I didn't say it's ok, if you re-read you will see  I was saying worse things have happened (with some examples) yet nobody is shouting. The important point was nobody is shouting anymore after somedays and forget about it. The same thing will happen with Ledger


For accounting or customer service or other things. According to the law, it is mandatory to keep invoices with customers' information and all traces of each and every transaction. It's all the businesses like that, it's just a matter of accounting using a ledger


It was, but apparently, not enough, and a (group of) hacker has found a breach in the system. It doesn't mean the system wasn't secured at all


They didn't lie and had no reason to do so knowing that with the GDPR the company might be in trouble if Ledger had knowingly lied to hide the size of the incident. Not to mention the bad press it would have received.
It's just that Ledger couldn't evaluate accurately the importance of the incident, we can't blame them for that, they did what they could and even hired an outside company to audit.

Their business model is partly based on trust Ledger has no benefit in losing it, on the contrary.


It was a strategic decision if they didn't communicate as the mass thinks they should. No matter the industry, rarely you will see a company communicating 'immediately'

None.
When you go to the bakery to buy some bread, you need it in less than a day or next week? What would you think if you had to wait 10 days to get your bread? You'd say "I'll go to a different bakery where I'll get it faster" and you'd be right to do it.

It's exactly the same with a trading platform, if I'm not able to receive my asset within the hour I'll go somewhere else. After all, there are many other exchanges on the web. If I want to buy something right now it's because I need it now, not a week later.
I would not be encouraged to use such an exchange platform, to be honest.

@martina14

It is simple to understand it, can't make it more simple. The question is how long you would be ready to wait to receive your coins during an exchange process.

Il vaut peut être mieux pour Coinbase de carresser la SEC dans le sens du poil étant donné que c'est elle même qui se prononcera sur l'introduction en bourse.

Pour information, XRP sera délisté de chez Bitstamp dès le mois prochain pour les US, l'exodus commence. Si des plateformes de cette taille commencent à le délister, on peut certainement s'attendre à ce que d'autres le fassent également.
Galaxy Digital et Jump Trading bannissent XRP et Bitwise liquide sa position sur le XRP

Dit il, celui qui nous a dit avoir volé/utilisé des numéros de carte bancaire de personnes pour pouvoir payer son hébergement web.

@OP

All Coinbase's users located in my country have the same problem since last week, it has nothing to do with the account being suspicious, it's because of the KYC enhancement from Coinbase to abide by the latest country's regulation concerning the AML program.
Depending on your country you live in, you may be forced to do it and in some others not.

Was your identity verified before? Did you notice other citizens in the same case? Because if yes then you can bet your country enhanced too the AML program

@bitmover

As I said in another topic in the French forum, the risk is not so significant as people may think. You can buy an HW wallet as a gift to someone from your friends and family, as a reward for a contest. You may have sold your coins when the market crashed. You may have changed your personal address since
There are so many other things to consider.

Someone would take the risk to come to your home without knowing if you still live there, or if you still hold cryptos, etc? That doesn't make sense or the person is very very hungry.


@ETFbitcoin
Selling user's data to advertising companies is different than having your server hacked and a list published to everybody. When Google+ had an exploit it wasn't selling user data, it was exposing them as a result of a security breach on their servers. The same goes to Amazon and Facebook.

No matter, even if we take the examples I posted earlier from the finance industry, it has to do with the money 'sphere' and information about people.


I can take a privacy-centric product as another example if you want. How many VPNs, supposed no-log, have suffered a data leak

The European central bank, the US Department of Homeland Security or the IRS data leaks are a lot more important than Ledger, with more possible damages

I know the answer may sound silly or too simple, but why not simply use google news with "Bitcoin" and select a time range, for example from July 2020 to December 2020.

You will surely find a lot of content to read. Boring news you read just the title and the interesting ones to read. By using the forum also, by looking at the threads and see which ones come up most often, you may notice a few trends.

Don't worry, the north is always at the same place, it hasn't moved since.

It's the Christmas holidays 🎅🎅🎅 and I'm a bit busy at this time so I couldn't read the latest posts. My life doesn't turn around Bitcointalk. I already did some modifications since, but I will update the original post in the next days, and It doesn't matter to me if the exchange is anonymous

On the other side, I did notice you're a coinbaazar's fan  

The most fucking backlinks I reported was like that instead of The most fucking backlink I reported was like that
You can't notice it while you read. Either you notice it by clicking on "quote" to look at the code directly, or by hovering the mouse over each word.


I reported so many SEO backlinks in the Off-topic sub-board. Most of the time I just need to read the title to be sure there is spam inside (VPN, streaming, Vacum, mother day,..)

