|
Good afternoon. If we succeed the use of Mooncoin in real economy, then we will see many positive surprises about its price in future.
|
|
|
|
Hello friends of the Moon, I come to bring the weekly feedback that I promised to you, I'm sorry to post just now night because I had a severe headache today and slept most of the day.
11/03/2018 Meeting between members Heitor Messias, Guilherme Castro and Pedro Castro. (Heitor via Mobile)
12/03/2018 Submission of merchan remaining material with the old logo and old site to Japan, less than 10usd shipping, this old logo is still widely used in Japan.
03/12/2018 Meeting between members Heitor Messias, Guilherme Castro and Anthoni Souza. (Heitor via Mobile)
03/14/2018 Order made by Heitor Messias of Material to be used in the campaign of commercial adoption with new blue half moon logo. (Heitor via Mobile)
03/17/2018 Merchan's materials ready and delivered.
Subjects discussed
* As soon as it would be used by the team Mooncoin Brazil, it was decided that we will use the logo of half moon blue without modifications. and also the logo
of TibiaMooncoin that respects the blue half moon logo and will be a 100% Brazilian server.
* A very important subject debated was the issue of commercial adoption, we intend to use the platform cointopay and the last available wallet, from the
next week we will do a series of tests with the available platforms to evaluate the stability and the best form of use by the trades.
* Guilherme Castro It will make available its company of the branch "business online" and its time so that the merchants exchange MoonCoin by fiat of form easily and fast,
and instead of negative rates such as credit or debit card, positive rates after the exchange. stipulated value for merchants who accept Mooncoin 10% + cash per Mooncoin exchange.
* Upgrades In the mooncoin.com.br site already requested and already on the way, maybe when you read this message the upgrades are already on the air, such as links exchanges,
links of Facebook Mooncoin Brasil recently created and link of twitter Mooncoin Brasil.
All members of Mooncoin Brasil Have a permanent job and we are Mooncoin members. I am talking about the entrance of new members of the team Mooncoin Brasil
so that we can begin to adopt measures for the implementation of the currency in the local society.
actions for the next week:
* photograph all members with the new merchan shirt one by one as it is difficult to gather everyone as I have already said. (HD Photography)
* we will try to put a gallery with the images of the members of Team Mooncoin Brazil, this action may not be ready next week because it is necessary to photograph
all members before making the gallery. at most 2 weeks the gallery will already be ok at mooncoin.com.br
* test with all platforms that currently accept mooncoin to structure a good method of commercial use in Brazil.
* Official invitation of one more staff member to support legal issues before commercial adoption.
next Saturday more news MoonCoin from Brazil
remaining material from the old logo sent to Japan
new material to be used by MoonCoin Brazil team with updated logo and links
 Android mobile wallet Il giorno 17 mar 2018, alle ore 23:18, Satowallet Listing < listing@satowallet.com> ha scritto: Hello Good day, Thank you for choosing to list with Satowallet. Our team have looked into your project and will be able to provide full support for your project within 7 days of standard listing payment. We will also be glad to assist with any upcoming development that your project may have, upon prior notice. Payment Address: 38ayLphMhdDXitxH95DUYJwUcmGBg1FafF Payment Amount: 0.1BTC After node compilation. you will be required to sen test deposit into wallet address we will provide to you. Best Regards TXID 4b1419ad4be97ab58f263f07913a4c8d5ba3b45b3be8629b5d4492d47f47a7d9  Good afternoon ! Thank you for your work ! I say it again: Mooncoin will be one of the big protagonists in 2018 !  |
|
|
|
Let's think long term about Mooncoin:
people know that technically Mooncoin works fine.
The network hashrate is growing, the speed of transactions will be growing, a new code contains SegWit, fast syncronising from scratch feature etc, a new diff readjustment algo that will make transactions faster.
Remember that having SegWit enables Mooncoin the access to the Lightning network (solving scalability issues) and smart contract features.
I'd not agree with people who were saying that MoonWord and SmartLikes or other projects on top of Mooncoin blockchain were not needed.
We all understand that Mooncoin must have real use in the future.
