There's been so many freelancer/gig economy platform already - Canya, hirematch, ethlancer, blocklancer, hiway, canlead, gigtrick. Most are barely functional, majority have turned out to be vaporware. So, what makes yours any different?


------------------------------------------------------
checked the team list. 6 members where 2 are community managers, 2 are marketing, 1 is the CEO and the other is John Q. Nice movie

Same questions on my mind.
Are we still dealing with a BTC fork or this has taken on a whole new life of its own? A simple comparison table between Aigar and Bitwhite would go a long way in shedding more light on the issue. Should we also be expecting an updated WP?

Trolling would be if the post contains malicious statement for self-gratification. Can't see any malice here. All they did was raise credible concerns based on provided by you and adviced the community based on materials provided or not provided by you. Your response would have been to provide more insight in order to disprove his claims/concerns or at least give an ETA for roadmap

Doubt it can compete with Trust. Better off as an alternative though. Trust launches faster, supports all ERC20 tokens and more coins. Infinito comes off a tadbit chunky. However, love infinito for BTC BIP2 address support compared to Trust's BIP3 only.

Another day, another shitcoin...
Oh snap! It's the same shitcoin with the same shitty announcement from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5180868.msg52333105#msg52333105
Wish something could be done about these sorts

Would have been a look more helpful if you'd disclaimed that beforehand. Also, even if it's a sneak peek, what are we sneak peaking at? Snazzy graphics? There's not even a basic summary/blurb to at least whet one's appetite.

The best?
Salvation of human race?

... what are you on? A coin with 85% to be distributed via ICO when the first crypto to pioneer deflationary mechanisms in the industry was freely given? Nothing but another cash grab here and the only SNAP happening here is how quickly your funds will vanish into thin air

BTC collateralized and calling it a stablecoin? The logical inference would be BTC = Stablecoin.
Does not compute
BTC is a very volatile asset. How is an asset collateralized on it anyway remotely stable, unless you're using another asset to hedge against the volatility or you've got a perfectly, functional crystal ball

Going on a limb to assume that mobile wallets will also support these atomic swaps too. My question is will the mobile wallet also support cold staking and will the wallet morph into a multi-coin wallet down the road?

Lost me.
Actually had some hope in this project and was holding a fair amount before it started bleeding.
Was prepared to double down and average losses, however, the fact that the thread is being botted is extremely worrisome. Visibility is one thing, faking activity is another. Haven't seen one making a success of it - with most exit scamming in the end.
I doubt COCOs will exit scam, however, the strategy being employed here may portend other unpleasantries down the line. Time to jump ship for now

Alright. Where to start? Been following your posts with mild interest, but there wasn't much to say since there wasn't anything to show for it until now. When can we see the raw MVP? How do you want to go about gathering the community?

Website barely contains any info. Can't tell what the token's about off the site, nor is there any literature - WP, LP, Business paper, or pitch deck - to ease one into what this is all about. Also, no team or advisors info

You know you just contradicted yourself. But let's talk market. Granted, nobody knows tomorrow - I think - but as a consumer, I'll be more confident in a "fully-backed product" rather than "something working and useable". Not a diss on your product, but accept it. Nobody wants to buy a car they have to first push before it starts. I do understand your enthusiasm for your own creation, but do know that the bear market save a lot of projects evaporated (and still evaporating) and quite the number were offering somewhat similar services


That's not a curveball. It would be a curveball if we'd displayed some non-working mvp, but as you can see we have something more.

If you want to troll us - please, go on. But if you are not trolling, you can assist us with something good you can do - coding, texts, interfaces, or whatever you're good in.
[/quote]

It's a fine line between criticism and trolling. However, the latter is not the case here. Just wanted justification for your "not coinsale" label when an IEO is a coinsale? And again, rather than get answers, I'm being roped in to "assist" the project with "skilled labor".

Increasing their post counts most likely. Will also start staying away from these decentralized gaming thingies with 10ft poles. Haven't seen any startup remotely make a success of it all. Just money down the drain

Promises without product was 2016/2017. Promises with half-baked products that shortly spirals into abandonware/exit is very much the motto of this year, so even if you have it doesn't mean you can and it will be sustained.
And still, that curveball does little to justify the game of semantics you have going on

Completely missed out on investigating the "physicality" of their physical structure. No need pursuing this any further.  It's just another tokenized castle in the sky development. Looks like none of these bank products are bankable - bankera, bankex, bankorus...

1. No telegram group, only channel which was created in May and still only has 4 members.
2. Wondering what this is doing in the coin section since it's obviously a token and no indication of developing its own native blockchain, but no biggie.
3. No team info or any information that hints at the competence of the team to deliver on the website - found it in the WP, but then social media links or linkedin to verify isn't there. Looks like We've gotta work to get infor here.
4. Banking license in 2021...? So, why present as a bank right now?

Unlike Satoshi, who had to invent a novel solution to the vexing and very complex Byzantine general problem, yours is just a "can be a good investment in the future" that basically exists as yet another token on a blockchain whose protocol you have zero say/control/development over. Take a look at yourself first before pointing Nakamoto?

Precisely what I was going to point out. There's virtually no difference between an IEO and an ICO - it's still a sale, either way, you slice it. These games of semantics never goes down well anymore. For a fleeting second, thought I'd stumbled in on something good...

Ha, that explains a lot. Seems there's some actions over there - sporadic at best but still a paragraph or two better than what's happening over here. Anxious to see where their latest is headed