Yep.

Means people who are able to write only in English cannot join here?

After looking at all the problems faced by users, I feel like I was maybe right when I compared yobit with unnamed because they had a lot of similarities and now users are facing similar kind of problems as well.

I made this thread but I failed to verify my claims: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5288936.0

I hope people get their money because such kinds of problems usually end up with users losing all their money.

Bitcointalk Profile Link:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93949
Current amount of posts (Including this one):  454
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 4
SegWit BTC Address: bc1q0nv4amx43luyn06j0nu8ygs52h43n32kmjc3xl

Lolzzz very funny . Seriously, people keep ranting about that guy like this is the first time that the market has crashed. They are even forgetting that China had a blackout sometime and like that’s not enough they also banned bitcoin again lol. So, it’s not like the Elon Musk they are all ranting about is our problem. It is better we talk about other very important issues that we are having in this crypto space and stop talking about Elon.

The bull run has reached its highest, we are happy we have been able to go as far as we did, and this is not the end, we are still going to go more than that next time.

^I didn't get those ones neither, that seems like a weird special bet situation, they will probably fix it from now on but there will be some people who will make a profit because it is either a win or void and that's like a "no lose" situation for sure.

One of them says 21 goals or more "money back if there is none" well those are the two options isn't it? I mean you will either have 21 goals or more in any group which means you will win, or you will not have any and then money back? How could that be true? I am sure that will be fixed. Other one is a goal in every match, or money back, that's once again same, I mean if you win that is a goal in every game, what is the other option? 0-0 right? If you get your money back in that case, when do you lose? What is the condition for losing? There is no chance and that is why I think there is really something wrong with these.

^^The ongoing discussion about data theft is actually a concern, indeed. I trust roobet because of the kind of promotions they do, the name they have created within such a small time, the kind of support they provide but even all that accounts for nothing because data theft can happen at any time and like mentioned even FB and other platforms were hacked so no one is prone to it.

I miss the old days when we would gamble any amount, any time and withdraw it without any concern of KYC being forced because we were into crypto casinos and KYC was not a thing.

A lot of people are even buying fake identity to get their accounts verified so be careful @roobet because someone can pay a few bucks and get KYC done from them.

I love playing at roobet but the day I am asked KYC, I might have to stop playing until I feel comfortable giving out my identity to an online casino. Not just roobet, this stands for almost all the casinos unless I have already verified myself there.

The problem during bull runs is that they take us away from reality and we start thinking this time will never end just like how a winner feels when they win a bet in gambling without realizing that good times won't last forever. I was aware that this bad run will start soon but just even knowing that, I didn't sell my coins at the right time. I am sure another bull run will come soon though.

Yeah it's like everyone knows they won't earn from gambling yet everyone does it.

When it comes to military, for sure the US has the strongest military there is right now, so I don’t think china is going to be competing in that area. This is not like the old days, and the US keeps on advancing. So, the Chinese is just going to keep trying to up their economy and that’s what they will be doing and the area they can be able to compete. As for Bitcoin, whatever these people are doing is just their own business, one thing I know for sure about Bitcoin is that no matter what it is going to keep on growing big every year, it’s not going to stop growing.

People are now starting to realize that the Bitcoin is the key to financial freedom. And governments around the world cannot stop people from making use of cryptocurrency, that won’t happen, people will still be able to make use of bitcoin even if it’s banned in their countries, that’s the good thing about it.

Chelsea lowkey is the reason why we have a financial fair play to begin with. Their owner is so rich that dude could just buy any player he wants, I know he is not "that" rich but he could probably build a PSG like team tomorrow if he wants to, it would be financially bad decision for hsi future but he does have that kind of money. Like saying Elon Musk owns a team, he could buy the best 11 players in the world and he would still be quite rich afterwards, wouldn't even be spending money that he doesn't lose in a single stock market day.

One billion or two billion dollars is nothing for those super wealthy people, but why would they do something that silly? Like that is money gone, makes no sense. Now that we have financial fair play, even the owner of the club can't put in that much money so Abramovich is rich but he can't just get all the players, he is not allowed by the ffp rules.

