because of the rising Hash Rate).


Let there be Lite!!

Hash Rate is picking up pace...

May the force be with you .




and every rose has its Thorne.

That's the spirit!!

          

For Madam!!!


 

This she-wolf in little red riding hood's clothes has a message for you.:



                                                                   



Buy! Buy! Buy!

 

Well ... can't deny this feels like standing on deck of a sinking ship, watching and waiting for the final wave to take it down.


... never mind, I just hope to reincarnate as a whale. 

taken from Startcoin ANN:
TrueAnon bashing START (at around 2200) sat on august 30.:



again bashing START (at around 2000 sat) on september 21.:



and then when START hit 4000 sat on october 20 (yesterday).:



you really funny guy...
 

I voted for bittrex.

Although I would like to see TRC back on btc-e, I think it is better to first gain some traction elsewhere.

BTC-e delisted terracoin on their own, so they should also decide by themselves to relist it, when time has come...


BTW: Great wallet - works flawlessly for me.

regarding 1.:
I think most people don't set up masternodes, because they have to allow incoming connections. Changing the amount of NEOS for setting up a masternode will probably not change the situation.

regarding 2.:
around 550,000 NEOS per year will be created with the current reward schedule. That is already pretty high considering the total amount of NEOS existing. Instead of increasing the supply, I would be in favour of gradually decreasing the reward (say something like halving the reward every year, or every 550,000 blocks).

regarding in-wallet trading:
probably not worth the effort. I know that I will not use it.


Just an opinion ...

... btw, I like the new POS wallet and I was positively surprised when you announced the continuation of development.


Best of luck for the future of this coin.

OK, I will out myself as an SD-card-on-a-RPi-staker.
I am running my wallet with a SANDISK-ultra on a RPi2 24/7 for over a year and without any problems.
I do backup the data directory as a zipped tar-archive from time to time (the wallet should be backed up anyways - whether HD or SD).

The SANDISK card is quite foregiving with powerfailures - though I had only one in the last year - but no corruption of the card after rebooting.

But there are a few things, that should be done before running the wallet.:

- completely deinstall dphys-swapfile - one could only deactivate it, but after rebooting swapping would be active again.
Swapping is a bad idea, at least on an SD-card, because when your memory gets exhausted and the card starts swapping data, it only furthers the slowdown until at a certain point your wallet cannot stay synced and either shuts down or gets unresponsive and you need to kill the process. It could also get worse and your hole system gets unresponsive and you need to pull the power-plug to shut it down and reboot.
So if you would need to swap on your SBC, because memory gets exhausted, you better use a SBC with more accessible memory instead of using a swapfile.

-I use a minimal installation (Raspbian minimal for the RPi) and compile the daemon, not the qt-wallet.
Lesser processes means lesser read/write cycles.

-When starting the daemon, I use '-printtoconsole > /dev/zero'. There is ofcourse no log at all, but that is exactly what I want anyways.


I do not intend to give advice to run your wallet as I do.
I just want to say, that I will continue running my wallet from SD-Card. If you are running from a HD, there is barely an advantage in using a SBC over a PC, because power consumption of your HD will probably be more than double the consumption of your SBC.
So you could as well use a PC for staking.

Thanks for reading,
 

my chinese source told me this:

4444.44 * 666.666 = 6.¯6

consequential:


- USD/CNY will be adjusted to 6.667 for at least 3 months, 2 weeks and 2 days after the halving.

- after 3m,2w,2d bitcoin price will:             - either soar to 4444.44 USD
                                                                     - or drop to 666.666 CNY, then drop to 23.777 USD, and finally implode to 000.000 EUR



Questions that remain unanswered:           - when did proudhon sell his BTCT account?
                                                                     - can rationality be smoothed out?
                                                                     - why do I feel so bored after posting in this thread?


thank you very much, have a nice day ...

btc-e ?

If bitcoin price is stable for longer, people need to pump altcoins to make profits. - right?

here's mine:





 

not really, ... seriously, ... not.

OK, thx for your reply.
So maybe I get something completely wrong, but I built vericoind without UPnP support and I thought I have to forward the port manually - if not, what is UPnP good for?

BTW I didn´t wonder about the 0.7 VRC being too little, but about the coins that were staking before and are now shown in "balance" and not in "stake" - I thought they would stay on stake all the time.

OK. Thank you very much for your answer.

So then my next silly question would be: Should I forward port 58684 and not 58683 in my router? Or do I not need to forward any port at all?

By the way, over night I generated 0.7 VRC with 1000 VRC staking. But today there are no coins staking at all and I got 1000.7 VRC shown in balance. Is this normal? Will the coins automatically stake again after some time?

Again sorry for the silly questions, any answers are much appreciated.

so we are at around 380 again?

Hope 380 - 450 range will hold for the rest of the year. Maybe then a new rally in early 2015.

Until then I am still waiting on the sideline - watching only, not touching

Cheers 

ok, so I installed vericoind on my raspberry-pi.
It is build without UPnP support - RPC-Port 58683 is forwarded manually.

It is running for a few days now, but no coins are on stake (in the wallet are 1000 VRC).

I checked the connections with and it seems like I do not get any connections on port 58683. (I have 5+ connections to peers at 58684 though.)

Sometimes the following line is included in the output:


So it seems the connection gets terminated on my side, but why?

Sorry if the question is silly, maybe there are other reasons, why the coins do not stake.(?) - any suggestions/answers are much appreciated.

EDIT: I have my coins staking now - but I still do not get connections at port 58683.

Hi guys,

I am just taking a short break from my break to show that I am still supporting Vericoin.

Soo, a few comments from me:

@effects: great job, Vericoin is positively back in the news and continues on its path towards the main goals
                (ease of use, mainstream adoption).

@buy4crypto: I can feel your struggle   ... I think you are (rightfully to a certain extent) too negative on the
                       development. I also think you became negative because of the recent price drop (which is maybe
                       still not over yet) and not so much because of the developers´ action/inaction.
                      
                       So please don´t follow the dark side and come back ... maybe not now, but in a few weeks.

@altcoinUK: Well bro, I have a feeling, that you are already lost to the dark side of BobPlop and gang. Your point of
                  view regarding importance of blockchain2 is simply wrong. Vericoin does not need
                  blockchain2 on itself. It can use existing platforms like ripple, stellar and what else is going to get
                  realized on this field. I feel like you are just annoyed, that your point does not get the dev´s and
                  community´s attention you had hoped for.
                
Vericoin is a virtual currency first and it is the goal to promote it as such. For example: Ripple is promoted as a transfer platform and not as a currency, the same with Ethereum. Stellar is just a Mcaleb Ripple clone with (allegedly) better distribution of the platform´s internal currency. If someone wants to invest in blockchain2, simply do it. But blockchain2 integration into vericoin is simply a waste of resources.

We should focus on the wallet right now. Security for minting, something like Peerbox would be great and will help to strengthen the network. If you need to clone it, do it and give credits to Peercoin´s Peerchemist.


Uh, ah ... a last word from me on the new developer:

1. I hope it is not one of the blackcoin guys.  
2. If the goal is to bring Vericoin to a higher price level, by hiring a new dev, I am against it. If the goal is to
    actually improve the wallet and to ease the workload of the three devs I would say yes. So because we know
    how drkman announced the man, I am against it.  

EDIT: spelling