I find this strange. DrDoofenshmirtz announces that they are closing their service Moneypot and in the same post DrDoofenshmirtz refers to an equivalent service that was advertised here about 2 hours earlier. The only thing I can think about is that they already know each other. One has decided to abandon, so the other has decided to continue the project. I don't see too much of a problem if that's the case, given that the code was open source and Moneypot left without a scam accusation (which doesn't always happen, unfortunately). One could also think that it's the same person and in that case, I don't see any problem. It is acceptable to want to make a fresh start (considering you didn't scam previously of course). I believe they were friends, working partners, or something like that. Were you thinking about something else?
Adding 2 new bitcoin mixers to the scam list https://bitcoin-mix.org/https://btcmix.online/
|
|
|
Tu te trompes de sujet. Ici la personne proposait de vendre des montres contre de la crypto... il y a 1 an et demi... Si tu veux faire l'achat de coins, il y a des douzaines de méthodes disponibles. Tout dépend du moyen de paiement que souhaite utiliser et c'est facilement trouvable. Bienvenue sur le forum
|
|
|
Ca fait plusieurs mois que je n'ai pas regardé ce qu"il se passait avec les altcoins. Aujourd'hui j'ai jeté un œil sur le top 100 des cryptomonnaies et wow. Y'a eu du changement depuis!
Cardano 3ème Binance coin 4ème Même Dogecoin dans le top 10. J'aurai jamais cru
'tin, j'ai presque envie de pécho du SOL, DOT, ou ADA
Shiba INU, d'ou ca sort encore ce truc? C'est un fork de Doge, un coin clown
|
|
|
Done. I added blindmixer.com to the list. The more mixers there are, the better it is - I removed [banned mixer], the site is gone, the domain name expired last week and it hasn't been renewed. It was one of the oldest by the way - A few days left for the V2 URL on Tor, I will update as soon mixers update their URL - Whalemixer is gone for good Happy mixing!
|
|
|
What makes centralised exchanges unsafe to use mate? I've never lost money using them unless one use a low rated exchange, binance and kucoin was once hacked and they reimburse everyone that lost fund, so mate tell me how won't I trust such exchange where their Devs are ready to pay users their lost funds Because there is always the possibility to see a hack event so big that a platform wouldn't be able to reimburse 100%. No matter how big the platform is and no matter if they have a 'special funds pool' (like what Binance has set up long ago). There is also the risk to get your account suspended for any reason they please and start to be bothered with the KYC/AML bullshit. Without being sure to get back your coins, on top of that... When you deposit some coins, you don't own the coins anymore. You lend it to the platform to make it works for you (to either buy or sell). As the guy said "not your keys, not your coins"
|
|
|
The funny thing is the 'illegal crypto miners' could actually mine BTC legally. It's rather because the Iran government wants to control the electricity and indirectly, the miners. In other words, you're illegal if you're a freelance, but you're legal if you follow the government.
If they really have so many uncontrolled outages, I guess they have very shitty infrastructures. Otherwise, it means the country is very very very poor
Come to Europe, actually, it's the best time, you will also see a major problem with the electricity market. It's all over the news everyday.
|
|
|
Still the main use of gold is for jewelry, and it's questionable whether gold will be in demand in this industry in the future. And I disagree on "only speculating or hold". Many of us here, including you, receive payments in BTC. Receiving payments in fiat currencies would be much more complicated. I didn't deny it. Yes, the main use is for the jewelry market (for about 60% actually) and it's not going to change contrarily to what you think. The demand will be the same, more or less. We're using gold for the jewelry before Ancient Egypt, 3000 years ago before Jesus Christ. Why and how will it change in the future (near or not) on "only speculating or hold" Yes, some people (including me) receive payments in BTC, well what I call real uses cases. But face the reality, the percentage of people using BTC for something else than 'real use 'case' (and here I mean only speculating) is the vast majority. 70% of the transactions on the bitcoin network are related to trading activity. I could link the research if you don't want to believe me. Not even a need for research to guess it, we perfectly know the crypto sphere, it's just a matter to accept the reality
|
|
|
They put Huge amound on Google Ads. Be Aware each day over +10 Transaction made to their address's.
I didn't find them as a result of a search on the top, but bestmixer.mx is relatively high on the list, and it is also a proven scam. Amazing that the whole thing is still working, and that no one has managed to knock them down - @LeGaulois posted about them back in 2020. We can try again to report to Google phishing, but the geniuses who work there have not yet understood what a mixer is, and what the difference is between legitimate and fake. Because he was referring to Bestmixer.mx and didn't notice the topic was about bestmixer.biz Bestmixer.biz is gone for good It changed its activity and was no longer a Bitcoin mixer but another business but it's now near 1 year there is nothing uploaded on the server (403 Forbidden)
|
|
|
One may find it difficult to handle cryptocurrency sometimes. But we in Polyx.net solved this issue. Now it is way easier to trade and store cryptocurrencies! You are working of your own site which name is something different of your username. It could be more interesting if you created name similar of your site and also you as it is high rated site you should buy a copper membership. Otherwise, it it seems something lower. This is one of the stupidest arguments I have read on this forum. People are ready to say anything just to be able to make a post, even if it's a big shit 'high rated site' based on what? You surely have never visited the website, nor you've heard about it before. Can you shut up please
|
|
|
Si ce n'est que de la publicité dans les boites aux lettres et de spams, ce n'est pas bien grave, même si c'est chiant. Lui par contre est déjà un peu plus emmerder. Des gens sont venus jusqu'à chez lui Il y a quelques mois, sa sœur est tombée sur 2 branleurs qui attendaient devant leur domicile. Ils étaient à sa recherche et possédaient ses coordonnées sur leur téléphone, et celles d’une autre personne habitant dans la même ville Une action en justice a commencée contre Ledger ( voir ici). Je ne pense pas pas que cela ira bien loin, je vois ca plutôt comme une opportunité de récupérer de l'argent via des dommages et intérêts ou autre chose. Si c'était leur propre banque ils n'auraient rien fait, et resteraient même dans la banque.