I have always said the same thing, rich people act as if they need money more than poor people do, and that's the problem with the world. Poor people are only caring about making enough money to survive themselves, give a poor person 1k dollars more per year (no matter where they live) and they will be happy about it, give a rich person 1k and he wouldn't even care, they want 1k of thousands of people to feel something.

It means rich people "steal" money from poor people as any legal way as they can, I have seen amazon news about not allowing people to go to bathroom so that they can work them even more, 15 minute breaks being so important that if someone takes 20 minute break they get a pay cut of that whole day... for 5 minute extra break. Basically they find any loophole possible to steal from people and managers who make barely enough to survive help them with it as well.

This should have been the case since the starting. I don't understand how other sites allow us to play the same games without having to complete our KYC while bitsler requires us to complete it before we can play them. I mean I have no problem verifying my account because I have immense trust in bitsler but still being anonymous is better than having your identity known online, since we are in crypto gambling.

I was even asking support the same question and they told me that it is how it is right now and not much can be done. Maybe it was the requirement from the games provider to them but if that's the case why they allow other casinos to play without KYC? really curious to know what forced to have players do their KYC in order to play those 3rd-party slots.

I sincerely hope that you’re going to find a way to unlock this wallet and recover what’s stored in it. And by the way, I think you should do a research and understand how cryptocurrency works because the explanation you have made here is not really clear. And you also have to be careful with every information that has to do with the wallet so that you don’t end up letting it get into the wrong hands, because when it does you’re going to be losing everything that is stored in the wallet.

The list of words you said are written down on a card, I believe that’s the seed, you have to be careful with it because that’s what you’re going to use in recovering the coins that are stored in that.

I do see most bitcoiners are always emphasizing about "the importance of buying BTC at dips" but this avatar depicts all those with respect to current bitcoin market scenario..



Check yourself: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379147

I just want to vote it as "best avatar of bitcointalk.org 2021".

Please consider adding these details to the OP since not everyone might be able to locate the updated details.
Thank you .

Probably here is the answer:

@Carollzinha

The rules and system are exact similar to what Steve tried last year and we all know how much criticism Steve faced as the rules were in favor of spamming which led to unplanned ending of the campaign.

You must learn from your own lessons as I am seeing you were one of participant in Steve's campaign.

Yobit.net and unnamed.exchange are curiously connected

I will make a full list of similarities and I will request people to add more points of similarities please.

NOTE: I do not know if my claims are right but after I saw the similar signature style I started digging and found some really important information which then inspired me to create this thread because if they are indeed connected the users might be at huge risk.

Sincere and unconditional apology to TillKoeln if I am proven wrong at the end and my allegations are wrong.


1- SSL certificate

Issuer : Both the certificates have been issued by Cloudfare Inc ECC CA-3

Yobit:(License valid from 04-09-2020 to 04-09-2021) http://prntscr.com/vhnjzk
Unnamed:(License valid from 15-06-2020 to 15-06-2021) http://prntscr.com/vhnk6a

They both have exactly 1 year license ... now what I mean by this is that when I checked the SSL certificate for Binance and Poloniex for reference, the license is not EXACTLY for 1 year for them instead it is odd like 1 year and some months like that which makes it a valid point that both these exchanges have certificates for exactly 1 year.


2- Similar operating style

Have a look at registration page and they exactly need those 4 details - Username/Login, Email, Password, Confirm Password.

Yobit: http://prntscr.com/vhnohk
Unnamed: http://prntscr.com/vhnoeg

Even, the button "I agree to terms/rules" and "I am not a robot" have the same order along with all those buttons.

You can visit Binance or Poloniex to check that how every exchange has different signup page usually so this is another key point.

Both exchanges do not require-KYC and feel proud about it

Yobit: https://twitter.com/YobitExchange/status/1087380428883845120

Unnamed: https://twitter.com/exchangeunnamed?lang=en


3- Color Scheme

It's pretty obvious that both the websites revolve around similar colors if you closely look.

Both have EXTREMELY similar signatures as well which was mentioned countless times in their thread too.


