Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 01:32:10 PM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 »
2041  Other / Off-topic / Re: Namecoin Dying on: June 23, 2011, 01:22:10 PM
You are kidding right? namecoin also needs to be renewed, and currently it's several times more expensive than just registering a ICANN domain with godaddy.

Also the cheapest price in the world would do nothing, if the whole world don't support the protocol.

Several times more expensive huh? With the current rates it costs around $7.5 usd to register .bit and it will keep on getting lower. Renewal costs $0. Meanwhile godaddy costs $12 per year.

well A few days ago it was at $20+, I guess it dropped in value recently.
2042  Other / Off-topic / Re: Namecoin Dying on: June 23, 2011, 02:37:39 AM
You are kidding right? namecoin also needs to be renewed, and currently it's several times more expensive than just registering a ICANN domain with godaddy.

Also the cheapest price in the world would do nothing, if the whole world don't support the protocol.

The problem is how do you convince the whole world to go against ICANN regulation and support .bit namecoin? My guess is it's almost impossible. So namecoin will remain an obscure experiment similar to OpenNIC

If the owning vs leasing argument doesn't convince people then the very low price of registration and renewal might.
2043  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Dwolla Transfer on TradeHill still Pending on: June 23, 2011, 01:43:24 AM
dwolla is not instant, but tradehill is usually quite fast, last transfer was just a few minutes for me.
2044  Other / Off-topic / Re: Namecoin Dying on: June 23, 2011, 01:35:02 AM
The problem is how do you convince the whole world to go against ICANN regulation and support .bit namecoin? My guess is it's almost impossible. So namecoin will remain an obscure experiment similar to OpenNIC

icann just announced that you will soon be able to register any top level domains. no longer any need to "mine" .bit

http://www.icann.org/

Isn't the whole point of namecoin that your ownership/control of the domain is cryptographically secure - as secure as the blockchain.

Therefore nobody can "steal" or "confiscate" your domain?
2045  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mining Difficult and Moore's Law on: June 22, 2011, 07:51:35 PM
Nothing can grow exponentially forever, Moore's law is coming to an end soon.
2046  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Idea ("Silk Road" except for gold/silver instead of drugs) on: June 22, 2011, 07:34:36 PM
I think it's a good idea, since the US government is planning to outlaw "over the counter" gold trading.
2047  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Monitor multiple pools - www.btc-poolwatch.com on: June 22, 2011, 06:01:17 PM
Can you add mtred.com?
2048  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Mining oddities that I've accepted. (Unless you can solve 'em!) on: June 22, 2011, 05:56:58 PM
I tried ubuntu on my first miner, and I come to accept that linux is unsuitable for my mining purposes and I have been using Win7 ever since. So far I could overclock the core, underclock the mem, run reliably for weeks without reboot, and almost no problems so far on win7.
2049  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: From reddit: MtGox might have lost control to the majority of their BTC deposit on: June 22, 2011, 05:48:51 PM
Question: when market opens should I sell BTCs for low?
 or just withdraw the BTCs?

Depends on your trust issues,

A. you lost trust in bitcoin itself ---> sell the bitcoins
B. you lost trust in mtgox ---> withdraw the bitcoins


I think it's best to just withdraw the coins and sell somewhere else like at tradehill. MtGox dwolla withdrawals are notoriously unreliable and slow even before all this.
2050  Other / Obsolete (selling) / Re: Selling Sapphire 5830 $140 or best offer on: June 22, 2011, 04:16:13 PM
problem with clear coin is, it only protects the buyer, not the seller.
i have provided my reputation, but none of the potential buyers are providing theirs

Buyer have zero incentive to piss off the seller if everything goes well. Though I'd be a bit careful when selling to a buyer with post count less than 5.
2051  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [Guide] Saving your wallet.dat to PAPER on: June 22, 2011, 03:54:57 PM
Nah, just hand etch the wallet.dat file bit by bit to an unused hard drive plaster. When you need your wallet.dat, just read the harddrive with your eyes and re-construct the bits.
2052  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: From reddit: MtGox might have lost control to the majority of their BTC deposit on: June 22, 2011, 03:48:26 PM
who cares, just withdraw as fast as you can, and you'll be fine.