As tu un lien vers cette affaire, stp ? https://www.capital.fr/entreprises-marches/ledger-les-victimes-de-la-fuite-de-donnees-entament-une-action-en-justice-1416678
|
|
|
D'après moi on devrait pouvoir faire pareil
En fait, tu fais un crédit pour acheter un bien immobilier, mais que tu remboursera bien sûr. Tu as laissé de la crypto en collatéral, mais tu ma récupère ensuite
Donc tu achètes par exemple une maison, et ensuite fait une hypothèque pour acheter un appartement. Pour avoir une plus value, il faut qu'il y ai vente. Or ici, ca ne serait pas le cas
|
|
|
Hi I know Mixsafer isn't a new mixer just launched but I have a quick question: Why your website is showing a different Tor URL than the one you posted here? A mistake on the website, or? chftlkc76mdlilnuclq3dnlr2zkocvvd7s6dplnmftxa6xui7k7p2eyd is used for a long time, according to my postxzngnm4mivqhly3zdlgnpagla4wja372whatiyhzgaxwanqqcd5aoqd is displayed on the homepage edit Thanks, I got it. but when you scroll down the homepage, I truly see another URL displayed. Other than that chftlkc76mdlilnuclq3dnlr2zkocvvd7s6dplnmftxa6xui7k7p2eyd.onion]chftlkc76mdlilnuclq3dnlr2zkocvvd7s6dplnmftxa6xui7k7p2eyd is there as well
|
|
|
The point to consider is: Who cares if the SEC regulates cryptos or not?
Do we need them to evolve? Nope. Bitcoin was supposed to be able to transact without any institution, so fuck them, we don't need regulations. The only ones interested are institutional investors and companies. A more clear framework and more chances they could be interested to enter the market (like how Microstrategy, Tesla, or some banks are doing). So far I'm not a company so I don't care.
I can already see someone replying to me "but it will encourage mass adoption!" Not a valid argument because Bitcoin has been able to be adopted (step by step) without 'their rules'. We shouldn't accept them to tell us what to do or not! My money, not theirs. Our rules, not theirs. In other words, they're not welcome to the party. The real reason people are so interested in regulations is speculation. Let's be honest, all they want is the price booming to Pluton (because the Moon is not enough) People are so greedy that they're ready to accept anything.
By the way, the SEC approved an ETF (today or yesterday). Not yet the kind of ETF the bitcoiners would like to see but we can say it's the start.
|
|
|
Evergrande est aux mains du PCC, l'entreprise ne coulera donc pas. Cependant cette faillite programmée est entièrement due au gouvernement chinois. Les promoteurs immobiliers n'ont plus le droit de vendre sur plan. Ils sont dorénavant obligés de finir de construire avant de vendre! (Pour, soit disant, lutter contre la spéculation...)
Tous ceux qui ont mis des billes dedans ne retrouveront pas leur argent. Evergrande n'est donc pas le problème, le problème c'est de savoir ce qui va se passer pour toutes entreprises étrangères à la Chine qui vont devoir entrer ces pertes dans leur bilan. Sont-elles suffisamment solides pour encaisser cela? Il me semble que oui, dans la mesure où les montants sont assez dérisoires. Par exemple, le fond BlackRock, un des plus gros actionnaires étrangers, possède 0,65% de l'entreprise.
Evergrande, malgré la taille de cette entreprise, est un non-évènement.
Ca me semble un peu plus compliqué que ca en fin de compte "Evergrande est aux mains du PCC, l'entreprise ne coulera donc pas" Tu voulais dire que de toute façon le gouvernement Chinois mettrait de l'argent sur la table pour éviter cette situation? Parce qu'à première vue, faut pas compter dessus. Le pays a demandé aux gouvernements locaux de se préparer à l'effondrement d'Evergrande, ce qui laisse plutôt penser l'inverse et qu'un renflouement des caisses n'est pas du tout envisager. Le groupe a plus d'un million de constructions non finies, si la faillite doit arriver, ca va faire non seulement un paquet de gens sur le carreau, mais aussi un bon paquet de nouveaux chômeurs avec la suppression d'emploi. Avant-hier, ou hier, le groupe a suspendu sa cotation à la bourse de Hong Kong. Aujourd'hui, il y a 2 autres gros groupes immobilier qui ont annoncé ne pas être en mesure de payer une échéance de dettes. Pour des sommes relativement faible en plus de ca. Ca commence pas à ressembler aux craintes du départ: un effet domino? Sans parler de je ne sais plus quelle entreprise qui a perdu 1 milliard USD à cause d'Evergrande. Le groupe commence à liquider ses participations et ses filiales, mais même avec ca on est loin du compte. Autant on peut envisager une croissance basée sur de la dette, il a quand même une limite, et la Chine semble l'atteindre.
