What do you think should SSOT lower the minimum contribution at pre-sale? Right now you have to buy 35,000 SEHR, that's $ 1,050 For many, that is a lot of money, even if you get to 30% bonus. I think with a lower minimum investment they would have already reached the softcap
I too think minimum contribution should be 1 ETH. I have seen many ICO even allowing 0.5 ETH as well. This way many small investors can join the ICO. I think in pre-sales the minimum contribution should be 10 ETH, especially since the value of ETH dropped. People who want to invest less can do so during the main-sale. 10 ETH means only medium to big investors can participate. People like me wants to join pre-sale can't Investe this much amount for one ICO. So I also think it should be reduced to 1 ETH 0.1eth before now use to be the standard and the minimum, of course project tend to avoid whale from carting a lot because of the huge bonus and take control of the pricing of the token, but things have change and project have no option now especially as touching the current market situation to raise the amount high
|
|
|
In regards to the 3 day sale, since ICO was closed 3 days early without much warning,4NEW plans to accommodate a number of investors by reopening the ICO for 3 days at $2 in June. This sale is more accurately defined as a pre-listing sale. Therefore, they anticipate a listing event to occur shortly after the sale is completed.
I know its not subject for discussion to avoid speculation but dear me, i just want a good listing and i hope bounty guys ain't dumping on this, 4new is already having a good start already and dumping below ICO ain't smart move, in fact smart ones will bag more Kwatt coin
|
|
|
nice, a good post, thanks for the link. I really like those articles that bring you even closer to the project. You often overlook something in whitepapers, and so you sometimes learn something new in such articles You are very much welcome mate. I glad it came handy to you. This article really simplified this project for me as well Articles are way much shorter and is easy to read. With a whitepaper you can miss critical information, because it is way too long sometimes. Is there any videos about Aidoc on Youtube ? I searched on youtube to see if there are videos there already from aidoc, it seems to me that there is an aidoc project that carries the same concept and even the name but the logos where different, i saw just this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD1TdTvosog which is not even about aidoc per say but i guess it's about aidoc airdrop... It will really be nice if they out up a professional video that explains the project
|
|
|
100% of companies in the world are getting attacked by the hackers and the average detection time is 256 days (2015 Ponemon Report) leading to enormous economic and privacy damages. Similar attacks repeated against multiple targets before they are detected, understood and mitigated.
And here is bitfence promising a zero day threat, that is, there won't be a break down of security any day for like forever, won't you just love the project
|
|
|
It's really amazing how we still get the same amount of tokens even if there is a rise or fall of the price of ETH in the market. There's no better project than forty seven bank.
Yes a good project does not depend on the rise or fall of ETH/BTC, do you think they will reach their hardcap in the remaining days? Even if we dont reach the hard cap, that doesnt mean anything. Please look at the soft cap. Its totally enough to continue the roadmap - www.fortyseven.io Actually, they shouldn't need to focus in the hard cap nor soft cap. Just focus in the mission and goal of the project and for sure the project would reach the success. Not sure I fully understand what you mean, in as much as they should focus on the mission and goal of the project, it is also important to focus on reaching soft cap or else the project will be unsuccessful To continue project need to be reach soft-cap. And FortySeevn already reached soft-cap. Also on previous page FortySeven Team members has said "Please look at the soft cap. Its totally enough to continue the roadmap". As per this statement I don't think have any problem hard-cap target. If the team says they are cool with what they have gotten so far then Investors should begin to see work being carried out already hardcap is not therefore a necessary thing to achieve even though it will really make a lot of sense to achieve that but we are very much far away from hardcap still Team is alreayd working, they already released the API/SDK to my knowledge for integrators to start testing and developing plans for how the backends will integrate, unless i'm misremembering, the softcaps what mattered as far as finances goes, the hardcaps just their to stop too much early growth that would devalue the token in the longrun, hardcaps just their to stop too much early growth that would devalue the token in the longrun how do you mean here, not sure if i read about hardcap fufiling a need of maintaining token value
|
|
|
Hope that this project will be successful, because it's very interesting to combine cryptocurrency and real healthcare, we'll, we will see soon
True, before now it has not been easy combining anything with cryptocurrency, i mean anything, but today it almost looking as though it's an effortless thing, take a look at a recent partnership that happened yesterday who would have thought that, is healthcare any different? i don't think so
|
|
|
That's the best idea. I will have about 15,000 tokens after the ICO, then i get every year good ETH as a Christmas gift :-) i will definitely hold my tokens