The question is how do you see this real use? Micropayments? Currency? But some governments don't want to allow crypto payments.
Experts say Bitcoin is an asset/commodity like gold. With Mooncoin, more interesting things (than with Bitcoin) could be done potentially.
In which way? Mooncoin is adjusted for fast and small transactions. They could be used for interesting projects like MoonWord, Smart Likes, other projects on top of blockchain, smart contracts after all.
That would be REAL USE. Interesting projects on top of blockchain, not just payments. If Mooncoin becomes a recognised coin/platform for scientific and social progress, there is a lot of opportunities, it's more interesting than a currency for regular payments which almost no one is using in real life and that could be banned by governments that wouldn't want to allow payments in not traditional currencies.
The main argument from some governments against crypto now is that crypto doesn't serve any socially useful function.
Let's make Mooncoin be truly socially useful. Then their argument will not work.
With projects on top of Mooncoin blockchain, that will help scientific and social progress (even if just little at the beginning, not sending expeditions to Moon or Mars and not solving all world problems at once),
Mooncoin can become a recognised coin, oriented for helping progress, e.g. for educational purposes like Evangelo suggested in the past.
And not only for educational purposes. It can be (for example) promoting of existing or new good scientific and social ideas, initiatives, small or medium projects - with help of Mooncoin blockchain (without bloating it, of course).
That is what SmartLikes can be used for (other than for liking anything with SmartLikes).
Good afternoon ! If we work all Mooncoin supporters and holders together, then we can do miracles...! |
|
|
|
Hi all.
Some good news for a change.
One of the Telegram community has been working on a Mac wallet for Mooncoin.
Final testing is going on just now and hopefully the wallet will be available very soon.
Thanks to Michi for all her hard work on this.
Hey guys. As mark said - Just finished some tests on the Mac mooncoin build. A little background - I've actually been here for a long time (under the username 'michi' - but my account got disabled in the hack; I'm trying to get it back.) So a little bit on the usual trust issue: My background comes from close dev ties with the Dogecoin team, and the source changes I made to make this work are there on my fork of the mooncoin wallet on Github. If you want to know any of my history feel free to ask the Dogecoin community - and you can take a look at my history on Reddit's /r/mooncoin (going back to 2013) and /r/dogecoin - under the user /u/michidragon . (most of the legwork was getting it to compile.) I was only able to test it under El Capitan so far, but it looks like it's working. Remember to add nodes from here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/#!network - into your 'mooncoin.conf' to bootstrap things faster. Here's the release: https://github.com/michilumin/mooncoincore-wallet/releases/tag/0.13.9-segwit-MacOSFixI've marked it as pre-release, because who knows what could be lurking, but I've done a few transactions back and forth and it all looks good from here. Good afternoon ! Thank you Michidragon for your efforts ! |
|
|
|
If you hear accusations (related to Mooncoin or to anything/anyone else), you can easily test if you are a newbie or not. A newbie believes everything. A person with some experience 1) asks a simple question Cui prodest? (for whose benefit?). Also 2) does a research and 3) asks for a proof. Let's discuss possible attack vectors against Mooncoin. First of all, security of network depends on a price. Lower price means less network hashrate and less security. Obviously the possible attack vector is to drop a price - then a network hashrate will drop. If a price is less than 1 Satoshi, then Mooncoin is a subsatoshi coin, not listed at big exchanges, again less security for investors. You realise that when a price rises, it means that investors see positive things. A lot of time, work, talents and other people's contribution is needed for making a price rise. It's a big work of the whole community. A price rises when there are positive things, recognised by investors who make a research, and a higher price means for a Proof-of-Work coin more network hashrate and more SECURITY as a result. In 2014 the Mooncoin network hashrate was below 1 GH/sec, now it's 100-200 GH/sec. You can see if Mooncoin direction is wrong or not with facts, not with words. While to make a price decline, it's not needed to do much work, to spend time, money, labour, to risk a reputation, to contribute talents etc. No. Just run some FUD, false accusations, add untrue or unconfirmed information from some wrong perspective, with words 'attack', 'hack', 'stolen', and newbies, people with bad translators, people who understand nothing - begin to sell. It looks like it's quite easy to make a price decline if you want to manipulate in this way. And it's absolutely not easy to make a price rise with anything, except honest and hard contribution of the whole community. How to drop a price artificially? It looks like there are several possible ways: 1) a pure classic FUD (Fear. Uncertainty. Despair) or trolling - not very effective these days 2) suspicions and false accusations against old and new members, devs, investors, supporters, random people, whoever else - quite effective 3) false wisdom about why Mooncoin is unsecure (Proof-of-work, no master nodes/checkpoints etc) or just has no future economically - very dangerous if posts look like if they were 'professional', from 'experts' 4) people could say that a 51% attack or any other attack took place and was successful (even with no proof) - very effective 5) anyone could say that he was hacked (after he just moved coins to another his address) - effective for dumping a price. Don't believe all that! Look at agswinner. He told he's not a tech expert and owned more than 30 bil MOON and what he told: if it were so simple I would not be here.
