Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 11:49:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 590 »
2021  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Can not send my bitcoin with Armory - someone help me please on: October 20, 2017, 07:40:45 PM
What version of Armory and Bitcoin Core are you using (do no just say "latest", give a version number)?
2022  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How do I configure bitcoin-qt to see all transactions? on: October 20, 2017, 07:40:12 PM
In Bitcoin Core, go to Settings > Options and click the button "Open Configuration File". Add txindex=1 to the text file that is opened and save it. Then restart Bitcoin Core, it will say that a reindex is required, click OK. The blockchain will be reindexed and the transaction index will be built so that you can request any arbitrary transaction.
2023  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Question regarding Lighting Network on: October 20, 2017, 07:36:32 PM
I've read it will solve the transaction volume (and fees) problem and that Bitcoin could be then used for daily transactions.
At the same time, it looks like Lighting network only makes sense if transactions are bidirectionnal. For instance I don't see why it's useful to pay the grocery store or my rent to my landlord, since they won't send me money on their side.

Am I missing something?
Yes, you are.

The lightning network is useful for paying the grocery store or your landlord because you do so on a repeated basis. Instead of making 1 on-chain transaction for every single payment to the grocery store or to your landlord, you can use LN to essentially batch your payments so you are paying them but only need to make 2 on-chain transactions over a course of a year, for example (instead of 12 monthly rent transactions).

Furthermore, your landlord or your grocery store is likely to be a hub with many open payment channels with other people. So if you wanted to pay someone or receive money from someone, instead of making an on-chain transaction to pay that person or making a payment channel with them, you can route a payment through your landlord or your grocery store to that person. For example, say your neighbor wants to pay you some Bitcoin. He can either make an on-chain transaction sending you money, or he can use his currently open LN payment channel with the landlord and route the payment through the landlord. This essentially means that he gives the landlord money over his payment channel with the landlord and then the landlord sends you the same amount through your payment channel with the landlord.
2024  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Pruned mode syncing doesn't cache file writes? on: October 20, 2017, 03:33:44 AM
dbcache was set to 3000. I don't think I saw the process use anywhere close to that much memory, but I'll look more closely next time.

Is dbcache only for the UTXO set? Is it for reads or writes?
The dbcache is used for holding the UTXO set in memory. Once the dbcache is full, the UTXO set will be flushed to the disk. Having a higher dbcache means that it is flushed less so it will reduce disk IO from the UTXO set side of things. However during the syncing process, blocks are being written and deleted from disk so that is a major source of disk IO and slowdown.
2025  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is My Address Hanging Out?? on: October 20, 2017, 12:39:23 AM
1: By just creating a watch only wallet.  Does this expose my bitcoin address, (thus tying my public key to my IP address)? Is anything "transmitted" or is this passive?
It is entirely passive. Nothing needs to be sent anywhere nor registered anywhere.

2: As long as my local blockchain is up to date, can I do step 1 (create unsigned trans.) without being on line? If so does my local blockchain need to be fully caught up or just past my last transaction?
You do not need to be fully synced to create an unsigned transaction. However if you are not fully synced, you could potentially have a problem where the inputs that you are spending are already spent in a transaction that is later on in the blockchain. If you are already fully synced, you can go offline briefly to make the transaction, but I don't see why you would want to do that because nothing is ever transmitted for an unsigned transaction.

3: To sum up, can I get to where I ONLY expose my Bitcoin address at #3.
You have to expose your Bitcoin addresses in order to receive Bitcoin to spend, so no, that's not really possible. If you ignore that, then yes. In fact, you will always only expose your addresses (ignoring the receiving part) when you broadcast a signed transaction.