This is not enough ... To get good money, the number of users on the platform should grow to a million ... i know that, and i am pretty sure that they will reach this number in the next 18 months. so from 2019 on we can receive a very good benefit. i look forward to it Well this is not a fairy tale and achieving such results is quite possible. But at the moment there are very few users, their competitors have much more. Therefore, I hope that we will get a really cool and functional platform, whose competitors will be few, or not at all. I completely understand your point and i"m quite aware of the fact that there are other gamble project but i'd like to know specifically which competition you've in mind that may give gifcoin a run for it's money? i agree with some people that said there should be a kind of scale-up for the marketing but then again it's a new platform and some sort of benefit of the doubt should be given Any of the major betting sites that exist already i think they are referring to, for example Bet365, however the thing that is unique about GiF is the dividends for being a token holder, so we'll see how they do. and aside from that, has bet365 integrated cryptocurrency as a payment option in its platform and am quite sure it doesn't also run on the blockchain platform too so alot of difference exist between gifcoin project vitalbet.com and other mainstream gambling platform In summary, we can say that the complete package GIFcoin, with the website Vitalbet, will implement a lot of new features. Exactly my point couple with the fact they are kind of pioneering a whole new shift into a new kind of betting, i'm sure for team to give out 80% as dividends shows a lot of money will come into the platform once this new features are fully integrated
|
|
|
That's the best idea. I will have about 15,000 tokens after the ICO, then i get every year good ETH as a Christmas gift :-) i will definitely hold my tokens
This is not enough ... To get good money, the number of users on the platform should grow to a million ... i know that, and i am pretty sure that they will reach this number in the next 18 months. so from 2019 on we can receive a very good benefit. i look forward to it Well this is not a fairy tale and achieving such results is quite possible. But at the moment there are very few users, their competitors have much more. Therefore, I hope that we will get a really cool and functional platform, whose competitors will be few, or not at all. I completely understand your point and i"m quite aware of the fact that there are other gamble project but i'd like to know specifically which competition you've in mind that may give gifcoin a run for it's money? i agree with some people that said there should be a kind of scale-up for the marketing but then again it's a new platform and some sort of benefit of the doubt should be given Any of the major betting sites that exist already i think they are referring to, for example Bet365, however the thing that is unique about GiF is the dividends for being a token holder, so we'll see how they do. and aside from that, has bet365 integrated cryptocurrency as a payment option in its platform and am quite sure it doesn't also run on the blockchain platform too so alot of difference exist between gifcoin project vitalbet.com and other mainstream gambling platform
|
|
|
look at Features of SecuredPHR App -
- Keep all personal medical records up to date - Integrated with any medical system operates on Blockchain - Authorization by the users discretion - Granularity of the access level are defined by the patients - Granularity of the access level are defined by the - You can export data in CCR format - Data in hands of individual in a HIPPA/CMS compliant storage - Blockchain enabled SSOT-ID creates SecuredPHR user accounts
The attractive thing for me in the whole of this list is that fact that they are in compliance with the laws of the land and with the health system of the nation so there is no fear of any regulation coming at them, more like they have done their homework before hand
|
|
|
It's really amazing how we still get the same amount of tokens even if there is a rise or fall of the price of ETH in the market. There's no better project than forty seven bank.
Yes a good project does not depend on the rise or fall of ETH/BTC, do you think they will reach their hardcap in the remaining days? Even if we dont reach the hard cap, that doesnt mean anything. Please look at the soft cap. Its totally enough to continue the roadmap - www.fortyseven.io Actually, they shouldn't need to focus in the hard cap nor soft cap. Just focus in the mission and goal of the project and for sure the project would reach the success. Not sure I fully understand what you mean, in as much as they should focus on the mission and goal of the project, it is also important to focus on reaching soft cap or else the project will be unsuccessful To continue project need to be reach soft-cap. And FortySeevn already reached soft-cap. Also on previous page FortySeven Team members has said "Please look at the soft cap. Its totally enough to continue the roadmap". As per this statement I don't think have any problem hard-cap target. If the team says they are cool with what they have gotten so far then Investors should begin to see work being carried out already hardcap is not therefore a necessary thing to achieve even though it will really make a lot of sense to achieve that but we are very much far away from hardcap still
|
|
|
One of the features of Bitfence is that; if a hacker attacks someone who is part of Bitfence network he will be tagged as a hacker at once and he will not be able to attack anyone else within bitfence network.