By the way,

Discussion boards like forums are more often visited by google's crawlers compared to a blog or a static website. A static website rarely has its content updated, a blog ~every day, while forums have new content (posts) every x minutes. Bitcointalk is probably visited every xx minutes.

Spamming your competitor doesn't really work as it used to be 10 years ago, especially if your domain name is not young and/or established. Otherwise, we could send Forbes to the google sandbox. The algorithm is well trained to detect this behavior

Comme la plupart des autres pays. Il y en a aucun au Brésil qui pourtant a 3 fois plus d'habitants que la France, idem pour l'Inde avec 15 fois plus, 0 en Russie, Chine ansi que plein d'autres pays. En comptant tout le continent Africain, on en trouve à peine une dizaine. Le Vénézuela en possède 2 alors que c'était la rué sur Bitcoin pour essayer de sauver les meubles quand leur monnaie s'efondrait.

C'est surtout concentré sur l'Amérique du nord en fait.

Au passage, en regardant la carte j'ai remarqué que les distributeurs qui restaient en France ont disparu, il n'y en a plus aucun.
Soit ils n'étaient pas non plus enregistrés auprès de l'AMF, soit ils n'ont pas envie de s'embéter avec le marché francais pour se mettre aux normes, ou tout simplement leur enregistrements ont été refusé.

Pour spéculer dessus? Ca ne risque pas d'être productif étant donné que ce sera un stablecoin IIRC


Et tu en penses quoi de ceux qui ne sont là que pour spéculer, sans rien comprendre à ce qui se passe derriere la scene, qui n'ont jamais lu de white paper, et qui ne comprendraient rien même si ils le faisaient, qui investissent dans des coins de merde tout ca parce que ils ont vu un mec sur youtube dire "achetez, achetez". Après on se plaint qu'il y a plein d'ICO à la con qui ne sont que des scams. Bah oui forcement, il y a toujours les pigeons pour envoyer de l'argent...
Savent à peine utiliser un explorateur de blocs etc... Qui critiquent le finance traditionelle actuelle mais ne font pas mieux dans l'industrie crypto.

Personne n'utilise XRP, y'a que les bots, t'as deja vu un shop qui n'acceptait que ce shitcoin? Non, ceux qu'ils le font c'est parce qu'ils utilisent coinpayment, bitpay and co

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2joy8BEjU0

They are considered to be unreliable for many people and your situation is not the only one, take a look at this topic from page #30 and you will see cases close to yours.

On the other side, the service was classified as a selective scam, and there are even unresolved accusations about them (see the user's profile). I won't be surprised if you never receive an answer from them :/

Yaplatu quand tu lui dis que ce va se péter la gueule.
- c'est du FUD du gnagnagna

Yaplatu  quand XRP se pète la gueule:
- c'est les soldes, une  opportunité incroyable, j'augmente mon bag

Yaplatu quand on argumente:
- c'est un mec de chimie il y connait rien.
(ah parce que toi t'es quoi?)

Mort de rire le schema classique de sa part, à chaque fois c'est la même chose. Sans compter les fois ou tu peux lui faire dire un peu ce que tu veux.
Son shitcoin à la con à 10 centimes la semaine prochaine. XRP est mort.

If people are able to forget about Google+ or Facebook, Amazon data leaks I believe they can forget Ledger's case as well. Yeah, you can say, it's not the same thing, not the same business at all. No matter, in fact, the result is the same.
Moreover, personal data is something you can even legitimately buy from companies, with much more information about what has been leaked from Ledger, yet I see nobody shouting even after they receive scam calls for insurances lol.

From the finance industry, whatever it is Citigroup, Capital One, Countrywide Financial Corp, Equifax, or even the European Central Bank is there a bankruptcy among those?

FYI 75% of the companies worldwide have already lost data. Most often due to human error.

Concerning Ledger, it's not even something that will damage the security of their products and that's what matters the most. Yes it was a big mistake, yet your coins aren't at risk

Are you sure only businesses need to apply for this license? Because on the page here , it mentions "Firms and individuals". It doesn't mention only businesses and you're on the "individuals" side as an average Joe
 
I believe that even if once a week you're just selling your bitcoins bought years ago, you fall into that kind of category from my point of view.

- dealing with investments (buying, selling, etc) or offering or agreeing to do
You invested in Bitcoin a while back and you're now getting the ROI+profits.

This, considering you have records of all your Bitcoin purchases in the past, including date, amount, payment reference number. Otherwise, you have no proof it was an investment, and your government may consider the bitcoins falling out of nowhere and charge different taxes.
(I'm not a UK citizen, just suggesting)

Criticizing a web wallet because it is a custodial wallet platform but on the other side using a custodial exchange not giving the private keys. How ironic it is. Things are not different for your information, they may also restrict your wallet at any time and they warn you about this. Your funds will also be gone to the graveyard.