He never lost even 1 Mooncoin except an issue with Cryptsy when he kept coins at an exchange. Obviously, agswinner as a not tech guy, who is quite active on the web and owns a lot of MOON in his wallets, could be the first target for thieves. But he never lost even 1 MOON since the very beginning of Mooncoin in Dec, 2013. Polemarhos888, too. As well as a lot of other people who just use normal or paper wallets. Look at these 62 billion on the top address, if Mooncoin is not secure, why these 62B are still on this address (since January, 5)? Why don't hackers take them, if Mooncoin is so unsecure? The community has to figure out how to be better protected against these attacks 1),2),3),4),5) in the future. You have right ! |
|
|
|
Glad to see that Mooncoin becomes a truly international project.
If the community doesn't mind, I'll add mooncoin.com.br and mooncoin.su to the original post this week.
I think that it's a brilliant idea ! Also, we can suggest the adding of these 2 sites in coinmarketcap. |
|
|
|
Hello guys! Greetings from cold and stormy Russia! I’m running the site http://mooncoin.su . First for Russian speaking guys and English version is coming in late April. I also have a number of social media accounts for spreading latest news both in Russian and English. So I’m asking our community for help in media administration: Twitter, Telegram, Facebook and VK groups. Besides I make a Youtube How-To-Use-Mooncoin clips and need some help with opening. If someone is ready to participate please PM me. Any questions and suggestions are welcome. And of course any donations and support will be highly appreciated. Всем, кто говорит по-русски, привет! Я веду первый русскоязычный сайт о MoonCoin- http://mooncoin.su . Также созданы группы в социальных сетях и мессенджерах. Нужна помощь в администрировании Twitter, Telegram и групп в Facebook и VK. Кроме этого зарегистрирован канал на Youtube и готовятся ролики о покупке и использовании Mooncoin. Нужна помощь с начальной заставкой для роликов канала. Если у кого-то есть предложения, идеи или желание помочь, пишите в личку. Good afternoon. Congratulation for your efforts ! I believe that there will be similar initiatives in the near future... |
|
|
|
That's why I voted for making Mooncoin more secure over and over again. But Mooncoin Foundation and some others blocked that - for example my suggestion of making MOON a PoS/PoW-hybrid coin or implementing another - more complex algo or technology - making it a little harder to attack Mooncoin, instead of spending development-power on MoonWord, SmartLikes and other relatively uninteresting things.