WOW! I didn't know about this attribute. I think it will really be nice for those hackers to carry the tag as a badge of honour That way we can be able to identify them LOL, with this feature hackers will think twice before attacking anyone in BitFence network community. So if one wants to be safe from hackers BitFence is a safe heaven for all. I think it would be great if a hacker then see a window in which reads "This system is protected by Bitfence" and a picture of a dog snarling teeth it is really a great plan to block once identified hacker for everyone in the bitfence network. Haha, your imagination tho, i'll love to see how Bitfence will tag the supposed hackers maybe a red danger sign. Stuff like that while cute, is not realistic the fact is most types of attachs are not some guy trying to access a webpage on your compuer that they can reply with a nice html response error, it's mostly cryptic low level attacks with no real visible way to slap them. Beyond that advertising what blocked an attacker is a bad idea as it lets the hacker know what kind of protection the network has and narrows their focus onto breaking into bitfence's protection instead of "oh hey their blocked somehow" saying its bitfence is bad that blocked them, just like saying a mailserver is running a certain specific version of mail software is just helping the attacker with future attempts I don't think bitfence is coming all out with what they intend to use in tracking and blocking hackers per say, i sincerely do not think that is the case, i think its more of an announcement attempt like "Hey hackers we can come at you as far as you come at us, we've developed a system" and the technical aspect of how they intend to achieve this i don't think has been or will be laid bare to the public cos that's not smart if they do
|
|
|
This is quite good in all sense... I like the fact that partnership with an offline entity is in place, would boost the image of the project and add some human feel too I don't know what the AHIMA is or what they can do to advance the SSOT Healthcare project, but any kind of partner- or membership with an association will boost the project. The AHIMA is a global association for health professionals involved in the health information management needed to deliver quality healthcare. Means it unites experts in the practice of acquiring, analyzing and protecting digital and traditional medical information vital to providing quality patient care. A perfect match to SSOT. Wow, this is amazing. At this movement I don't know how much this partnership will help SSOT. But AHIMA name should tells lot of things. There is a huge potential for both to collaborate together. Each can use the others tools/ AHIMA utilizing SSOT and SSOT utilizing AHIMA. I am curious of the kind of partnership they have in place. SSOT democratizes the whole record keeping and eliminates fraud in the system, AHIMA works on facilitation and implementation of result gotten from data received/generated in the SSOT platform I guess... I went through the AHIMA platform and it seem like they are both alike in terms of concept
|
|
|
That's the best idea. I will have about 15,000 tokens after the ICO, then i get every year good ETH as a Christmas gift :-) i will definitely hold my tokens
This is not enough ... To get good money, the number of users on the platform should grow to a million ... i know that, and i am pretty sure that they will reach this number in the next 18 months. so from 2019 on we can receive a very good benefit. i look forward to it Well this is not a fairy tale and achieving such results is quite possible. But at the moment there are very few users, their competitors have much more. Therefore, I hope that we will get a really cool and functional platform, whose competitors will be few, or not at all. I completely understand your point and i"m quite aware of the fact that there are other gamble project but i'd like to know specifically which competition you've in mind that may give gifcoin a run for it's money? i agree with some people that said there should be a kind of scale-up for the marketing but then again it's a new platform and some sort of benefit of the doubt should be given
|
|
|
AIDOC will be able to provide user real time health advice, maintain well being, and identify risks to prevent disease. This is possible by combining digital medical technology with advanced data computing that constantly uploads your health data to the blockchain
Yeah basically what aidoc is all about, making sure your health is always better and keeping records notifying you on any bad health signs or habits. Having the ability to access your medical records no matter where you are in the world remotely, with extra added security using the secure blockchain. Pretty attractive if you compare it to todays system / technology Yeah man, i for one hate going to the clinic i'm really glad i learnt of AIDOC project so whenever i feel some type of way i can easily check my self out with going to the clinic. Yeah it's good if you live in remote places with no easy access to doctors/GP surgerys. The medical imaging diagnosis will really help change people's lives for the better, maybe they could even run a small charitable company on the side that offers these services to people in poverty/conflict zones. That would be really commendable. However, I don't think AIDOC can completely the replace the check in a clinic by a doctor. It can be a good for a first diagnosis but it should be approved by a real doctor. I agree this kind of things are useful, but the best thing is always to get it checked by a real doctor. Maybe AIDOC could say that you need to be checked by a docter when you have serious problems. It will probably always refer you to a doctor after giving advice. But in reality, doctors can't hold all of the current medical knowledge in their heads, much less the daily changes that come out with research. This AI will be able to access vastly more information than any live doctor... it's the problem solving ability that will be in question. Often patients don't really understand their symptoms well enough to diagnose and a doctor reads between the lines. Will this project be able to replicate that? The first line of your reply answeres your question, of a truth no human can hold off all of the information, there would be times he/she gets some details off his mind sometime by mistake no matter how much qualified of a doctor he/she is... I think Aidoc like you said will help both patients read their signs and symptoms well as well as help doctors make the right decisions reading between the lines properly
|
|
|
I like this a whole lot I'm super excited to see some gradual implementation, 10MW as we speak is quite hopeful... 4new.io is having cool features too... Patience is indeed a virtue, am sure investors are glad with this development
|
|
|
I like the idea of the “BitFence Cyber Store” that is mentioned in the whitepaper, on this store they will sell their BitFence zero-day Threat Subscription Service and BitFence Configured Hardware & Software.