4- Calling it Trollbox

Look at this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1481722.msg28705457#msg28705457 clearly Yobit used to call it Trollbox that time and now unnamed also uses the name for their chat as Trollbox

very smartly they started calling it "Chat" on Yobit so that they can use Trollbox for unnamed.


5- Pump/Dump and the Ponzi

Yobit is very well known to Pump and Dump coins and the Ponzi scheme but the funny part is that TillKoeln also has some deep and long past with ponzi and pump and dump even supported the pumps as you can locate one of the many post here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1468142.msg14884892#msg14884892

TillKoeln has a long history with Yobit as well as he had a few coins of his own listed there.

Have a look here too - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1495387.msg32811311#msg32811311


6- Support for Yobit since start

You can see even his coins were given to people for free for chatting in the trollbox at yobit.

source - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1468142.0



7- Connection with pokerowned

pokerowned is marked as a scammer by reputed members of the community like JollyGood and others and it was concerning that his coin tip coin was added to unnamed exchange - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169406.0

What was more concerning is TillKoeln(owner of unnamed exchange) gave positive trust to pokerowned despite knowing that reputed members had given negative feedback to pokerowned .

Have a look here - http://prntscr.com/vhodn7


8- pokerowned part of the unnamed.exchange team

There were questions asked why they chose to keep the signature similar looking to Yobit and they never gave a clear answer instead pokerowned gave an answer whose post is now deleted but I catch that in another member's reply.

Watch the reply from pokerowned, a known scammer - http://prntscr.com/vhozqm

Source - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169189.msg53133505#msg53133505

Looking at the reply from pokeronwed it is quite clear he is a team member of the unnamed.exchange and it baffles me why they took a scammer in their team when clearly JollyGood's feedback was there even before pokerowned made that post.

post made by pokeronwed: November 20th 2019
Feedback from JollyGood: October 25th 2019

so why did they have a known scammer in their team?


9- Supporting the known and proven scam yobit despite being warned again and again

TillKoeln Vouching for PROVEN scam Yobit on 20th April 2019- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4416697.msg50683712#msg50683712

Why would you promote a scam when you are making your own exchange.

After being advised that Yobit is A SCAM he still was taking yobit's side without any real reason. When his own exchange is running, normally you will not promote competitors within your own thread when you are in that field and surely not scammers at least .... have a look https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169189.msg53117634#msg53117634


10-Yobit cares for Unnamed

The signature for Unnamed is identical to Yobit but when Yobit came back to forum, they changed their own signature and left to another forum instead of asking Unnamed to change theirs which sounds very strange because unnamed copied them.

Also when unnamed exchange was formed there were some vouches from yobit shills but those replies are deleted as you can see AdolfinWolf mentioned that in his post here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169189.msg51961393#msg51961393 which makes it even more dark why would yobit shills vouch for unnamed and I would be glad if someone can find those deleted posts or AdolfinWolf can recall what happened.

In case AdolfinWolf's post is deleted now, I have taken screenshot - http://prntscr.com/vhomzj

(I have screenshot and archives for almost everything so TillKoeln please don't edit/delete your or others posts)


I would like to know the community's opinion on this and I am once again sorry if the claims and allegations I am making are proven wrong because I am digging all this information and working hard just to make sure we don't have another yobit in the forum scamming users with a new name. In the process if I accuse someone innocent, please accept my unconditional apology.

^ Congratulations Small Rabbit for your achievement of successful completion of this signature campaign.

So, you are planning for another phase of signature campaign but payment in different coin, right?
When you are ready, you need to edit the subject-line of this to reflect the change in payment method and then you need to move this topic into Bounties (Altcoins) sub-board.

To stay within this services board, you may plan up for paying your participants with both BTC+altcoin.

Good luck!

You sound like there is only 100% market space and all stablecoins need to share that. How we can assume all the coins (whether it is stablecoin or not) are having equal chances?

If a coin is unique and having good marketing strategy then it can occupy all 100% of market space or it may create more possibilities to push it toward 200% as well.

This stablecoin sounds like unique but how wildly they are going to market it, is going to decide its fate.