If MtGox has indeed lost control to their BTC deposit, it'll be impossible to withdraw any BTC, or possibly the first few withdraws might be successful if MtGox pays out of their own pocket (which is pretty deep considering they were making $30k worth of BTC per day). So I guess your advice is correct, withdraw as fast as you could and don't get left behind  Grin
2053  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / From reddit: MtGox might have lost control to the majority of their BTC deposit on: June 22, 2011, 03:26:17 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/i4xgc/follow_the_money_trail_part_2_1500btc_generated/
2054  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Do not buy a 5830 for $160. It's a blatant ripoff. on: June 22, 2011, 03:01:27 PM
Unless you are able to sell 5830 to me $109 shipped immediately, then I think you should stfu. Availability has its value. Sapphire 5830 at $160 is still cheaper than the cheapest Sapphire 6870 (rebate can only be used once per address, even with rebate it is $190). If you are building multiple machines with 4 x GPU, the price difference add up to a lot of money very quick.

Sure $109 price point is great, IF you can get them. Otherwise you'd have to wait god knows how long, and be god knows how fast to get any at $109.
2055  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Tradehill not working? on: June 22, 2011, 12:54:57 AM
expect to see a good amount of this the whole week as more and more money is coming in to buy up btc

I doubt it, as hackers recently got hold of tens of thousands of BTC, and I imagine they will be unloading them for a while, depressing the price
2056  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Rich Men With Ugly Girlfriends.. Most of You = Ugly Men, No Girlfriends on: June 21, 2011, 11:54:56 PM
wait, the first pic is not Mark Zuckerberg nor Pricilla Chan
2057  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is tradehill.com really hosted on a shared hosting account? on: June 21, 2011, 11:48:26 PM
Dedicated server is old school, nowadays you want VPS or cluster, both allowing instant scaling, not the dedicated crap.
2058  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MtGox really secure now on: June 21, 2011, 07:57:34 PM
Quote
Server: nginx/0.8.53
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:55:52 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Status: 200 OK
Etag: "(snip)"
P3P: CP="NOI DSP COR NID ADMa OPTa OUR NOR"
X-Runtime: 12
Set-Cookie: _zendesk_session=(snip); path=/; HttpOnly
Cache-Control: private, max-age=0, must-revalidate
Content-Encoding: gzip

200 OK
Got from support desk.
Oh wow, they do run nginx 0.8.53 while latest is 1.0.4 !! For sure, everybody's computer is infected by trojan software now !!!

Oh look look !!!
Quote
  <!--[if lt IE 9]>
  <script src="https://assets.zendesk.com/javascripts/vendor/html5_shiv.js?1308347461" type="text/javascript"></script>
  <![endif]-->
They actually hotlink javascript from zendesk's website for Internet Explorer users, in plain text in the HTML source code for everyone to see !! I shit in my pants, this is now the end of the world !!!!1

/joke


>copypasta of random "Too many connections" error and feeling 1337 about it
>not showing proper screenshot, unable to understand what problem is
>implying this actually is a vulnerability, server saying "whoops, can't handle this much shitload"
>instead of mail MagicalTux about it and appear stupid to one person -> post in Bitcoin forum and appear stupid to everybody else who actually work with PHP and MySQL
>be marked as troll, for now

Good luck finding a real job in PHP/MySQL if you display stack trace to random visitor on a production site of any serious tech company.
2059  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / MtGox really secure now on: June 21, 2011, 06:40:15 PM
Quote
   Warning: mysqli::mysqli() [mysqli.mysqli]: (HY000/1040): Too many connections in /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/DB/MySQL.class.php on line 25

    Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'Too many connections' in /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/DB/MySQL.class.php:26 Stack trace: #0 /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/DB/MySQL.class.php(73): DB\MySQL->_construct(Array) #1 /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/DB.class.php(24): DB\MySQL::getInstance() #2 /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/db_structure.php(3): DB::getInstance() #3 /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/init.php(48): require_once('/www/p/pl/platf...') #4 /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/www/handlepage.php(3): require_once('/www/p/pl/platf...') #5 {main} thrown in /www/p/pl/platform-stable.dns.st/includes/DB/MySQL.class.php on line 26

Thanks for the informative error message mtgox, I'm sure displaying stack trace to random visitors is really secure
2060  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: liquid cooling question on: June 21, 2011, 02:20:19 PM
too expensive for the marginal performance gain. Mining is all about money vs performance ratio. If liquid cooling had better ratio, people would be all over it.
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!