|
|
|
I would personally say Bitcoin. Bitcoin is currently in demand. Many different companies are constantly investing in Bitcoin. At present its price is 45 thousand, in future it will not take more than 1-2 lakh.
Many? How much? You probably can't name a dozen of them without looking at google. You saw Microstrategy and Tesla buying BTC and that's probably all you know about. So "many" companies turn out to be 3 or 4. Did you know that there are more companies demanding gold than companies demanding BTC? Gold is not only for the jewelry industry. In fact, Gold has more use cases than BTC. What can you do with BTC? Not much, only speculating or hold, and if you want to spend it you most of the time need to exchange it for vouchers or fiat or something else done with a 3rd party. Gold can be used in the pharma industry, electronics, jewelry, dentistry, architecture, aerospace...
|
|
|
Ecoute,c'est marrant ce que tu dis parce que j'ai remarqué à plusieurs reprises que lorsque Yaplatu ne se connecte pas pendant plusieurs jours, le prix de BTC augmente. Et lorsqu'il revient, le prix redescend. C'est pas une règle abosolue mais très fréquente. J'ai voulu en faire une blague en prenant le graph de BTC et ses connections sur bitcointalk. Je pense que pour le bien de Bitcoin et de l'humanité on devrait demander à Theymos de suspendre son compte Au début, je croyais que c'etait un mec qui venait sur le forum quand il a avait un peu picollé. Aux USA, ils ont bien envoyé une taupe du centre des impots, pour aller sur LocalBitcoins déterrer les fraudeurs. Alors quoi, un Yaplatu espion c'est possible Quant à Patrickus, je ne sais pas, peut etre que le p'tit pépère n'a pas digéré sa 3ème dose. Un coup de Badoit ca ira mieux ca teste les 50k mais ils sont vigoureusement défendus pour l'instant, la barrière psychologique des 50k est là et je ne pense pas que beaucoup de monde soit motivé pour l'enfoncer vu l'historique du cours depuis le début de l'année.
Je crois que l'on a dépasser les 50k aujourd'hui, et peut etre même les 51k
|
|
|
I can't resist saying it now
There are a few stuff making me think that you're behind crypto swapper. If I'm wrong then I'm sorry, but I have been watching your website since the beginning of the year, and each month my doubts seem to confirm. Perhaps, it's me and paranoia but I have a few good points on my side. I don't feel the need to develop here since it doesn't really harm others
what's wrong with it? Basically nothing, but if I'm correct it's a tricky method that is used
by the way, bitmix is gone for many weeks, or months
|
|
|
I have got a tweet to show you about Edward Snowden saying Bitcoin got stronger despite government crackdowns, in which I half disagree A coordinated global campaign by governments: I don't think it's coordinated but for sure the governments are active on this. But let be honest, they suck at doing their propaganda. We're lucky to get some clowns as politicians. there is too much green light for bitcoin now, it's too late. So instead of trying to deny and bash BTC all the time, why not look for some advantages? Oh I know, that's because Bitcoin is the people's money and not the state's money. Making BTC stronger? As I posted earlier, I find BTC more volatile than before when there is the slightest government intervention, 10% within hours after, how strongly do you call that? If it was the case, then People are now used to China's announcements about cryptocurrencies, it shouldn't touch the market anymore Edit: My bad, stronger is compared to last year. So yeah in this case I agree
|
|
|
Etant donné que j'ai trouvé 2 topics au sujet de Zebitex, je commente ici... La plateforme a obtenu la semaine dernière le statut de prestataire de service sur actifs numériques (PSAN) par l'autorité des marchés financier. C'est seulement la 3ème entreprise française a obtenir ce statut. On est super rapide en France (</sarcasme). A la vitesse ou ca va, nous ne somme pas prêt de voir notre pays devenir une "crypto-nation", sauter dans le train pour faire parti des pionniers et ne serait ce qu'être assez 'friendly' pour développer un écosystème autour des cryptomonnaies Sans ce statut les entreprises deviendront des dinosaures, et une entreprise qui n'évolue pas et reste un dinosaure est une entreprise qui meurt tôt ou tard. Quoi qu'il en soit pour la plateforme, ca va lui permettre de se développer plus facilement et de façon pérenne. D'après leur compte Twitter, il est prévu l'ouverture de compte bancaire avec des CB. Le plus important pour eux actuellement c'est de dépôts en euro https://twitter.com/ZEBITEX/status/1443539387061612547https://twitter.com/ZEBITEX/status/1443890694519672832
|
|
|
|