anyone have more info on that cubic thang ? I tried going to official site jinnlabs.com but "The requested URL /jinn-is-coming-soon-1/ was not found on this server." is all I get. Not very convincing yet but im sure this is gonna be a nifty thing if its the cfb thats making it. Qubic isn't a currency. It is a protocol. Any currency could use Qubic as a protocol. BTC and NXT are both value tokens and both could be transferred on to the Qubic protocol.
|
|
|
Yeah, let's not delete this thread so we can laugh at the hypocrisy of it. Let's unite (centralize) against centralization!
I don't think Just that pretty much covers it. Looking at your history of anti-communist post yet you want people to join your group or die and you're down with corporations, want the people to rise up So you want to form a one party group, destroy all opposition, get rid of corporations, down with capitalism, let a peoples party run it all. Sounds like "Join, or Die" means, if the free cryptos don't unite against the corporatizers / centralizers, we will be overrun. I have no problem with free enterprise, but corporations should not control the blockchain. There is no difference between Communism and Corporatism. You my friend sound like a rebel without a cause clue. Then you tell me the difference between Communism, which is the state controlling the monopoly, and Corporatism, which is the monopoly controlling the state.
|
|
|
Yeah, let's not delete this thread so we can laugh at the hypocrisy of it. Let's unite (centralize) against centralization!
I don't think Just that pretty much covers it. Looking at your history of anti-communist post yet you want people to join your group or die and you're down with corporations, want the people to rise up So you want to form a one party group, destroy all opposition, get rid of corporations, down with capitalism, let a peoples party run it all. Sounds like "Join, or Die" means, if the free cryptos don't unite against the corporatizers / centralizers, we will be overrun. I have no problem with free enterprise, but corporations should not control the blockchain. There is no difference between Communism and Corporatism.
|
|
|
This "coin" (if you can even call it that) is a ridiculous money grab by a bunch of liars, cheaters and thieves. I feel sorry for the people who buy into this joke. PoI is fundamentally flawed because there is no way to prevent network topology loops.
Were your sock puppets shitcanned? No. I'm not a liar like the rest of these cheaters and I only claimed ONE STAKE. I can guarantee you the only sockpuppets that were "canned" were ones that weren't controlled by UtopianFuture and the devs.
|
|
|
Yeah, let's not delete this thread so we can laugh at the hypocrisy of it. Let's unite (centralize) against centralization!
I don't think a coalition of decentralized cryptos is "centralized".
|
|
|
Can mods please delete this useless thread?
"Useless"? We have all these Corporatizers running around here trying to destroy the original intent of crypto and you call my thread "useless"? Unless the free cryptos unite, we are facing the removal of the people as the beneficiary of the cryptocurrency movement.
|
|
|
This "coin" (if you can even call it that) is a ridiculous money grab by a bunch of liars, cheaters and thieves. I feel sorry for the people who buy into this joke. PoI is fundamentally flawed because there is no way to prevent network topology loops.
|
|
|
This entire thread is my sadly poor attempt to show you all the energy in the tidal wave now approaching land. If you are a wise investor, you will look at that surging energy and ask yourself, "What will happen to that beneath-the-surface momentum when it reaches shore?"
|
|
|
This crypto already exists. It's called Bitshares.
|
|
|
Oh yes, and the BitShares p2p road trip presses on in style... Your BTS cronies look like a bunch of deranged hippies. Why don't they get a shave and attempt to look like respectable individuals instead of spreading Communism door-to-door across America? Someone needs to report this to Homeland Security.
|
|
|
Zero. Communism always fails.
|
|
|
The Nemesis block is now complete
The Nemesis block is now complete
The NEMESIS block is now complete BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!111Eleventy OMG... Seriously? "Nemesis Block" BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!111111Eleventy You Nemwits crack me up. Talk about a Freudian slip. BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111Eleventy
|
|
|
Ya man, this is a truly sophisticated scam with professional grade deception and misdirection.
When an intelligent man crosses the street via the North Pole... all the alarms should go off.. Instead of building a trivial futures market to hedge Bitcoin... the Larimers build Frankenstein.... Because it's Frankenstien that transfers millions of $$$ from idiots to the Larimers, their insider buddies and the Chinese Communists.
And you wonder why I know Feds run this place.