I didn't block anything: you were able to find a dev, convince him, convince the community and implement PoS or Hybrid, or Proof-of-Capthas. Why I'm personally against PoS and exotic algos: Mooncoin is a Proof-of-Work coin (like BTC, DOGE, LTC). It's a time tested model, a golden standard. A network hashrate of Mooncoin now is like a hashrate of DOGE and LTC in 2014-2015. Proof-of-Stake is a completely different model. A lot of coins are Proof-of-Stake, but very few are Proof-of-Work. Proof-of-Stake often works like a pyramid when someone who already has a lot of coins, receives more and more. While with Proof-of-Work - miners mine coins, it costs money to mine a coin, they are not made out of thin air and people have equal opportunities. In the future regulators may also pay some attention not only to ICOs, but also to Proof-of-Stake coins with big percentage rewards, they really may have some pyramidal features in some cases. In a Proof-of-Work model - labour, resources create coins. It's mining. It's a different model. Proof-of-Stake and other algos have a lot of their own security issues. It's untrue to say that Proof-of-Work algo in case of Mooncoin is unsecure while Proof-of-Stake or Hybrid would be secure. No. There was a lot of discussing on that, so even without having so much tech knowledge as coinflow, I can definitely say that other algos have their own security issues. Why not exotic algos: without miners (and pools are focused on Proof-of-Work mining which is simple and available for them, and btw miners are not ready to solve captchas or accept other proof-of-human algos like coinflow suggested earlier) - the network will be weak. Exotic algos have their own (often UNKNOWN) security issues. For example, a creator of Balloon hash algo disclosured on his page that it had potential security issues, unknown vulnerabilities. Also in case of Balloon and other exotic (or simply not tested by Mooncoin) algos, there will be a lack of miners and as a result - a low network hashrate, which will lead to security issues. The same would happen in case of selling of frozen coins, the price would be low, which would lead to low network hashrate and to possible security issues (however even in this case if you keep your coins in the normal wallet or on paper wallets, it's safe, a 51% attack cannot steal your coins). I personally have no idea how to transform a PoW coin into a PoS coin technically. I doubt that this could be done without making a new blockchain from scratch and without a swap. Anyway that would be 100% and even 1000% against Mooncoin's philosophy of decentralisation and simply would be rejected by the consensus. Don't forget that even a fork is a big risk (to say nothing about a swap).
Mooncoin needs a stable and serious development, ironing-out of bugs and strong and friendly support of normal investors by a competent dev, as well as strong efforts to get it listed on further, bigger exchanges. Not a new soldier-of-fortune-feature or short-sighted-speculator-candy every day or week. That's all what it takes. If Mooncoin has achieved this, one could think about new features, if necessary. But first of all, serious investors need stability, honesty and a proven record of development. Everyone can write a white paper or a "roadmap", but developing a stable coin that becomes a "classic" or a "no-brainer" to invest in, needs much more than changing the block-reward or burning coins. Why not burn every coin except of 43, to become the brother of 42-coin? Why not do a swap and set the deadline to next week, so that the result is, that all earlier holders of MOON are out of the game? They would recognize months later, when they look again at their wallet, that their coins are useless then.
What coinflow says: hypothetically Mooncoin with 43 coins of total supply as a brother of 42-coin it is simply NOT POSSIBLE. It would be rejected even if someone announced it. As well as any bad dishonest things. Remember: the consensus in a decentralised project accepts only good things. And it's not me who blocks/blocked that. If you want, just try, find a dev, try to convince a dev, the community etc. If people agree, they will support you. Some responsibility is advised though. People should ask experts first and do a good research. Yes, I'm personally against Proof-of-Stake, but my vote is only = 1. We can endlessly say that Mooncoin needs serious developers etc, but did you try to find anyone? If you tried, you knew that's extremely difficult. A dev must be experienced, honest, he must communicate, he must have courage, and finally he must provide his identity when he is going to code and compile wallets. No one, except barrysty1e (James) agreed in 2015-2016 to become a dev on these conditions. But barry had problems with communicating and completing things. After several months of madness of community in 2017 about barry's communication issues, an user polemarhos888 from Crete, Greece (who also contacted Mr. Valamontes but Mr.Valamontes didn't agree), polemarhos888 said that he found a dev in his town, Vassilis Kritharakis, he started to convince Vassilis to join Mooncoin development, and only after his many efforts Vassilis agreed. He provided his identity and started working, fixing issues first and after that he was going (he didn't even start it unfortunately) to implement new features MoonWord and SmartLikes directly into the wallet. We all know what has happened later. Good afternoon ! All these people need to read this post from Mooncoin Foundation. I will try to help again this community about new developer. But in my opinion, we need more people to help us in this section (new developers). Also, I believe that this coin has huge possibilities. Of course, we need winner mentality to highlight them ! |