Note that it is practically impossible to figure out the IP address of the node that a transaction originated from. Transactions are not tied to IP addresses and Bitcoin addresses are not tied to IP addresses. The IP address that you see on block explorers like blockchain.info are the IP addresses of the node that first relayed the transaction to blockchain.info's node. That node is most likely not the node that created the transaction.
2026  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Pruned mode syncing doesn't cache file writes? on: October 20, 2017, 12:33:53 AM
Increase the size of the dbcache by starting Bitcoin Core with the -dbcache=<n> option or adding dbcache=<n> to your bitcoin.conf file where <n> is the amount of RAM in MB that you want to dedicate to the database cache. Increasing this will reduce the amount of disk IO that is done as the database will be flushed less frequently. A dbcache of ~6000 should allow the entire database cache to be held in memory so only on flush is required.
2027  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory 0.96.3 stuck in "Organizing Blockchain" on: October 19, 2017, 09:08:55 PM
Then I tried to start Armory, but I don't think I've ever got past the infamous "Organizing Blockchain" step that goes on forever (side note: If I understand things correctly, Armory added this horribly slow step in order not to copy over the entire blockchain. Personally, I was happy with the duplicated blockchain from before, because it was fast and I have disk space).
You are not understanding correctly. The previous system was much much slower than the current one. Just because you are experiencing this issue does not mean that everyone else is too and that the process must be slow for everyone. The original design was way worse and performed horribly compared to the current system.

I've read through many posts describing similar issues, and tried various things, but to no avail. One workaround had an interesting result though:

- I ran `bin/bitcoin-qt` on its own, letting it sync.
- I then ran the ArmoryDB command line on its own (without starting Armory itself):

> ArmoryDB --db-type="DB_FULL" --cookie --satoshi-datadir="/home/user/.bitcoin/blocks" --datadir="/home/user/.armory/" --dbdir="/home/user/.armory/databases"

This command printed a bunch of "parsed block file #<number>", and then nothing at all for a very long time (20h or so), and then it seemed to have finished. I got excited, killed the process, and started Armory itself, but it seemed to start re-processing every block from the beginning, and got stuck on "Organizing Blockchain" again.
Do this, but instead of killing it, start ArmoryQt. Also remove --cookie from your command.

According to your logs, it was able to parse all of the data but for some reason everything it did was not saved to the database. You may have killed the process too early before everything was done.
2028  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.15.0.1 Released on: October 19, 2017, 07:45:00 PM
Quote
warning fee estimation is currently not possible

i guess it is  because of the fork coming in 25th ??
No, that has nothing to do with fee estimation. In order for the fee estimator to work, you need to have your node be one for some time. It needs to have received several blocks with a mostly up to date mempool in order to actually estimate fees. This is because it will compare what in its mempool got into a block and how long that took to happen, so it cannot use historical blockchain data.
2029  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Some questions about the Lightning Network on: October 19, 2017, 05:26:32 PM
I've been wondering about something related for a while now: as far as I understand LN, a payment can go through different payment channels to connect Bob and Alice. That means several people are involved. What if one person decides to close a channel, even though it will cost him money? Does that mean all connected channels also have to close?
No. Payments are not dependent on channels remaining open after the payment has completed (i.e. the HTLCs* have been fulfilled).
I think you misunderstood me: I know the payments are safe, but the channel has to close. If the users want to continue using it, they'll need to open another channel, making on-chain transactions with on-chain fees to do so.

*Hashed Timelock Contracts (wiki)
Payments to one person do not necessarily have to follow the same route. A different route can be chosen to route around the fact that someone has closed a channel. One person closing a channel in the route just means that that route can no longer be used. All of the other channels in that route can remain open.
2030  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Command Prompt Window on Windows on: October 19, 2017, 05:21:59 PM
What version of Armory are you using (don't just say latest, give a version number)?