The imminent flood of crypto ETFs complete with options markets will render hedging with Frankenstein moot.... And, personally, I don't see much difference between the soon-to-be-indicted Josh Garza and the Larimers.
Exactly. I couldn't have said it better myself.
|
|
|
join our community at BitShares (where everybody knows our names).
That's an interesting comment seeing that you removed everyone's name off your website.
|
|
|
I was referring to the price of BTS not your fraudulent "bitAssets".
Oh really? So when you made the following post: "Pegs are tracking beautifully" my ass. bitUSD is trading at 87 cents. Are you willing to compensate the individuals who lose money?
You weren't talking about the price of bitassets? Might I note that bitUSD is once again within 1% of $1.00 again, now that things are fixed. There I was referring to the price of your fraudulent "bitAssets" which are really derivatives contracts, but which Bitshares(TM), the company, insists on tricking people into believing that they're actual "assets". but on the blockchain itself there is a nice ~ $12,000 buy wall at .99
Gee... I wonder who put that there. When you run out of funds to prop up the market then what will happen? Lots of natural demand for stability in a down market. This has turned out to be a great robustness demo for BitAssets in general. Amazing. Yep, -14% in one day and the other day -10%. Amazing alright. Maybe when this Bitshares(TM) scheme is up, you can steal from the legally retarded. There I was referring to the "shares which are worth only pennies" released by Bitshares(TM), the company, which according to Stan Larimer, the head of operations at Bitshares(TM), the company, give shareholders the power to elect delegates which are just like directors on the board of a company. Bitshares is in a downtrend, thats obvious. Please show me a crypto thats never had a downtrend. So many people seem to think that if a crypto goes down, then 'its a scam'. Is bitcoin a scam because it went from $30 to $2, or from $1200 to $150?
It seems that to some people if a developer gets any benefit at all out of creating a cryptocurrency, then "its a scam". What did Bytemaster get out of creating Bitshares? A salary for the past year that is less than what someone of his talent could get working at a software company? How does that make it a scam? If the devs wanted the money they would have taken stable gobs at google instead of inventing bitshares.
It is true that it some other coins, devs work for free and get no compensation. This is not a sustainable situation. One should not have to starve to death or be independently wealthy in order to work on developing this new technology sector.
Imo, it's a scam because they are intentionally trying to convince people their derivatives contracts are better than their real, physical counterparts and I quote, "Safer than a Swiss bank account". The mass majority of individuals are not savvy enough to know that "bitAssets" are really derivatives and they will lose money from it. Imo, Dan, Stan, and the whole Bitshares(TM), the company, team know this and are using people's lack of knowledge against them to make a quick buck at their expense. Imo, this is highly unethical and against everything crypto is supposed to represent. The good thing is that no matter what I or anybody else does Bitshares will blow itself up and that will stop it from hurting other people.
|
|
|
but on the blockchain itself there is a nice ~ $12,000 buy wall at .99
Gee... I wonder who put that there. When you run out of funds to prop up the market then what will happen? Lots of natural demand for stability in a down market. This has turned out to be a great robustness demo for BitAssets in general. Amazing. Yep, -14% in one day and the other day -10%. Amazing alright. Maybe when this Bitshares(TM) scheme is up, you can steal from the legally retarded. We already know you are a lying Troll...I was referring to the price of BTS not your fraudulent "bitAssets".
|
|
|
My friend and I were walking along a sidewalk when I spotted a $20 bill lying in our path. As I picked it up he warned, "Don't bother with that, it's not Fully Redeemable for a $20 Gold Coin any more!" I stuffed the bill in my pocket. Lol. What a pathetic analogy. The difference between USD and bitUSD is that USD is a fiat currency (backed by government mandate) and bitUSD is a derivatives contract that isn't backed by anything. Regardless of what the Bitshares Foundation says, just because bitUSD can be sold for BTS and BTS for BTC and BTC for USD, it doesn't make bitUSD backed by USD. Stop trying to led people to believe that bitUSD is just as good as USD and that it's "Safer than a Swiss bank account!". Even with "Gateways", the entire bitAsset float isn't (and never will be) fully redeemable. This analogy which misrepresents the truth is a perfect example of why so many people oppose Bitshares. Bitshares purpose isn't to help people escape monetary policies which are detrimental to their well-being. Instead, you are putting people at greater risk of financial loss by trying to convince them to trade their real assets for derivative contracts.
|
|
|
|