So, is there any ETA for the deliverables. I understand you can't hit the finer details from the post above, but are we looking at second quarter or sometimes next year? Also, what jurisdiction are your targeting for compliance?

There are mostly two ways to scam folks in crypto, Mr. Brand New Account that just happened to stumble on this ANN:

1. Ask for money upfront to develop hot air
2. Dump hot air on buyers through exchanges

The first is gradually becoming easy to detect. So, most scammers are now going through the "faux-selfless" second route where it looks like they are building something, then dumpo. Slap on a popular brandname you don't own and the chances of it catching the eye increases

It's sad to see another gig on the blockchain project bite the dust again. If I was a superstitious man, I'd say there was a curse somewhere (well with all the rampant exit scam and community letdown, it's quite possible). But I think it's down to the fact that none of them has no competitive edge or even a plan for market penetration in the first place

Deadpool is a copyright/licensed character. Do you have the license/approval to use such?

It's nearly always all funs and games until you're not only hit with a C&D, but also infringement of copyright and who knows how much $$$ the house of M is going to valuate that infringement at

While it's laudable that we keep seeing startups popping up to try and wrestle back our data from GAFA (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple), it simply hasn't worked out yet. So, what makes this attempt any different from what Data, Databroker, and even Bitclave had attempted previously (not even going to list those that have fizzled out along the way)

All documentation seems to be inaccessible - WP, summary, 1 and 2 pagers - just keeps spinning and spinning. Nothing to read. Trying to weigh the team's approach to betting and esport that makes this different from what others have tried implementing

Had me tripping on my shoelaces for a minute there. Thought it was a privacy crypto and was taken aback when I saw the money for youtuber comment.

Talk about amateur hour. Sheer desperation and a stark lack of vision or direction. Anybody buying this is better off flushing their funds down the toilet

I'm never the smartest guy in the room, so I'm just gonna ask anyway: How do you ensure privacy for data being stored on the network. Last time I checked, Golem and SONM seems to be in a tussle about how to ensure data privacy if someone like Disney wants to store the files for Yoda Jr's saga.

Also, how does this decentralized internet differs from Sentivate's version?

Yeah. Their entire investment portfolio seems to have gone south. I remember when I saw the voyager announcement and was asking if it was not only ambitious, but based on their recent acquisition of non-performing assets, also impractical. Now, they seem to be trying to build something that they can piggyback of existing publicity.

Then, we have the obvious red flags (other than the parent company name ofc): 


Target price by who? Driven by what?

Have I seen proof of an NDA? You're being rhetorical, right? NDA = Non-Disclosure Agreement. So, you want to see proof of something that can't be disclosed

Great, amazapants!

I've worked with NDAs and know how infuriating they can be. Maybe you should. You also, sort of, complimented the team for doing what they should be doing anyway. Delivering the codes for what they proposed to build in their WP. Didn't see PR or News in the documentation they used for funding though.

But I understand the anger.

Nobody wants to see their funds lose 10x it's initial value just because they put it into xyz coin rather than another. Becomes much more painful when everything from A to W appreciates in value and xyz just seems to be doing the opposite. I was angry at another project for doing the same, until I realized that I could have DCA over the 4 months I spent ranting at it. About 14 months later (last week), it went 7x. With my DCA, got out at around 4x. 14 months is a long time to wait for most folks, but they kept delivering the codes and networking with what looks like the right people to use it, so I held. My getting out wasn't because "muh lambo", it was simply because I expected a correction and wanted to be able to rebuy without regretting how much I could be having if I had sold the top - a painful experience from yet another crypto.

Bottom line is you have the right to be angry - emotional, but when has that helped anybody in crypto?

Come on, mate. That's hard to swallow. You mean someone employed a head of content/communication without vetting them and even after they published "official" company documentation publicly, none of the team members capable of remotely reading the language raised any concern? I can understand being busy to read banner and third-party PR stuff, but website and WP?

Need water to swallow this - a whole lake of it

lmao. Negative feedback due to a single post? If everything was kosher, there wouldn't be any need to worry. Sadly with these folks, things are rarely as cleancut as they peddle it, hence the panicking at the disco when the narrative looks like branching out.

Doubt they can comply with any regulations though. Regulators hate the "horse before the cart" approach. You have to have consulted and received the greenlight from them first before announcing to the world. Not gonna happen with this one

Ok, this is a mess to read. Thought it was just the usual ANN getting lost in translation by a third-party, but then it turned out the ANN was lifted from the website which, in turn, was lifted from the WP - glorious emoji inclusive. I've seen five years old write better - and no, not native English speaker either.

Nothing makes sense here

You're right about the marketing ploy. I was caught up on the QC hype too, hopping from one project to the next, trying to connect all the doomsday scenarios they were painting and how to avoid them in one fell swoop. Then, came across an article that explained it as it really works.

Bad news folks. BTC too is quantum-resistant if you don't reuse the same address. Feels like I've been had

I think the NDA is likely to be more binding on Dusk than Bitfinex. Bitfinex was likely trying to drum up justification for the partnership - also, STOs was quite the hotcake around that period and everyone was trying hard to sell it out

Guess it goes to prove the fallacy in the tokenization of everything mania that's been sweeping the industry. Just because you blockchained it doesn't mean people will hope on board and abandon existing business relationship just because "blockchain"

Amazing what a "mere" site revamp can do to a product. The product suddenly feels accessible and less daunting to "consume". The usecase presentation right off the site's front page immediately draws one into the product, while explaining what it's all about

Quite the roadmap that is. So what happens when he goes back to sleep? It all falls apart as his head hits the pillow stuffed with the exit scam funds?

Can't fault him for being upfront about it, but this is starting to feel like the 90s again and script kiddies trying to nail down some bragging rights

Let's hope this year truly becomes the year of launches for CARD. Given, development takes time. However, CARD's seems to be a tad bit more hard-hitting than most probably due to communication or catering to the wrong community. Hopefully this will turn around with the releases

Can't wait for NYM to finally take off. Been following this for a few months now... the wait's getting harder, though the steady stream of updates had softened the wait a bit. Good things take a while they say and NYM seems to be making all the right moves