|
|
|
Reddit questions, they are to Vassillis, and one who asks them, also answers them. Of course, the fork is encoded, but will it happen or not will depend only on our community (first of all, on miners). It's called consensus. Yes, it's a decentralisation. No one is able to force that. If people update a wallet to the latest version and mine, the fork happens. If they don't update, it doesn't happen. As far as I know, exchanges and other services like cointopay.com (online wallet) already updated, but you may want to contact them to be sure, please contact pools and block explorers to update the wallet. It depends on you - Vassillis doesn't respond! You can go to chainz.cryptoid.info, select 'Moon' and to see how many nodes are on the new wallet with SegWit (0.13.9) and how many are on the old one (with diff retarget issues). Usually in several days before the fork block more wallets move to the latest version. The reason is that after the fork block is reached, you cannot move coins from the old wallet to exchanges, and if you are not an expert, it will not be safe for you to use the old wallet after the fork block. Regarding whether Vassilis left or not: I've just sent a PM to him, asking this question and asked him again to post. Even if he was shocked in January after sudden receiving of 62B (he shared his emotions with the community in his posts) now time had passed and he could give us a normal answer whether or not he will continue with Mooncoin development. Polemarhos888 just PMd me that Vassillis is not going to continue, and polemarhos888 had posted recently at Bitcointalk that a lawyer recommended Vassilis not to communicate with the community, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1733963.msg32013548#msg32013548and we all understand that it's not possible to develop a coin, without communicating. However, even if a lawyer recommended a 'safe choice', the community gave a lot of trust to Vassillis, and a transparent post from him with his final decision, with no emotions, would be appreciated. After that, if Vassilis really decided not to continue, not to communicate at all, then he should transfer a Github password to a new dev, or a new dev will create a new Github with a copy of Vassilis' code. The community has to find a new dev in this case. Then people who run Mooncoin resources will update links, if they agree. About tech risks with a fork, you can not be sure 100%, any fork is a risk, however now there are many more chances for success than with Balloon and with issues, which were fixed already by Vassillis. Miners, pools mine Scrypt, they don't mine Balloon! I'm not a miner though, better ask mining experts like mebagger or coinflow, or tuaris (you can find links to their accounts in the OP). Please understand: in a truly decentralised system like Mooncoin you mostly don't know who runs all these pools, services, sites, block explorers etc (or even if you know some, it's not always a good idea to disclosure that, any additional info could help hack the resources, also to run personal attacks etc). There are enthusiasts from all over the world. You can not make them do what you want. Do good things, don't offend people, and people will support you. After all, try to figure out what a consensus means in a decentralised system. Good afternoon. I agree 1000 % ! |
|
|
|
Good morning ! I prefer this attitude 100% ! |
|
|
|
Was not right by saying 'not dangerous' in my previous post. The case is dangerous to a degree. It's not so dangerous as destroying of the project, but it is dangerous if Vassilis decides to scam and to dump coins. Vassilis doesn't post and doesn't answer PMs since Jan, 20 : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1403637 that's why people begin to doubt in him. Why doesn't he post? Could the community ask polemarhos888 who lives in the same town with him to meet with Vassilis and to try to convince him to disclosure his plans? I have meet Vassilis before about 2 weeks. He said that was dissapointed with the behaviour of some people in community. So, he did not communicate for this reason. Also, his lawyer have gave the same advice. He said me that he is waiting his lawyer's finally solution too. But I and Agswinner have asked lawyers for the same issue. Their answer was the same: It's not a simmple issue. Vassilis' lawyer has the same opinion too. So, we know that these coins are safe now ! Vassilis will not use them for any reason ! And in my opinion, the most important things now is the support and development of Mooncoin. Let's do it ! Why did you not shared this information with the community? It looks like you and agswinner know a lot but do not share. I and Agswinner have talked about our lawyers' opinion. Also, I have said that Vassilis is waiting his lawyer's finally solution. But the basic issue now is the development. I have seen your posts about your lawyer but I dit not know that Vasillis did not communicate with the community because of the behaviour of some people and on advice of his lawyer. I hope things wil be turn for the better in the future for Mooncoin! It's ok ! Personally, I have learned many things with this fact too. I believe that Mooncoin community will be stronger after that ! |