The Bitfence zero-day Threat Subscription Service is available to all kinds of customers, ranging from home offices to corporate clients with over 2500 users, the customer can customise the requirements for their subscription including the length of the subscription.
The BitFence Configured Hardware & Software section of the store will sell a variety of products, one of the products available is BitFence Routers that can be purchased with integrated Bitfence subscriptions. Pre-installed Light Plug-n-Mine Raspberry Pi and BeagleBoard with StingMiner Software which can be purchased with own/lease to own/lease options. SD Card images for Do-It-Yourself miners. BitFence software will also be available to download as freeware. The freeware will be available on Windows/Mac/Linux platforms and in the future it will also be in Android and iOS.
The store will be a really good source of revenue for Bitfence, it also encourages investors to purchase HNY tokens because they will need to use HNY tokens to purchase the products and services that I have listed above. Hopefully this will always mean there is a decent level of volume in the HNY markets as there is a real use for them, especially if the products on the store are a more affordable option compared to their competitors that are not blockchain based and only accept fiat.
This is fully packed security system Bitfence is set on bringing on, I never thought they are going to be in stores at best provide constant security features and apps both hardware and software, I mean this is all that is needed, I don't know if there is need for more, I know of security project in the blockchain as well but they don't come fully packed as Bitfence is
|
|
|
It's really amazing how we still get the same amount of tokens even if there is a rise or fall of the price of ETH in the market. There's no better project than forty seven bank.
Yes a good project does not depend on the rise or fall of ETH/BTC, do you think they will reach their hardcap in the remaining days? There is still 2 weeks more for before the end of the ico.. Although it is going to be difficult i believe they would be able to reach the hardcap. Two weeks to sell more Tokens and push the project forward. I hope that they will hit their hardcap, at least close to the hardcap. Hope so, 14 days to go close ICO. If they will not reach hardcap so what's next steps will be taken by FortySeven Team? I think that if they don't reach their hardcap they will probably burn the rest of the tokens. Giving them out is not a good idea so you burning is the best option. They have already extended one time so i don't expect it twice. Burned unsold tokens is always best to increase price of tokens. But can we have confirmation from 47B team/admin? Guys, nothing will be burned . The unsold tokens would be not generated then. This is what they have said from the start, they have a maximum amount of tokens that they would create (their hardcap of 5,000,000 FSBT) if there is not enough demand for these tokens then they will simply not produce the "leftover" tokens, even though they are not really "leftover" in a sense. So what will happen to them will they just be removed or something? i think they are already produced and that burning them will be the best option. Theirs nothing to be "removed or something", only sold tokens are ever generated, if they sell 4565915 tokens, for instance, their will only ever be 4565915 tokens, as thats all that was sold, therefor all that will be minted by the smart contract. No need for burn, no need for anything, they mint what they need so theirs no excess tokens created, its really the best way for an ICO to generate tokens as its the most transparent. If all they generated is already sold what about Token that is needed to run the platform, and FSBL loyalty program? Is there a kind of continually minting as new need arise cos I read somewhere that they intend to mint just once
|
|
|
Amazing the video is not even so long and they have already won me over to invest in this project this will definitely attract a lot more investors. The video is truly awesome, but i wish that they had made this video before the ICO. So it would have more views, and let more people know about the project. However it is still great to see that they are making videos. Have the team considered YouTube ad? , at least crypto ads on YouTube are not yet flagged and I doubt if Google is going to take that step, I think a solid project makes visible their project to the world
|
|
|
|