Armory 0.96
You should use Armory 0.96.3. That should fix your problems with Bitcoin Core 0.15.0.1. There are known issues with older versions of Armory and Bitcoin Core 0.15.0.1.
2031  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bcoin vs Bitcoin core integration/staging tree on: October 19, 2017, 05:18:14 PM
Do you (or others on the list) know the status of particular JSON-RPC extensions?  We're thinking of tapping into that, somewhat similar to this proposal:
 
  https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/9/9d/JSON-RPC.pdf

It sounds like we'd need formal approval for an extension to be used.  Or, is this simply an internal network optional that we can modify as we'd like?
If it is not part of the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification, then Bitcoin Core probably does not support it.
2032  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Some questions about the Lightning Network on: October 19, 2017, 05:15:38 PM
I've been wondering about something related for a while now: as far as I understand LN, a payment can go through different payment channels to connect Bob and Alice. That means several people are involved. What if one person decides to close a channel, even though it will cost him money? Does that mean all connected channels also have to close?
No. Payments are not dependent on channels remaining open after the payment has completed (i.e. the HTLCs have been fulfilled).
2033  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Segwit2X - (Gold Fork) Date on: October 19, 2017, 03:33:01 AM
Segwit2x and Bitcoin Gold are two completely different things.

Both are hard forks and they are set to activate by block height. Because they are activating by block height, predicting the actual time of activation is somewhat difficult. There is no pre-announced date of fork because that date is not concrete.

Bitcoin Gold will fork at block 491407.

Segwit2x will fork at block 494784.
2034  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Command Prompt Window on Windows on: October 19, 2017, 03:23:41 AM
What version of Armory are you using (don't just say latest, give a version number)?

Do not close that command prompt or Armory will not work. It is a prompt for a background process that Armory runs and it must stay open for that to work. Do not close it, Armory should close it for you when you stop the wallet.
2035  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Some questions about the Lightning Network on: October 18, 2017, 11:11:19 PM
I have a personal question about the Lightning Network:
Could it be possible to set up a LN node and earn satoshis just putting some BTC available to others to create payment channels or these channels are just for those involved in the transactions (Bob and Alice)? Sorry if you have explained this in other post.
Yes, that is certainly possible.
2036  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: My own BTC address on: October 18, 2017, 03:16:00 PM
You can generate a custom address here (https://bitcoinvanitygen.com/). The site allows you to choose up to 6 characters for free. So you can generate an address that has your name (or at  least an abbrevation ) in it. The reason your address changes everytime is due to privacy concerns. Most online wallets give you a new receiving address each time you make a transaction. But you will still receive the bitcoin if you use an address more than once.
You should not use that website, they are known to have issues in the past where people have had their money stolen when they used vanity addresses generated on that site. Even if they are not scammers, you should never use a service where they generate a private key and give it to you to use; you never know whether they are holding on to that private key and can thus steal your money in the future. You should instead use local vanity address generation software like vanitygen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25804.0. Or you can use a service which uses split key vanity address generation. Split key generation keeps your private key private, the person generating the address only has part of the private key and they can't get the full private key.
2037  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: My own BTC address on: October 18, 2017, 02:16:52 PM
1)i see some users have BTC address with them names How to make this ?.
These are called vanity addresses. They are made by randomly generating addresses until one is found by chance to have a prefix that you want.

2)why my btc address changes ?
For privacy and security reasons. It is recommended that you do not reuse addresses, so every time you want to get an address to give to someone, your wallet will give you a new address. Your old addresses will still work, just that your wallet knows it has already given you that one, so it gives you a new one. This helps preserve your privacy and makes it easier to keep track of your coins. It can also help protect your coins in the event that ECDSA is broken.
2038  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / MOVED: Need help identifying key on: October 18, 2017, 01:19:00 AM
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.

Duplicate
2039  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / MOVED: Help identifying key on: October 18, 2017, 01:11:15 AM
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.

Duplicate
2040  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Can I export a WIF (Wallet Import Format) file from Armory? on: October 17, 2017, 06:49:10 PM
There is no such thing as a "WIF file". WIF is not a file type, it is an encoding for private keys. You can get your private keys from Armory is WIF format by going to Wallet Properties > Backup This Wallet > Export Key Lists. The WIF format private keys are labeled as PrivBase58. You should also check the box "omit spaces" at the bottom of the window so that the keys can be easily imported.
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 590 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!