|
|
|
Was not right by saying 'not dangerous' in my previous post. The case is dangerous to a degree. It's not so dangerous as destroying of the project, but it is dangerous if Vassilis decides to scam and to dump coins. Vassilis doesn't post and doesn't answer PMs since Jan, 20 : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1403637 that's why people begin to doubt in him. Why doesn't he post? Could the community ask polemarhos888 who lives in the same town with him to meet with Vassilis and to try to convince him to disclosure his plans? I have meet Vassilis before about 2 weeks. He said that was dissapointed with the behaviour of some people in community. So, he did not communicate for this reason. Also, his lawyer have gave the same advice. He said me that he is waiting his lawyer's finally solution too. But I and Agswinner have asked lawyers for the same issue. Their answer was the same: It's not a simmple issue. Vassilis' lawyer has the same opinion too. So, we know that these coins are safe now ! Vassilis will not use them for any reason ! And in my opinion, the most important things now is the support and development of Mooncoin. Let's do it ! Why did you not shared this information with the community? It looks like you and agswinner know a lot but do not share. They both posted thier discussion 2weeks back (or 2 months my memory sucks) . but they was also trounced upon. We all agree that the issue with coins is strange and complicated. Criticism is the only easy thing in these cases. But a strong community is able to solve any problem. Of course we need unity and action ! |
|
|
|
Was not right by saying 'not dangerous' in my previous post. The case is dangerous to a degree. It's not so dangerous as destroying of the project, but it is dangerous if Vassilis decides to scam and to dump coins. Vassilis doesn't post and doesn't answer PMs since Jan, 20 : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1403637 that's why people begin to doubt in him. Why doesn't he post? Could the community ask polemarhos888 who lives in the same town with him to meet with Vassilis and to try to convince him to disclosure his plans? I have meet Vassilis before about 2 weeks. He said that was dissapointed with the behaviour of some people in community. So, he did not communicate for this reason. Also, his lawyer have gave the same advice. He said me that he is waiting his lawyer's finally solution too. But I and Agswinner have asked lawyers for the same issue. Their answer was the same: It's not a simmple issue. Vassilis' lawyer has the same opinion too. So, we know that these coins are safe now ! Vassilis will not use them for any reason ! And in my opinion, the most important things now is the support and development of Mooncoin. Let's do it ! Why did you not shared this information with the community? It looks like you and agswinner know a lot but do not share. I and Agswinner have talked about our lawyers' opinion. Also, I have said that Vassilis is waiting his lawyer's finally solution. But the basic issue now is the development. |
|
|
|
Was not right by saying 'not dangerous' in my previous post. The case is dangerous to a degree. It's not so dangerous as destroying of the project, but it is dangerous if Vassilis decides to scam and to dump coins. Vassilis doesn't post and doesn't answer PMs since Jan, 20 : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1403637 that's why people begin to doubt in him. Why doesn't he post? Could the community ask polemarhos888 who lives in the same town with him to meet with Vassilis and to try to convince him to disclosure his plans? I have meet Vassilis before about 2 weeks. He said that was dissapointed with the behaviour of some people in community. So, he did not communicate for this reason. Also, his lawyer have gave the same advice. He said me that he is waiting his lawyer's finally solution too. But I and Agswinner have asked lawyers for the same issue. Their answer was the same: It's not a simmple issue. Vassilis' lawyer has the same opinion too. So, we know that these coins are safe now ! Vassilis will not use them for any reason ! And in my opinion, the most important things now is the support and development of Mooncoin. Let's do it ! |
|
|
|
Didn't post for awhile.
Glad to see some good activity of the community. Sad to see that the thread became toxic.
A lot of fear, a lot of anger.
I will try to answer real questions (about SmartLikes, about issues with Proof-of-Stake and with Proof-of-human algos etc. and why the community had chosen Proof-of-Work and about barrysty1e's protection) and your messages in upcoming days.