If you wanted to criticize a web wallet because it doesn't give you access to the keys. We all know that already. No matter, everyone knows the risk of not having access. It doesn't make much difference in how it is used.

It is perfectly acceptable to use such a platform when you need to make a quick transaction for your daily purchases, instead of using a hardware wallet for example.
But just to be on the safe side you don't store all your savings on it. In the same way that you don't store all your coins on an exchange.

Vous réagissez un peu comme si c'était la première et la seule entreprise française à être victime d'une fuite de données.
Ils n'ont pas minimisé la gravité de la fuite de données, ils l'ont juste sous estimé, par manque d'information ou d'analyses mais on ne peut pas les blamer pour ca. Ils ont réagi à ce problème dans les règles du RGPD.

Qu'est ce qu'ils peuvent faire de plus pour l'instant?

Même Google, Amazon ou Facebook ont subi des fuites de données, j'ai vu personne se plaindre et aller voir un avocat
Bon cet article est vieux et même si la situation s'est amélioré, avec la 'pression' ca donne une bonne image de la réalité dans les entreprises: "70% des entreprises françaises victimes de pertes de données".
De toute façon en France les entreprises ont vraiment des lacunes sur la formation des employés à la sécurité et un manque de moyens réel. Tu peux y trouver des choses et des pratiques étonnantes.

Conserver les coordonnés cet un devoir, ne serait ce que pour de la comptabilité, suivi client,... La façon dont était géré ces archives est questionnable cela ne fait pas de doute, l'entreprise est loin d'être la seule à agir ainsi.

Choisir un Point relais n'est pas une option pour tout le monde et pas du tout appreciable pour une entreprise, c'est vraiment pour faire plaisir au client alors, et puis de toute façon il faut quand même une adresse de facturation.
Oui je vois venir les gens dirent de donner une adresse bidon, et si un jour il y a un problème ils seront les premiers à blamer Ledger

Charles Martel et les arabes, parce qu'ils ont cru qu'ils allaient nous la mettre à l'envers et prendre la Gaule

Regarde sur Flyp.me, tu n'as pas besoin de créer de compte. Je l'ai utiliser plusieurs fois sans problème
Ici, tu peux trouver d'autre plateformes" accountless", à toi de comparer les frais.

Tu peux vraiment faire ton paiement que en LTC? Ou c'est pour épargner sur les frais? Autrement puisque tu dis avoir un compte sur Kraken, pourquoi ne pas échanger ATOM>>USD ensuite USD>>LTC ou ATOM>>ETH ou XTZ>>ETH ou ATOM/XTZ ensuite en BTC et ensuite LTC

Autrement il te faudra t'inscrire sur un autre échange et faire à peu près la même chose, genre ATOM>>USDT ensuite USDT>>LTC..



Je n'ai pas été vérifier à vrai dire, avec touts les coins de listés difficile de se rappeler de touts. Autrement dans le lien que j'ai donné il trouvera très certainement

Il n'en reste plus que 3, et à Paris. Ce sont touts ceux de la marque Shitcoin qui ont été concernés

La France est beaucoup plus restrictive sur les ATMs comparé à d'autres pays ou tu n'as rien a demandé à personne, tu as juste besoin de mettre la machine dans un coin dans ton commerce et c'est tout.

Ne serait ce que pour avoir l'agrément auprès de l'AMF en tant que prestataire de services sur actifs numériques, ce qui n'est pas donné à n'importe qui évidement, et qui nécessite quelques critères tels que de disposer de procédures pour lutter contre le blanchiment, bla bla bla.
Il n' y a que 6 ou 7 entreprises disposant de l'agrément (dont Coinhouse aka la maison du Bitcoin, BitPanda, Sheeldmarket, ect)

Le 18 Décembre c'était le dernier délai pour être en conformité, ils n'auront pas trainé pour passer à l'action

Version 1.5.1 there is an annoying bug.

The application doesn't detect the blockchain confirmation and doesn't update the trade process and stuck in a phase.

Bug in examples:

-Bitcoins are transferred but the application doesn't detect a confirmation hence the trade cannot continue.
-You're selling bitcoins, the buyer initiated the payment and you receive it but you can't confirm to then release the bitcoins. In another word, you can't finish the trade but the timer continues to go. After the initial delay, I won't be surprised if I lose my security deposit because I didn't respect the protocol (which I can't since the application is buggy)

I'm trying to resync the SPV file with the hope it does something positive otherwise I won't be able to do much:/
Coincidence, it happens when you don't have the time to take care of such things