Remember that I'm just an investor like you. I'm not a crypto coder. I'm not familiar with barrysty1e, Vassilis and other Mooncoin devs.
I communicated with them only via PM and transparent posting in this forum. I deliberately was not active for awhile, not to look like I speak on behalf of community in this situation. The community decides everything.
Now the consensus is clear: 1 person (coinflow) said to burn no coins, 1 person claimed several millions, 1 person (probably without knowing the situation) posted he's against forks, burns etc, and A LOT of people voted by their posts for burning of coins.
Also there is no 'Foundation' group. 'Foundation' is just a word in my nickname, it's my Bitcointalk account. That's disclosured in the OP.
We are not familiar in real life with coinflow, agswinner and other users.
2 years ago I suggested to make a conference in Europe to meet with coinflow, agswinner and other investors, an user coinflow (a recognised Mooncoin leader in 2014-2016) blocked the idea. We don't know each other yet.
In fact I'm familiar with no one from Bitcointalk in real life.
I'm one Mooncoin investor who started my account and this ANN thread to help the community (the original thread was outdated after disappearing in 2014 of deaconboogie, an original dev of Mooncoin, after he had reported health issues). If you need to update the original post of this ANN thread with some actual info, please tell me. Unfortunately, other things don't depend on me, but we have a strong community, since 2014 it survived many devs. Now it is just another crisis, we saw many of them during several years. Anyway the project is growing. Don't believe? Look at Mooncoin's network hashrate. In 2014 it was about 1GH/sec, and now?
Good afternoon ! I am very happy because I see you online again ! We need to make things as a good team now. I believe that we have learned many lessons from the facts of the last months. So, we can succeed ! |
|
|
|
In my opinion, we need 2 simple things now: 1) A New Team Of Supporters:This Team need to find and support the new developer, any marketing action and the entrance in new exchanges. 2) A New Developer: This person must have the appropriate qualifications. Agswinner have suggested 2-3 independent devs. Of course these developers must to colaborate with each other in important projects. Then we can do anything and achieve any goal ! |
|
|
|
Hello friends of the Moon, I hereby present in ANN the official page of Mooncoin in Brazil that will be the basis of the commercial adoption and registration of businesses that in the future will accept Mooncoin.
mooncoin.com.br
Good morning ! Congratulation for your efforts ! Mooncoin must be one of the first 100 cryptos in coinmarketcap.We can do it ! |
|
|
|
Investors (and exchanges) want to see, active dev, transparent and honest, an active team, a good community, working apps, network etc. Now they see so many lies and untruths, FUD, false public accusations in social media against the main and historical supporters of MOON. Whatever we say and we write remain in the history and in the future all will judge what we have done, all will know who was right, who has been honest or deceitful.
I am repeated, the stolen coins are in good hands (VASSILIS is honest person) now and the situation is better than before (P.VERNON hands). Our dev Vassilis, afraid and without the correct support of some, has left. MF is not active, it is tired ? worn-out, frightened ?by the continuous attacks, also toward the privacy, that is important to safeguard against cybercrimine (MF members are people with at least 1 blns...)
It needs to select 2/3 independent devs now and to reconstitute the main team that supports MOON.
I will keep on supporting this coin and those people that feel like doing. I like the Brazilian team (thank for the express solidarity) and I will support their project.
They have sent me further details on their project, I trust them and I remember you what I have always said: “the use creates the value”.
let's go on!
Good afternoon ! I want to say a big thank you to Agswinner for this message. I agree 100% with his comments ! This community does not need public disagreements, lies and personal attacks to any supporter. If anyone is really interested for Mooncoin, it's time to prove it ! I will take some initiatives in the next coming days. |
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon ! With all respect, I ask from everyone to donate the very good Mooncoin team in Brazil.
Their wallets are the following:
Moon 2NaeGcg9acy9E3LJuTQPhN8VfNCXWkPdkb
BTC: 1GqRJxbFVtQQDzg83HqsTuCjejgSGZWiiy
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
